Cheney explains his memo philosophy

Dick Cheney, based on nothing but on-the-job performance, is unlikely to receive kind treatment from historians, but The Examiner noted today there’s another reason for scholars to get frustrated with the Vice President.

Anyone awaiting an anthology of Vice President Dick Cheney’s papers might be in for a disappointment.

Speaking on Friday at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library & Museum in Grand Rapids, Mich., Cheney said that because he served as President Ford’s chief of staff, “researchers like to come and dig through my files, to see if anything interesting turns up.”

“I want to wish them luck,” he quipped, eliciting laughter from the crowd, “but the files are pretty thin. I learned early on that if you don’t want your memos to get you in trouble some day, just don’t write any.”

That’s cute, but it’s also incomplete. Cheney actually writes memos all the time, but he’s come up with a special classification for his materials that mandates that his memos be treated as if they were actually classified.

Stealth is among Cheney’s most effective tools. Man-size Mosler safes, used elsewhere in government for classified secrets, store the workaday business of the office of the vice president. Even talking points for reporters are sometimes stamped “Treated As: Top Secret/SCI.” Experts in and out of government said Cheney’s office appears to have invented that designation, which alludes to “sensitive compartmented information,” the most closely guarded category of government secrets. By adding the words “treated as,” they said, Cheney seeks to protect unclassified work as though its disclosure would cause “exceptionally grave damage to national security.”

Across the board, the vice president’s office goes to unusual lengths to avoid transparency. Cheney declines to disclose the names or even the size of his staff, generally releases no public calendar and ordered the Secret Service to destroy his visitor logs. His general counsel has asserted that “the vice presidency is a unique office that is neither a part of the executive branch nor a part of the legislative branch,” and is therefore exempt from rules governing either. Cheney is refusing to observe an executive order on the handling of national security secrets, and he proposed to abolish a federal office that insisted on auditing his compliance.

In the usual business of interagency consultation, proposals and information flow into the vice president’s office from around the government, but high-ranking White House officials said in interviews that almost nothing flows out. Close aides to Cheney describe a similar one-way valve inside the office, with information flowing up to the vice president but little or no reaction flowing down.

Of course, some written materials may, despite Cheney’s wishes, someday see the light of the day. Perhaps that’s why there are industrial shredders stopping by the Naval Observatory?

The more these hypocrites demand secrecy for themselves in the operation of the people’s government the more they demand that the privacy of the people be placed in the hypocrites’ data banks. Maybe someday the complete records of Cheney, the Bushes, et al will be made public by invading their Stalinist hideouts and literally throwing their records out to the public as was done in the fall of East Germany.

  • Well, maybe Congress can at least cut out paper/pen/pencils and related supplies, and possibly computers, form the OVP budget. Doesn’t sound like they really need them.

  • Big Dick wages illegal wars, destroys important CIA assets, loots the treasury, craps all over the constitution, and then shreds his paper trail. But Nancy Pelosi says that these criminals aren’t worth impeaching.

    Makes me wonder what they have on her.

  • Reminds me of something else the Dick-tator said: “An investigation [of the events of 9/11] must not interfere with ongoing efforts to prevent the next attack, because without a doubt, a very real threat of another, perhaps more devastating attack still exists.”

    The important thing to remember is the fear brought about by 9/11, not the secrecy of the brownshirts unlawfully occupying The People’s Executive Branch. Just rest assured that Dick&Bush testified to the 9/11 Commission together, in private, not under oath, and without transcript.

  • Cheney acts just like a mob boss and is hated because he doesn’t feel he needs to be responsible to the American people. He has dared anyone to stop him and takes great pleasure in “getting it over” on the American public. How someone this despicable ever got to be vice president should be a lesson to us all. He should have been impeached long ago and has brought shame and dishonor to our nation. It should have been Pelosi’s top priority to impeach Cheney yet she has blocked impeachment every step of the way thereby being complicit in the shame Cheney has brought to our Country.

    btw***Interesting that the man size Mosler safe in Cheney’s office was provided to him by Cunningham’s buddy for the exact amount of the cost of the “Dukestir” Yacht. That conspiracy leads all the way to Cheney…and thus the importance of stooping the investigation by firing the USA promoting it. Ironic eh?

  • JKap: Dick&Bush testified to the 9/11 Commission together, in private, not under oath, and without transcript.

    And without an outcry from the Democrats either, which is the saddest part of the episode. After the nation’s worst terrorist attack, the Democrats curled up into the fetal position and haven’t moved much since.

  • ***hey JKap*** as important as the fact that Bush and Cheney testified together is the video of Bush being asked the question of “why” they had to testify together. You’ve never seen a more obvious showing of nervous dishonesty coming out of Bush’s mouth and the more he tried to avoid answering the more the question was asked and the worse he got.

    There’s an excellent documentary out titled ” Zeitgeist” which shows this sequence as well as proving that 9/11 was an inside job. Truly amazing video. I guess it took awhile for Cheney to teach Bush how to be a better sociopath.

  • Marc (re #1) think Ceausescu.

    That’s the ghosts of hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed from Iraq shrieking, I’m just channeling.

  • A question for any lawyers out there. Can the next president override any executive orders issued by this president? Or are there inherent restriction that limit a future presidents ability to undo such orders?
    Thanks in advance.

  • Well, I’m still in law school, but executive orders do not carry over. What happens with a new president is that he/she typically signs an order carrying over those orders he/she likes from the past, and the rest simply die off.

  • Comments are closed.