Did NH phone jammer get green light from White House?

I continue to believe, perhaps mistakenly, that the GOP phone-jamming scandal in New Hampshire is a bigger deal than the attention it’s been getting. To follow up on last month’s item about the White House’s possible connection to the controversy, a new report suggests one of the indicted phone jammers may end up pointing the finger at the RNC and the Bush gang.

According to a recent court filing, indicted phone jammer Shaun Hansen may offer an affirmative defense at his upcoming fall trial, arguing that the phone jamming scheme which his company carried out had the seal of approval of both the Republican National Committee and the White House.

Apparently, Hansen’s defense strategy is not going to focus on whether or not he jammed Democratic phone lines on Election Day in 2002. Rather, his defense strategy will be to persuade a jury that he may have been persuaded not just that the phone jamming was legal, but that he would be carrying out the scheme on behalf of the United States government.

As John Byrne explained, Hansen owned the company that did the literal phone jamming, and was “indicted in March for conspiring to commit and aiding and abetting the commission of interstate telephone harassment relating to a scheme to thwart get out the vote efforts on Election Day, 2002.”

According to the filing, Hansen “does not have firsthand knowledge of Administration intervention.” That’s a pretty big caveat. But Hansen nevertheless believes, and apparently hopes to prove in court, that his indictment was tantamount to entrapment — White House officials, who spoke with master-schemer James Tobin 12 times during the actual phone jamming on Election Day 2002, allegedly signed off on the calls as legal, which suggests to Hansen that “the government, or an agent thereof, actually induced the offenses.” Interesting defense.

The broader phone-jamming story still isn’t generating much excitement, but I still have a hunch this could turn into a big deal. At a minimum, it’s worth keeping an eye on.

It’s too early to say whether this is a legitimate defense–ie. based on what actually happened–or whether he’s trying to get the court to let him subpoena some of the big shots. If he can do that, it might get interesting, but until he actually manages to get some of these people forced to testify(and I’m not terribly optimistic)this doesn’t add up to much

  • maybe he’s betting on the “subpoena WH officials = pardon” formula.

  • If I might modify Mencken’s famous statement, a more modern version might be:

    Nobody ever went broke over-estimating the depths to which the traditional Republican criminal class will descend.

    You’re not mistaken that this is a big deal. I’ve been wondering all week which one of these professional Republican criminals was advising the Calderon campaign in Mexico.

  • “Rather, his defense strategy will be to persuade a jury that he may have been persuaded not just that the phone jamming was legal, but that he would be carrying out the scheme on behalf of the United States government.”

    That is amusing. The White House can commit electorale interference and it’s LEGAL?

    Please, try to make that case, Hansen!

  • This administration is a scandal by any standard. The fact that our ‘Caesar’ stumbled across the Potomac in a dry drunk haze of sanctimony and privillege makes our shame all the greater.

    We thought that the electorate was as inviolate as the ‘invisible hand’ of capitalism. Maybe the biggest lesson of the 20th century was the collapse of the Weimar Republic and Hitler’s 38%(same as Lincoln’s, I believe).

    We have become a nation besotted in consumption, apathy, deliberate callous indifference, willful ignorance….arghhh, we have met the president and he is us!

  • Comments are closed.