CNN to offer more ‘Britney and Michael Jackson’ coverage

Last week, Al Gore told CNN that one of the problems with our discourse is the media’s obsession with “trivialities.” As Gore sees it, the “line between entertainment and news is now very blurred…. And so we get a lot more of Anna Nicole Smith’s funeral arrangements and Paris Hilton’s legal battles on her jail term than we get about how we can solve the climate crisis and how we can get our troops out of this civil war they are trapped in, in Iraq.”

Right on cue, Faiz noted this gem from CNN this morning.

Confirming the central thesis of Al Gore’s criticism of the media, this morning CNN announced the hire of a new reporter who will “be covering things like Britney, as well as the Michael Jackson memorabilia”:

KIRAN CHETRY: Britney Spears, she’s blogging — that’s what they do these days, the celebrities — about her trip to rehab, about hitting rock bottom, and about what she really thinks her troubles are…. And joining us to talk more about that this morning is Lola Ogunnaike…. You’re going to be covering things like Britney, as well as the Michael Jackson memorabilia.

OGUNNAIKE: Yes, I’ve got the Britney, Lindsay, Michael Jackson memorabilia beat.

Keep in mind, CNN has already been offering plenty of coverage of various celebrities and their personal lives — Lola Ogunnaike was hired to “report” on these people exclusively. In other words, CNN decided that its current team wasn’t sufficient; it needed a celebrity beat reporter to do nothing but inform the public about “Britney, Lindsay, [and] Michael Jackson memorabilia.”

I guess CNN isn’t exactly taking Gore’s advice to heart.

Atrios said something last week that stuck with me.

The problem is not that there is celebrity news or sports news, the problem is when trivial stories dominate the entire news narrative. That almost never happens with sports, which gets little coverage on cable news or Matt “Rules Their World” Drudge. The problem isn’t that there’s a sports section in your newspaper, the problem is when unimportant stuff bleeds into the regular coverage.

I think this is right, though I’m just stuffy enough to suggest that major news outlets could probably stand to give up on most of its celebrity news, by at least 90%. (They could start by sticking to actual celebrities. Who on earth is Anna Nicole Smith?)

But Atrios’ larger point is spot on — the real problem with the media’s poor judgment is pushing trivia in lieu of real news. They allow (read: encourage) nonsense to dominate in such a way as to obscure stories that people actually need to know about.

When CNN was first created, most journalism purists were thrilled. Finally, they said, there would be 24 hours of news coverage. There’d be time for the fluff, but there’d also be time for detailed reports on news that might otherwise go unmentioned. The network newscasts only get an hour; CNN would offer 24 times as much!

Except, as we know, it didn’t quite work out that way. It’s simply become proportional — whereas some celebrity nonsense would get a few minutes of World News Tonight, it now gets hours of coverage, with frequent updates, throughout the day on CNN, MSNBC, and FNC.

That CNN has hired someone to cover “Britney, Lindsay, Michael Jackson memorabilia” is not a surprise; that the network didn’t already have someone on this beat is.

Reason #1,684,351 why I do not watch television news.

There’s a reason why watching CNN is like having a lobotomy and why Hate Radio spews its version of bubonic plague. It’s really simple:

Many Americans are really stupid. They like to hear about Britney’s latest panty exposure. They like to hear about how America is the greatest country on earth and how Rush is going to save them from the Defeatocrats.

And most importantly, they buy the worthless shit that’s sold during the commercial breaks. This is the fuel for the engine.

Maybe the news will get better when the stupid people run out of money.

  • Hey covering Brit Brit and crew is very important.

    Better than showing:
    a) More folks die in Iraq
    b) People are trying to take away your freedom
    c) Oil is never going to get cheaper

    It’s the modern version of breads and circuses (known today as Junk Food and celebrity inanity.)

    Well, it isn’t trivia because the powers that be know folks want to see bullshit than deal with harsh reality. As someone wrote before, the news is now considered a profit center of the entertainment machine thus it must sell those ads. If CNN did a hard hitting expose on the Wall St, Waldemort, oil, sub prime mortgage lenders and junkfood then they would have no ads what so ever. Be bad for Time Warner’s bottom line and such and make Wall St. very unhappy. If they worry about the inane dumbass human trainwreck then the money for ads keeps rolling in.

    I curse the day that Canadian (I’m taken shots at one of my own) git Marshall McLuhan came up with the “medium is the message.” That stupid phrase has been the televisual newsie’s justification for crap. If the medium was really the message then no one would be able to differentiate the meaning of the message between bullshit spread on the front porch and bullshit spread on a garden.

  • Such is a sad state of contemporary American culture. Morris Berman commented on this in his excellent (if deeply flawed in parts) bookThe Twilight of American Culture, in which he foresaw a nation developing in which, “[f]or a zoned-out, stupefied populace, democracy will be nothing more than the right to shop, or to choose between Wendy’s and Burger King, or to stare at CNN and think that this managed infotainment is actually the news.”

  • Reason #1,684,351 why I do not watch television news.

    PBS’ Newshour with Jim Lehrer is worth watching. Perhaps it’s the exception to your “rule”. I never could stomach watching local news…

  • […] democracy will be nothing more than the right to shop, or to choose between Wendy’s and Burger King, […] — Morris Berman, via James Dillon, @3

    The addition of gossip columnist to CNN doesn’t affect me much, because I just don’t watch TV and probably wouldn’t, even if it were better than y’all’s reports suggest. But, throughout my 34 yrs in the US, I’ve been struck by the multitude of “choices” which are no choices at all, that one is offered. Where it affects me, personally, is in the grocery store: there’s about 5 brands of white flour, but try and find even one, of rye, and you’re out of luck. Even whole wheat is not all that common. It seems to be the same with TV stations, and fast food restaurants, and just about everything else.The variety of choices is an illusion.

  • We’re devolving into an idiocracy. We’re amusing ourselves to death.

  • i have found myself completely perplexed to find coverage of freakin’ lindsay lohan’s rehab stint in the HuffPo newsfeed! honestly, wtf????

  • The thing that’s very strange about CNN is that, if you watch CNN International, you see actual news stories covered in depth that leave you feeling smarter and more informed about the world. CNN and Headline News, by contrast, make you feel dumber and less informed. Why should this be? After all, they’re both operating out of the same studios in Atlanta.

  • Maybe the news will get better when the stupid people run out of money. — Racerx #1.

    Maybe the people will get better when the stupid money runs out of news (i.e. never).

    In places like Britain where there is a more sensible news diet across most of the media, people often ask “Why is the news so depressing? Why is it only bad things we hear about?” Maybe American media are trying to preempt that criticism (probably not).

    If the news is mostly bad that’s good: it means that bad things are relatively rare (otherwise they wouldn’t be news). When ‘good’ things (= trivia) dominate the news, that’s really bad since it means bad things are the norm.

  • No, Former Dan (#2), you do yourself and your countryman a gross disservice. Marshall McLuhan did not say “the medium is the message”. He said “the medium is the massage [mass-age]”. There’s a huge, and subtle difference, you’ll admit. He was no git.

    ‘Let them eat cake’ (Marie Antoinette) here springs to mind.

  • today’s cnn poll question is whether or not britney spears has hit rock bottom.

    i think it must be a typo — the question is whether cnn has hit rock bottom. i think they’ve answered it on their own.

  • Karen Marie,

    Not quite. Today’s question is “Would you visit a ‘Harry Potter’ theme park?”– which I think might edge out the Britney question as true rock bottom.

    In addition to the Berman book I cited yesterday, I’d recommend Benjamin Barber’s new book Consumed, which does a good job of demonstrating the connection between America’s atrophied public culture and conservative economic philosophy.

  • Comments are closed.