Dems to Bush administration: You’re welcome

For the last several months, the White House and its allies have had a consistent message: debating the merit of the war in Iraq is an inherently bad idea. In February, when lawmakers were considering (and passing) a non-binding resolution criticizing the escalation strategy, Tony Snow went so far as to suggest that the debate itself brought “comfort” to terrorists.

A month later, when the House and Senate took up spending measures that included timelines for withdrawal, conservative war supporters said the very discussion sent a dangerous signal to the world, undermined the troops, and “emboldened the enemy.”

But when one cuts through the nonsense and the rhetoric, it looks like the Bush gang finds the Dems’ efforts useful after all.

[Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said Tuesday that] demands in the U.S. Congress for a timeline to withdraw American troops from Iraq are constructive because they exert pressure on Iraq’s leaders to forge compromises.

“The debate in Congress … has been helpful in demonstrating to the Iraqis that American patience is limited,” Gates told Pentagon reporters traveling with him in Jordan. “The strong feelings expressed in the Congress about the timetable probably has had a positive impact … in terms of communicating to the Iraqis that this is not an open-ended commitment.”

How about that, a “positive impact.” For literally months, the White House and its congressional sycophants have been arguing the exact opposite — that dissent is dangerous, that our enemies are listening, and that our troops are undermined when there are political divisions over war policy. But in reality, Dems are doing what the president refuses to do: pressuring Iraqis to step up.

What’s more, this seems to be part of a trend.

Just ask Condoleezza Rice.

[I]n her recent trip to Iraq, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice used the debate as part of a diplomatic strategy to urge Iraqi political leaders to accelerate their efforts to produce results on the economic and security conditions in Iraq. The NY Times reported:

“Ms. Rice said she used the restiveness in Washington to underline for Iraqi officials the spread of American frustration with Iraq’s lagging political and economic progress.

“She said she had ‘made clear that some of the debate in Washington is, in fact, indicative of the concerns that the American people have about the prospects for success’ if Iraq’s leaders did not quickly take actions to ensure longer-term stability.”

Iraqi leaders took note. Hoshyar Zebari, Iraq’s foreign minister, said Rice “emphasized a great deal the issue of urgency.” Rice stressed to Iraqi leaders that “patience is not unlimited in the United States and that there’s a great deal of frustration,” Zebari added.

In other words, congressional Dems are sending a message — which just so happens to be one the Bush administration thinks Iraqi officials need to hear.

What’s more, it’s not just the Bush administration. During John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) recent (infamous) visit to Iraq, the senator used the Dems’ calls for withdrawal as a means to “motivate the Maliki government.”

“So how do you motivate the Maliki government? Well, one of the ways is go sit down and have dinner with him like Lindsey Graham and I did last week,” he said, alluding to his Republican colleague from South Carolina. He said that he and Mr. Graham had warned Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki that the patience of the American public was running out. Many members of the Bush administration and other lawmakers have met with Mr. Maliki to make the same point.

“We’re telling you, there’s been votes in both houses of Congress which portend, unless the American people see measurable success, that we’re going to be out of here,” Mr. McCain said, recalling the message he had delivered to the Iraqi leader. “No matter whether I happen to agree with it or not.”

It’s awfully convenient, isn’t it? Dems do all the heavy policy lifting, Republicans question their judgment and patriotism, and when push comes to shove, it’s the Dems who are giving the administration leverage to push for progress in Iraq.

Apologies can be sent to: Congressional Democratic Caucus, Capitol Hill, Washington, DC 20515.

thank goodness the adults are in charge again.

  • Gates: “The strong feelings expressed in the Congress about the timetable probably has had a positive impact”

    Bush: “Uh-oh. Hey, Bob, you’re uh… off-message. I hired you to bomb Iran, not support the Democrats… Better start questioning the Democrats patriotism pretty quickly. Or else, I’ll find a war-czar to do your work for you. heh-heh I like saying war-czar. Somebody find me a war-czar…”

  • But in reality, Dems are doing what the president refuses to do: pressuring Iraqis to step up.

    Right, Bush is too afraid of looking scared or like an idiot to change course.

  • Bush and friends (kind of like “fox and friends,” but only goofier) are going to play this watered-down version of “The Will of the American People” to eke out just enough of an improvement to justify keeping the troops in Iraq. Think about it—they’re not telling Maliki that “Congress has voted for an ’08 withdrawal deadline;” they’re claiming, instead, that “Congress wants to see improvements as an alternative to an ’08 withdrawal deadline.”

    Ahhh, the Bu$h scam-ministration—only they can make deceit look like fine art, and a foul lie sound like a symphony. So many Saurons, so few Frodos….

  • Republicans just want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to win two contradictory ways at the same time. They keep saying that the time to withdraw is when the Iraqis are ready to take over, but they can’t show how what they are doing makes it more likely the Iraqis will be ready to take over.

  • If Dems all had shut up like Republicans wanted us to, think how much longer it would take for these ideas to get out there.

  • just bill

    I’ve often thought of Democrats as Mom and Dad… they insist you have your veggies before dessert, make sure the bills are paid, look out for your safety and make sure you CAN go to school even if you’re dumb enough to play hooky.

    Then there’s Uncle Ted (the GOP) who Dad and Mom let you go on fishing trips with twice a year. Uncle Ted serves burgers and fries for lunch and dinner with chocolate chip pancakes for breakfast. Double malts as beverage. You watch Schwartzenegger movies all night and get up at 5 for the fishing on Sunday. He asks if you want to go to church and looks relieved when you say no. You go back to Mom and Dad on Sunday night, bloated, sick to your stomach, pockets empty from blowing your whole allowance at the video arcade, tired and worn out, worthless at school for the next two days.

    We need Mom and Dad, but dangit, we LOVE Uncle Ted.

  • Hey Bill Jacobs… Uncle Ted also pulls an ID theft on Mom and Dad, cleans out your trust fund, lets his friends molest your little brother, and then he splits for the Cayman Islands.

    Shoot him.

  • Ohioan,

    Good stuff but I have one ammendment. W probably does not call the SOD Bill. I bet it is Gatey-Gator or Billy BathGates or GoldenGates… Other than that…Too funny!

    Bill Jacobs,
    I have no idea what you are trying to say, do you? Are you suggesting that the GOP allows us to be selfish monkey-slobs every so often and we love it? Maybe the GOP is less uncle Ted and more sad, fat divorced dad who deals with mommy’s new boyfrioend by purchasing two motorcycles for us to ride on weekends despite the fact he cannot afford then and doesn’t even pay his child support on time. It is nice that the YMCA he lives at has a pool though.

  • What heavy policy lifting?

    Democrats haven’t really done anything except create a policy stalemate, which wil, paradoxically, work the WH’s advantage in a “supply the troops” fight. Democrats have rallied, as a party, behind the “withdraw from Iraq” option without seriously considering how military defeat (and that is what it will be considered to be by our enemies) will affect the war and eventual AQ and Iranian attacks on the American homeland.

    Americans despise the notion of losing, which is the notion that more of your base activists appear to be embracing. This is a word of warning from one of your political opponents, but hear me well: Americans despise a loser and a party that trafficks in military defeat.

    Your embrace of the politics of the short term has condemned you to wander in the wilderness. You cannot see that now, but it will come.

  • Comments are closed.