‘Bush the Listener’

As far as the Bush White House is concerned, the two words of the day are “listen” and “advice.” Given what we know, and what we’re hearing, both appear disingenuous.

President Bush on Monday opened three days of intensive consultations on Iraq, saying the United States and countries across the Middle East have a vital stake in helping the fragile government in Baghdad succeed.

Bush went to the State Department to review diplomatic and political options — the latest in a series of consultations that dominate his agenda as he seeks a new course in Iraq.

After his State Department meetings, Bush offered reporters one of the more garbled run-on sentences I’ve seen in a while: “There is no question we’ve got to make sure that the State Department and the Defense Department — the efforts and their recommendations are closely coordinated, so that when I do speak to the American people, they will know that I’ve listened to all aspects of government and that the way forward is the way forward to achieve our objective: to succeed in Iraq.” For a 64-word sentence, the president didn’t say much.

Nevertheless, it’s apparently all part of a new effort, shaped by White House Chief of Staff John Josh Bolten, to characterize Bush as someone who’s actually listening when it comes to Iraq policy.

The challenge for Bush’s team [after the Iraq Study Group’s report was released] was to make the president appear as though he were taking the release of the report seriously, without necessarily embracing its conclusions. In the days following the report’s release, Bush the Decider transformed himself into Bush the Listener. Usually prickly with war critics — on the rare occasions he spoke to them at all — the president now invited them in from the cold and kept quiet. […]

“The change in Bush’s approach had its beginnings well before [James A. Baker III’s] group put pen to paper. It came about in part because of a slow, careful effort by Bush’s closest aides — under the direction of chief of staff Josh Bolten — to convince the president that he had to listen to different voices on Iraq, and ultimately change direction.

Except — and here’s the key — it’s all for show.

The New York Daily News reported over the weekend that those close to the president describe him as “still resolutely defiant, convinced history will ultimately vindicate him.”

Outside Republican sources report that except for isolated pockets of realism, the West Wing bunker hasn’t yet absorbed Bush’s diminished power.

“The White House is totally constipated,” a former aide complained. “There’s not enough adult leadership, and the 30-year-olds still think it’s 2000 and they’re riding high.”

One White House assistant insisted to a friend last week that the election was merely a repudiation of Bush’s execution, not his policies.

“They don’t get it,” a GOP mandarin snapped. “The Iraq report was their brass ring to pivot and salvage the last two years, and they didn’t grab it.”

Looking over news accounts today, there seems to be a sense this time is different. Bush wouldn’t be seeking out all of this advice if he didn’t want a range of competing ideas to consider. It took nearly four years, but the White House is ready to change something.

But none of this is true. Bush thinks he’s Truman, his aides think changing course would “undermine the whole premise of his presidency,” and the Bubble remains very much intact.

Consider a story in the latest Time magazine, recounting the efforts — before the commission was approved by Congress — of three supporters to enlist Condoleezza Rice to win the administration’s approval for the panel. Here is how Time reports it:

“As the trio departed, a Rice aide asked one of her suitors not to inform anyone at the Pentagon that chairmen had been chosen and the study group was moving forward. If Rumsfeld was alerted to the study group’s potential impact, the aide said, he would quickly tell Cheney, who could, with a few words, scuttle the whole thing. Rice got through to Bush the next day, arguing that the thing was going to happen anyway, so he might as well get on board. To his credit, the President agreed.”

The article treats this exchange in a matter-of-fact way, but, what it suggests is completely horrifying. Rice apparently believed that Bush would simply follow the advice of whoever he spoke with. Therefore the one factor determining whether Bush would support the commission was whether Cheney or Rice managed to get to him first.

Only 770 days to go….

It’s hard to listen when you’re inside a multi-layered lexan bubble. Maybe we should get Bush a book on lip-reading?

I keep getting the mental image of a hamster in an exercise bubble, zooming along and then crashing into the furniture, only to get back at it and zoom off into the next room.

  • “Bush would simply follow the advice of whoever he spoke with.”

    First or Last?

    There was an English king noted for following the advice of whomever talked to him last. Interesting that BG2 seems to only take the advice of whomever talks to him first.

  • “Maybe we should get Bush a book on lip-reading?”
    Racerx

    I didn’t know they did popup lip reading books.

  • Bush offered reporters one of the more garbled run-on sentences I’ve seen in a while:

    “Yeh see, uh, yeh see, I’m saying to the American people that, that you need good advice, so you, so the way forward is clear and the path we choose to go through is better than the way to the other path, in Iraq, and democracy for the Iraqis, will not, uh, yeh see, its important for the resoluteness of the armed forces to get good advice, and that’s what we’re trying, yeh see, to do here with this today.”

  • He’s “faking sincerity.” They view the public as something to be manipulated, and they’ve gotten the message that the public thinks Bush isn’t paying attention, so they march him around “paying attention” and “listening”.

    I have a feeling no one is buying it.

  • At another blog (I can’t remember which one) someone made an observation that puts this whole listening tour into perspective. By consulting with a multitude of other advisors/ committees/ wise persons, Bush waters down the impact of the ISG. The ISG will simply be one of a multitude of voices, leaving Bush to discount any and all of them with a simple rejoinder like, “Opinions are like a**holes: everyone’s got one.” That will leave him free to say he’s heard it all but best trusts the advice of those in his inner circle. Sounds Rovian enough to be believable.

  • CB

    “Nevertheless, it’s apparently all part of a new effort, shaped by White House Chief of Staff John Bolten, to characterize Bush as someone who’s actually listening when it comes to Iraq policy.”

    Shouldn’t that be Josh Bolten instead of John?

  • Faking listening isn’t going to work. Everyone with a brian knew that the military efforts in Iraq had failed, but the media couldn’t say so because, with Bush saying everything is peachy over there, saying so would be “partisan”. Now, the media can tell it like it is. If Bush says he is going to continue doing what he has been doing, the media then can openly discuss Bush continuing “his failing policies”.

    One of Rove’s big discoveries was that if a Republican says white is black, the media won’t say the Republican is lying or is in denial, but will instead say that there is a difference of opinion on the issue. But you can’t keep blowing smoke after a authoritive committee has said the truth.

  • I heard Andy Card on MSNBC this morning going on about how the ISG had “tunnel vision” on Iran’s role in the Iraq war, and that the ISG failed to consider the “broader geo-political landscape” with respect to Iran. I wonder how Jim Baker & Co. feel about such condescension from a relative amateur like Card?

  • The problem with propaganda is that the truth can not escape, once it does, the mis-information is no longer propaganda, it’s just deceit and half truths. The truth has been seeping out and the ISG report was the nail on that coffin.

    Bush backed himself into one hell of a corner, he used to have three choices, spin the facts, change strategy, or stay the course. The obvious and most loved strategy, spin, is only a faction of what it once was so that option is off the table. It just isn’t working. So we have policy change or stay the course.

    Bush equates change with weakness and I don’t think anyone seriously thinks he is going to change any policies that would do anything to make him look weak or worse, make him look wrong.

    So stay the course is the only option left, yet staying the course is really not going to set well with the public. If changes aren’t made soon, the public is going to want his head.

    So back my original point, Bush has backed himself into to one hell of a corner.

    Right now the man is just buying time.

  • Gates, Baker: It is pretty apparent that Daddy Bush is jumping in to bail out junior’s ass (again) and junior is acting like the surly adolescent that he is. He’s going to resist all rational adult efforts to bring a reasonable policy to bear until something breaks. Since he simply doesn’t care how many of the underclass (military enlisted) he kills, this can take some time.

    He’s a spoiled child who’s daddy has told him to put his toy soldiers away and he doesn’t want to. We should be very afraid that when he is forced to, he will throw a tantrum and break as many as he can.

    I expect that daddy is pretty close to putting his foot down and taking over. Watch for Rove’s resignation and Baker, or another high level advisor from Daddy’s entourage becoming a White House advisor.

    I wonder how Baker feels about stealing Florida now.

  • those close to the president describe him as “still resolutely defiant, convinced history will ultimately vindicate him.”

    And Jesus is coming back real soon. And global warming is a hoax. And evolution is too.

    God, save us from your followers.

  • After all of the “listening” BushBaby will think: “OK, I covered my ass now.” And continue on his merry way.

    The trully alarming thing is that if the elections had followed ShrubCo’s script, the ISG wouldn’t have been formed, Rumsfeld would still be funking up the Pentagon, Bush would be too busy gloating over the voters’ repudiation of the Cut n’ Run party to even pretend to listen to new ideas.

  • “The trully alarming thing is that if the elections had followed ShrubCo’s script, the ISG wouldn’t have been formed” – TAIO

    Not quite, the ISG was established before the election.

    Or do you mean the whole election period?

    Petorado is right (or the person he’s quoting is) that BG2 is using the Pentagon and State as “other voices” to undermine the message of the ISG. He does not want to have to take advice from his daddy’s “wise men”. That would be like Baltazar coming back 33 years later and telling Judea bar Joseph that he’s likely to get crucified if he keeps it up.

  • Speaking of “other voices”, I’m sure Jesus/god will tell him what to do one of these nights.

    Funny how Jesus/god is always telling people what they want to hear… (scary loud voice from the heaves)”Stay the course Georgie Boy, bring freedom and democracy to the world, just be resolute in your ways my boy”.

  • Lance. I think he meant that the report might have looked a little differently , or maybe that the report would still be in process.

  • “Funny how Jesus/god is always telling people what they want to hear” – ScottW

    Angel to Jean Darc (later know as Joan of Arc): “You are the Maid of Orleans, go and liberate the city and crown Charles Dauphin king.”

    Years later.

    Angel to Joan: “Sorry, no, you can’t recant being the Maid of Orleans and yes, you have to be martyed at the stake.”

    Maybe not all the time.

  • “Lance. I think he meant that the report might have looked a little differently , or maybe that the report would still be in process.” – ScottW

    You read TAIO a lot differently than I do. If the Republican’ts had won the election then the ISG might have made different suggestions. I doubt the five DLC members of the group were helping tailor it to see that Republican’ts get back the majority in 2008.

    Mostly, I think the septagenarians just want an ANSWER to the mess BG2 has made.

  • I wonder how Baker feels about stealing Florida now.

    As a friend of mine once put it, I’m sure he sleeps quite well in his pure silk pajamas, hand-made silk sheets and 600 fill goose down comforter. He got his all-important tax cuts and two very young supreme court justices.

  • I’m going to do a very un-ReThuglican thing:
    I was incorrect when I said the ISG would not have been formed. Thanks Lance, I won’t even claim post-election euphoria induced amnesia (or booze). Please forgive my blunder.

    However, I do think The Decider and his squad of syncophants would have been even more dismissive of the final report if there were still a GOP majority. Come on, you know you can easily imagine BushBaby making jokes about Surrender Monkeys. (Heh. Heh.)

    I stand by the rest of my post and add John “I am the Walrus” Bolton to the list of unpleasantries we’d still be saddled with.

  • This simian-in-chief needs a new label for his stellar ignorance. Maybe we could call it “Dubya—the Dumber Every Day World Tour 2007.”

    What—you think he’s gonna grow brains between now and next year?

  • After “listening” to a wide range of viewpoints, Bush will conclude that his plan has been right from the start. And he expects history to prove him right.

    Reality has a well-known liberal bias.

  • Well I agree with all this jabber but I really just hope W lives a long miserable life of quasi-dementia and chronic alcoholism.

    Oh and I wouldn’t be sad if Rove meets his maker in some parking lot with a tire iron.

    Real soon.

    Jesus, what monumental assholes.

  • My eighteen-month granddaughter has a better concept of “listening” than the commander-decider bush.

  • Comments are closed.