Careless whispers — a mystery solved (I think)

Following up on an item from yesterday, the “mystery” surrounding Mitt Romney, Thursday’s debate, and that odd whisper seems to have been resolved.

If you’re just joining us, Romney was asked whether he’d follow in Reagan’s footsteps on Social Security policy. When Romney paused to answer, the television audience could hear a distinct, audible whisper from someone who says, “Raise taxes” (or, possibly, “raised taxes”). A moment later, Romney said, “I’m not going to raise taxes.”

Adding to the intrigue, MSNBC published an item about the whisper yesterday afternoon, and then removed it without explanation.

Given the speculation, MSNBC responded last night with a more detailed explanation.

While the buzz over the incident was loud enough that Brian Williams, Russert’s co-moderator and anchor of “NBC Nightly News,” felt the need to weigh in, the grassy-knoll types will be disappointed. Romney’s innocent, the network said.

Domenico Montanaro, an NBC News political researcher, wrote on the network’s political blog, First Read: “After reviewing the tapes, NBC determined that an open mic[rophone] picked up a whisper from the audience.

“It is unclear who it is that says it, but it was not said by any of the candidates, was not heard in the hall and, more importantly, not heard by the candidates.”

In case you’re wondering how a microphone could pick up a whisper from someone in the audience (who wasn’t mic’d), Rachel Sklar notes that Paul Tash, editor and chairman of the St. Petersburg Times, had a live microphone, and he was sitting in the audience at the time.

And what of the missing MSNBC’s First Read item, which was published online and then yanked without disclosure? There’s a reasonable explanation for that, too.

There has been a lot of confusion over a whispered moment from last night’s debate — someone saying what we believe was “not raise taxes” after a question from Tim Russert on Reagan and social security. We put the following post up last night immediately following what we and several First Read commenters heard.

For full disclosure, the way it works for us when we’re liveblogging is our contributors, who are either on site at the location or in D.C. or elsewhere, will usually send me posts via e-mail. While I am watching the debate, I read the dispatches, post if applicable after quickly editing and put up my own thoughts. Regular e-mail questions get mixed in sometimes. I put this one up, but when I did, Lauren Appelbaum wrote me and said it was not necessarily intended to be a post but actually just a question to me if I knew who made the “taxes” comment. Being in South Carolina, following the Democrats for their primary and not on site in Florida, I didn’t know. We thought it might have simply been our control room cueing a question, which then didn’t seem to warrant a post, since that would be very inside baseball. So, I took it down.

After some of the confusion today, we are putting it back up for those that haven’t seen it.

I have a hunch some will continue to raise questions about all of this, but it seems like a mystery solved, doesn’t it?

It’s good to see the Republicans parsing responses. I was beginning to think it was a purely Democratic affliction.

  • Call me cynical, but I have no faith that many of these candidates can actually stand at a podium and think at the same time.

    The widespread mendacity and obfuscation we see throughout the various campaigns may actually be more of a combination of candidates trying to cover up their lack of knowledge as well as bambozzlement.

    Personally, I wouldn’t put it past the Romney campaign (or any of the Republican candidates for that matter) to try and feed him some prompting assisstance.

  • youtube has a second instance posted where you hear “support” whispered and he immediately changes his response to include this. He was being fed…

    He is a cheat and has cheated from the beginning…you want him…have him!

  • Are they trying to say that whispers were picked up on two separate occasions, and then, by sheer coincidence, Romney utters the same words that were supposedly picked up from the audience.

    Bullshit!

    They try to say it came from Paul Tash’s mic, but that would mean that he only said 3 -4 words the entire night, and those happened to be whispers.

    Bullshit!

    American’s should be outraged, but this will be forgotten by Monday in the Mainstream Press.

  • If you listen to the tape more carefully and on high volume, you can actually hear a SECOND piece of the whisper right as Romney begins to respond. So the full whisper is, “He raised taxes. I’m not–”, and then Romney says “I’m not going to raise taxes.” This additional evidence seems to preclude any possibility that the whisper came from Brian Williams or another neutral member of the audience or film crew. There are also other moments during the debate when a faint whispering can be heard, although the words are inaudible. Furthermore, the sheer fact that Romney’s language directly mirrored the whisper indicates that it was likely a prompt, and that he must have been listening closely.

  • What’s strange to me is that the Wall Street Journal chose today to run a story about voices. I wonder what their message is…

    This may be the grassiest of knolls, but it is strange given the timing of the buzz.

    And I love how MSNBC used the word “bandit” to cutesie up the story.

  • What strikes me is that this was a very stupid question. If Russert wanted Romney to swear he would not raise taxes he should have asked him that directly. It is numbing that at a time our country is hopelessly in debt we are treated to shallow questions and even shallower answers by our presidential candidates.

  • I seriously doubt that anyone on the Romney campaign, or in the audience, could be that quick on the uptake. Whoever said “he raised taxes” had to know in advance what the question was going to be. That leads to the thought that maybe Russert was being “coached” by some MSNBC staffer in the wings that was near a microphone, whether or not it was intended for him to hear it. It would be really nice if the person who said it would come forward and explain it to everyone. Anyone who thinks the Romney campaign could cook this up *and* be that quick on the uptake is giving them too much credit.

  • Why did Romney not include the whisper in his version on Youtube?

    Why did the audio come only on one channel????

  • John Doe,

    Can you explain the significance of one channel audio for those of us that aren’t knowledgable on audio?

  • Mystery solved? I don’t think so. I’ve been a professional audio engineer for 13 years, and I can tell you with 100% certainty that the whisperer had a microphone directly in front of his mouth. If it was Paul Tash of the St. Petersberg Times, shouldn’t he have said something by now?

    There is also more to this, apparently. Read this:

    http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/romney-whispe-1.html

    If you turn up the bit between when the voice says “he raised taxes” and Romney starts to answer, it appears that the whisperer continues on to say “I’m not gonna”… which is exactly what Romney starts to say. MSNBC’s excuses for this are really starting to look farfetched. They are either extremely lazy, or they are lying. If they are lying, they are complicit in this.

    If this is a feed for Romney, there are two possible scenarios that I can see. First… Romney’s staff set up the wireless feed, and it happened to be on a similar frequency to what they were using for some of the wireless mics on stage. Under such a scenario, it is certainly plausible that the wireless receiver for one of the house mics was intermittently picking up Romney’s feed by mistake.

    The second possibility… and worse… is that MSNBC’s own audio people were in on it. In other words… whoever was running the audio for the event was also running candidate feeds through auxes on the same audio console. Whoever the audio guy was made the very big mistake of routing Romney’s feed to the main mix for everyone to hear.

    With the way MSNBC’s story is changing every few hours, I see the second scenario as quite plausible at this point.

  • Oh would it be fun to hijack the mike and whisper choice phrases into Romney’s ear like..

    “I’m an empty suit”, or “I hate dogs”

    and then watch him realize what he has just said.

  • The most plausible explanation, as has been posted elsewhere, is that the candidates were provided the questions ahead of time by MSNBC and that Romney was using an electronic device that *he* was actuating to prompt him on his answers. It would be like having electronic “notes”. Could be that the candidates refused to participate in this debate unless the questions were provided in advance – given the treatment they got from CNN earlier in the season. This scenario would explain why MSNBC is not being completely forthright in their answers. Plus, if you listen carefully to the whispered voice, it sounds a lot more like Romney’s than anybody else that was participating. I still don’t believe that anybody would be quick enough to realize that Russert was going to refer to Reagan’s raising taxes unless they knew what the question was in advance.

  • Comments are closed.