Bush’s bubble repels news on Social Security

I have assumed for months that the White House, and probably the president himself, are aware of the fact that the drive to privatize Social Security is a complete debacle. Perhaps I misjudged their capacity for self-deception.

From the Bush gang’s perspective, they hoped a post-election “mandate” and an aggressive sales pitch would put the Dems on the defensive, convince just enough of the public, and Bush would eventually win out. But they can read polls just like everyone else, and surely they know this is a fiasco, right? Apparently not.

Republicans leaders in Congress are taking the lead in crafting Social Security reform, saying President Bush was making little progress on the landmark reform proposal.

When congressional leaders met with Mr. Bush last week, they were surprised that the president didn’t know how much trouble his plan was in, said a source close to the meeting who requested anonymity.

“The more he talked about it, the worse it got,” said the source, who worked in previous Republican administrations. “This White House does not encourage negative feedback. You know that Bush’s legislative affairs office is dysfunctional because they weren’t bringing any of the warning signs back to the White House.”

When Bush speaks on the issue publicly, I expect him to deny reality and insist he’s making progress on privatizing Social Security. This president has no policy expertise, so cheerleading is expected when he holds publicly-funded private rallies with pre-screened sycophants. But when he meets with his fellow Republicans on the Hill, and there are no cameras or reporters, Bush should be willing to acknowledge reality and adapt for the future.

Except he’s not. Bush apparently isn’t even aware of the political problem he’s created for himself and his party. It’s stunning.

Even Karl Rove, who’s insight and political proficiencies are supposed to be legendary, seems to be completely confused about the reaction to Bush’s scheme.

“We’ve been probably to some degree too successful” in selling private — or personal — accounts, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove said yesterday.

There was a recent poll he had seen that found that about 40 percent of those who disapprove of Bush’s performance on this issue actually want private accounts, explained Rove, who stopped by The Washington Post yesterday for lunch. (This is not to say the White House ever, ever looks at polls, though Rove cited several more in the next few minutes.)

“I think their attitude,” he said, “is: ‘I disapprove of the president’s performance on Social Security because he hasn’t gotten it done. Hasn’t he been talking about this for six months and shouldn’t he have gotten it done?’ “

But that’s completely wrong. Americans overwhelmingly disapprove of Bush’s handling of Social Security, but they also reject privatization and benefit cuts, which are central to Bush’s plan approach. In fact, all available data shows that the public dislikes Bush’s idea more as they learn more about it. The White House hasn’t been “too successful”; it’s been too incompetent.

Do you suppose these guys are just out of touch with the real world or are they in deep, deep denial?

In response to your last question, I would answer “neither.” They, epecially Rove, are in ddep, deep spin mode. Just as with the election campaigns, Rove always wants to fake us out by acting as if their goal was in the bag. Remember 2000, when just a few days before the election Bush went to California to campaign, to give us the idea that the state was in “play”? He did some of the same maneuvers in 2004. This is just more of the same.

The real revelation of the story is that Bush is just as delusional in private as he is at his “love fests.” It’s not an act, he is truly clueless. Is that the result of hubris, being seriously disconnected from reality as a “true believer,” or good old-fashioned incompetence? Hopefully a (politically) lethal combination of all three!

  • I agree with the above that Rove is spinning.

    But the President’s response is deeply lost. Reading this made me realize why the President often reponds to challenging questions by beginning with, “Look, I understand that…”. He did this today in Denmark when questioned about a lack of European support for the war in Iraq. “I understand that not everyone supported us…”. He did the same in his last press conference, “I understand that things are difficult in Iraq”.

    I’m beginning to think that this is not just a verbal tick but a revealing statement of fact. In this White House, the real question is not what the President thinks about an issue but whether he understands that an issue even exists, and whether he ever thinks about it. And as he reminded us recently about Iraq, he “…thinks about it everruh day”.

    I guess we can be comforted by small signs of progress.

  • Bush is a very simple guy. He’s the Chauncey Gardener president. All surface, platitudes and cliches. But, over the last few days I’ve seen a twitch. Like a brain fold quivering.

    He really wants Alberto to be on the court. This is one thing he has true awareness of. Gonzalez is his buddy. They’ve stuck together through a lot and George wants to make Alberto’s folks proud of him. He can do this for Al and he wants to but the fundies are dissing his friend. He is truly irritated about this. It’s the first time I’ve sensed a setting of the jaw when it comes to questioning his being a RepubCo tool. Does Bush even understand the social and political ramifications of picking one potential jurist over another? Doubtful beyond the broadest parameters. But he is Alberto’s best shot at a seat on the high court and he understands that. He doesn’t want to let his buddy down.

    Friendship 1 Fundies 0.

  • It’s been pointed out many times by many writers that this administration is an evil genius when it comes to campaigning but has no skill or competence at all when it comes to governing. The people who swept into Congress riding on Bush’s coattails are in many cases as breathtakingly incompetent as Bush and Rove are themselves when it comes to getting the job done for the American people. The briefest glance at Rick Santorum’s new book of “wisdom” should be proof enough for anyone who still has two active brain cells to rub together.

    Campaigning is all they know, so campaigning is all they do. The Social Security clown shows that Bush thinks are so swell are a case in point. Totally ineffective and not fooling anyone, even their own people these days, but it’s all they know so they keep on doing them because it’s the only method they know.

    Day in and day out it’s the same: Attack, deny, confuse, refuse. They’ve been following the credo ‘If we say it ten times then it must be true and people will believe it’ for so long that they have succumbed to their own delusions and truly have no idea of what else to do.

    In a way it’s the ultimate safety net for society. Ruthless and clever men have managed to gain influence in government for a while at various times in history, but eventually their own stupidity and dishonesty brings them down. It happened to Joe McCarthy, it happened to Richard Nixon, and it will happen to George Bush and Karl Rove. Maybe not today or tomorrow, but sooner or later it will. They’re just not smart enough to save themselves in the long run, I guarantee it.

  • For some time, I’ve been convinced that pronouncements from the White House have nothing to do with truth or falsehood. They’re what anthropologists call “phatic communions” — speech intended to establish social relationships rather than impart information.

    The classic phatic communion is “How are you doing?” “I’m good.” Both participants in this conversation recognize it as a social thing. “How are you doing?” doesn’t really mean I want information about your state of health and “I’m good” is said as a correct reply, whether or not it’s true. In fact, we might be taken aback if someone takes the initial question seriously…and usually when I say “I’m good” the truth or falsity of the statement never enters my mind. “I’m good” is a social statement; its truth is beside the point.

    The same applies to statements from the White House. If you ask Republicans how they can believe certain things Bush says, a good many of them simply shrug. “That’s the sort of thing politicians say.” They don’t relate to the statements as things that should be evaluated as true or false. This is just speech for social bonding. It uses words that will connect with Republicans; neither the speaker nor the intended audience is concerned with the truth or falsehood of the actual content, because that’s not the point. These are statements of solidarity, not statements of fact…and in the same way that all my friends recognize that “I’m good” shouldn’t be judged for accuracy, all Bush’s friends recognize that his statements about Iraq, or Social Security, or anything else shouldn’t be judged on the correctness of their content. The truth is irrelevant; all that matters is if you speak like one of Us or one of Them.

  • Rove is probably spinning, but Bush is clueless. We
    know that. He doesn’t read newspapers. He doesn’t
    watch television news, and if he did, it would be
    Fox, and even CNN would still leave him clueless,
    maybe even upbeat, with their cheerleading. Obviously, he doesn’t cruise the Internet for news, and he doesn’t read Time or Newsweek or the Weekly Standard, either. He admitted publicly that he gets his information from his subordinates, which in any
    business textbook is absolutely suicidal for a
    boss. In every endeavor, you have to examine multiple sources to get the information you need to do your job. And Bush is childishly unaware of this. He is truly a simpleton. It is astonishing,
    but it’s true.

    He hasn’t a clue as to what’s going on.

  • remember, bush’s entire world view consists of these words: “don’t negotiate against yourself.”

  • I think that the real story here is that a Republican insider would say this publicly, even if it is anonymous. The White House has done a pretty good job of circling the wagons and making sure that these types of stories don’t reach the press but you can only perpetuate myths for so long before people start to see the truth.

    I’ll leave with this story. A school friend of mine works in the office for the Republican Congressmen in my district, just in conversations that I have had with her I have concluded that it’s pretty much a given that the people she works with think that Bush is incompetent. Think about it, his whole party knows him for what he is and they’re all covering for him.

    Rufus T. Firefly for president. Hail Freedonia!

  • Wouldn’t it be a hoot if some day done the road it’s revealed that no one ever told poor George that all those love-fests were staged?

  • I think his handlers and colleagues have always known that he’s a fraud. An empty suit. A shallow, hollow man. But he has appeal to the masses, and that’s why the neocons chose him to be their puppet leader. None of them would have ever won the who-would-you-rather-have-a-beer-with contest. Bush has appeal – his folksy ignorance bequiles tens
    of millions. And for some reason they think he’s a
    straight shooter. And for some reason they overlook
    his aristocratic roots and think he’s one of them, that he cares about them, in spite of the fact that
    he’s even said that he doesn’t know how poor people
    think.

    I think it’s worse than what scott suggests. I
    don’t think he knows that he’s not the president.

  • Comments are closed.