Most of the recent national polls have shown widespread discontent with politicians in Washington. Both the White House and Congress are wildly unpopular, leading a lot of conservatives to boast that the new Democratic congressional majority has already lost the electorate. After all, if Americans liked what they saw from the new Democratic Congress, the institution’s approval ratings wouldn’t be so dreadfully low.
As Republican talking points go, this might sound vaguely persuasive, if it weren’t completely wrong.
Public attitudes toward the two major political parties have not changed much in recent months. That’s good news for the Democratic Party, which moved into a superior image position when compared to the Republican Party more than a year ago. Americans not only continue to view the Democratic Party more favorably than the Republican Party in general terms, but they also choose the Democratic party as the preferred party for maintaining the nation’s economic prosperity. And, in a departure from recent history, Americans see the Democrats as the political party better able to protect the country from terrorism.
The notion that Americans have cast a pox on both houses is simply wrong. According to Gallup, 53% of the country has a favorable opinion of the Democratic Party, while 43% have an unfavorable opinion. For the GOP, those numbers are nearly reversed — 38% have a favorable view of Republicans, while a surprising 59% have an unfavorable take on the party.
This gap becomes even more dramatic when it comes to identifying the party of national security. I’ll give you a hint — it’s not the GOP.
Through this period of decline in the Republicans’ overall favorability, one enduring strength for the GOP has been the perception that it is the better party for handling international terrorism and national defense. One year after the 9/11 attacks, the Republicans had a 19-point lead over the Democrats in this area. That lead gradually sank to a statistically non-significant 2-point lead in 2006.
This year, for the first time since Gallup started asking this question in 2002, more Americans say the Democratic Party will do a better job than the Republican Party of protecting the country from security threats, 47% vs. 42%.
The conventional wisdom is slow to catch up, and if you listen to Joe Lieberman, you’re led to believe the public is deeply skeptical of Dems on national security, but if you actually ask Americans, the results (and the trends) are clear.
Chris Bowers raises a good point about the data.
Now, I have a question for liberal hawks: during the time when Democrats gained on, and eventually overtook, Republicans on national security, did Democrats become more hawkish? As I remember it, during these five years Democrats have gradually and greatly increased their opposition to things like the Iraq war, FISA and the Patriot Act. Even though we are still losing votes on those issues, we are doing a lot better than we were a few years ago.
To be sure, I suspect the numbers are trending in the Dems’ direction in part because Americans have simply rejected the Republicans’ failures. Dems are benefiting from being on the other side of a policy and philosophy that just doesn’t work.
Nevertheless, I think Chris is right. Dems have been more vocal in criticizing the war, more assertive in standing up for civil liberties and checks and balances, and more aggressive in denouncing the neocons’ worldview. And they’ve seen their numbers soar.
There’s a lesson in there, if the DC establishment is willing to notice it.