Cheney’s misguided alienation strategy

If you haven’t read the transcript of Dick Cheney’s speech yesterday in Washington, you owe it to yourself to take a look. It’s rare to see a constitutional officer deliver such breathtakingly dishonest remarks in public. Cheap shots, demonstrable falsehoods, over-the-top rhetoric, straight-faced mendacity … it’s all here, in about 600 words. If it weren’t pathological, it’d almost be impressive.

“[I]n Washington you can ordinarily rely on some basic measure of truthfulness and good faith in the conduct of political debate. But in the last several weeks we have seen a wild departure from that tradition.”

It’s like watching a Twilight Zone episode. A man who’s completely abandoned “truthfulness and good faith” is accusing others of dishonesty and exploiting the war for political gain. It’s as if Shaquille O’Neal mocked someone for being tall.

Cheney summarized all of the new WH talking points nicely: Dems had the same intelligence, now they’re contradicting themselves, and they’re undermining the troops. The claims have no basis in reality, but then again, that’s never stopped Cheney before.

But instead of analyzing every word of Cheney’s speech, I wanted to highlight one sentence that has the most political salience.

“American soldiers and Marines are out there every day in dangerous conditions and desert temperatures…and back home a few opportunists are suggesting they were sent into battle for a lie.”

What Cheney doesn’t seem to appreciate is that those “few opportunists” he’s dismissing happen to be a majority of the country. While the VP wasn’t looking, the concerns raised by congressional Democrats and the concerns raised by regular ol’ outside-the-beltway Americans became the exact same thing. It might make the White House “comeback” strategy a little tricky.

Over the last week, two national polls (Gallup and NBC/WSJ) showed a clear majority of the country now believes that Bush deliberately misled the country into the war. Cheney can try, but it’s tough to reject the beliefs of 100 million people and tell them to stop believing their lying eyes.

Indeed, the new WH offensive has a variety of flaws (it relies on blatant falsehoods, for example), but among the more serious political problems is its ability to alienate the very people the Bush gang wants to win over.

In 2002 and 2003, most Americans, like many Democrats in Congress, heard their president and believed that Saddam Hussein was an imminent threat with WMD and ties to al Queda. A majority supported invading Iraq in order to keep the United States safe. Since then, Americans have learned a lot — including inconvenient truths the administration suppressed before the war — and now they’re not happy. The more they discover, the more the electorate grows angry and disappointed, and the more support for war plummets.

According to the new Bush/Cheney talking points, these Americans are not only unpatriotic, they’re hypocrites. If your opinion changes as you learn facts, Bush and Cheney insist, then you’re contradicting yourself — and you’re hurting the troops. Left with few choices, this is the strategy the geniuses at the White House have come up with.

If the White House was simply targeting Harry Reid and John Kerry, it’d be crass, cynical, and wrong. But as it turns out, the Bush gang is inadvertently picking a fight with everyone who believes the war was a mistake, which means the Bush gang has a bigger fight on its hands than they realize.

What do you call a man who boldly lies in the face of the public? When all of his lies are on video?
Does he think we’re a nation of ditto monkeys?
Fucking lying chicken hawk, and worse, war profiteer.

  • If your opinion changes as you learn facts, Bush and Cheney insist, then you’re contradicting yourself — and you’re hurting the troops.

    Libs should make a big deal about this. The polls are on our side. We should tell the 60+% who oppose the war that Bush is attacking them. Maybe Bush could then fall into the 20s for approval rating.

  • The ads, solely of Cheney’s comments leading up to the war, juxtaposed with the truth as discovered after the war, should be run early and often.

  • I have always wonder if the desire to create their own reality was pathalogical for the administration and Bush/Cheney in particular. Now I know it is. Seriously, bunker living and obsession has so totally warped their thinking that Cheney can say shit like this with a straight face. I wonder if he needs to be removed from the VP slot based on his lack of sanity.

  • Morons.
    They are acting as if they still have popular support.
    When a majority of the country believes that they were mislead into war, you don’t attack the critics because the public ARE the critics. The way for the administration to deal with this public distrust is to PROVE that they didn’t mislead the public.
    However, almost three years into this debacle all the information that seeps out seems to prove the opposite.

    So the only other options are to 1) manufacture new evidence, 2) sidetrack everyone with a diversion, or 3) find a good fall guy (Cheney).

    Going back to this typical tired old playbook might work and divert everyone’s attention for a little while (I’ve noticed that the AP reporters in particular have swallowed the new White House line hook and sinker), but ultimately doesn’t deal with the underlying public perception. And until this perception is addressed head on, it will only perpetuate itself.

    Of course, since they did mislead the public there’s really not much they can do.

    Hopefully they jettison Cheney not start another war.

  • My immediate reaction was this is a brilliant move. Bring out a man nearly twice as unpopular as you are (Cheney with a 19 percent approval rating, Bush at 36) to boost your polls and engage in some old-fashioned mudslinging. All while the majority of the American public thinks the Iraq war was a mistake and begun under false pretenses. Surely, SURELY, this will turn things around for the Bush Administration.

  • The cardinal rule in the bullfighting world is that you never cape a bull before it goes into the ring, otherwise it learns the matador’s tricks and won’t be fooled by them again.

    The Bush administration has been caping the American public for years now and the old tricks just aren’t working anymore. They’re starting to get worried but have no idea of any other way to behave so they just keep going back to the same old-same old.

    Sucks to be them, doesn’t it?

  • Their strategery is to convince the public
    that the lying, traitorous Dems
    bamboozled them into thinking the
    war was a bad thing and that it’s
    not going well. It’s too soon to tell
    if will work or not, but it’s pretty
    clever, I think. Many of the Dems,
    like Hillary and Biden, are pretty
    much in the Bush camp anyway.
    Painting a few rogue Democrats
    as dastardly flip-floppers out to
    confuse the public and destroy the
    morale of our brave troops while
    aiding and abetting the terrorists
    could be effective. We’ll see.

    Even Bill Clinton’s recent the war
    was a “big mistake” was anything
    but a repudiation of the invasion,
    as some liberal blogs headlined
    it, including Huff-Po. Clinton did not
    condemn the war – he simply said
    it was poorly executed.

    So you’ve got a situation where the
    Big Dems aren’t coming out against
    the invasion, and the Republicans
    are demonizing the few who are.
    The lack of Democratic unity on this
    issue is being exploited.

    Maybe it will work.

  • It looks like Cheney’s remarks haven’t deterred Democrats from criticizing the administrations Iraq policy. According to Reuters ,

    “The U.S. cannot accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. It is time to bring them home,” said Rep. John Murtha Pennsylvania, a senior Democrat on the subcommittee that oversees military spending

    Also, if you haven’t already seen it take a look at this new high production value propaganda from the RNC. The DNC has to come up with a solid counter campaign. CB’s idea that Cheney is attacking the majority of Americans would be a good starting point.

  • My favorite line is:

    “Senator Wallop stayed in the lead, and was in fact one of the very first national leaders to advocate a defense of our country against ballistic missile attack.”

    Cuz what’s so funny is that now we know that Star Wars itself was in fact a myth cooked up by Reagan to scare the Russians and that the feasibility of it (at the time) was impossible and could only be replicated in video game style on television. But heh, it was a cool program (though going against existing treaties) and it looked even cooler on TV, and seemingly it scared the Russians.

    Cheney points to another lie!

  • I think this strategy will backfire though because once the Republican echo chamber gets ahold of these new talking points, which are ridiculous, the media will point out the falsehoods. Oh shit, maybe it will work.

  • The White House pushed hard for intelligence favoring a war. Bush lied about not having plans for a war on his desk and spent months arguing that it was premature to discuss going to war, and then shifted overnight to it being unpatriotic to argue against the war at such a late date. The White House arm-twisted Congress into authorizing force primarily as a way of giving him credibility in pressuring Saddam and painted anyone who opposed the war as a traitor. The forces that they moved to the Middle East as a sensible precaution suddenly turned into another credibility problem if we didn’t go ahead and use them. White House officials from top to bottom lied to us about the WMD, and they lied about building a meaningful coalition. Worse than all of the above, after selling 85% of the American public on the war, they then totally mismanaged the occupation, with one hideous blunder after another, allowing looting, failing to secure ammunition dumps, failing to supply enough armor for the troops, establishing torture, secret prisons, and denial of habeas corpus as American operating principles, and so on and so forth. And now they want us to believe that they weren’t deliberately deceiving everybody, and that original supporters aren’t justified in changing their minds about the war given how hideously badly the Bush administration has handled the aftermath? That’s sickening. Shame on them.

    I want a democratic sweep next year, followed by impeachment of both Bush and Cheney, and war crimes trials.

  • As someone said on one of the other blogs (sorry, I don’t remember which one), Cheney’s goal is not to convince anyone who’s already seen the truth. The goal is to provide the base with something to say, however false it might be.

    Cheney has to give supporters some comeback line in case they’re confronted by doubts. The line doesn’t have to be true, or even make sense. It just has to make the lambs stop crying. If the White House doesn’t provide the base with some kind of response, the base has no mental walls to hide behind.

  • Comments are closed.