Bush lashes out at critics of immigration bill

A week ago, I had an item suggesting the president doesn’t really care about the immigration deal he struck with congressional leaders. If he did care, he’d do what he did when touting his war policy and his plan to privatize Social Security: give enthusiastic speeches, use his Bully Pulpit, lash out at critics, etc.

To be fair, I should note, by way of follow-up, that the president appears to be taking the immigration proposal far more seriously this week. Indeed, Bush is doing what comes naturally — questioning the motives and patriotism of those who dare to disagree with him.

President Bush attacked opponents of an immigration deal Tuesday, suggesting they “don’t want to do what’s right for America.”

“The fundamental question is, will elected officials have the courage necessary to put a comprehensive immigration plan in place,” Bush said against a backdrop of a huge American flag. […]

“Those determined to find fault with this bill will always be able to look at a narrow slice of it and find something they don’t like,” the president said. “If you want to kill the bill, if you don’t want to do what’s right for America, you can pick one little aspect out of it. (emphasis added)

“You can use it to frighten people,” Bush said. “Or you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all.”

It’s a classic Bush argument. The president believes his immigration policy is the right thing for America, so if you have a different policy idea, you necessarily “don’t want to do what’s right for America.”

In this case, most of the strongest critics of the White House policy are on the right, which — you guessed it — means Bush just slapped his base pretty hard.

The AP feed quoting Bush is still fairly new, so there aren’t too many reactions available, but this one, from a far-right blogger, seems like the kind of thing we’ll be seeing quite a bit more of later today.

I, apparently, “don’t want to do what’s right for America” — and neither do millions of other Republicans, at least according to President Bush.

That’s because I’m not ready to sign on — lock, stock and barrel — to an immigration plan that is deeply flawed, most significantly because it lacks the controls to ensure that this country is not infiltrated by jihadists.

It’s hard to figure out what advantage President Bush sees in attacking those of good conscience who disagree with him. Many of them happen to be some of his staunchest allies in the war on terror, and it isn’t clear how it serves him to insult them gratuitously.

Bush was probably just acting on instinct — those who disagree with him are perceived as the enemy. They don’t need outreach; they need to be smeared, relentlessly.

I have a hunch the right isn’t going to respond well to this. Stay tuned.

I’m not a fan of this immigration bill, based on what I know about it: frankly, it seems to do too little to support those trying to come here through “the front door,” and while I’m very supportive of the notion that we should put highly skilled individuals in the express lane–we need them, frankly, to keep our economic edge–the hoops through which less fortunate/skilled newcomers must jump are repellent on equity grounds.

Purely on the politics, though, the Democrats do nothing but gain from this issue staying front and center for as long as possible. It does split the right base, with the free-market fundamentalists (who want and need guaranteed cheap labor to resist a possible-to-probable resurgence of unions as well as to keep the profit margins high) against the rank-and-file haters, who just don’t want to have fur’ners around.

Of course, Bush richly deserves this for the xenophobic culture he’s helped to create.

  • After 8 years of choosing between “agree with Me or hate America” will Americans have enough unscrambled brains left to vote in 2008 or will we be reduced to drooling and blathering? Doesn’t matter what the issue is, Bush’s method of promoting his position is the same thing every time.

    Note to Dubya: I don’t agree with you and I don’t hate America — I just hate your twisted vision of America.

  • Ms. Liebau needs to get her goose-stepping ass in line with the Loyal Bushie Brownshirters. Dear Leader has spoken, Ms. Liebau, and political dissent spells treason in the Cheney Administration. Consider yourself on the no-fly list!

  • It’s hard to figure out what advantage President Bush sees in attacking those of good conscience who disagree with him.

    Perhaps those on the right will now have a taste of what progressives have been dealing with under Bush. We all love this country; we just have differing views about how to make it better. But that standpoint doesn’t wash with this Administration.

    You’re either with them in everything that they do, or you hate America. There is no nuance allowed.

  • When it comes down to corporate Republican base or racist Republican base I guess we know who wins?

    Before I want a single illegal to get a green card I want three things:
    1) Hard codified law enabling RICO law to confiscate corporate property that hires illegals after the law passes. Otherwise we’ll be coming BACK to this tired argument in 2027. (Extra credit: make this part of the law retroactive)

    2) Every fur’ner who applied and was cleared for citizenship is IN. Automatic citizenship. Supply a major carrot for doing things right. The illegals can wait five years or whatever the current backlog of INS approved citizen applicants is. They have to wait like their friends and loved ones back home.

    3) The FAA should authorize pigs to fly, cuz if Bush signs a bill with #1 and 2, I may as well go for broke.

  • Well, this is amusing. Bush’s sense of loyalty is evolving yet again. Now he’s even going to disparage his base for not being loyal enough. Carol Liebau now knows what’s it’s like to be told to drink more kool-aid and clap louder to support the prez. Welcome to the club Carol … we’ve been dealing with this pathetic rhetoric for years.

    Bush is gunning for approval ratings in the teens, and if he keeps this up he’ll get just that.

  • It’s hard to figure out what advantage President Bush sees in attacking those of good conscience who disagree with him.

    Hey, far-right bloggers: Welcome to the club!

  • This had to happen sooner or later. The right is comprised of two occasionally contradictory forces: the religious and political on one hand, and the money interests on the other. The later encourages and supports the former in order to gain and maintain political power so that they can do what they do, which is to enrich themselves at the expense of all else. They care about nothing else. In the end, Bush represents these people only; he’s said so himself. So, when there is a conflict between business interests and religious/political doctrine, business comes first, just like in the mafia. Stay tuned for more fun.

  • “You can use it to frighten people,” Bush said. “Or you can show leadership and solve this problem once and for all.”

    CB, can you put some sort of Irony Advisory on your posts? My Irony-O-Meter couldn’t deal with Bush scolding legislators for frightening people and Kablooie!

    It’s hard to figure out what advantage President Bush sees in attacking those of good conscience who disagree with him.

    The posts could use a WATB alert as well. Seriously, you can imagine this dink wailing “I thought we were friends!” But that is the secret of Rove’s Election-Tronic. Appeal to all the lonely bastards who want to belong and keep them happy.

    I wonder if Bush will come back and try to distinguish between the members of Das Base and various Kool-Aid slurpers who object (quite all right) and liberals who object (EVIL, KILL!!!)?

  • Ah, how fun it is to see the wingnuts twist in the wind.

    I’m with TAIO, this just drips with irony.

    Pity Boy George II is to brain-burned to recognize it. Of course introspection is not a skill the man (any longer) possesses.

  • In addition to his standard support-me-or-you-hate-America rhetoric — which, I agree, it is hilarious to watch the wingnuts squirm over as it is directed their way for a change — I love how Bush belittles the criticism as picking out one “little slice” of the bill. Most of the criticism I’ve seen, from either side, is either to the new guest-worker program or to the legalization (i.e., “amnesty”) process. Those seem like pretty significant parts of the bill to me, not some obscure little provision tucked away.

  • I clicked on The Sphere and found this at Daily Pundit:

    But no more pigs in pokes, especially from the GOP doing the Democrats’ dirty work for them on behalf of a bunch of chicken packers who make big donations to Republican war chests.

    See? It’s the DemoNcRATS fault!

    Still, it’s nice to know that Dems only need a razor-thin majority to control the vurld.

  • Most of the Mexican immigrants I’ve met are pretty hard working. Give them a generation, and Mexican-owned small businesses will be all over the landscape.

    Sometime between now and then, these Republican hillbillies are going to wake up in the GOP’s bed and realize they were slipped a roofie (or a “Magical Jesus Pill”, if you prefer).

    Apparently now is that moment for a few of these right-wingers.

    What a bunch of suckers. “small government” is code for “I don’t give a damn about your 6.00/hour job”, and contempt for education is why these morons don’t have the skills to compete in the first place.

  • Comments are closed.