Bush warns of Iranian ‘nuclear holocaust’

In 2002 and 2003, in making the case for a war with Iraq, the president and his team would frequently tell Americans that we couldn’t wait for actual proof to justify an invasion, because the “smoking gun could be a mushroom cloud.”

In 2007, in describing a possible confrontation with Iran, Bush has decided to be even less subtle.

The United States demanded Tuesday that Iran end any support for extremists in Iraq “at once” and raised the specter of a “nuclear holocaust” in the Middle East if Tehran gets atomic weapons.

US President George W. Bush branded the Islamic Republic “the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism,” citing its backing of Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Shiite fighters killing US troops in Iraq.

“And Iran’s active pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust,” he told the American Legion veterans group.

“Iran’s actions threaten the security of nations everywhere, and the United States is rallying friends and allies to isolate Iran’s regime, to impose economic sanctions. We will confront this danger before it is too late,” he said.

Shortly before the president’s speech, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said the U.S. is “prisoners of your own quagmire. You have no choice but to accept the rights of the Iraqi people.” He added, “I can tell you there will be a power vacuum in the region. We are ready with other regional countries, such as Saudi Arabia, and the people of Iraq to fill this vacuum.”

It’s almost as if Ahmadinejad is taunting Bush. Given the circumstances, that seems like a very bad idea for all concerned.

Post Script: By the way, in his speech to the American Legion conference, Bush added:

“I appreciate your efforts to honor the American flag. There are those who say the flag is just a piece of cloth. That’s not the view of those who bled for it and saw it drape the caskets of some of our finest men and women. It was the American flag that we planted proudly on Iwo Jima, that first graced the silver surface of the moon. The country is careful to protect many things because of what they symbolize. Surely we can find a way to show equal respect for the symbol that our soldiers and sailors and airmen and Marines and Coast Guard’s men and women have risked their lives for — the flag of our nation. So today I join the Legion in calling on the United States Congress to make protection of the flag the law of our land.”

Really? Just 15 months left in office and the president is suddenly going to start taking a flag amendment seriously?

This is so totally in character for Bush. He loses two more of his key hand holders/office wives/enablers/yes-men within a week so he wants to go nuke somebody in a petulant fit.

Typical spoiled child who wants to break something when his favorite toys are taken away.

  • Protect the flag but let the Republic for which it stands go down in flames. Classic hypocritical Shrub.

    I hope that our Armed Forces refuse to follow any more illegal and immoral orders from this maniac. Lord Help Us.

  • “There are those who say the flag is just a piece of cloth.”

    And there are those who say the constitution is “just a goddamned piece of paper.”

    And there are many many of us who think George W. Bush is “just a worthless piece of shit.”

  • “It’s almost as if Ahmadinejad is taunting Bush. Given the circumstances, that seems like a very bad idea for all concerned.”

    Unfortunately, there’s a certain twisted logic to what both “leaders” are doing. Bush is unpopular, for obvious reasons. Last time he ginned up support for a war on phony premises, his popularity soared. Why not try it again?

    Ahmadinejad is beset by internal problems of his own, with unrest over the decreasing availability of gasoline reaching near crisis proportions, if these comments are to be believed:
    http://energybulletin.net/33987.html
    (scroll down to the article on Iran)

    How better for Ahmadinejad to get Iranians to rally around him than to convince them that Bush is about to attack them? So, in case Bush needs provocation to keep up the bellicose rhetoric, Ahmadinejad may as well taunt him.

    Of course, the results of all this saber rattling could be very ugly for millions of people.

  • The United States demanded Tuesday that Iran end any support for extremists in Iraq “at once”…

    Isn’t the U.S. the biggest extremist group in the Middle East?

    And some corrections:

    “And Iran’s active pursuit of technology that could lead to NOO-cue-ler weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence under the shadow of a NOO-cue-ler holocaust,”

    Just saying…

  • That’s not the view of those who bled for it and saw it drape the caskets of some of our finest men and women.

    That would be the same flag-draped caskets that your Administration will not allow to be seen by the people? Those?

    It is you, sir, who disgrace our flag. Every moment you deign to use it as a prop for your disgusting rhetoric. Enough with you and your faux patriotism.

  • Well, Bush had to wait to get the flag amendment going – he was too busy autographing (and thereby desecrating) American flags before…

  • Wait a minute:

    “I can tell you there will be a power vacuum in the region. We are ready with other regional countries, such as Saudi Arabia, and the people of Iraq to fill this vacuum.”

    Isn’t that what we are trying to do anyway? Get other local regional powers to step up and help? If Ahmadinejad and Shia Iran and the Sunni Saudi’s are honestly both willing to step in and clean up what exactly is the problem?

    Maliki has been to Tehran to chat with his neighbors, obviously he’s not feeling too bad about them. If what Ahmadinejad says is true (and presumably we can ask our “allies” the Saudis if it is.) then why not broker this sort of solution?

  • It’s almost as if Ahmadinejad is taunting Bush. Given the circumstances, that seems like a very bad idea for all concerned.

    Oh look. Two mad dogs yapping at each other through a fence.

    If Iraq were quiet I’d say Amenalongname should worry. But I don’t see Saudi Arabia welcoming more war in the region. To say nothing of Pakistan which probably doesn’t want another war on another border. I expect Dick will be summoned to the Royal House of Saud again.

    “Listen my fat friend. Tell that coke addled president to stop bugging Iran. Ami’s on the phone all day whining about it and it makes my head ache. No, I did not say stop licking my shoes…”

  • “And Iran’s active pursuit of technology that could lead to nuclear weapons threatens to put a region already known for instability and violence — Tweedle Dumb

    Kill your parents, then ask the judge for leniency, because you’re an orphan…

  • ” The United States is rallying friends and allies…”

    That ought to be complete in about as long as it takes to make a cup of coffee, and with not much to show for the effort.

  • Comments are closed.