Dear Diary: Well, I’m leader of the free world!

Guest Post by Morbo

Every few weeks, I get a catalog from a firm in Connecticut that sells books that have been remaindered. It’s printed on newsprint in tiny type but is always worth poring over because, while most of the offerings are dross, gems do lurk within.

One thing I’ve learned from years of reading this catalog is that the cult of Ronald Reagan is alive and well. Every possible aspect of Reagan’s life has been chronicled, dissected and discussed, often from an idol-worshipping, hagiographic perspective. Many of these books have ended up remaindered.

In a recent catalog, I saw perhaps the worst Reagan-related item ever: a multi-CD set of radio speeches he gave as governor of California. How much Reagan-flavored Kool-Aid would you have to ingest, I wondered, before you longed to hear The Gipper pontificate about the burning issues of 1972?

But even knowing of the cult’s existence and the fanatical devotion of its adherents, I have to wonder how many people will get through the Reagan diaries.

Note that in the reporting about these writings, which Reagan kept all through his presidency, certain words were used. The diaries, we were told, portray Reagan as “amiable,” “uncomplicated,” “wistful” and “funny.” Words that were not used to describe these writings include “insightful,” “intelligent” and “analytical.”

My favorite line was this passage from the Associated Press:

The earnest entries are marked by a spare writing style in which Reagan reduced complicated matters to their essence.

I realize Reagan is dead and that this means the mainstream media is too cowardly to say anything negative about him for the next 50 years, but maybe his writing style was “sparse” and he “reduced complicated matters to their essence” because the man was, in fact, a lunkhead.

I don’t know about you, but after seven years of a president who makes Reagan look like Soren Kirkegaard, I’m ready for an occupant of the White House whose mind is somewhat “complicated.”

We already had a president “whose mind [was] somewhat ‘complicated.'” His name: Bill Clinton.

  • Reagan was a True Conservative – when he said ‘I don’t remember’ he meant it!

  • I saw a documentary on the Discovery channel about Reagan and the end of the Cold War. It was interesting to see Reagan’s former staff members and historians talk about him. They always talk about this ability to hear all the relevant information about a situation and then “stick to his guns” with the decision that he had already made before getting all the information.

    This is viewed as a strength.

    Because Reagan happened to be right (some say lucky) about the demise of the Soviet Union, this presidential “style” is lauded. Never changing your mind is viewed as a strength. What’s the saying, “Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.”?

  • The Hamilton’s catalog is always worth scanning to see which Regnery titles didn’t move, even as come-ons for National Review new subscribers. All those bulk purchases that push this dreck up the charts have to wind up somewhere, and ‘somewhere’ seems to be a small town in Connecticut…

    They always talk about this ability to hear all the relevant information about a situation and then “stick to his guns” with the decision that he had already made before getting all the information.

    This is viewed as a strength.

    In the context of revealed religion — and movement conservatism resembles nothing quite so much as a revealed religion — this is a strength…

  • Homer #3

    In fairness, the line is “a FOOLISH consistency is…”

    Fortunately, that also works.

  • Comments are closed.