Bush still committed to ‘changing the psychology’

After Phil Gramm’s recent comments about a “mental recession,” and the notion that we make up a “nation of whiners,” I expected leading Republicans to stop talking so much about psychology and the economy.

No such luck. Here’s the president this morning, during a White House press conference, in response to a question about whether the nation is “headed for a recession.”

The video shows Bush talking about all the things members of Congress can do to help the economy. “I readily concede that, you know, [drilling is] not going to produce a barrel of oil tomorrow, but it is going to change the psychology that demand will constantly outstrip supply,” Bush said.

Later, in the same press conference, the president emphasized the need to change the “psychology in the oil market,” twice.

Far be it for me to offer Republican leaders advice, but I don’t think they appreciate how foolish all of this “psychological” talk makes them sound.

Of course, it’s not just Bush; McCain keeps doing the same thing.

In January, here’s how McCain described economic problems: “A lot of this is psychological. A lot of it’s psychological. Because I agree the fundamentals of our economy is still strong.”
And in April, McCain said, “[A] lot of our problems today are psychological.” He said he intended to give voters “a little psychological boost,” in lieu of a meaningful policy.

And in June, McCain said he’s still focused on the “psychological impact” of various policies.

The Jed Report pulled together a clip featuring all of this very misguided talk:

Now, I suppose I know what Bush and McCain are trying to say when they talk about consumer confidence and the impact it has on the economy, but these constant references to “psychology” make it sound as if they think economic problems are a figment of our collective imaginations, or worse, that symbolic-but-meaningless policy gestures can placate us into feeling confident again.

In other words, they need a new talking point.

The hysterical thing is that these are almost exactly the same kind of comments conservatives made during the Hoover administration about the early years of the Depression. That worked out well, didn’t it?

  • I know my boss ended our health insurance plan because of psychology. Or was it because it was so expensive? I can’t remember now, I’m going through a mental recession.

  • The sad truth is that any oil that goes online in 7-8 years (if we start drilling today) will only be replacing depleted oil fields in other parts of the world. I read that worldwide, output from existing fields is falling by as much as 8 percent a year, which means that oil companies must develop up to seven million barrels a day in additional capacity simply to keep current output steady—plus many more millions of barrels to meet the growth in demand of about 1.5 percent a year. A near impossible task..so we have to rely on other energy sources and that is where we should be investing.

    As for psychology….maybe Bush/McCain should consult with Tom Cruise. Exercise and vitamins, lads!!

  • Well if the GOP are experts on anything, it’s all things psychotic … er … psychological.

  • Also funny: the desperation, the grasping for any excuse. Republicans — the macho Daddy Party — are the sort we expect to disparaging psychological insight as a “girlyman” view, or what they think liberals are and like. Maybe that’s because Republicans don’t seem to like to think, or think things through — and they sure as hell hate questions and people who dare to ask questions — but it’s strange to see this host of Bush, McCain and Gramm endorsing something so unmacho as psychology.

  • Gridlock said… The sad truth is that any oil that goes online in 7-8 years (if we start drilling today) …

    Additionally, we simply can’t start drilling even remotely close to today. Take a look at this article about how there is an estimated 34 billion offshore barrels ready to be exploited, but remaining untouched. California won’t agree to drilling, so McCain and Bush would have us add about another 8 billion barrels of unexploited oil to the leased inventory, where it would sit.

    McBush’s offshore drilling plans won’t do squat.

  • I got that “I’ll be able to fill my tank in 8 years” feeling. It puts a lilt in my step.

    And I got the”My food bill went up 25% last month” blues. Doesn’t put a lilt in my step.

    What’s a conflicted guy to do?

  • It’s really hilarious to hear Bush and McCain talk about psychology. What’s missing is somebody turning the question back around to getting both of these deranged agents of terror into some serious psychological counseling.

    One can only imagine what Bush’s comments might be in reference to an assessment of his thinking and behavior by a trained expert in psychology. But as in the past I’m certain he only respects judgments as they relate to others, hence the idea that it is we the people who are delusional.

  • To the effect that the price of crude oil is affected by the collective thinking of the oil futures market, there is an element of psychology involved as these traders place their bets on whether to go long or short on the market. And that is part of the problem, that we have people who have no intention of doing anything with oil futures other than skimming profit off of, and acting to inflate the price of, barrels of oil they will never receive delivery on.

    But if Bush is changing hats from the “Decider” to the “Psychologizer,” he’s way off if he thinks that talk of opening up drilling in places that will take a decade to bring new oil to the market will “change the psychology that demand will constantly outstrip supply.” If
    supply were ever to make oil cheap again, demand will catch up in hurry and reverse that equation. I though Bush would have learned some economics while getting an MBA.

    Market economics is working its magic as energy costs are hitting pain thresholds and people are having to make choices for a change. The Bush administration has been working on the concept that they create their own reality for a long time. Catapulting the propaganda will not change the reality that people are responding to, not in time to save Bush’s legacy and not in time to change the energy picture either.

  • Since Bush took office:

    The Value of the Dollar has Crashed.
    Banks are starting to fail
    People are losing their homes in record numbers
    The health of our very Planet is in Peril
    Gas prices have skyrocketed
    Food prices are rising

    I don’t think this is all in our heads. What we do not need is more of the McSame.

    We need to clean house. No more torture, no more wars, no more heckuva job brownies. No More.

  • “Psychology” is a capitalist code word for faith. Smith’s invisible hand will swoop in and make a market correction, saving us all from the socialist liberals who are wringing their hands about equality, ecology, and preservation of the commons.

  • To quote Bea Arthur in History of the World Part I:

    “Oh, a bullshit artist. Did you bullshit last week?”

  • Mocking voters’ feelings and the GOP’s sincere and laudable attempts to provide balm to the electorate’s pain shows that like Barack Obama, Steve Benen is a sterile human being who is uncomfortable with the emotional side of life.

    It used to be that Democrats were accused of being too touchy-feely. Now, in the party’s zeal to erase any traits perceived as feminine from its image as a way to crush Hillary and disenfranchise the millions of women supporting her, the Democrats have outmachoed the GOP. Congratulations, boys. Do you feel proud of your cojones?

  • Global warming? It’s all in your head. Can’t win in Iraq? It’s all in your head. Economic problems? It’s all in your head. Running out of oil? It’s all in your head. Not enough water? It’s all in your head. Overpopulation? It’s all in your head. Food shortages? It’s all in your head.
    Ya gotta be strong! Be a man! You can jump off any cliff. Don’t worry, you’ll fly.
    It’s all in your head.

  • This is just an extension of the typical Republican mind set — blame the victim. The fault is not with bad policies, rather the fault is with the consumers paying the price for those policies. Hence, the problem would not exist if consumers would stop thinking they have a problem.

  • well i said this yesterday on another topic .. according to the Baker-Hughes U.S. Rig Count .. there are almost 2000 rigs currently drilling .. both land and offshore rigs are included in that count .. almost 1600 are drilling for natural gas .. 397 are drilling for oil … so the oil boyz are “with the program” at all ..they’re drilling 3 to 1 for NGas .. not oil ..

    are couple this with the news that our current EXPORTS of oil are at record highs ..yes .. we’re exporting oil ..

  • arrrgh .. typos .. i hate ’em ..

    read: the oil boyz ‘aren’t’ “with the program” …

    and read : “and couple this with the news” not “are couple”

    sorry ..

  • Hence, the problem would not exist if consumers would stop thinking they have a problem.

    The problem would not exist if consumers did not exist. Bush is on his way to making sure that happens. And if the economy doesn’t finish them off, call in the bombers.

  • The psychology of electronically rigging the unregulated oil futures markets? Hmm.
    Bush, McCain and Gramm are economic traitors to America by having created this stupid situation in the first place.

    ENRONed again…

    ENRONed again: this time by oil futures contracts speculators who are unnecessarily and very profitably driving up the price of crude oil and hence retail gasoline prices.

    We’re being ENRONed again. Curious as to why you are suddenly paying over four dollars a gallon for gasoline? No, it’s not due to “supply-and-demand,” no, it’s not due to “OPEC,” nor is it due to “peak oil.” It’s due to totally unregulated electronic oil futures trading in world markets. Check out the very lucid article that explains the unseen financial machinations in oil futures markets written by F. W. Engdahl on May 2, 2008, entitled, “Perhaps 60% of Today’s Oil Price is Pure Speculation.” It may be viewed at http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/2008/0502.html.
    In a nutshell, he suggests that the Bush Administration dropped the ball in January 2006, when they allowed totally unregulated electronic trading of oil futures contracts in New York. Previously these electronic trades had been made at the London Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) Futures Market. With that decision by the Bush Administration, all of the world’s oil prices were then opened to upward pressure from speculative futures contracts. In essence, oil futures contracts made by speculators, banks, hedge funds and pension funds all competed with real demand on the spot markets and had the effect of driving up both wholesale oil prices and retail gasoline prices. Speculators have made billions of dollars on their trading of oil futures contracts. All of their profits come right out of our pockets.
    Even with a stable oil supply, there is a slow worldwide increase in demand for oil, which creates a long-term upward pressure on oil prices. However, with the relentless saber-rattling and war-mongering by Bush and Cheney in the last several years, and the more recent war talks by McCain and the Israelis, the oil futures markets are rife with speculation and paranoia. This war talk keeps ratcheting up the prices on the oil futures contracts and hence the wholesale spot market prices. It is an endless spiral of greed and paranoia.
    As long as there is no tough and effective oversight of the electronic oil futures markets by the Bush Administration, the oil prices will climb endlessly. These oil prices will be quickly followed by hikes in the retail gasoline prices at the pump. The 60% speculation share of the $4.25/gallon gasoline price, is about $2.55/gallon, which is what we consumers are paying to these oil speculators as a “service fee.” Not a bad “fee,” since the speculators produce no usable goods or services…Just a few large greedy oil futures traders helping themselves to your gas money.
    Without this added-on oil futures “service fee,” you would be paying about $1.75/gallon for gasoline. Write, call or smoke-signal your Representatives and Senators today and suggest that they read the June 2006 report by The U. S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations entitled, “The Role of Market Speculation in Rising Oil and Gas Prices.” Then demand that they investigate and then force the Bush Administration to firmly regulate the computerized oil futures contracts trading in New York, London and Dubai.
     
    These unregulated electronic oil futures trading markets should be completely shut down immediately. They serve no social purpose, they only enable corporate greed. These same greedy corporate speculators are probably also responsible for the rapid rise in the prices of basic food commodities, such as wheat, rice and corn. No one who is not prepared to accept physical delivery of one thousand barrels of oil on their front doorstop should be allowed to participate in the oil futures markets. Same goes for wheat futures, rice futures and corn futures.

  • OK. So their fundamental argument is that if we all thought the economy was doing better, then we’d spend some money, and that’d be good for the economy, right? That’s where they were going with the gas-tax nonsense and the rebates. But isn’t one of the root causes of the current economic depression the credit crunch (that we’ve been spending more than we can afford to, and now the bill has come due)? So, if we blindly spend more because we think we can, aren’t we just digging myself in deeper?

  • When energy prices began to climb in 2001, Ari Fleischer, then the White House press secretary, was asked whether the president was considering a campaign to urge Americans to conserve energy.

    “That’s a big no,” Fleischer said. “The president believes that it’s an American way of life, and that it should be the goal of policy makers to protect the American way of life. The American way of life is a blessed one. And we have a bounty of resources in this country.”

  • The argument that if we had been drilling 7-10 years ago we would be in better shape is ludicrous.

    First of all, oil was at about $28 a barrel and oil companies couldn’t even begin to think about spending the money to explore or drill, it wasn’t worth the effort for the return (the same reason they haven’t done squat up until recently).

    Second, the oil we bring up isn’t exclusively for America…it will be sold on the world market, and prices will be just as contingent upon the market forces we see today, including speculation, supply and demand.

    Third, and most importantly…someone tell me when George W. Bush’s administration has EVER addressed alternative energy sources before the current situation developed??

    The man is a pathological liar and will say literally ANYTHING to keep the wolves from the door.

  • What is the due date on Oil Futures? Lots of those tv folks seem to think that a promise of more oil in seven years will drive down the oil futures prices?

  • Just BELIEVE, clap your hands and the economy, like Tinkerbell, will come back to life! This is the best that the Peter Pan’s in the Republican party can do…

  • “I readily concede that, you know, [drilling is] not going to produce a barrel of oil tomorrow, but it is going to change the psychology that demand will constantly outstrip supply,”

    Woah… wait… wait… So what he essentially wants is people to unlearn that increasing scarce valuable resources are in fact finite. So, the major lesson that people have been slowly becoming aware of over the last decade, sustainability is key to ensuring long-term viability of civilisation, is a ‘psychology’ that needs to be changed.

    I keep looking at that sentence thinking he must be trying to say he wants to teach people that demand will constantly outstrip supply… cos that would be the responsible mature lesson to learn out of this CF… but that doesn’t make any sense either. One doesn’t ram a message home about finite resources by ripping open new wells.

    All of that said, his coastal drilling will have a significant effect if current supplies continue to dwindle AND we do little in the next decade to change behaviour. In that scenario, even bringing on a small new field would probably have a big effect on the oil price, what do you think $900-$1500 a barrel (Of course that is just numbers thrown into the wind)?

  • If pain economical is strictly optical, then how come that Bear (Sterns) Fannie (Mae) and Freddie (Mac) are getting real pills (from our taxes) and not just a session (each) on some shrink’s couch?

  • Bush said “the economy Is growing. productivity is high. Trade’s up and people are working.”

    This is embarrassing. How out of touch is this president? Never again should Americans elect ANY underachieving college students from Yale.

  • Comments are closed.