Crichton’s revenge

There’s an old expression, “Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel.” Apparently, there’s a new addendum to the adage: “Never pick a fight with someone who sells novels by the millions.”

TNR’s Michael Crowley wrote a terrific-but-scathing cover story in March, blasting novelist Michael Crichton for his climate-change denials, partisanship, anti-intellectualism, and general hackery. With this background in mind, Crowley was apparently taken aback when he picked up Crichton’s new novel and found a character named “Mick Crowley.” Here’s an excerpt (warning: this is unpleasant, graphic stuff):

Alex Burnet was in the middle of the most difficult trial of her career, a rape case involving the sexual assault of a two-year-old boy in Malibu. The defendant, thirty-year-old Mick Crowley, was a Washington-based political columnist who was visiting his sister-in-law when he experienced an overwhelming urge to have anal sex with her young son, still in diapers. Crowley was a wealthy, spoiled Yale graduate and heir to a pharmaceutical fortune. …

It turned out Crowley’s taste in love objects was well known in Washington, but [his lawyer]–as was his custom–tried the case vigorously in the press months before the trial, repeatedly characterizing Alex and the child’s mother as “fantasizing feminist fundamentalists” who had made up the whole thing from “their sick, twisted imaginations.” This, despite a well-documented hospital examination of the child. (Crowley’s penis was small, but he had still caused significant tears to the toddler’s rectum.)

Crichton went to describe the Mick Crowley character as a “weasel” and a “dickhead,” and, later, “that political reporter who likes little boys.” As it turns out, the Mick Crowley’s role in the book is entirely inconsequential, and has no bearing on the plot. It’s almost as if the character were an afterthought, thrown in to make some kind of point.

And what might that be? Hmm, Michael Crowley is a political reporter, Mick Crowley is a political reporter. Michael Crowley went to Yale, Mick Crowley went to Yale. Michael Crowley wrote a scathing criticism of Crichton, Mick Crowley is a child rapist in Crichton’s next book.

Talk about payback.

The road to this literary hit-and-run began back in March, when I wrote an article about Crichton pegged to his 2004 best-seller, State of Fear. The 624-page thriller presented global warming theory as the work of a fiendish cabal of liberal environmentalists, celebrities, journalists, academics, and politicians. Crichton’s populist disdain for these “experts” dovetailed neatly, I argued, with the Bush administration’s antiintellectual streak–and it was the reason that Karl Rove had invited Crichton for a chat with George W. Bush at the Oval Office and a right-wing senator had asked him to testify before his committee. Crichton discussed his White House visit with me, and our talk was friendly — though Crichton was clearly nervous about being linked to Bush. How ironic, then, that he wound up responding to my critique with a move worthy of Rove’s playbook.

I suppose, at a certain level, this is to be expected. Crichton has been hanging out with Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) to help attack climate change science, and addition to cozying up to Bush. Not exactly above-board types.

That said, doesn’t this kind of over-the-top response in Crichton’s novel make him appear rather … I don’t know … small?

Lord, this is reminiscent of the Godzilla movie writers/director introducing a fat, stupid mayor in the movie that was clearly Roger Ebert, in revenge for his criticism of Independence Day . When I realized the connection, my already low estimation of the film and its producers fell exponentially. I am now in a nearly identical situation regarding Crichton’s ‘talent’.

  • Wow. Seems like a page right out of my defamation case book in law school. Not much there to distinguish (or disguise) the real journalist from the twisted caricature of virtually the same name.

    Can’t imagine any good reason not to sue. Seems like a pretty boneheaded move on the novelist’s part — pinned a big “kick me in the pocketbook” sign on his own backside.

    And I would think the millions of copies sold just adds to the damages tally.

  • M. Cretin is a male Anne Rice, only he hasn’t yet had the decency to have a complete blow out, find Jesus and stop wasting trees with his repetitive tripe. He’s written the same book about a dozen times, let the success of Jurassic Park go to his head and now there’s even less of a chance he’ll ever realize he’s a tapped out hack. I wouldn’t be surprised to find he stuck that little excerpt in both to get back at Crowley and an attempt to boost sales. Fuck him.

    And using the logic his ReThuglican friends applied to Webb: Cretin must be a baby raping creep with a small dick. Did I say fuck him? Oh well, a second time can’t hurt.

  • The success of Chrichton-movies adapted to film like Jurassic Park and The Thirteenth Warrior is due to the talent of the production teams that put those films together, not Michael Crichton.

    He’s a second-rate talentless opportunist who associates himself with anyone who can give him a national stage. It’s not surprising he’s found companionship with the Global Warming Deniers (GWD) and the Delusional Brigade.

  • Thank you Michael Crichton, you just invented a new form of right wing sleaze: Swiftbooking.

    … And to extrapolate the analogy “Michael Crowley wrote a scathing criticism of Crichton, Mick Crowley is a child rapist in Crichton’s next book.” I guess that Crichton himself is a toddler with tears in his rectum.

  • Not only was The 13th Warrior a success, Grumpy, it is true, factual, and actually happened.

    Further, it only takes a couple days amongst those speaking another language to learn and master their language.

    Now, “keep your teeth together and go back to work.”

    Note: I meant to say “Crichton-books,” not “Crichton-movies” in my post, #4.

  • I’ll bet Crichton, his agent, and his publisher had a real guffaw over that. “Small penis! WA-HOO-HEE-HOO-HAW-HEE-HAW!” Classy guys.

    Conservatives have the sickest imaginations. Maybe this vile fiction can be used to smear the next politician to whom Crichton attaches himself. Fair’s fair, isn’t it, Senator Webb?

  • Methinks tAiO is on the right track, but Cretin deserves something much colder than just a simple slander or two. His bread-n-butter is his book sales—so maybe a little enhanced degradation on his earnings potential is in order.

    Here’s an idea: Make people think that his books are all just rehash of earlier works, and they’re only worth reading if borrowed for free from a library. That step alone will gut a good 10-20% from his sales numbers.

    Hey—what about the good ol’ “Enquirer?” Same sleaze, much less expensive than a Cretin book.

    Check out the condition of his books in the library. If a cover is wearing thin, buy some tape and fix it. If a page is falling out, then glue it back in. The method to this “madness” is that the library won’t go out and buy a replacement copy.

    Or—have a librarian suggest what other books are available similar to Cretin’s, then repeat those suggestions to anyone you know who reads his bunk. It’ll deflate his readership. Libraries don’t often replace books that demonstrate low circulation numbers (which are tracked by computer records now). If a library decides that Cretin isn’t a good draw, they’ll take his name off the “buy” list. You get a bunch of libraries to do that—and word goes around the distribution circles VERY fast.

    Yeah, Cretin—you’re number’s coming up right quick—now isn’t it?

  • That said, doesn’t this kind of over-the-top response in Crichton’s novel make him appear rather … I don’t know … small?

    Well Crichton is six and a half feet tall, but you’re right this does make him seem small.

    I personally enjoy Crichton’s novels, even State of Fear. At the time I didn’t perceive that as anything more than a story with an alternative kind of hook. But seeing the pettiness Crichton is capable of, I’m reassessing my opinions.

    As Jeff #2 said, this is such transparent defamation. It’s a cry to be sued. This will get a lot of publicity for the book, but it will certainly turn off a lot of readers too. Bad career move.

    This puts him in the Bush/Rove camp more firmly than the actual ideas in his books do.

    This doesn’t make him a bad writer, just a bad person.

    I like the term Petorado #5 coined, Swiftbooking. But isn’t Ann Coulter the master (mistress?) of that?

    Better tears on the pillow than tears in the rectum. -random remark

    Not excusing Crichton, but Wright’s characterization “The 624-page thriller presented global warming theory as the work of a fiendish cabal of liberal environmentalists, celebrities, journalists, academics, and politicians.” of the novel is not accurate. It was about one mega-egotist who tried to awaken awareness of global warming by staging disasters.

    As Wright says their conversation was friendly and then he wrote a scathing article. Crichton probably felt sandbagged by Wright, but this is a very immature and right-wingish kind of retribution for Crichton to extract.

  • Crichton’s new book, Steve Benen rapes virginal nuns and then eats there still beating hearts just because he could.

    Talk about ‘V for Vengeance’; totally disgusting, but that is one way to scare the hell out of a critic or future critics.

    There are two out comes, critics will run for the hills and Crichton will never ever have a bad word said about him. Or the more probable, he gets the shit sued out of him and people taught Crichton until his dieing day trying to get a piece of his pie.

  • Make people think that his books are all just rehash of earlier works, and they’re only worth reading if borrowed for free from a library.

    You mean…tell them the truth? [/snark]

    After reading Jeff’s comment I wonder if this may be a very lame attempt to get sued. I’m sure M.C. (hmmm, same initials as the baby raper…) could easily absorb whatever damages a jury might find against him and it would be a lot of free publicity.

    As demonstrated by Satanic Verses and more recently A Million Little Half Truths Pieces, people will buy a book just to see what the fuss is about. I think the best thing Crowley could do is starve the attention whore of what he so clearly craves.

  • In #12 Please subsitute Crowley for Wright.

    Hmmm, wondering what my reaction would have been if Crichton had used a right wing columnist. 🙂

  • the question is, who else has crichton slammed in his books? i assure that people will now be going through them with a fine tooth comb, comparing each character with people he’s run up against.

  • If I tell you you’re spoiled, you’re really spoiled. If Republicans say someone’s spoiled, it’s because they believe all rich people are spoiled, unless you’re a Republican.

    I’ve talked to rich people and sometimes I’ve felt snubbed, not given a chance, but many other times they seemed cool. The right-wingers have hired a bunch of thugs who believe in this false populism the right-wingers have created, and are motivated mostly by prejudice. It’s pretty scary.

    a wealthy, spoiled Yale graduate

  • (Crowley’s penis was small,

    Aha! Crowley was fed soy formula as a baby! On a par with being an heir to a pharmaceutical fortune and going to Yale. With such upbringing, it’s no wonder he took to raping two year olds.

    What is it with men and their obsession with inches, which are not an accomplishment but an accident of birth? It’s not the size of the tool that counts, but the dexterity with which you use it.

  • Hmm, what did the wingnuts try to do to Webb…?

    I think we all should go out to our favorite moron blogs and tell them how Michael Crighton makes a lot of money writing about small boys being raped in the ass. He makes his money describing how to rape little children, and he practically endorses this type of crime by including graphic descriptions of the act for no literary purpose.

    Make sure to include some of the nasty passages he wrote, and let the wingnuts decide if they want to ever buy a book from such a sadistic man ever again.

    Yes, its a tactic that will only work on stupid people. But stupidity can come in useful sometimes, let’s use it when dickheads like Chrighton need a good whacking.

  • As I once said to Michael Cricton upon meeting him (he’s 6′ 8″) at an SFFWA meeting: “Wow, I didn’t know they could stack bullshit that high without it toppling over.” Several other writers heard that an laughed, at which point Mr. Bazillion-seller shot a look that could kill and turned on his heel. Never been on his Christmas card list since (not that I ever was), but it felt really good to do that to him back when he was playing the racist card with “Rising Sun.”

  • Lord, this is reminiscent of the Godzilla movie writers/director introducing a fat, stupid mayor in the movie that was clearly Roger Ebert, in revenge for his criticism of Independence Day . When I realized the connection, my already low estimation of the film and its producers fell exponentially.

    What’s worse, as even Ebert pointed out, the Emmerich failed to follow through on the joke and have Godzilla step on “Mayor Ebert”!

    I love me the Japanese Godzilla movies, but good Ford, what a lame piece of crap Emmerich’s film was.

    We now return you to your regularly scheduled comment thread.

  • “Yes, its a tactic that will only work on stupid people. But stupidity can come in useful sometimes, let’s use it when dickheads like Chrighton need a good whacking.”

    Then there is a very large audience available in our country…

  • As I once said to Michael Cricton upon meeting him (he’s 6′ 8″) at an SFFWA meeting: “Wow, I didn’t know they could stack bullshit that high without it toppling over.”

    Bravo! Bravissimo!

    I guess we should check M.C.’s books for a character named Tim Cleaver who likes to assault farm animals. Personally, I think there would be a certain honor in annoying a whining little creep into a petty act of vengance.

    Hey, if Crowley doesn’t want to sue for defamation could he sue for royalties? That would really frost the hack’s ass.

  • Re: #2 and #14… (starting with Jeff’s comments about defamation)…

    Absolutely, this is very transparent libel. The advantage of libel (written defamation) over slander (verbal), is that the courts often find it easier to prove and more damaging, due to its permanence, and the idea that it is usually reviewed before being published.

    As far as the costs go, the damages may not bankrupt or even hurt Crichton, but the publicity might not be all that good. If the publicity is combined with a good P.R. drive to point out the garbage he created out of his own imagination (pedophilia and other misc. deviant sexual activities), he may lose points with a lot of the people who bona fide believe in the ideals of their religion.

    Secondly, if Crichton is sued for this, you can expect that the publisher and editor may also be named as defendants. I’m sure publishing his works is profitable, but if you get named as a defendant in a civil suit because of a petty revenge and your star author’s reputation is tarnished, it minimally gives the publisher pause to think about his works, and secondly, will likely increase the amount of editing required before going to print. And if the damages are high enough or the relationship sours, the publisher could even sue Crichton for the damages.

    This may be a tangled, ugly web, and you can bet that, if Crowley so chooses, Crighton might not be able to afford that addition to his house or that new yacht, and could potentially have his reputation destroyed.

  • Michael Crowley does have a shot at winning any suit. I remember a story about a favorite author (not person) of mine, Harlan Ellison, wrote an episode of Man From U.N.C.L.E. about an author/editor he really really hated as an awful villain. She sued him for slander/libel and won.

    Paythemback writer aka The Beatles’ Paperback Writer

    Dear Sir or Madam will you read my book
    It took me years to hack, will you take a look
    based on bullshit by Sen Inhofe
    and I need a job
    so I want to be a Big Oil Whore writer
    Big oil whore writer!!!

    It’s the stupid story of a stupid man
    and his crazy plan that just won’t stand
    Who plans on starting a warming panic
    It’s a shitty job
    But he wants to be a Global Warming Fighter
    Global Warming Fighter
    Global Warming Fighter

    It’s a thousand pages, give or take a few
    I’ll be vomiting more in a week or two
    I call my critic an ass raping child prev
    Lawsuit proof I don’t know
    But I’m just a major pay’emrback writer
    Pay’emback writer

    If you really like it you can have TV rights
    It could make a million for you overnight
    If you must return if you can send it here
    But I need a break
    and I want to be a Pay’emback writer
    Pay’emback writer
    Pay’emback writer
    Pay’emback writer
    Pay’emback writer

  • Yeah, Harlan still remembers that, too (he being not only one of my favorite writers but a long-time friend. Ask me why it is that all three Terminator movies have as their final credit “The Producers Wish To Recognize The Work of Harlan Ellison” – comes as a result of comments made by a certain director when he and the writer who was interviewing him about the first movie thought the tape had run out when he made some comments about where he got his ideas that he later wished he hadn’t said, since the tape was indeed running). In fact, he has put it in some of his advice to writers that one not take this sort of revenge on those who cross we “ink-stained wretches.”

    Crichton could very definitely get whacked financially on this, and professionally damaged. Couldn’t happen to a nicer futhermucker.

  • It really makes you wonder why Crowley would say those things about Crichton after raping that baby…

  • 28: HA!

    I don’t think Crowley has any intention suing. He released a statement, which I don’t have in front of me, but the gist of it was “Actually, I’m flattered. I tore Crichton a new one in print, backed up my assertion with facts, and instead of challening me OR those facts, he made up a child molestor with my name. He’s essentially telling me that I’m right and he’s wrong, because this is the best he could come up with in retaliation.” Granted, he said it better than that, but that was the gist. Plus, I suspect Crowley doesn’t want Crichton to have any more time in the limelight based on this “scandal,” proving once and for all who the “bigger” man really is.

  • I’d like to read Crowley’s article which started the debate. I am sure he did not say anything derogatory about Michael Crichton, because he is a caring and compassionate guy. I am sure he was equally generous to George Bush, as all liberals are. Of course, it is possible Crichton is on to something. I would have to put my money on M. Crowley being a real dickhead, albeit a small one.

  • I believe that Mr. Crowley has gotten more than 15 minutes of fame out of this. To tell you truth if not for the repeated publication of the 2 paragraphs regarding the character of Mick Crowley, I would not have remembered him at all. This character did not make an impression on me as I’m sure happened to the other Crichton fans. I guess Mick just wanted some attention.

  • Comments are closed.