Bush sent Cheney after Wilson

There’s been an interesting “evolution” to the White House line when it comes to the Plame leak. The initial argument, which they stuck to for months, was that the White House had nothing to do with the pushback against Joseph Wilson. Slowly but surely, that story broke down as evidence emerged that top White House aides intentionally leaked classified information and, in many instances, lied about it.

Today, Murray Waas moves the ball forward a little more, implicating the president directly in the series of events.

President Bush told the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case that he directed Vice President Dick Cheney to personally lead an effort to counter allegations made by former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV that his administration had misrepresented intelligence information to make the case to go to war with Iraq, according to people familiar with the president’s statement.

Bush also told federal prosecutors during his June 24, 2004, interview in the Oval Office that he had directed Cheney, as part of that broader effort, to disclose highly classified intelligence information that would not only defend his administration but also discredit Wilson, the sources said.

That’s the bad news. The good news, at least for Bush, is that he told prosecutors that he did not know if Cheney directed “Scooter” Libby to leak classified information to the media and did not direct anyone to disclose Valerie Plame’s identity.

That said, the bad news is not at all encouraging for the president.

One senior government official familiar with the discussions between Bush and Cheney — but who does not have firsthand knowledge of Bush’s interview with prosecutors — said that Bush told the vice president to “Get it out,” or “Let’s get this out,” regarding information that administration officials believed would rebut Wilson’s allegations and would discredit him.

A person with direct knowledge of Bush’s interview refused to confirm that Bush used those words, but said that the first official’s account was generally consistent with what Bush had told Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald.

If Waas’ report is accurate, and at this point I have no reason to doubt it, and if Bush told prosecutors the truth during his Oval Office “interview,” the president was far more involved with this mess than he ever let on publicly. While the Bush White House pretended to have no real interest in Wilson’s revelations, and at times even denied knowing who Wilson was, the president of the United States was personally instructing the VP to step efforts to discredit the former ambassador, who, not incidentally, was right.

This led to a series of unfortunate events, including the leak of classified information, the outing of a CIA official, a criminal investigation, and the first criminal indictment against a top presidential aide in 130 years.

I hate it when stories like this one come out the day before a major national holiday.

“I hate it when stories like this one come out the day before a major national holiday.” – CB

You’ll just have to repeat it on Wednesday, won’t you 😉

So is Boy George II really the evil ‘genius’ of the Bushites? This would seem to imply yes, but I still have to wonder.

  • Moly Ivans, who apparently grew up in the same town as GWB, and knew him when, says he is not stupid. He is just a crafty arrogant ass-hole, who uses the country boy bumpkin persona to further his agenda That makes sense to me. Let’s really understand who we are dealing with. If Jesus did indeed “change his heart” I would hate to have seen him in his pre-christian phase.

  • I wonder if the Regal Moron will fire his own sorry ass.

    And speaking of national holidays, let’s all sing a rousing verse or two of “To Anacreon in Heaven”, the erotic old English drinking song from which, with Francis Scott Key’s lyric, we got our “Star Spangled Banner”. For a really rousing acapella version in mp3, first and last verses only, click here. Happy Independence Day.

    To Anacreon in Heav’n, where he sat in full glee,
    A few Sons of Harmony sent a petition;
    That he their Inspirer and Patron wou’d be;
    When this answer arrived from the Jolly Old Grecian;
    “Voice, Fiddle, and Flute,
    No longer be mute,
    I’ll lend you my name and inspire you to boot,
    And besides I’ll instruct you like me, to intwine,
    The Myrtle of Venus with Bacchus’s Vine.”

    The news through Olympus immediately flew;
    When Old Thunder pretended to give himself airs.
    If these Mortals are suffered their scheme to pursue,
    The Devil, a Goddess, will stay above stairs.
    “Hark”, Already they cry,
    “In transports of joy,
    Away to the Sons of Anacreon we’ll fly.
    And besides I’ll instruct you like me, to intwine,
    The Myrtle of Venus with Bacchus’s Vine.”

    “The Yellow-Haired God and his nine lusty Maids,
    From Helion’s banks will incontinent flee,
    Idalia will boast but of tenantless Shades,
    And the bi-forked hill a mere desert will be.
    My Thunder no fear on’t,
    Shall soon do it’s errand,
    And damme I’ll swing the Ringleaders I warrant,
    I’ll trim the young dogs, for thus daring to twine,
    The Myrtle of Venus with Bacchus’s Vine.”

    Apollo rose up and said, “Pry’thee ne’er quarrel,
    Good sing of the Gods with my Vot’ries below:
    Your Thunder is useless”–then showing his laurel,
    Cry’d “Sic evitable fulmen’ you know!
    Then over each head
    My laurels I’ll spread
    So my sons from your Crackers no mischief shall dread,
    While snug in their clubroom, they jovially twine,
    The Myrtle of Venus with Bacchus’s Vine.”

    Next Momus got up with his risible Phiz
    And swore with Apollo he’d cheerfully join-
    “The full tide of Harmony still shall be his,
    But the Song, and the Catch, and the Laugh, shall be mine.
    Then Jove be not jealous
    Of these honest fellows,”
    Cry’d Jove, “We relent since the truth you now tell us;
    And swear by Old Styx, that they long shall intwine,
    The Myrtle of Venus with Bacchus’s Vine.”

    Ye Sons of Anacreon then join hand in hand;
    Preserve Unanimity, Friendship, and Love!
    ‘Tis yours to support what’s so happily plann’d;
    You’ve the sanction of Gods, and the Fiat of Jove.
    While thus we agree,
    Our toast let it be:
    “May our Club flourish Happy, United, and Free!
    And long may the Sons of Anacreon intwine,
    The Myrtle of Venus with Bacchus’s Vine.”

  • I’ll get excited when new information comes out of Fitzerald’s office — assuming that happens in my lifetime. I’ve grown weary of unnamed sources and speculation assembled from bits and pieces from other unnamed sources. I don’t doubt for a second that Waas and a few others are trying their best to discover what really went on, but so many “developments” in this story have never materialized that I don’t know what to believe when “new developments” come forth.

  • Thanks Ed: you make my English Lit major’s heart go pitter-patter. Your random comments are a very big part of why I love to read this site.

  • I discount the story.

    Not because I doubt Bush’s involvement:

    The guy is a major league prick… and capable of all manner of backwoods evil…

    but because:

    the story fails to acknowledge just how big a prick Bush is.

    HE WOULD NEVER DEIGN TO ADMIT HIS WRONGDOING TO INVESTIGATORS.

    Unless of course,
    He is even a bigger prick and perp that I realize:

    AND HE ADMITTED TO IT– KNOWING FULL WELL THAT HE’S THE DECIDER AND WHAT ARE YOU BASTARDS GONNA DO ABOUT IT ANYWAYS?

  • They pulled the same shit on the arms inspectors after making the show of going to the UN to drum up support to attack Iraq. They pulled the same shit on the Democrats after cowing them to support the war resolution in Congress. So what if he pulled the same shit on the American public about lieing about finding the source of these leaks? The US is getting everything it deserves by not holding these guys to account in the last election.

  • I am frustrated with how slowly this thing is moving, and if Murray Waas wasn’t out there, we’d really be in the dark. If the Democrats retake at least one chamber in November, will we be able to have hearings on this issue and skirt around Fitzgerald? Would Congress be able to subpoena Fitzgerald for the, at least, non-classified information in his hands now. Someone on Firedoglake accused him of being a Republican hack. I wouldn’t go that far now, but I think his timing of announcing a big investigation of aides of Illinois Democratic Governor Blagojevich shortly before the fall election while choosing the same time period to “clear” Rove and allowing Libby’s trial to be scheduled after the election is a little troubling. Anyway, if someone could answer my two questions above, I would greatly appreciate it.

  • Hrrrm…. Is this Mr Cheney, meet Mr Bus? It has that feel, doesn’t it? As CB and other have noted, Cheney is at the epicenter of each of Bush’s failures.
    Has Bush hit the breaking point as he indulges himself in contemplating his legacy?
    Of course, Bush’s legacy will be dipped in blood and prominently feature a red foam clown nose, but I doubt he sees it that way.
    Bush has so few options remaining, that it would be surprising if Cheney isn’t fed to a bus’ undercarriage.

  • Bush admitted his wrongdoing to investigators because they were on the path of getting the goods on him. They won’t prosecute the filthy little rat-child for lying to the American People—but there’s no way to “presidentially interpret” his way out of perjury and obstruction-of-justice charges.

    The man is certifiable. He envisions himself the American Messiah, warring against all things detrimental to his “legacy.” He certainly isn’t beyond shoving “Face-Shot” under the bus if it offers a bit more breathing-room. He’d likely hang his old man out on the line as well; maybe even “mums.” In the end, we’ll probably see him lash out at the entire GOP for abandoning the ideal he internalized as his own little reality—with the final step of the Bush Apolcalypse being the denigration of Reagan himself. It’s as if the fool wants to emulate the failures of National Socialism….

  • Time Machine Wed. February 11, 2004

    If there’s a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is,” Bush told reporters at an impromptu news conference during a fund-raising stop in Chicago, Illinois. “If the person has violated law, that person will be taken care of. ..(From 2004)

    Aaah!
    savor the, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”, moment.

  • In 1170, Henry II said of his old friend turned opponent, Thomas
    Becket, “Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?” and then
    claimed ignorance when two knights rode to Canterbury Cathedral
    and murdered the Archbishop of Canterbury as he knelt praying.
    While the king was not removed from office, his effectiveness as
    king ended with that crime.

  • Tom Cleaver…

    I don’t mean to meddle with your allegory…

    But I think Edward II may be a better fit for “G. W. Bush.”

    And…

    Some of us agnositcs out here–who would never be caught dead on our knees in worship–might even find ourselves praying for a similar historical ending (a red hot poker shoved up the anus).

  • Joe Wilson failed to prove that the assertion by the British, that Iraq sought yellow-cake from Niger, was wrong. If anything, Wilson showed that the British were probably right.

    Secondly, Valerie Plame, Wilson’s wife and the mother of small twins, was not undercover, so there was no underlying crime in the special prosecutor’s case.

    Neither Plame nor Wilson are deserving of anyone’s sympathy. They were both partisan political players.

  • Thanks. koreyel. Your random comments are a very big part of why I also love to read this site.
    Sorry, this is just too good to leave unquoted (my emphasis):

    [The armies of Roger Mortimer of Wigmore, one of the barons, who had been exiled in 1323, and Isabella, his (Edward II’s estranged) wife and queen] followed Edward and the Despensers, and after a futile effort to escape by sea, Edward and a handful of supporters were captured on 16 November and escorted to Monmouth Castle. According to legend, his capture took place at Pant-y-Brâd (“the dell of treachery”), near Llantrisant. He was later transferred to Kenilworth Castle. It was thought prudent to compel the captive king to resign the crown, and this occurred on January 20. The Articles of Deposition accused Edward of many offences including: being incompetent to govern, unwilling to heed good counsel, allowing himself to be controlled by evil councillors, giving himself up to unseemly works and occupations, and plundering the kingdom.

  • Jose Chung,
    Did you take a wrong turn on your way to the FreeRepublic? The Carpetbagger Report is a member of the reality-based community. Your recycled Rovian talking points won’t buy you any converts here.

    It’s not about sympathy, by the way, it’s about the truth, and we all know the truth.

  • Comments are closed.