Bush has ‘taken the lead’ on what?

Some White House whoppers are so spectacular, so jaw-dropping, so breathtaking, that it’s genuinely hard to believe. For example, today, White House Press Secretary Tony Snow told reporters that “contrary to stereotype,” President Bush has been “actively engaged in trying to fight climate change.” (It’s true, TP has the video.)

When a reporter noted that leaders around the world believe a global mandatory emissions cap and trade program could play a key role in confronting the problem, Snow responded, “Well, what the United States has done is we have actually taken the lead on those kinds of innovations.”

Think Progress did a little fact checking.

President Bush has taken very little real action to fight climate change and even refuses to admit that it is manmade. He broke his promise to cap carbon emissions and insists that global warming can be fought through individual “voluntary” programs.

Despite being the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, the United States has refused to participate in the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement that assigns mandatory targets for the reduction of greenhouse gases. Between 1990 and 2004, emissions of all industrialized countries decreased by 3.3 percent, but in U.S. emissions grew by almost 16 percent in that same period and now accounts for approximately two-fifths of the industrialized world’s greenhouse gases.

If the Bush administration has “taken the lead,” it’s no wonder we’re not making any progress.

Indeed, if Bush is “leading,” it’s worth noting that no one is following.

A Washington Post editorial…states, “After the coming election, President Bush is likely to face a Congress more apt than the current one to take strong action on climate change. He will then face a fateful choice: Does he want to spend his final two years in office blocking action and pretending that voluntary curbs on greenhouse gases will solve the problem of global warming, or does he want to help shape solutions? … Will he take a hand in developing America’s response to this global problem, or will he go down as the president who fiddled while Greenland melted?”

The world’s climate negotiators aren’t holding out much hope for the Bush administration; instead, they’re waiting for a U.S. regime change in 2008. “A new administration will have a different policy on the matter,” said Matthias Duwe of the Belgium-based Climate Action Network Europe. “I would imagine [U.S. involvement] would take place after the next presidential election,” said Michael Zammit Cutajar of Malta.

For its part, the administration’s most recent action on global warming has consisted of unveiling a new website on climate change. In the press release announcing the website, the Environmental Protection Agency underscores the administration’s position that the responsibility for curbing greenhouse gases lies with individuals, not the government. “The United States is working aggressively to address climate change through voluntary programs, but there are many cost-effective ways for individuals and organizations to take action,” reads the statement.

Someday, someone is going to have to explain to me how Tony Snow gets through these briefings without laughing at his own nonsense. It’s quite a skill.

He gets through because he is a sociopath. He’ll never have a problem ignoring reality because he has no conscience.

  • The Whitehouse was never the same after Ari left. McClellan was always horrible at the job and Snow likes to show-off his twisted bullshit while still acting like the media’s buddy (the term snowjob always comes to mind). But Ari always knew how to refuse to answer a question while making you feel foolish for bothering to ask it. He was less a Press Secretary than a snooty matre’d who only condescends to speak to you to put you in your place. I honestly think the country would look a whole lot worse right now, had Ari stayed on the job. He wasn’t necessarily a smart man, but he could sure frustrate the smartest of them.

  • You can fault their absolute lack of morals and ethics, but you have to admire the willingness (a) to assume the worst about the attentiveness and intellect of the American public and (b) to mimic to a fault the Big Lie tactics of earlier totalitarian states. Alas, that they so rarely get called publicly on this stuff leads me to believe that, with regard to point(a), they are enjoying being living proof of the aphorism that no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.

  • What is crazier saying it and thinking no one would gape/laugh or actually believing it? I have to wonder which catagory Snow actually lands in.

  • Snow-job is doing the same purty mouth routine regarding stem-cell research, also according to Think Progress.

  • ZeItgeist said “you can fault their absolute lack of morals and ethics, but you have to admire the willingness (a) to assume the worst about the attentiveness and intellect of the American public and (b) to mimic to a fault the Big Lie tactics of earlier totalitarian states. Alas, that they so rarely get called publicly on this stuff leads me to believe that, with regard to point(a), they are enjoying being living proof of the aphorism that no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.”

    Amen, if saying “amen” will not be interpreted as pandering to the Christian Right Republican Theocrats. The Bush wind machine is relentless, souless and operates without compunction.

    Joe Stalin would be proud.

  • I certainly agree that the U.S. has lagged far behind the rest of the world in many dimensions of environmental policy, climate change in particular, but I suspect Snow is correct in the statement quoted above. I think the U.S. has been an innovator in environmental policy and in tradeable emission permits in particular (note that he does not say the “Bush Administration”).

    The U.S. has generated much innovative research regarding environmental policies — if only we could get rid of the Bush Administration we might be able to implement some them.

  • Wow. I guess the Decider has decided we are leading the world in anti-climate change action. Must be part of the clear skies and healthy forests plans. I believe W also claimed he was personally leading the Major Leagues in RBI with runners in scoring position.

    Totally delusional.

    I have heard GOP talking points in several local MN debates and thay all seem to be taking the same Rovian tack. We are weak on the following (list every major issue here) so we go out and tell everyone we are strong on (repeat issue here). Nevermind if it is a lie. If you like the free lapel pin and access to the Congressional health club you will overcome your dislike for bald face lies.

  • The wit and wisdom of Tony Snow …where a global mandatory emissions cap is called “those kinds of innovations”.

  • The only thing the little twirps on Pennsylvania Avenue are leading in—is the tumultuous retreat (read: “rout”) from reality. These guys are like the “F Troop” of politics. As for SnowFlake—he’ll know what “actively engaged in trying to fight climate change” means when it bites him in the backside….

  • Bush fighting global climate change means he is running around the White House waving a toy light sabre to defeat imaginary climate evil doers. Tony Snow, we remember when George was looking under the funiture in the Oval Office for WMD. Your little verbal games aren’t cute.

  • I sure hope the Democrats are keeping good records of all the lies the Republicans are telling about climate change, because at some point in the near future there will be a hue and cry for action. At that point, the Republicans will switch to shilling for whatever BS half-measures the oil lobby wants, and the tapes of them lying their asses off would be very helpful in reminding the public who wants to save their kids and who wants to save ExxonMobil.

  • You can be sure RacerX that when they switch from Denial on climate change, they will go straight to Despair. That is the “conservative’s” nature. From “Let’s not do anything” to “There not anything we can do” in one easy step.

    I’ve been waiting for George F. Will to make the jump for years, but he’s still stuck in a river in Africa.

  • Carpetbagger, you misunderstood Snow! He was perfectly correct when he said that Bush was “actively engaged in trying to fight climate change.”

    The only word he left out was “political” in between ‘fight’ and ‘climate’…

  • A favorite argument on the right is that European countries that have signed on to Kyoto have failed to meet its standards. While this is true for some countries, like Denmark, all of them have reduced greenhouse emissions, while the US increased. Thanks for putting the actual numbers out there. It seems like classic righty thinking: if it doesn’t work immediatly, why bother at all?

  • Comments are closed.