Bush has ‘other words’

For all of the president’s problems with grammar, language, pronunciation, and extemporaneous speaking, he’s occasionally decent on the stump. No one will ever label Bush the Great Communicator, but if you hand him something to read, and put it on a teleprompter, he can usually impress a sympathetic crowd and get by without embarrassing himself.

But once in a while, something goes wrong. This morning, for example, the president delivered a speech on funding the war in Iraq before American Legion Post 177 in a DC suburb in Virginia. Maybe there was a problem with the teleprompter, or maybe the president decided he’d wing it, but one need not have been on the stage with the president to know that he wasn’t sticking to a prepared text. See if you can spot Bush’s verbal tic.

In other words, we don’t have the luxury of hoping for the best, of sitting back and being passive in the face of this threat…. And in the face of the violence — in other words, there was reprisal, people said, we’re going to get even, how dare these people do this — and in the face of this violence, I had a choice to make.”

In other words, the lack of security would have created an opportunity for extremists to move in…. In sending more troops — in other words, in sending troops in, it is — I recognize that this is more than a military mission.”

“A little less than half of — only about half of the reinforcements that he’s asked for have arrived. In other words, this operation is just getting started….. Our troops are also training Iraqis. In other words, part of the effort is not only to provide security to neighborhoods, but we’re constantly training Iraqis so that they can do this job.”

In other words, slowly but surely these extremists are being brought to justice by Iraqis, with our help…. In other words, there are consequences for delaying this money…. I tried to put this war into a historical context for them. In other words, I told them that they’re laying the foundation of peace. In other words, the work we’re doing today really will yield peace for a generation to come.”

In other words, it matters what happens in distant lands.”

There were 13 in all. The speech was only a half-hour long.

Of course, for those of you interested in more substantive concerns, Bush’s speech wasn’t just awkward and repetitious, it was also wrong.

“In the coming days, our military leaders will notify Congress that they will be forced to transfer $1.6 billion from other military accounts to cover the shortfall caused by Congress’s failure to fund our troops in the field. That means our military will have to take money from personnel accounts so they can continue to fund U.S. Army operations in Iraq and elsewhere.”

That’s wrong. The non-partisan Congressional Research Service found that the Army can fund the war through July. Bush is manufacturing a crisis because he thinks it suits his purposes.

“If we retreat — were to retreat from Iraq, what’s interesting and different about this war is that the enemy would follow us here. And that’s why it’s important we succeed in Iraq.”

First, they won’t follow us here. Second, National Intelligence Director John McConnell concluded that terrorists organizing in Pakistan are much more likely to attack the United States than terrorists in Iraq — and as far as Bush is concerned, Pakistan is an ally.

“When it comes to funding our troops, we have no time to waste. It’s time for them to get the job done. So I’m inviting congressional leaders from both parties — both political parties — to meet with me at the White House next week.”

Actually, he called the meeting to demand 100% compliance with all of his demands.

“[T]here are some encouraging signs.”

Actually, over 40 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq this month — the month that started 10 days ago. If the tragic trend keeps up, April will be one of the deadliest months for U.S. soldiers in Iraq in years.

If this speech was part of some kind of public-relations offensive, the White House has quite a bit of work to do.

He reminds me of a 2-3 year old who has suddenly learned a fun new word, and proceeds to use it ad nauseum, whether it makes sense or not. (Hey, I kind of like ad nauseum, I think I’ll start using THAT everywhere, to the point of… well, nausea.)

  • I’m sure he will tell us that the increase in troop deaths is a good sign that the surge is working. If the death toll went down, that would also be a good sign that progress is being made.

    In other words, he’s still full of crap. This is not news to most people, with the exception of some of our media bobbleheads.

  • Well, it certainly is offensive public relations. In the sense of being really annoying, that is.

  • My handlers told me see…
    That some of you see…
    Are always….
    Making fun see…
    Of…see… my 50s gangster tough guy use of the word “see”
    See:

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “SEE… we don’t have the luxury of hoping for the best, of sitting back and being passive in the face of this threat…. And in the face of the violence — SEE, there was reprisal, people said, we’re going to get even, how dare these people do this — and in the face of this violence, I had a choice to make.”

    “SEE, the lack of security would have created an opportunity for extremists to move in…. In sending more troops — SEE in sending troops in, it is — I recognize that this is more than a military mission.”

    “A little less than half of — only about half of the reinforcements that he’s asked for have arrived. SEE, this operation is just getting started….. Our troops are also training Iraqis. SEE, part of the effort is not only to provide security to neighborhoods, but we’re constantly training Iraqis so that they can do this job.”

    “SEE, slowly but surely these extremists are being brought to justice by Iraqis, with our help…. SEE, there are consequences for delaying this money…. I tried to put this war into a historical context for them. SEE, I told them that they’re laying the foundation of peace. SEE, the work we’re doing today really will yield peace for a generation to come.”

    “SEE, it matters what happens in distant lands.”

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    See?

    The phrase: “In other words,” see…
    Sounds more intelligent see…than the word “see”
    See?

  • Frequently, when Bush talks, words lose all meaning. I can’t even read what he says without hearing that fake Texas twang and that Beavis & Butthead heh-heh-heh. The deeper the drawl, the bigger the lie – the more laughter, the more serious the subject.

    Like fingernails on a chalkboard.

  • Here’s an interesting frame that I ran across, there is no war in Iraq (other than their own civil war, which of course we helped happen).

    It’s an occupation, not a war. The “war” ended when Saddam’s army was routed in 2003. And you can’t really “win” or “lose” an occupation, you either continue it or you end it. So all the incoherent ranting about “retreat” and “central fronts” doesn’t even apply.

    Other occupations give us plenty of rhetorical ammo. For example, in the case of India, did the British “retreat” or did they end their occupation?

    Nice frame, if you ask me.

  • Bush is a fucking moron. When he speaks he gets stuck on a talking point or phrase and he’s unable to move on to another subject because there is only so much room in his pointy little head and he can’t retain more than one or two ideas for any length of time. I know 10 year olds who have more thought retention than this idiot.

  • Uh, — “they won’t follow us here”? “They” already can and could have launched attacks if “they” wanted to. That the conflict is holding them at bay is nonsense.
    —And, why is it that right-wing yahoos like Bush think that being stubborn and stupid is some kind of sign of manhood?

  • “In the coming days, our military leaders will notify Congress that they will be forced to transfer $1.6 billion from other military accounts to cover the shortfall caused by Congress’s failure to fund our troops in the field. That means our military will have to take money from personnel accounts so they can continue to fund U.S. Army operations in Iraq and elsewhere.”

    That’s wrong. The non-partisan Congressional Research Service found that the Army can fund the war through July. Bush is manufacturing a crisis because he thinks it suits his purposes
    ******************************

    More lies from the consummate liar. How can anyone give this babbling, incoherent, soulless, egomaniacal puppet an ounce of credence? All he knows how to do is repeat talking points. Repeat, repeat, repeat. The simplest form of learning for the simplest presiDunce in history.

  • CB: If this speech was part of some kind of public-relations offensive, the White House has quite a bit of work to do.

    lol, where’s pigmonster karlrove when they need him? (hopefully chilling in some mental hospital).

  • In other words, abuse of drugs can damage brain cells

    Comment by kali

    LOL. Perfectly stated. Why do you think they call it Dope!

  • If this speech was part of some kind of public-relations offensive, the White House has quite a bit of work to do.

    Not if offensive is the operative word there.

  • no. 13, sarabeth: Not if offensive is the operative word there.

    maybe someone accidentally on purpose left out that wonderful oxymoronic ‘charm offensive’?

  • Have you ever noticed how Bush’s voice rises into almost a whine when he’s trying to convince the listeners of something?

    It’s so fucking irritating.

  • What a vulgar, politically-motivated load of hog wash. Right up there with Baghdad John.

    Actually, much worse. Watching DUBYA just now on C-SPAN, he’s a terrible actor. This is not even funny any more. He’s not in-charge! He’s just working a script, period. He’s absent!

    P.S. Way to totally ignore the valid argument that seventy percent of Americans are shouting for! What a disgraceful “presidency.” Our democracy has truly been hijacked!

  • That means our military will have to take money from personnel accounts so they can continue to fund U.S. Army operations in Iraq and elsewhere.”

    Erm… It doesn’t follow.The army could take that money (1.6 bilion) and spend it on getting our soldiers’ asses out of Iraq. It’d be a more legitimate use of “personnel accounts”.

  • Keith Olbermann did the same thing recently with the phrase “hard work,” which Bush repeated over and over again in a recent speech. Seems to be a pattern here….

  • Instant 120-IQ test:

    If hearing Bush makes you scream for peace and quiet, you are greater than 120.

    If hearing him doesn’t drive you mad… you are sub-120.

  • I was wondering if GWB would be able to answer to this really basic question:

    Who are our enemies in Iraq?

    – The Sunni Muslims (who were with the Sadam regime)?
    – The Shi’ite Muslims (who are with Iran – whom we are currently against)?
    – Or Al Qaeda?

    In other words, how would we know whom to fight or whom to join?

    I think this is why it’s not a war – we have no idea who our enemy is.

  • I want the same questions answered as Elsie asks — except, we know there is no answer. Racerx @6 states the frame correctly: It’s an occupation, not a war. You can’t ‘win’ an occupation. You either stay or go.
    I think the question that we really need to be asking (fat chance of getting an answer, of course) is “Why are we there?” It’s hardly a difficult question, but after four years it’s never been answer.
    It’s exactly the same paradigm as the Attorney Purge. They give us ten answers, hoping we’ll go away and not find the truth. We already know the truth. We just want to hear them saying it. In the long run they might even find their vaunted salvation through it.

  • Comedian Kathleen Madigan does a bit about Dubya’s use of “in other words.” In fact, she named her last stage show for that very phrase, “In Other Words.”

    “I love it when he explains stuff to us the way they explained it to him. He does it a lot when he’s ‘free-speaking’ and you can always tell when one’s comin’ ’cause he says, “in other words,” but it’s usually about stuff that didn’t need ‘other words’ except earlier in the day, it did…” Her example while doing her best Dubya immpression:”Osama bin Laden’s on the run, still hidin’ in a cave people…in other words, the man’s jis’ playin’ peek-a-boo”

  • Most politicians have verbal tics. As many speeches as they do, certain phrases get stuck in the frontal lobe and pop out as filler.

    I started keeping track of my governor’s favorite tics, such as “The reality is…” which got trotted out reliably three or four times in a half-hour speech, along with other old favorites.

  • Comments are closed.