Chertoff rumors pick up steam

Rumors about Michael Chertoff replacing Alberto Gonzales as Attorney General are looking increasingly reliable.

This morning, CNN’s Suzanne Malveaux reported that “very senior level sources” inside the administration are telling her that Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff will replace Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.

Additionally, these sources say Chertoff will be replaced at Homeland Security by Clay Johnson III, the Deputy Director for Management at the Office of Management and Budget.

I watched the TP clip and it’s worth noting that CNN’s Malveaux initially quoted “several senior administration officials,” and then clarified to say “very senior.” For reporters covering the White House, that’s a designation limited to a small circle of top people in the West Wing.

It could be a trial balloon, of course, but to dish to CNN with this level of specificity suggests this accurately reflects the White House’s thinking, at least for now.

Other Attorney General-related news this hour:

* Gonzales delivered a very brief public statement at 10:30. He did not respond to questions, and did not explain why he is resigning. It was, perhaps, the most unusual public resignation announcement I’ve ever seen.

* Bush is now scheduled to comment on Gonzales’ resignation at 11:50. If Gonzales’ appearance was any indication, the president won’t have much to say, either.

* Reporters caught wind of Gonzales’ pending resignation yesterday, and an NYT reporter asked the departing AG about the rumors 24 hours ago. Gonzales said the rumors were false. It’s hardly the most striking lie he’s told lately, but it seems to have annoyed quite a few reporters.

* Clay Johnson, the apparent frontrunner to replace Chertoff (who is the apparent frontrunner to replace Gonzales), may have a tough confirmation fight of his own. He has no experience in security policy, immigration, disaster response, transportation, or anything else the DHS does. Johnson’s chief qualification seems to be that he’s a life-long buddy of the president.

* House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.): “It is a sad day when the Attorney General of the United States resigns amid a cloud of suspicion that the system of justice has been manipulated for political purposes. More than accountability, we need answers. Unfortunately, the continued stonewalling of the White House in the U.S. Attorney scandal has deprived the American people of the truth. If the power of the prosecutor has been misused in the name of partisanship, we deserve a full airing of the facts. The responsibility to uncover these facts is still on the Congress, and the Judiciary Committee in particular.”

* From Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.): “Alberto Gonzales was never the right man for this job. He lacked independence, he lacked judgment, and he lacked the spine to say no to Karl Rove. This resignation is not the end of the story. Congress must get to the bottom of this mess and follow the facts where they lead, into the White House.”

* House Speaker Nancy Pelosi: “The resignation of Attorney General Gonzales is long overdue. The rampant politicization of federal law enforcement that occurred under his tenure seriously eroded public confidence in our justice system. The President must now restore credibility to the office of the Attorney General. Given the serious loss of public trust and the disarray at the Department of Justice, the American people must have absolute confidence in the integrity of the next Attorney General as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer and as defender of our constitution independent of political influence. The President’s nominee must have the character and stature to command that confidence.”

* Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who has also been rumored to be a possible Gonzales replacement, said, “This will not bring peace. This will bring more chaos.”

* Joke #1: Gonzales resigned to “spend more time with his defense lawyer.”

* Joke #2: “Gonzales reportedly concluded that his tenure had become too much of a distraction from the administration’s other lawbreaking.”

Great — an AG who dictates law based on his ‘gut’. On the other hand, that’s clearly a step up from an AG who had no principles whatsoever…

  • Joke No. 3: “I don’t really recall being the Attorney General, but some guy who said he’s the president as well as a friend of mine told me I was, so…I thought I should resign to spend more time trying to remember all of that. Wait – who am I again? And who are you people? Oh, I get it now: Live from New York, it’s Saturday Night!!! No?…darn! Always wanted to do that…Oh, well, whatever job I have, I’m quitting.”

  • Joke #4 Gonzales resigned to spend more time watching Nancy Pelosi on CSPAN doing absolutely nothing of consequence to bring a bunch of criminals to justice and restore the constitution.

    yeah, it’s not really funny.

  • “It’s hardly the most striking lie he’s told lately, but it seems to have annoyed quite a few reporters.”
    Ruffling the feathers of the MSM? A Crime Against humanity! /snark.

    “Johnson’s chief qualification seems to be that he’s a life-long buddy of the president.”
    Seems to be the only one required to work in this admin. Worked out great for New Orleans.

  • “This will not bring peace. This will bring more chaos.”

    Does Cornyn know what Bush has up his sleeve?

  • Fire up the popcorn. Schumer was just on CNN (between the Micheal Vick stories) and said that Gonzo’s Justice Dept had less credibility than FEMA – a not too subtle shot at Chertoff.

  • I give up – there is no artistic or political imagination great enough to be able to imagine al this shit, and I lived through Watergate when I was old enough and active enough to be on the administration’s enemies list. Seven years ago, in the middle of the campaign, if you had told me how radical these traitors were – even me, who has nothing good to say about any Republican since Eisenhower! – I would have said you were a paranoid looney.

    Poor Alberto. Ol’ Massa’s house boy found out what happens when the house boy becomes the story and Ol’ Massa has to pay attention to him.

  • I hope Congress has the balls for a protracted confirmation fight. And some thumbs down votes.

    If the Bush Administration was smart, they’d nominate someone like Comey or Fitzgerald. But I seriously doubt they’ll choose a competent, independent thinker, even from their own party.

  • Clay Johnson III is being mentioned as a replacement for Chertoff as director of the Department of Homeland Security. Here is what it says about his resume at Wikipedia:

    “He was previously President of Horchow Mail Order and President of Neiman Marcus Mail Order, the Deputy Director/Chief Operating Officer of the Dallas Museum of Art, and held positions at Frito-Lay and Wilson Sporting Goods.

    “He was a classmate of President George W. Bush at Phillips Academy, roommate and Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity brother at Yale University, where he helped pull down the goalposts after a Princeton game, and received his B.A. He received his S.M. degree from the MIT Sloan School of Management in 1970.”

    And his Homeland Security qualifications are….???? Well, he’s obviously a loyal Bushie. Sounds like another “Heck of a job, Brownie,” doesn’t he?

  • Racerx said:

    Joke #4 Gonzales resigned to spend more time watching Nancy Pelosi on CSPAN doing absolutely nothing of consequence to bring a bunch of criminals to justice and restore the constitution.

    Yeah, Henry Waxman and John Conyers are just loose cannons with their pointed hearings aimed at putting the brakes on this lawlessness. I’m sure Speaker Pelosi has nothing to do with the direction of these committees.

    It’s too bad that Nancy acknowleged political reality and disappointed some of the long knives when she said that impeachment is off the table. Does anyone here believe that if either of these two House committees manages to build an actual record, based on evidence and testimony, that shows that the president or vice president committed crimes, that impeachment wouldn’t become a centerpiece of said table.

    It’s one thing to want something real bad right away. It’s another thing to move in a direction and a way that might even bring it about someday. I think Nancy’s getting a bum rap on this.

  • And to think, he’d be on the Supreme Court right now, if conservatives didn’t hate Hispanics so much. He’s probably thinking the same thing.

    And now he’s completely radioactive and his career is screwed for a long, long time. Hell, he doesn’t even have an interesting enough voice or personality to get his own radio talkshow; which is still the last bastion of ruined rightwingers. I wonder if he’s a drinking man.

  • So Gonzo lied to MSM reporters again. Gee, what are they going to do about it? About as much as they did when he lied as AG: nothing. Getting your knickers in a twist when a high government official lies about his resignation, however, is ready made for the MSM media who always think the story is about them.

  • Bush could open a really distracting can of worms if he nominated Lieberman as AG. (The Republican governor would get to appoint a replacement senator.)

  • Orrin Hatch has been a vocal cheerleader for Gonzales, never backing off his position that there was no proof that Gonzales committed any wrongdoing, so yes, Hatch would be a reliably loyal toady, not inclined to clean up anything because he doesn’t see any dirt.

    Just what we need.

    And Lieberman? Good thing I haven’t had lunch yet, but I still think I threw up a little in my mouth. Blech.

  • Am I the only one worried about the possibility of Bush filling AG with a recess appointment? I know Reid made a deal with Bush where he wouldn’t do this, but Bush has never been one to keep a deal if it didn’t suit him.

  • #12 colonpowwow*** Pelosi necessarily doesn’t want to get involved because she would be in line as a replacement and so must stand back. At the same time it is pretty lame to have a philosopy that wants all those who are destroying the contstitution to commit suicide before you begin to defend the constitution. You, like them, want an assured victory before you will stand up and fight. You want all the senators to agree to indict before you even have a trial. Can’t hide behind “executive privilege” with impeachment. We already have enough evidence to impeach Cheney. The corruption of this administration is so overwhelming already that with a special impeachment investigator/prosecutor the evidence from the House would make it impossible for anyone to side with this administration. It’s a win-win situation all around and it’s not about winning or losing in the senate, it’s about standing up against this administration and for the constitution. It’s important enough to shut down the government if necessary and do nothing else in order to let this president and any future president know that these acts committed will not be tolerated. We will fight against any dictatorship, against the removal of our personal freedoms and the misuse of our military.

    Pelosi needs to do her JOB. She has so far made a point to stand against impeachment and against doing what the constitution dictates under our present circumstances. This is not political savvy, it is cowardice. It is saying when an enemy is tearing down your house, “I will not fight with them until I know for certain I can win, it would distract me from wall papering”. I mean give me a break. The time has long passed for her to put impeachment, at least of Cheney, back on the table making it a number one priority. She, like the rest who support her, are just avoiding their responsibilities until we get a new president and then they won’t have to deal with it. Somethings are worth fighting for and a majority of voters feel impeachment is one of them. Pelosi is as stubborn as the president in refusing to change course even when it has long become necessary. She refuses to even discuss it. I wish I could watch her and Bruce Fein (however it’s spelled) discuss impeachment on Bill Moyers. He would destroy her every argument.
    That said….Anyone else paranoid about why Gonzales resigned now? I mean why now? Does it have anything to do with FISA. Since his main job was protecting the president, who will do that now? Is there such a thing as planned incompetence? Chertoff certainly has no business being AG. Is John Woo banned from WH policymaking now too?

    Bush would never…never let Gonzales go without there being a major plan behind his resignation. So what’s up? I live in fear of this president everyday…of what he might do next. Impeach Cheney first.

  • I wonder if he’s a drinking man.

    No need to feel sorry for this guy- if he’s got a personal fortune, and if he’s really not going to do anything, he can be a drinking man and go on to a film-noir-esque existence.

    That’s fun.

  • Picturing Alberto standing by a bar in a huge club, drink in one hand and cigarette in the other, a jaded look on his face, and some kind of soft piano music.

    The pick-up lines will write themselves.

  • #21 bjobotts

    I understand your passion on this, but what’s the point? If the House drafts articles of impeachment on Bush (I’m just focusing on him), what are the charges? Pelosi can count (I hope you agree), does she have the votes right now to even get articles approved and past the Blue Dog Dems?

    My point is that her best FACTfinders (Bad Henry Waxman and John Conyers) are combing through the garbage that is the Bush crime family activities and it is reasonably certain that they will uncover evidence of actual criminal activity if they can ever get past the stonewalling. Now even if they do that before 2009, they are then faced with linking these crimes with the President in such a way that articles of impeachment are forthcoming. Those are the facts. It has nothing to do with so-called cowardice.

    To quote the marine from Aliens, “What are you gonna attack ’em with, bad language?”

  • “If the House drafts articles of impeachment on Bush (I’m just focusing on him), what are the charges? Pelosi can count (I hope you agree), does she have the votes right now to even get articles approved and past the Blue Dog Dems?”

    And just supposing that she did, then what? Which 17 Republicans (or 16 Republicans + 1 Lieberman) in the Senate do we think might actually vote to impeach (assuming all 50 Democrats did) under any circumstances even remotely imaginable? There may be some alternate universe where Bush gets impeached and removed from office but I don’t see it happening in this one.

  • Does anyone remember from the Bolten mess, how long a recess appointment can stay in the job? I want to say it was a year or so.

    Bush can put his (likely controversial) person in without going though the whole nomination inconvenience and that person could last until the end of his presidency.

  • Gonzo’s official expiration date is Sept 16. By which time Congress will be back in session. So, no recess appointments this time.

  • Comments are closed.