Child-labor reality show draws complaints

Saturday-contributor Morbo is off on a top-secret mission again this weekend, but should return next week. While he’s away, I thought I’d mention a story that I know he’d like. It’s about a reality show revolving around child labor, which, oddly enough, has sparked a controversy.

The ads promoting “Kid Nation,” a new reality show coming to CBS next month, extol the incredible experience of a group of 40 children, ages 8 to 15, who built a sort of idealistic society in a New Mexico ghost town, free of adults. For 40 days the children cooked their own meals, cleaned their own outhouses, formed a government and ran their own businesses, all without adult intervention or participation.

To at least one parent of a participant, who wrote a letter of complaint to New Mexico state officials after the show had completed production, the experience bordered on abuse and neglect. Several children required medical attention after drinking bleach that had been left in an unmarked soda bottle, according to both the parent and CBS. One 11-year-old girl burned her face with splattered grease while cooking.

The children were made to haul wagons loaded with supplies for more than a mile through the New Mexico countryside, and they worked long hours — “from the crack of dawn when the rooster started crowing” until at least 9:30 p.m., according to Taylor, a 10-year-old from Sylvester, Ga., who was made available by CBS to respond to questions about conditions on the set.

Apparently, the mother of the 11-year-old girl who was burned with hot grease while cooking filed a complaint, and the New Mexico Children, Youth and Families Department said the show “almost assuredly violated state laws requiring facilities that house children be reviewed and licensed.” What’s more, the agency said CBS had never contacted officials about the “project.”

I’m not a parent, but I’m not sure why so many of these kids’ families are upset now. What did they expect?

Look, I understand CBS’s motivation — they want another cheap-to-produce reality-show hit. If the NYT article is any indication, the network is optimistic that “Kid Nation” will draw huge ratings. I won’t be tuning in, but I don’t doubt that millions will.

But it seems odd to me that parents would complain now. CBS took 40 young children out of their homes and into the New Mexico desert for nearly six weeks during the middle of the school year. Those kids’ parents signed off on the deal, knowing exactly what the show was about. Sure, they didn’t expect children to be accidentally drinking bleach, but guess what? Forty unsupervised kids between the ages 8 and 15 living in unpleasant conditions for a month and a half are going to run into trouble. Indeed, CBS was counting on it.

The show’s producers should expect to get sued, the parents should’ve expected the kids to have problems, and CBS should expect to receive a few letters from viewers about the inherent flaws in lowest-common-denominator television.

who gets the conch?

  • “Let’s sign the kids up for this reality show in the desert. Something is bound to go wrong, and then what a lawsuit we’ll be able to file! How deep do you think CBS’ pockets are?”

  • If true, this is stunning. When children are used in films, their schedules are limited and rigorously monitored. Tutors are always on set, and classtime is counted against their working hours. They are never left to their own devices.

    Lawsuits should be the last of the producers’ concerns. It sounds like they broke every child labor regulation in the book.

  • I’m not a parent, but I’m not sure why so many of these kids’ families are upset now. What did they expect?

    Yeah, but what can you do? Lots of people are dumb. I remember after the first Survivor series (I basically stopped watching reality TV shows after that, but my brother and mother love all those reality shows and watch everything) this young guy who was on it started taking exception to it like he was John Savage from A Brave New World and became the voice against reality TV as a hallmark of the decline of western civilization, or something. I guess you can’t really know what something’s like until you try it. It can take that for ethical complaints that should have been obvious to come to fruition.

    I thought this show was a pretty terrible idea. What’s the point of it? To show all the children of America that they couldn’t get along with their parents help? To give parents something to use against their kids, to say, “Without me you’d have to haul your own water all day long . . . I bring home the bacon”? If so, there’s really no need for that.

    The show also reminds me of all the stupid stuff I did when I was a kid. I remember I (by accident) dropped a hot iron on my brother’s head, and he started crying. Another time, I put gum in his hair (and he started crying) and it turned out to be a lot harder to get out than I could have imagined beforehand. I hurt myself all the time when I was a kid, doing all kinds of stuff, and I got burned with grease cooking and stuff- but that’s going to happen to a lot of people who do any great amount of cooking, especially when you’re less experienced. Kids need to learn to cook.

  • I agree….the onus should be on the parents who were exploiting their own children….

    Wonder what was in the contract they signed; concerning supervision and conditions?

  • What parent wouldn’t want to put their young child into “Lord of the Flies: The Reality Show”? Sounds like a responsible and non-exploitive premise to me … if I was a complete idiot.

    People need to realize they can live happy and fulfilling lives if they never get on TV, but the lure of that 15 minutes of fame just seems too great. Plus, people need to realize that “reality” shows are very exploitive by their nature and the goal is create drama from situations where none may have in fact occured. Anyone who has been featured in one of these shows will testify that what happened on the set and what appeared on the tube are two very different things.

  • To show all the children of America that they couldn’t get along with their parents help?

    Oops, “without their parents’ help”-

    argh

  • Wow, TV exploiting people and their kids? Who’d thunk it?

    Part of me sympathizes with parents, but a larger part of me would like to take a baseball bat to these dipshits for being famewhores. petorado has got it right. Who gives a shit about fame as it is fleeting? Wonder how the Paris, Brits and Lindseys of the world are created? I don’t.

    It is parents like this that make me wonder if we should have parent licenses before allowing folks to procreate.

    This verse from Peter Larkin’s poem “This Be The Verse” should be tattooed on the forehead of every parent in this mess:
    “They fuck you up, your mum and dad,
    They may not mean to, but they do.
    They fill you with the faults they had,
    And add some extra, just for you.”

  • Wow that makes child beauty pageants sound almost benign.

    Yeah they’ll get sued. It’s Lord of the Files.

  • Strikes me as a catastrophic failure… the producers are surely coming back with some “clarification” about the safeguards that were in place, which will include at least people with expertise in child development and status as a mandatory reporters.

    Certainly parents should have made responsible choices, but where were the professionals?

  • It reminds me of Jon Stewart’s comment about the Anna Nicole show (roughly quoted from memory): “Why doesn’t someone show a shred of human decency, put down the camera and help that woman?”

  • What?
    The?
    Fuck?

    according to Taylor, a 10-year-old from Sylvester, Ga., who was made available by CBS to respond to questions about conditions on the set.

    Made available? Oh. How nice. They let her out.

    I may log an hour a month in front of the boob toob so I don’t know much about current programming, but this premise is the most fucked up thing I’ve ever heard.

    all without adult intervention or participation.

    Bullfuckingshit. At the very least, they knew that if they left a bunch of near-adolescents alone, they’d wind up with at least one pregnant near-adolescent.

    I don’t know what the parents were told and if they can whip out a deceptive contract, good luck to them. If they really did think their kids would be on their own in the desert, I’ll help Former Dan with baseball bat swinging duties.

    I don’t know why CBS would create a show that basically violates every child welfare and labour law on the books. If they insist it was “reality” and the kids were untended, they’re fucked. If they admit that it wasn’t it quite as advertised, it pokes another hole in the myth of the “reality” show. Good.

  • CBS undoubtedly waved a fat check in front of the parents’ faces which mezmerized them long enough to sign whatever the network put in front of them.

    Wow, that was pretty cynical even for me, but what the heck were these people thinking???

    If the network had any brains at all they would have included a release form in the contract excluding them from any responsibility for mishaps and problems during the production. And if the parents signed that, they’re even more retarded than they sound already.

  • I think that this is an example of why government has an important regulatory function in our society. Despite the failure of both CBS and the parents to look out for the welfare of the children, the government should. Neither the parents nor CBS look good in this.

  • Parents who want to see their kids on reality tv shows are parents who are looking for ways to get-rich-quick. Lawsuits qualify.

    I hope we get a chance to see this show. Many of the “protective” laws against children are simply designed to make sure that they are as powerless today as women were 100 years ago.

  • Now, I’ll agree that CBS needs to be hung out to dry for this one—but what about these idiotic parents? think about this for just a few moments:

    Mom-and-Dad decide to pull their darling little rugrat out of school and stuff them into the desert with a bunch of strangers. Shouldn’t this be triggering some alarm bells?

    Isn’t this something called parental neglect of a child?

    Or how about FELONY ABUSE OF A MINOR!?!!

    We might even call it CHILD ENDANGERMENT!

    And to hell with the “they were misled by the big, bad network.” If they’re that freaking stupid, then they ought to lose their kids, and be hung by their respective genitalia from some really high telephone poles.

    I say frontal lobotomies all around for these malfeasant excuses for parents!

    Period.

  • CBS undoubtedly waved a fat check in front of the parents’ faces which mezmerized them long enough to sign whatever the network put in front of them.

    I dunno…. how fat is $5,000 per kid? They must’ve given them the dough in small bills….

  • Parents — definitely the biggest culprits in the debacle
    CBS — not too far behind in culpability, with their hare-brained idea (has o one ever read The Lord of the Flies? It should have been handed out to parents and comprehension tests administered before they signed contracts)

    But I also wonder about the camera-folk. They just, robotically, filmed a kid drinking bleach because there was supposed to be no adult intervention? The mind boggles (or, as I used to say before my English improved, “it buggers my mind”)

  • libra –

    It doesn’t say that the kids were filmed drinking bleach, just that some of the kids did. If they’ve got that many kids they probably didn’t have cameras on all of them all of the time. (Plus, if it was bleach in a pop bottle the camera guys might have thought it was pop too – who expects there to be bleach in a pop bottle?)

    When I saw ads for this a while back I thought it was a phenomenally bad idea – a show where lots of stuff could go wrong AND that wouldn’t make interesting TV except in the “watching for the car wreck” sense. I didn’t think they’d be quite this stupid though.

  • Child labour is a monster which is engulfing the life of innocent children. Here specially in India child labour is a very common crime. One side we have big corporate houses of telecom,currency trading finance, IT, and almost in every field we have progressed, still we are not be able to stop child labour completely. These small children working in factories and industries, becuase they must be needy, hungry or forced by their parents or some cruel peoples, who targets them
    But this should not be happen, we must stand together to stop this hazard which is going to destroy the future of the kids.

  • Comments are closed.