Two weeks ago, a [tag]Treasury[/tag] Department report made clear what was already pretty obvious: “tax cuts do not come remotely close to paying for themselves.” Yesterday, Treasury undermined the administration’s message on [tag]tax cuts[/tag] again, this time reporting that — surprise, surprise — the cuts have costly consequences.
The federal government will need to either cut spending or raise taxes down the road to pay for extending [tag]President[/tag] [tag]Bush[/tag]’s recent tax cuts, the Treasury Department said in a report released yesterday, dismissing the idea popular with many Republicans that such sacrifices can be avoided. […]
[T]he Treasury’s view reflects “a recognition the federal government has to finance the tax relief” to avoid a rise in government debt, Robert Carroll, deputy assistant secretary for tax analysis, said in an interview.
The report stressed that the economic effects of extending the tax cuts “depend crucially on whether they are financed by lower [tag]spending[/tag] or higher [tag]taxes[/tag] in the future.”
Leonard Burman, a Treasury official in the [tag]Clinton[/tag] [tag]administration[/tag] and now the director of the Urban Institute’s and the Brookings Institution’s joint Tax Policy Center, said, “All of the hard questions are swept under the rug. We’ve increased spending and cut taxes, which is politically a very effective strategy. But in the long run, the effect on the economy is a disaster.”
You don’t say.