Crude stereotypes don’t honor native peoples

Guest Post by Morbo

And now an update from the world of sports: The National Collegiate Athletic Association has informed a state university in western Pennsylvania that it must stop calling its sports teams “Indians.”

If officials at Indiana University of Pennsylvania don’t drop the name, the NCAA says, the institution will be ineligible to host post-season tournaments. Reported the Associated Press:

The university had appealed the NCAA’s decision in August to include it on a list of 18 schools that were banned from using American Indian mascots or nicknames during postseason tournaments because the nicknames or images were “hostile or abusive” to American Indians.

In its decision, the NCAA noted that even if no offense was intended, the use of the nickname is still problematic. The term, the NCAA ruled, “could be construed as a stereotypical reference to Native Americans.”

I have something of a special interest in this question since I graduated from this somewhat obscure, oddly named university about 50 miles east of Pittsburgh. Although it has zero prestige, the school is a good institution with solid academics and a growing reputation. (U.S. Rep. John Murtha did some graduate work there.) The university attracted me for two reasons: It was extremely affordable, and it admitted me even though my SATs were, let’s say, less than stellar.

When I was a student there in the early ’80s, the football team was named the “Big Indians” and the mascot was a tall white guy who would run out on the field at halftime wearing phony buckskins and a long feathered headdress. He had paint smeared on his face and brandished a tomahawk.

I wince to think of it now. The university seemed to realize it had a problem. Fourteen years ago, the Indian mascot was dropped in favor of a bear. Yet the sports teams retained the name “Indians.”

This is a problem that plagues several colleges and pro teams as well — consider the even more offensive Washington Redskins. Defenders argue that these nicknames are really a tribute to the native people and aren’t meant to offend.

I agree to a point — the names aren’t meant to offend. But the fact is that they do anyway.

The use of them and of associated costumed mascots propagates crude stereotypes. Imagine a team called the “Blackskins” whose mascot was a white man in blackface. He wouldn’t last a minute.

Critics are already carping about the NCAA’s crackdown, accusing that body of political correctness run amok. I wish they could see that old Indian mascot. Maybe then they’d feel differently.

As for my alma mater, my remedy is radical: The school takes it name from its location in the city of Indiana and the surrounding county, also named Indiana. It confuses people to see a school in Pennsylvania with the word “Indiana” in its name. The school should become something less confusing. I recommend the University of Western Pennsylvania. At the same time, it can dump the Indian nickname and either keep the bear or adopt another local animal for its mascot. Deer are all over the place there. Why not become the University of Western Pennsylvania Bucks?

Maybe I should have gone to Slippery Rock University after all….

I went to Amherst College, and our mascot is naturally Lord Jeffrey Amherst — he of the smallpox-infested blankets given to Native Americans as proto germ-warfare.

Apparently, even up to the 1970s, the dining hall crockery had a border of Indians running around the plate with Lord Jeff on a horse chasing them. The way I’ve heard the story go, a group of performers ate dinner at the dining hall one night, and said incredulously “students, look at what’s on your plates”, and people just started smashing them. I don’t know if this story is true, but I heard it from a professor.

  • This has been an issue with me for a long time. The use of Redskin for a NFL team name in our nations capitol is inexcuseable. Everytime I see or hear the name I cringe and feel ashamed. What has bewildered me is that everytime I bring up the Redskin subject with someone it is a none issue with them and they feel I am making something out of nothing. I lived in Arizona and have talked to many Native Americans and every person I talked to was offended by the use of these names. When I asked them how they felt about the Redskins name most could only shake their heads and would not respond. It is a profound insult to them.

  • I probably agree. “Redskin” really is offensive. I’m not sure that many others (tribal identities like Seminoles and Mohawks.) are. Should we also get rid of Notre Dame’s “Fighting Irish”? That was originally a term of derision, from the days when people didn’t even blink at a store window sign: “Help Wanted / No Irish Need Apply”. It was turned into a term of positive affect. The “Black is Beautiful” movement comes to mind. My own university, Western Washington University, has its Vikings (Scandinavian). One of my undergraduate universities, USF, had its Dons (Spanish).

    The sad thing is that we’re having such a discussion. Radical improvement in higher (and other) education is much more important that what we name professional sports farm clubs disguised as colleges, but no one in either party wants to go there.

  • Morbo, I suggest they have a Deepak Chopra look-alike as their Mascot. Problem solved.

    And “professional sports farm clubs disguised as colleges” is definitely where a look at how public moneys are used should be investigated. Imagine you’re the best professor of literature in the country and you compare your salary to a coach at a football school. Where’s the equity?

  • sports illustrated did a poll a few years ago which said that native americans, even ones located on reservations (which are still some of the worst places to live in the US) were not offended by this (67% were not, 33% were). the washington redskins were one of the more controversial teams, but a majority of native americans still said they were “not offended”. professional complainers are the ones making all the noise, while the people they claim to represent are overall not offended. the illinois illini were forced to give up their mascot, despite the fact that the fricking state is named for the native american tribe.

    instead of ridiculous gestures by the NCAA, how about we improve living conditions on reservations, and take greater steps to decrease alcoholism there? that’s where my charity is going this year, and I think that’s a much more postive step than banning native american mascots.

  • Well, white people don’t go around calling each other ‘whitey’ or ‘paleface’, so it’s kind of insulting for them to call other people ‘redskins’ or ‘braves’.

    And, BTW, why don’t I as a white person have a right to be offended by rascist language? I can easily think of a few words my listener might not want to hear, and when I do I usually don’t use them. When you show respect for others, you compliment yourself, for it shows you are a cultured person. A Chinese woman told me that.

    Nor am I amused, in fact, by Kiganshee’s assumption that native Americans are drunks, and the best way to ‘help’ them is to cure their drunkenness. In my neck of the woods it’s the native Americans who are helping the whites with projects like wetlands restoration and fisheries development. As well as providing the best entertainment venues in the county.

    I went to Antioch. Our Mascot: “Mascot?” Our Football Team: “We have a football team?!?”

  • 1. cb, please tell me you read gregg easterbrook’s “tuesday morning qb” column” now on nfl.com, which celebrates the indiana of pennsylvania v. california of pennsylvania tilt as the obscure college game of the year.

    2. currently i’m in redskins country. no native americans in site. no one cares. washington up on st. louis when i left the sports bar. the jets still lose, facilitated by poor calls.

  • Comments are closed.