Bush’s rehabilitation of Iran-Contra criminals

Clearly, the White House has been rattled by the Rove/Plame scandal, but let’s also take a moment to note how unconcerned they are by the seriousness of the last important presidential scandal: Iran-Contra.

In 1987, Robert L. Earl told a grand jury that he had destroyed and stolen national security documents while working for Lt. Col. Oliver L. North during the Iran-Contra scandal.

Now, he sits in one of the most coveted offices in the Pentagon as chief of staff to Gordon R. England, acting deputy secretary of Defense. Earl has clearance to review the kinds of classified documents he once destroyed.

Independent counsel Lawrence Walsh once told Congress, “Earl attempted to conceal evidence regarding the arms sales to Iran and the diversion of profits…. He destroyed [National Security Council] documents, assisted [Oliver] North in the destruction of documents … and made false statements to the FBI.” And now he’s poised to get Paul Wolfowitz’s old job.

It’s really amazing when you think about it. Common Cause’s Mary Boyle noted that some of Clinton’s nominees got into trouble for hiring illegal immigrants for domestic work, but Bush is hiring people who helped orchestrate a massive, illegal international conspiracy, and it hardly raises an eyebrow.

Indeed, we see a whole team of Reagan-era officials who were integral players in a major White House scandal, but who have been welcomed with open arms by the Bush White House, regardless of culpability and/or criminal background.

* Elliott Abrams, who pleaded guilty to withholding information from Congress about the illegal funding of the Nicaraguan Contras during the Reagan administration, serves on Bush’s National Security Council as head of the Mideast bureau.

* Retired Adm. John M. Poindexter was directly involved with diverting money from Iranian arms sales to Nicaragua, and admitted to shredding and destroying records. Poindexter was tried and convicted of five felonies, including obstructing official inquiries and lying to Congress. Bush hired him to head the Pentagon’s Information Awareness Office.

* Laurence Silberman had first-hand knowledge of Oliver North’s activities, but when North’s case went to federal court, Silberman didn’t recuse himself, despite a conflict of interest. Walsh later said Silberman was so biased during the oral arguments of North’s appeal that he nearly prevented an appellate counsel “from presenting a coherent argument.” Bush hired Silberman to direct an “independent” commission to investigate the nation’s intelligence failures in 2001 and 2002.

* Otto Reich ran a State Department office during the Iran/contra affair that “engaged in prohibited covert propaganda,” according to a government inquiry. Bush hired him to be the Assistant Secretary of State for Latin America.

* John Negroponte was Ambassador to Honduras and facilitated a clandestine quid pro quo deal, under which the Reagan Administration sent aid to Honduras in return for Honduran assistance to the contras, at a time when Congress had banned the Administration from assisting the contras. Negroponte’s embassy also suppressed information about human rights abuses committed by the Honduran military. Bush hired Negroponte to be Ambassador to the UN, Ambassador to Iraq, and the first ever National Intelligence Director.

As David Corn explained so well a couple of years ago, “The Bush Administration is turning into one big rehab center for the Iran/contra schemers of the Reagan/Bush White House.”

But we all already know. CROOKS,LIARS and CHEATS. This is normal for Bush

  • Wonder if Bush will use the same ploy his old man did, and just pardon everyone involved.

    Hey, it worked once!

  • “Mitch Daniels helped direct Reagan’s damage-control effort over the scandal. Bush hired him to head the Office of Management and Budget (and last year, Indiana voters made him their governor).”

    What is wrong with directing a damage control operation? To put him in the same class as convicted felons (pardons don’t change the fact that they were convicted) diminishes the value of the whole list.

    Why create a strawman that your enemies can easily knock down???

  • Why create a strawman that your enemies can easily knock down???

    Fair enough, Neil. My point was that one could be deeply involved with the Iran-Contra scandal — in Daniels’ case spinning deceptive claims to the public — but nevertheless get hired by Bush. But your point is well taken; Daniels’ work pales in comparison to that of, say, Poindexter.

    As such, I pulled Daniels from the list.

  • I don’t think the comparison of the Bush admin to a rehab center is being used appropriately. It implies that these guys are going to change. And as we can see from the Rove incident, these guys don’t change. They only grow more brazen.

    One can only hope that when Rove gets his come-uppance, the blood in the water attracts the press like sharks to these other criminals in the admin.
    Repugs bragged that they would bring “honesty and decency” back to the White House???
    Are those two of the street names for the criminals in this administration?

  • The Right has no new ideas, doesn’t want any new ideas and will fight any purveyor of new ideas to the point of destruction.

    As I read the recounting of Robert Earl’s actions in 1987, I look to my side at a photo in todays paper. It’s a photo accompanying a Jon Chiat column harkening back to the days of the Bork hearings in Sept. ’87. Gerald Ford is offering a pithy comment while Bork, (looking like the love child of a lemur and a goat) and a pre-Viagra enhanced Bob Dole look on.

    18 years isn’t all that long in dinosaur years but it’s a long time to feel like we’ve been spinning our tires in the same old mudhole.

    Along the same lines, David Rothkopf’s new book, “Running the World: The Inside Story of the NSC and the Architects of American Culture”, goes back to the Nixon/Kissinger years and reminds us of how many individuals and connections go back that far quite intact.

    America’s government is stagnant. The inability to leave the past behind and to reach for new concepts and goals is hobbling us. The World and the 21st Century demand much more imagination than we are demonstrating if we are to remain a respected world power for more than just our military and pop culture products.

    Nothing new is being reaped because nothing new is being sown.

  • Burro is right, but people do WANT that change. Bush said as much just to get reelected. Even though people fell for it, they didn’t fall for “let’s all stagnateâ€?, or, “I’ll hire the same guys from Iran Contra fame.â€?

    Now if Democrats would put someone up who could connect to people (sorry, Kerry wasn’t that guy), then things could move forward more. Clinton was a great start, but it took Bush to show just how far a president can push this country in a direction no one else really wants to go. So now that the gloves are off, this country is in line for some big change in the right direction for once.

    The major power players in the Democrats are losers left over from the revolution we still find ourselves in. They will drag Dems down as long as they are there, but with their track record, that won’t be long.

    Edwards could have won.

  • Eadie:

    Ditto twice.

    Folks do want change which makes the current situation so much more frustrating.

    Edwards was picking up steam right when Dean cut loose with his rebel yell and scared so many people into the “safe” and boring Kerry camp. Edwards lost momentum and at the time I felt disappointment and a distinct loss of possibilities. The campaign and potential outcome could have been totally different.

    And last, it’s Jon Chait, not Chiat. My apologies.

  • Comments are closed.