Dems set to call for phased pullout

Just to follow up on yesterday’s discussion, there seems to be a growing consensus among Senate Dems on a phased-withdrawal plan.

Congressional Democrats, seizing on public discontent over the war in Iraq, will offer legislation this week calling for a phased withdrawal of troops from Iraq and a shifting of forces to other nations, where supporters say American soldiers will be less likely to come under attack.

The resolution, crafted by Democratic Senators Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Carl Levin of Michigan, will headline a second week of debate in Congress over the state of the war. It is the first real debate Congress has held on the war since the US invasion in early 2003.

Senate Democrats, many of whom voted to authorize force in Iraq but have become critics of the war, will unveil a resolution today demanding that President Bush begin phasing out US troop presence in Iraq this year.

Good. Under the Reed/Levin proposal, a small contingent of U.S. troops would stay in Iraq train security forces, but would redeploy most our forces. It’s effectively the same policy Murtha, Kerry, Pelosi, and others urged the party to get behind months ago.

Fortunately, this time it’s a policy that seems to be winning over some Dems who had balked at the idea in the past.

“Three years and three months into the war, with all of the losses, the insurgency, the burgeoning civil war that’s taking place — what was it, seven bombings in Baghdad yesterday? — an open-ended time commitment is no longer sustainable,” [California Sen. Dianne] Feinstein said on CNN’s “Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer.”

“I don’t think it’s sustainable from the military point of view in terms of troop commitments. I don’t think it’s sustainable in terms of what Americans think about the war,” Feinstein said.

“A timetable, some goals, some discussion with the Congress by the administration. The president might not have wanted to have done that early on, but three years and three months and a bogging down, I think, suggests that the time has come for some discussion as to where we go from here.”

The Reed/Levin resolution may go to the House floor as early as tomorrow. Stay tuned.

In the time we’ve spent in “The Quagmire” we won WWII and developed the outline of Marshall Plan for European reconstruction. I’m glad that, at long last, the Dems are finally showing minimal signs of life, even if it’s only mumbling in their sleep.

  • Man, why can’t thes folks raise the US Ambassador’s report at such appropriate times?

  • Then Cheney will growl and most of the Dems will pee their pants and duck and cover. The sooner the cowards get replaced by real men and women of strength and conviction, the better. I see Obama, Murtha, Durbin, and Reid. Any other Dems with Guts right now?

    The only thing worse than a neo-con running the country is relying on the current crop of Dem leaders to stop them.

    Sorry, it’s Monday.

  • Good. Get on the record now to withdraw troops. If Dems do not have a proposal for troop withdrawls on the record I would expect announcements of troop withdrawls just shortly before the November Elections. If they do after we propose it then they cannot take full credit.

  • Mr. Carpetbagger,

    these two statements are a bit confusing:

    The resolution, crafted by Democratic Senators Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Carl Levin of Michigan,

    The Reed/Levin resolution may go to the House floor as early as tomorrow.

    is it going to the floor of the House or the Senate?

  • The Reed/Levin resolution may go to the House floor as early as tomorrow.

    I need to work on my html skills…

  • please note, previous comment aside, this is a great post and a even better development by the Dem caucus. Thanks for bringing it to my attention Mr. Carpetbagger.

  • how long before republicans start lashing out the dems for being “women” when it comes to war, given pelosi and feinstein being in the dem van?

  • Can what we heard last week be described as a “real debate” on the war? It was a bunch of chances for Republicans to slander Democrats (especially Murtha), disguised as a debate about one silly resolution, with no amendments allowed.

  • Comments are closed.