Bush wasn’t in the Gang of 14

When the compromise was reached in the Senate last week over how to avoid the nuclear option, the lawmakers who participated in the negotiations wanted to send a message to the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue: the White House has been part of the problem. The deal specifically said:

“We encourage the Executive branch of government to consult with members of the Senate, both Democratic and Republican, prior to submitting a judicial nomination to the Senate for consideration.”

In the immediate aftermath, many observers believed this shot across the president’s bow could affect the nomination process. The Washington Post’s Dan Balz said the Gang of 14’s compromise puts Bush “under pressure from the moderates to work more cooperatively with the Senate on judicial nominations or face rebellion from at least some of them.”

But if the negotiators were trying to send a message to the White House, the president didn’t get it. Bush doesn’t do nuance, and he doesn’t do consultation.

The White House is preparing to send a raft of new judicial nominations to the Senate in the next few weeks, according to Republican strategists inside and outside the administration — a move that could challenge the durability of last week’s bipartisan filibuster deal and reignite the political warfare it was intended to halt.

The Bush administration has been vetting candidates for 30 more federal district and appeals court vacancies that have been left open for months while the Senate battled over previous nominations stalled by Democrats. Now that Democrats have agreed not to filibuster any new candidates except in “extraordinary circumstances,” Republicans are eager to test the proposition. […]

No names have been publicly floated, but officials familiar with the process said they believe the nominees will be consistent with Bush’s previous choices, some of whom have stirred considerable controversy among Democrats. The Bush team indicated that it plans no changes in its selection process in the wake of the Senate deal. Senate Democrats said they have not been consulted on any new nominations.

In other words, nothing has changed as far as the White House is concerned. There’s no desire to find consensus judicial nominees or contact lawmakers about the selections before the nominations go to the Hill; only a stack the courts with ideologues.

So, Gang of 14, what are you prepared to do about it?

Bush didn’t endorse the compromise and, by all indications, doesn’t like it. His agenda in this area is pretty clear: nominate whomever he pleases, ignore the “advice” part of “advice and consent,” demand confirmation, and whine like mad if Dems don’t play along.

The Gang of 14, particularly Lindsey Graham, suggested Bush could make the process better by working with the Senate instead of against it. Bush has other ideas.

But while the “extraordinary circumstances” phrase gets all the attention, the real test will be how seriously the gang’s Republicans take that “encourage the Executive branch of government to consult with members of the Senate” phrase. Since it’s been ignored, will the seven GOP senators by sympathetic to Dems’ concerns when some of the new nominees draw the Dems’ ire?

This was, I think, what many people were concerned about when the whole ‘compromise’ thing came down. Yes, the immedidate crisis was averted for a short time, but the underlying situation really didn’t change that much as far as the White House is concerned.

So the question is: 1) Are the Dems going to cave when the next heinous choice comes down, and 2) If they don’t, how much of a backbone will the ‘moderate’ Repubs have to stand up to the White House juggernaut in support of the compromise they hammered out before?

I don’t feel very good about the chances for good things to come of this.

  • Democrats are so stupid. When Republicans make the issue that Democrats are blocking nominees, Democrats try to refute the pseudo-facts put out by the Republicans, insisting on an accurate history. It is always a waste of time to debate facts with liars.

    Democrats should come back that the “real” scandal in the Senate judicial nomination process is that the Republicans are not rejecting anyone.

    Republican Senators should do their jobs or resign. Any Republican Senator, who argues for deference to the President’s choices for any office, whether a lifetime judge or a U.N. Ambassador should be ridicule for his lazy-ass ways.

  • When will Republicans (at least the ones with functioning brains) in the Senate realize Bush doesn’t give a crap about what they want. He only likes tradition when it benefits him, and he thinks he knows better then they do. Until they (and the Dems that jump the aisle) say enough is enough and join forces to road block all of his authoritarian machinations, they will contine to get rolled.

    This isn’t just about Democratic leadership. Republicans of the sane variety and those concerned with Senate viability/independence under future presidents should wake the freak up. If they think this and abberation and is going to just go away when we get a new president, they ought to think again.

  • Bruce hit the nail on the head. But it’s not so much that the Republicans aren’t rejecting people out of hand, it’s that they aren’t even debating the merits of nominees (except George Voinovich). Senate Repubs are simply subservient patsies for the president and don’t have spine enough to question anything the executive branch does. They are elected to represent the best wishes of their constituents, yet are foresaking them for party loyalty to their “old boys club”.

    We claim this nation is the land of the brave and the home of the free, but Congressional Republicans are neither.

  • You cannot appease a Dictator. Shrub is our first– and hopefully our last– MBA President. CEO’s are Dictators; the concept of a “CEO of America” is a profoundly anti-American idea. There is no democracy in Corporate America; it is an autocratic or at best plutocratic model. Shrub is thorougly versed in the “ownership society”– which means “I own it, so fuck you”.

    Luckily, Reid didn’t claim that the compromise was going to bring us “peace for our time”. He knew goddamned well it was a temporary hack.

    Krugman nailed it in the preface to “The Great Unraveling”. Shrub and his cronies are not “conservative”, they are radical revolutionaries who will not stop until they acheive total dominance or are utterly and permanently destroyed.

    Expect a nucular summer.

  • Comments are closed.