Clinton gives herself another multi-million dollar loan

Three months ago, on Super Tuesday, Terry McAuliffe, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, was asked about the state of the candidate’s finances. “Look, if there’s one thing Hillary Clinton doesn’t have to worry about, it’s money,” McAuliffe said.

Shortly thereafter, the campaign acknowledged that Clinton had loaned herself $5 million. We learned this morning that it was the first in a series of personal loans.

Hillary Clinton loaned her campaign $6.4 million over the last month, CNN’s Candy Crowley has confirmed. The senator from New York previously loaned her campaign $5 million in February.

According to the most recent campaign reports filed with the Federal Election Commission, Clinton began the month of April with close to $32 million cash-on hand. But only $9 million of that total could be spent during the primary season.

The report also showed Clinton owed more than $10 million, meaning the Democratic presidential candidate was in the red even before she heavily stepped up television advertising ahead of the Pennsylvania primary in late April.

Clinton spokesperson Howard Wolfson fleshed out the details of the loan on a conference call this morning: “‘Senator Clinton gave the campaign a $5 million loan on April 11th, a $1 million loan on May 1st, and a $425,000 loan on May 5th,’ Wolfson said, adding that she’d lent the campaign the money to keep pace with Obama’s spending on TV in Pennsylvania, Indiana and North Carolina. ‘The loans are a sign of Senator Clinton’s commitment to the race, to continuing the process, and to continuing to be competitive with Senator Obama on television and in other areas,’ Wolfson said.”

Might there be additional loans on the way? Wolfson wouldn’t “rule out” the possibility.

I suspect this is part of an effort to get all of the bad news out at once, rather than letting it drag out over days.

Now, it’s worth noting that self-financing is not necessarily the end of the world. Wealthy candidates have done it before, and they’ll do it again.

The problem with Clinton’s loans, however, is what it tells us about the state of her campaign.

* She’s broke — Clinton has raised enormous sums over the last 16 months, but she’s spent it all, and she’s still losing.

* Maxed-Out Donors — Many of Clinton’s top contributors have probably already given the legal limit, making it impossible for the campaign to go back to those donors now that she’s in trouble.

* Undermined Pitch — It’s harder to reach out to new donors if they’re thinking, “Why contribute if the Clintons are already self-financing?” (It’s hard enough to convince new donors who now believe Clinton has no chance.)

* Hypocrisy — Bill Clinton recently criticized candidates who self-finance, and suggested the very approach undermines the spirit of campaign-finance laws. I’m sure he wishes he hadn’t said that.

It’s possible that these loans will help rally supporters; that’s precisely what happened in February and Clinton was able to pay back her loans fairly quickly.

But the results out of North Carolina and Indiana left the Clinton campaign in a very precarious spot, and the news of the loan(s) doesn’t help inspire confidence.

“Maxed-Out Donors — Many of Clinton’s top contributors have probably already given the legal limit, making it impossible for the campaign to go back to those donors now that she’s in trouble.”

Remember they can give both for the primary campaign and the general election. Hillary knows there is more money out there for her if she takes the nomination. That alone is a fact prodding her forward. In fact she already has a lot of that money banked from early donations.

Put her on the ticket and we get to spend it.

  • I suspect this is part of an effort to get all of the bad news out at once, rather than letting it drag out over days.

    My take is a little different. I think this is the first step of stepping down. They’re broadcasting what they’re going to need before they agree to formally concede: either major Democratic donors or the Obama campaign retiring the Clintons’ debt to themselves. If it rallies the most sappish of small donors (as Al Giordano described it, elder women on fixed incomes on whom the Clintons should be showing some mercy at this point), that’s just a plus.

    However this shakes down, I do hope Mark Penn gets stiffed.

  • If there’s one thing Hillary Clinton’s campaign doesn’t have to worry about, it’s credibility, which they ran out of a couple months ago.

  • George McGovern says give up, Hillary. You can do it now, or do it later after you become radioactive.

  • Am I correct that she is now owed 11.4 million from her campaign? Or did she repay the first 5 million?

  • Clinton began the month of April with close to $32 million cash-on hand. But only $9 million of that total could be spent during the primary season.

    So is this another reason for her to stay in the race? Can she pay herself back only if she doesn’t drop out? If she does drop out, can she still pay herself back after the convention? What happens to the war chest if she drops out?

  • If Hon. Sen. Clinton drops out, does she have to give back the for-general-election-only money? Does Edwards (if he has any)?

  • Meanwhile Hillary and Chelsea are doing a stump appearance in Shephardstown WV today. It is at a college, but it is the only Republican part of the state. Interesting.

    And yes, if she doesn’t get nominated she has to return money to donors for the GE portion.

  • Put her on the ticket and we get to spend it.

    It is an interesting comment and answers the question: Where do dead-enders go when they reach a dead-end? The answer is: A feeble and febrile attempt to place their candidate on the bottom half of the ticket. Barack Obama can raise 32 million dollars for the General election faster than you can say: Hillary is in deep debt doo-doo.

    Putting her on the ticket because of general election money is an idea not fit to be trolled.

  • I hope she’ll now be paying all of those small vendors that she’s owed money to for a while instead of using the money to continue her (pointless) campaign. For the small vendors that money they are owed is HUGE. I can’t believe she didn’t pay them earlier since she (personally) has the money.

  • #10: There was a conversation on CNN (I broke down and watched a little) about the possibility of Hillary becoming the VP nominee. A bunch of pro comments and then the final, negative (can’t remember who said it): I doubt Obama wants Bill anywhere near the WH in his administration.

    One of the commentators said he doubts Hillary wants to go back to the Senate. How about is Obama offers her a Supreme Court nomination when Stevens decides to retire? Would her nomination go through? Depends I guess on the # of Dems in the Senate after this fall’s elections.

  • I agree with Maria’s conclusion but for different reasons. I dont think she is trolling for repayment help – Clintons can make up the 11 mil in a couple of speeches. I do think she is setting up a simple decision tree: either her supporters come through against like they did after the first 5 mil loan in which case she has a reason to continue or — and her team has to know the circumstances have changed since then and that Plan B is more likely — the money issue becomes the face-saving exit strategy. “I’m a fighter, and I feel excited enough about this race and strong enough that I would love to go forward and fight for the issues of working Americans all the way to convention, and then to beat John McCain in November. But the reality is that you can’t campaign just on good ideas and a desire to serve. Campaigning takes a constant flow of money, and as this race has gone on, we simply do not have enough money to campaign at a level that is appropriate to this important election. . .”

  • Hannah,
    “I can’t believe she didn’t pay them earlier since she (personally) has the money.”

    I can.

  • It’s Wednesday morning and the HillBilly campaign is going race-baiting:

    Garin (capaign) argued that the North Carolina contest, which Obama won by 14 points, represented “progress” for Hillary because she did better among white voters there than she did in Virginia.

    Garin said that the Virginia electorate was the “closest white electorate in the country” to North Carolina, and added that Hillary “started even” among whites in North Carolina, and “ended up earning a significant win of 24 points.”

    “We obviously did not do as well as we would want or needed to among African American voters,”

    There they go again.

  • If I am understanding this correctly, does she need to stay in to pay back her personal loans from the GE fund ? If that is the case, anyone that thinks she is going out quietly with $11M of her money on the line, is on crack.

    Again, if that is case, no one she owes money to is going to tell her to drop out. They are going to get shafted if she does.

  • Terry McAuliffe was just on MSNBC and he is reaching Lanny Davis levels of delusion and hackery. I don’t know how he could keep a straight face saying garbage like “Hillary Clinton is the Eli Manning of this campaign.” I laughed so hard I nearly choked on my cookie. Terry , do yourself a favor and shut up because you’re starting to look like a dumb whore (what am I saying he’s always been a dumb whore for the Clintons!)

  • As an Obama donor, I’d be pissed if he agreed to help her retire her campaign debt. Clearly if she can loan herself millions, and if she could blow millions on the oh-so-valuable guidance she got from Mark Penn, she doesn’t need the money that I gave in order to help Obama win.

  • Nick Beaudrot pointed out that with respect to Geoff Garin’s argument referenced in #16, 22.5% of North Carolina adults hold college degrees compared to 29.5% in Virginia. Furthermore, Obama did worse among whites in TN, SC, MS, and AL. So the case is rather unconvincing, not to mention that I get a bit tired of all the demographic slicing to prove that one or the other candidate is the better one.

  • Am I the only one who is concerned by the similarities between the Clinton campaign and the Bush presidency? There’s a common thread of wishful thinking and a philosophy of “saying it makes it true.” Plus you’ve got Hillary’s newfound disdain for experts, and the cynical Rovian campaign tactics. What the hell happened?

    The longer she goes on, and the more she insults all of our intelligence with flat out denial of reality, the less I want to see her anywhere near the White House. We’ve had eight years of head in the sand leadership; why in the world would we want four more?

  • I dont think she is trolling for repayment help – Clintons can make up the 11 mil in a couple of speeches

    Not any more they can’t. Bill commanded those prices — hundreds of thousands for a single speech — because and only because his wife had a good chance at the presidency. Now that we know she won’t be elected, the fees will drop like a stone. The Clintons, especially Bill, will still garner very respectable amounts for speaking gigs, but not anywhere near the obscene prices he was getting when it was thought they were on their way back to the White House.

    Slight change of subject: Besides the $11.4 mil the Clintons lent the campaign, her camp owes Penn millions and plenty more to others. What’s the total Clinton campaign debt, does anybody know?

  • Where are the SuperDelegates today? What the heck is going on?

    These people should be coming out in droves for Obama, telling Mrs. Clinton that US Sentor is as far as she will ever go. Its over. The fat lady has sung for the fat lady.

    Now we need our SuperDelegates to announce support for Obama to get this woman off the air and keep her from detracting any more from the Democratic Party’s message. She’s truly making a mess of things.

  • Now is the best time for Mrs Clinton to retreat and retire. It’s best to quit when the Ovation is louder. Her continued stay will damage her reputation the more.

  • Who the $(*&*are Racer and Maria that they KNOW that Clinton will not get the nomination? Obama supporters are smug and really nasty, as is CNN, who gives its dwindling viewing audience nothing but snotty anti–Clinton smut. They are also slow-witted to believe that this privileged black man is going to represent them SHOULD HE become president, which I sincerely doubt. I hope she stays in until the end, which will show, not a lack of character, but that she is a fighter, and an damned feisty one too!!! It may also result in her nomination, which is rightfully hers. Also, doesn’t anyone remember the prosperous times under President Clinton, whom we could actually trust witht he welfare of the United States? That is, before the corrupt regime we have now was allowed to destroy his Presidency and erect the most ineffective government policies I have witnessed in my lifetime.

  • Has anyone researched besides me, Barack Obamas’ major sources of funding ? Obviously the mass news media is failing to fully inform the voting public and is too focused on REV WRIGHT>>>Money continues to pour in endlessly. Just to name afew… EXXON/MOBIL,(big Oil sector), EXELON(nuclear industry) ARCHER MIDLANDS DANIELS (BIG Agribusiness) JP MORGAN, CHASE,MASTERCARD( Big Finance) etc……And a smatterring of various LAW and LOBBYIST firms. SO MUCH FOR GRASS ROOTS contributions. I have heard him on stump speeches say numerous times”I have never taken money from lobbyists or corporations and I never will” He’s either a liar, an amnesiac or a classic politician who will say or do anything to get elected. What ‘s very disturbing is his voting record in Congress indicates blatant pandering to his corporate donors. CAFA is but one example, which limits the right of individuals to sue corporations for wrong doing or injury etc.. by limiting sate court venues for lawsuits to be heard. This was heavily lobbied for by corporations and supported/voted for by Senator Barack Obama. Hillarry Clinton Voted against it. JUST WHO EXACTLY IS ACTING TO PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF THE CITIZEN? OBAMA and DNC chair HOWARD DEAN have brokered a that if Obama is the chosen front runner he will bring BIG TICKET DONORS into the DNC. SO MUCH FOR DEMOCRACY. Clinton has been borrowing from her own funds to keep going due to lack of contributors who have now cast their lot with the OBAMA GROUP. THINK! EDUCATE YOURSELVES BEFORE YOU VOTE! If You are going to promote yourself as an outsider ,an agent of change and champion of the people your own record had better be consistent. At least Hillary Clinton is that. This is one former Barack Obama voter who will now support Hillary Clinton. Cat D May 7 2008

  • From Feb. to March the Obama campaign has taken in 95 million in contributions. Presently he has a surplus of about 43 million. Hillary Clinton is in the red to the tune of about 1.5 million. His corporate donors will just keep replenishing his campaign treasury until the desired outcome is effected. She has been, from the very start of this campaign , SHUT OUT . Al Gore agrees that the natural Democratic process should be allowed to continue until June 3rd. I say Keep fighting Hillary ! IT IS ONLY FAIR! The irony is she is being thwarted by a vast left wing conspiracy of the DNC. This has already been decided from the start. Some liberal and moderate journalists have already caught onto this story. UNfortunately it’s getting very limited exposure. IT IS WRONG FOR ANYONE TO UNDERMINE THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS NO MATTER WHO IS DOING IT. The shadiness with the Florida and Michigan primaries should be under further scrutiny ie.. All candidates names were on those ballots. DNC chair and Obama campaign team had his name taken off those ballots. There should ‘ve been more constructive problem solving rather than power tripping by the DNC. Those votes and delegates should be counted for they are valid.

  • Maria

    It appears that Hillary’s debt stands at more than $16M with the new loan to herself, but it could certainly be greater than that, after her big pushes in NC and Indiana.

    Slate has a fascinating piece on Hillary’s debt and what happens if she can’t pay it back:

    Sen. Hillary Clinton has lent her campaign another $6.4 million since April 1, a staffer confirmed on Wednesday. The Clinton campaign began last month with $10.3 million in unpaid bills to everyone from political consultants to caterers. If a candidate borrows money during the course of a campaign, what happens to all that debt when she drops out or the election’s over?

    It needs to be paid back—unless the candidate is the one owed the money. Lenders want their money back, and they are expected to follow the same practices they would if they were lending to a business or an individual. (If Clinton had borrowed from a bank, for example, she would be required to pay interest on the loans.) Moreover, under campaign finance law, an uncollected loan from a corporation—whether it’s a bank or a sign maker—could be construed as an illegal contribution. As a result, even though vendors don’t always require campaigns to pay upfront, they must make a good-faith effort to collect on any money they might be owed.

    To pay back those loans, a candidate is forced to do exactly the thing she wasn’t able to accomplish during the course of the campaign—raise more money. As long as someone hasn’t already given the maximum legal contribution for a given campaign, he or she can—subject to the same campaign finance rules—donate to the effort to pay off debts even after Election Day has come and gone. The long-dead presidential campaigns of Chris Dodd, Bill Richardson, and Rudy Giuliani all have active Web sites inviting contributions to the former candidates’ debt-retirement efforts—as long as you haven’t donated $2,300 already. For candidates who run for office again, campaign debts can roll over to the next campaign cycle—depending, of course, on the terms of their loans. In perhaps the most famous case of outstanding campaign debt, former Ohio Sen. John Glenn remained nearly $3 million in the hole for more than 20 years after a failed bid for the presidency in 1984. (The Federal Election Commission granted him a reprieve two years ago.)

    Debt retirement gets a little more complicated when candidates lend their own money to their campaign. After an election is over, any campaign contributions that go toward repaying the candidate’s own loans serve, in practice, as money directly into a politician’s pocket. As a result, campaign law (PDF) now limits to $250,000 the amount a campaign committee can repay the candidate after the election. In the case of the Democratic primary, the election will end when a nominee is selected in Denver. So unless Clinton is able to raise enough money to pay herself back by then, she’ll have to write off millions of dollars she lent to her campaign.

    The rest is here:

    http://www.slate.com/id/2190880/

  • Maria

    YW!

    This explains why Hillary absolutely must continue in the race until August. She must stay in the race in order to raise the $16M if they want to recoup it AND more money to pay off the rest of her debts. If she bows out any time soon, they’ll lose that $16M, receiving only $250,000 for recompense. And she’ll STILL be responsible for the other debts they’ve run up.

    No wonder she keeps saying she’ll stay in until the convention!

  • Great info aristedes.

    Wow, let me get this straight, the person who in all likely hood will take nearly a $16M personal loss in a losing campaign, thinks they are capable of fixing the countries money and economic woes.

    Seriously ?

    Hillbots, chime in whenever.

  • Scott

    Yes, that’s pretty amazing. It really doesn’t speak well for her that she can’t raise enough money to finance her campaign.

    This is why Tim Russert suggests that Obama could quickly buy Hillary out of the race by offering to pay her debts, though apparently Obama hasn’t commented on this suggestion.

    Over on the Huffington Post, the Obama supporters are going NUTS at the idea of his doing that — they point out that Obama’s money has come in $20, $50, and $100 amounts from millions of people who really didn’t have it to spare who wanted HIM to use the money for his campaign, not to pay off Hillary’s debt. Let her sink or swim, most of them say. I saw one post suggesting that Obama pay off her debt to vendors but leave it up to her to pay off staff salaries and just absorb her $16M debt to the campaign.

  • Comments are closed.