Coming soon, to a ‘shopping mall near you’

The White House always has a fallback plan: when all else fails, scare the bejezus out of as many people as possible.

[Yesterday] on Fox News, White House Press Secretary Tony Snow defended the President’s Initial Benchmark Assessment Report, which argues that the administration is making “progress” in Iraq.

Snow attacked proposals to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq, claiming:

“To walk out of Iraq right now would plant a seed that ultimately would lead to destabilization there, hundreds of thousands of deaths, loss of our influence in the region, would create instability throughout the Middle East throughout East Asia, throughout Europe. And sooner or later it would come to our shores, to a shopping mall near you.”

OK, so this is the kind of shameless, pathetic fear-mongering we’ve come to expect of those who’ve run out of substantive arguments (maybe this is part of Snow’s “surge of facts“?). It’s also an off-shoot of the thoroughly discredited “follow us home” argument, which the White House repeats nonsensically.

But I have a different question: is Snow suggesting there’s something unsafe about going to shopping malls? Does he have a “gut feeling” about terrorists striking at a mall?

If the economy takes a downturn because people start to fear shopping malls, can we blame Snow?

On a more substantive note, Igor Volsky and Ryan Powers note that Snow’s doomsday scenario (sans the mall attacks) is already happening in Iraq.

* Since Bush announced his surge in January, violence has skyrocketed. Close to 600 U.S. soldiers and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians have died since January. Military assessments suggest that “the U.S. military’s plan to secure Baghdad against a rising insurgency is falling far short of its goal.” A recent bombing killed over 150 in Baghdad, “one of the deadliest single bombings, if not the deadliest, since the 2003 invasion.”

* The war in Iraq has already destabilized the Middle East and exported terrorism throughout the world. “The rate of fatal terrorist attacks around the world by jihadist groups, and the number of people killed in those attacks, increased dramatically after the invasion of Iraq. Globally there was a 607 percent rise in the average yearly incidence of attacks.”

* The U.S. has already “lost influence” in the region. In a poll of 18 countries, the percentage of those “saying that the United States is having a mainly positive influence in the world” dropped 11 points from two years ago, down to just 29 percent. Just 17 percent believe the United States is a stabilizing force in the Middle East.

True, but other than this, Snow’s argument was perfectly sound and persuasive.

This shopping mall threat is serious. Bush told us after 9/11 that our main obligation was to go shopping. Now we find that’s where the terrorist are waiting for us. Man cannot live by the Home Shopping Network alone.

  • Ha, Ha! I can tell you who that 17% are – the loonies on this cruise: http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2766040.ece . Check it out; you won’t believe how little of their attic insulation some of these people have left. I particularly enjoyed the suggestion by one that, “some prominent liberals should be executed” to sort of let the rest know that undermining the Imperial State in a time of war would not be tolerated. Then, she suggests, “things’ll change”.

    Indeed.

  • Snow always falls back on tossing off the glib comment, forgetting that he’s not an entertainer, but a spokesperson for the WH (or maybe that’s redundant, I don’t know). Given how often Bush has told us all to keep shopping over the years, Snow’s need to be glib appears to be in conflict with one of the Bush administration’s best policies: shop til you drop.

    The increasingly mixed message these guys are putting out these days, with all the talk of gut feelings and shopping malls and maybe a cell is on the way here and maybe it’s already here, is telling me that they are terrified they are going to get caught with their pants down again, so they are preemptively laying the groundwork for their excuses when it happens. These kinds of word games are standing in for the real work on things like ports and borders and nuclear and chemical facilities and air and sea cargo – work that has not been done leaving us with vulnerabilities that still exist.

    They would rather sell us on their story than actually do the job…how sad and disgusting is that?

  • Nice article Mark

    Was it wrong to keep thinking a well-placed iceberg sinking that ship would have made me believe in God again?

  • maybe this is part of Snow’s “surge of facts“

    Probably.

    Which just proves that it’s hard to push forth a “surge of facts” when one has spent six years burying everyone under an “avalanche of bullshit.”

  • Hey, Sister; what struck me as curious was how willing they were to gather in one place like that. Often the truly crazy are inordinately paranoid as well, and convinced that large gatherings of like-minded nutbags are prime targets for the brown-skinned Muslim hordes (in this case).

    An iceberg would in this instance have been a Godsend, not to mention hard to blame on Iraq.

  • Whatever the worse case scenario could be…that is what will happen if we don’t follow the Bush agenda. To expect people to give credence to this explanation of why we should support Bush assumes we are all stupid, that we have no memory.

    Giving Bush the “benefit of the doubt” is destroying our military, draining our treasury, and making us less safe in the world.

    What is truly tragic is that we knew this is what Bush would say and do before the surge started. He will never admit to any kind of failure. He will never leave Iraq until he is forced to. We must force him out of Iraq. something not even the Iraqis can do now.

    Remember: We already knew then what we know now, and we already know now what we will know then.

    Petraeus cannot say, “Conditions have not improved and are unlikely to.”, no matter how true it is. He will only say what will support the mission or the Bush policy. They both already know the truth .

    Bush must not only be forced from Iraq but he also must be forced from office, not only for things he’s already done but for things he plans to do if he remains.

  • “To walk out of Iraq right now would plant a seed…”

    The seed was planted when we went into Iraq. When we leave, we will–or rather, Iraq will–be only harvesting the fruit.

  • Comments are closed.