Cardinal Virtue: Catholic cleric stands against ‘fundmentalism’

Guest Post by Morbo

Back in July, I criticized a Roman Catholic cardinal, Christoph Schonborn, for writing an opinion piece defending “intelligent design.” I asserted that Schonborn was dragging the church back to its anti-intellectual past.

In an effort to be “fair and balanced,” I must note that not all church cardinals are behaving like Neanderthals. Recently, Cardinal Paul Poupard, head of the Pontifical Council for Culture, told reporters during a Vatican press conference that the church must pay heed to the scientific community. Failure to do so, Poupard said, risks pushing the church toward “fundamentalism.” It was a welcome and much-needed corrective to Schonborn. Observed Poupard:

“The faithful have an obligation to listen to that which secular modern science has to offer, just as we ask that knowledge of the faith be taken in consideration as an expert voice in humanity.” […]

“We…know the dangers of a religion that severs its links with reason and becomes prey to fundamentalism.”

Imagine that — a church that would actually listen to the secular world every now and then, and even learn from it. Wouldn’t that be a refreshing change?

The cardinal even brought up Galileo, telling reporters, “The permanent lesson that the Galileo case represents pushes us to keep alive the dialogue between the various disciplines, and in particular between theology and the natural sciences, if we want to prevent similar episodes from repeating themselves in the future.”

A monsignor who was also on hand, Gianfranco Basti, specifically defended evolution as more than a theory. “A hypothesis,” he noted, “asks whether something is true or false. [Evolution] is more than a hypothesis because there is proof.”

Basti heads up something called the Science, Theology and Ontological Quest, a Vatican project that seeks to remind church members that there need be no conflict between religion and science.
Not all Catholics will be persuaded by these statements, of course. People like Pat Buchanan, who insist that the bishops must be obeyed when they criticize legal abortion, feel free to ignore them anytime they say anything even vaguely liberal.

But statements like Poupard’s and Basti’s are important because they remind the world that the Catholic Church has an intellectual tradition and that not all clergy are eager to race back to the Middle Ages. Clearly some Catholic clerics and layperson would happily surrender modernism in a rush to embrace fundamentalism and align with Jerry Falwell. Poupard’s comments are a welcome reminder that that won’t happen without a fight. More power to him.

The positions of the Catholic Church often do not directly answer the questions raised in this debate. Note the Pope’s recent

This has been interpreted by intelligent design advocates as supporting their positions.

  • What we tend to forget is the crazy evangelicals and conservatives, the Robertsons and Dobsons, do not represent all the religious views in this country. We would do well to remember there are millions of well-meaning, tolerant Christians who are, like you and me, appalled at the thought of lynching gays and Muslims, and, like you and me, would much rather put their efforts to more Christian goals, like eradicating poverty and disease. Liberals and Christians have lots to talk about, lots of common interests. We need to stop letting the crazies divide us, stop letting the crazies convince the rest of the people that we hate America, that we hate religion, etc, etc. And we also need to wake up ourselves and stop believing what the crazies convince us, that religious America has necessarily lost its way.

  • Here is a quote from my favorite religious leader, the Dalai Lama: “I have often said that if science proves facts that conflict with Buddhist understanding, Buddhism must change accordingly. We should always adopt a view that accords with the facts.”

    When do you ever see religious fundamentalists change their thinking when presented with the facts?

    By the way, he is speaking this afternoon (Saturday, 11-12) at the Society for Neuroscience’s Annual Meeting at the Washington Convention Center.

  • The recent Pope, John Paul II, said much the same as the Dalai Lama. See “Faith can never contradict reason” from L’Osservatore Romano, 4 Nov 1992. He was the one who officially “forgave” Galileo at long last.

    I keep hoping, for the sanity of everyone, that the mainline churches will, on their own, begin to put the whacy fundies and hatemongers in their place. I don’t know why the’ve let the Falwells, Robertsons and Dobsons run rampant, but they have. Maybe they just envy their money and membership drives; seems to me their primary job is to witness, to tell the truth as they see it, however poor it leaves them. Jesus wasn’t a banker or a tv whore, nor did he give a damn about politics (which, after all, is what did him in).

  • Let’s not go overboard here. I imagine the majority of clergy believe that God exists, is benevolent, and is responsible for our current existance. Of course they will. They believe God guides all sorts of aspects of our lives, why wouldn’t that extend to DNA? So maybe they believe God has a hand in our evolution…so what? The danger of the intelligent design theory is it’s scientific assertion that humans could not have evolved by non-supernatural methods. That claim is the both the hallmark of ID and two steps past the boundary between faith and science. It’s fine to spiritually believe whatever you want. It only becomes an issue when you conflate science and theology. I think the church has carefully avoided making any scientific claims, and short of that, people should allow them to think what they like.

    As mentioned, the reason the Catholic Church no longer makes scientific claims, is because of people like Galileo. It’s fairly righteous of them to warn their younger peers that they’re making a mistake.

  • We are going to have five Catholic Supreme court justiisces soon. If a new pope changes his mind about faith contradicting reason we are in trouble.

  • Comments are closed.