Censure resolution to get hearing, floor vote

What’s the latest on Sen. [tag]Russ Feingold[/tag]’s (D-Wis.) [tag]censure[/tag] resolution? For one thing, it’s stuck at three co-sponsors (Feingold, Boxer, and Harkin), which is where it’s been for a couple of weeks.

Regardless, Senate Judiciary Chairman [tag]Arlen Specter[/tag] (R-Pa.) said yesterday that he’s moving forward with a scheduled hearing on the resolution, in advance of a vote on the Senate floor.

Specter said he doesn’t know how the controversial resolution will play out before his Judiciary Committee, but suggested it could be brought to the floor under a rare procedural move. The panel could vote to defeat the bill, but send it to the floor anyway with an unfavorable recommendation.

“I think this one may well be the exception” to regular order, Specter said. “We’ll have a hearing on it. We’ll take in do course what the committee action will be.”

According to Roll Call, the Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing tomorrow, and Feingold said he will be prepared for the discussion. In fact, he already has two interesting witnesses lined up.

Making arguments about the extreme seriousness of the warrantless wiretapping issue — and the need for a Congressional response — will be noted constitutional lawyer Bruce Fein, who served in President Ronald Reagan’s Department of Justice as Deputy Attorney General, and author and legal commentator John Dean, who served at Richard Nixon’s White House counsel before breaking with the president to reveal the high crimes and misdemeanors of the Watergate era.

Fridays are generally pretty quiet in the Senate; tomorrow should be rather lively.

I do hope the story is put out before late afternoon Friday, but I’d be willing to bet that it won’t. This is Specter’s way of burying censure once and for all.

  • What do you want to bet that these two guys are going to be labeld “disgruntled former Nixon/Reagan employees”?

    Count on it.

  • I’m sure it will come out that they’re partisan Democrats and there’s something weird about their personal lives.

  • Interesting of Spector to have the debate about the Censure after the hearing with the FISC judges. I’m sure there was enough wiggle room in the testimony for the Republicanite members to vote against Censure, but it would really be nice to see them all on the record for trashing the constitution and the bill of rights.

  • Good, get the votes down on paper. Let’s see where they really stand so when they’re called to task on it they can’t back down. Cowards, the whole lot of them.

  • Whoa, sounds like we’d all better be writing and calling our papers and news stations between now and tommorrow to make sure that they’ve got some coverage about this. And make sure we mention censure in our letters to newspapers and calls to TV and radio talk shows.

    Tell your friends & colleagues, and let ’em know that the Senate is discussing it.

  • Can anyone tell me when this will happen? I mean what time will it be on C-Span so that I don’t miss it.

  • You know, if these guys are SERIOUS, they’ll call to task EVERYONE who knew about it. On both sides of the aisle.

    Yeah, right.

    Congresscritters knew about it. But it wasn’t until the media blew the whistle that the terrorists figured it out. I’ll bet that sigint traffic has plummeted since the publicity.

    A gleeful democrat, crying “Censure! Censure!” may well be crying “we want their heads!” after more security-conscious terrorists strike another U.S. target.

  • Comments are closed.