I’ve long believed that hand-wringing over Howard Dean’s DNC fundraising is unnecessary. The DNC collected over $51 million last year, which was about half of what the RNC took in over the same period, but was far better than the DNC’s fundraising in the last off-year cycle (2003). Indeed, under Dean, the gap had actually narrowed against RNC totals.
With this in mind, the kvetching about Dean’s fundraising prowess, which helped get him the job in the first place, seemed at least somewhat misplaced. According to subscription-only Roll Call, however, concerns among party leaders have less to do with what Dean has received and more to do with what he’s spent.
Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill are privately bristling over Howard Dean’s management of the Democratic National Committee and have made those sentiments clear after new fundraising numbers showed he has spent nearly all the committee’s cash and has little left to support their efforts to gain seats this cycle.
Several well-informed Democratic sources said Congressional leaders were furious last week when they learned the DNC has just $5.5 million in the bank, compared to the Republican National Committee’s $34 million.
Sources also indicated that Senate and House Minority Leaders Harry Reid (Nev.) and Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), along with the Senate and House campaign committee chairmen Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), have made their concerns — directly or indirectly — known to Dean.
As the piece explains, Dean spent freely in 2005, developing infrastructure and nurturing state and local parties as part of his broader, long-term vision.
This represents something of a sea-change in how the party operates. For years, the party has bolstered the DNC coffers towards helping boost congressional candidates. This year, the DNC offers a key year, with the opportunity to take back Congress on everyone’s mind, but start off without much in the bank — about a seventh of what the RNC has on hand.
Dean’s response is, essentially, “Trust me; I know what I’m doing.”
Dean said then that the DNC isn’t just a presidential committee, but a support structure for the party as a whole, from local races to House and Senate contests. And, Dean said the DNC “has to be everywhere” while the DCCC and the DSCC cannot “because then they wouldn’t have enough resources to do what they have to do.”
“Our job descriptions are a little different,” Dean said. “Their job is to pick up as many seats as they can. … Our job description is to have a long-range plan for the party, a long-range plan that works for the party for the next 15 or 20 years, and my job is to make sure that we have active Democrats in all 50 states.” […]
Dean said to win back the majority, Democrats must re-energize its core by creating a stronger party structure in every state. He stressed they also must articulate a message based on values and honesty, and stand up and fight for “what they believe in and who we are.”
“I understand that makes people uncomfortable, but we have to win elections,” Dean said.
Is Dean right? Roll Call found a whole lot of party leaders who don’t think so. “A lot of people are scratching their heads as to what’s going on,” said one senior Dem congressional aide. Another Dem source familiar with the party fundraising apparatus said there is “obvious displeasure” among party leaders on the Hill.
In about 10 months, Dean is either going to look like a genius or look like a fool. Stay tuned.