Digging a little deeper into McCain ethical lapses

When considering John McCain’s history of unethical behavior, the list usually starts (and ends) with the Keating Five scandal in the 1980s, for which McCain was rebuked by the Senate Ethics Committee for having shown, at a minimum, poor judgment. While McCain took on the role of a “reformer” in the scandal’s aftermath, his ethical lapses have hardly disappeared.

The NYT noted a few weeks ago, for example, that McCain went to considerable lengths in 1999 to help one of his top campaign fundraisers buy the land at an Army base that was being closed. McCain helped his benefactor get the land — and special water rights — for just $250,000, which the donor then sold two years later for $30 million. (The donor, Donald Diamond, was rather candid about buying influence with politicians: “I want my money back, for Christ’s sake. Do you know how many cocktail parties I have to go to?”) It’s the kind of obvious influence peddling McCain swears he never gets involved with.

Today, the WaPo has a front-page item highlighting yet another real-estate controversy in which McCain helped out one of his most generous supporters.

Sen. John McCain championed legislation that will let an Arizona rancher trade remote grassland and ponderosa pine forest here for acres of valuable federally owned property that is ready for development, a land swap that now stands to directly benefit one of his top presidential campaign fundraisers.

Initially reluctant to support the swap, the Arizona Republican became a key figure in pushing the deal through Congress after the rancher and his partners hired lobbyists that included McCain’s 1992 Senate campaign manager, two of his former Senate staff members (one of whom has returned as his chief of staff), and an Arizona insider who was a major McCain donor and is now bundling campaign checks.

When McCain’s legislation passed in November 2005, the ranch owner gave the job of building as many as 12,000 homes to SunCor Development, a firm in Tempe, Ariz., run by Steven A. Betts, a longtime McCain supporter who has raised more than $100,000 for the presumptive Republican nominee.

Betts now claims that he and McCain never discussed the real-estate deal, but there are some real oddities to McCain’s behavior on this one.

McCain initially withheld support for Hayworth’s bill, which failed in 2002. Ruskin saw McCain’s restraint as an obstacle. He said Senate staff members warned him that the senator was wary of a swap because “he spent some political capital and got some bricks thrown at him” over the Tonto National Forest deal.

Ruskin, who is a pediatrician by training, said he realized he needed to hire lobbyists “to open communications with McCain’s office.”

He turned to some of McCain’s closest former advisers. In 2002, he sought out Mark Buse, McCain’s former staff director at the Senate commerce committee, which the senator chaired.

“I had gone to him to see if he had any advice as to how to deal with McCain,” Ruskin said. “We had a couple of meetings and I paid him a little bit.” Buse’s federal lobbying records do not list the ranch as a client.

That year, lobbying records show, Ruskin also paid $60,000 to Michael Jimenez, another former McCain aide. Wes Gullett, who had worked in McCain’s Senate office, managed his 1992 reelection bid, and served as deputy campaign manager for his 2000 presidential run, also lobbied on the bill, documents show. The watchdog group Public Citizen lists Gullett and his wife, Deborah, as bundlers who have raised more than $100,000 for McCain’s White House bid. Ruskin also hired Gullett’s partner, Kurt R. Davis, another McCain bundler and member of the senator’s Arizona leadership team, to work with local officials and “to help with McCain if we needed help.” Buse, Jimenez and Gullett did not return calls seeking comment.

Despite his previous opposition, and despite reports that the government was getting a raw deal, McCain ultimately switched, clearly the way for a land swap that directly helped one of his biggest donors.

Worse, this may be part of a pattern.

Betts is among a string of donors who have benefited from McCain-engineered land swaps. In 1994, the senator helped a lobbyist for land developer Del Webb Corp. pursue an exchange in the Las Vegas area, according to the Center for Public Integrity. McCain sponsored two bills, in 1991 and 1994, sought by donor Donald R. Diamond that yielded the developer thousands of acres in trade for national parkland.

In the late 1990s, McCain promoted a deal in Arizona’s Tonto National Forest involving property part-owned by Great American Life Insurance, a company run by billionaire Carl H. Lindner Jr., a prolific contributor to national political parties and presidential candidates.

First, this is something to keep in mind the next time the media characterizes McCain as pure as the driven snow.

Second, if the Rezko story was considered a big deal by campaign reporters, this sketchy behavior on McCain’s part should be huge.

McCain really struggles when confronted on his problems – but luckily for him, no one will ever confront him on “Fort Ord-gate” or “Pine Forest-gate”.

I love how Jon Stewart nailed him on Hamas – McCain admitted that Hamas doesn’t care who’s president, JS responded so they are not really rooting for Obama – and he basically stuttered.

Good job by Print journalists and Comedy Central. Now if only TV news will catch up.

  • Stinks on ice. But I doubt if many of the corporate whore media will risk their seats on the McBush Express trying to explain it to the low-information readers they normally shoot for.

    I think the thing they need to go after is his affair with the beer baroness, and any unsavory connections with her mobbed-up daddy.

  • How dare you attack ‘Senator Clean’!!!

    Don’t you realize that it is ‘out of bounds’ to tell the truth about Rethugnicans. Being critical of Senator Clean just shows your contempt for our country. Please pay closer attention to the Corporate News Media and they will show you the path of salvation via McSame.

    Your behavior in attacking Senator Clean with the truth is ‘hitting below the belt’. Your contempt for our country may even manifest itself in attacking Senator Clean’s wife for being an admitted junkie thief. That wouldn’t be fair, would it?

    Would your contempt for America extend to applying the same standard to McBush’s evangelical preachers as to Rev. Wright? That would not be fair. After all, Wright is black and everyone knows that the only wacko preachers who should be talked about are the black ones.

    When push comes to shove, you should take your cues from the Corporate News Media. Stop being critical of Senator Clean and get behind the Corporate Candidate.

  • …there are some real oddities to McCain’s behavior on this one.

    Shouldn’t surprise anyone – he is batsh@t crazy. The neocon/repugs had 6+ years to find an successor to the most criminal administration in American history, dur chimpfurher. They found an ideal candidate – a senile political hack that has lived on the government gravy-train all of his life and married into extreme wealth.

    They know he stands for nothing and the media has been grooming him with a fake “maverick” and “straight-talker” image for many years. He is a spineless fool that increasingly has no grasp on reality.

    More importantly – he has TONS of skeletons in his closet, including spousal abuse and prostitutes (including the DC Madam that was MURDERED).

    He was not a hero in Vietnam – he was a traitor.

    He was one of the major players in the Keating/Savings and Loan scandal when ronny reagan was presi-NUT. At the time, the most expensive scandal in WORLD HISTORY.

    Obviously, mclame has the kind of “credentials” the repugs/neocons seek in a pResident.

    Of course, shillary has essentially the same type of credentials too – pretty scary.

  • Laura (4): Influence peddling is illegal. Proving an actual quid pro quo relationship is the hard part. But if a politician wants to avoid the appearance of impropriety, he would avoid changing positions that favor people who raise money for him, especially when the intermediary is a former staffer.

  • Everyytime McCain raises this Hamas garbage, he should be asked about the fact that al-Qaeda No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri has declared that he is actually on McCain’s side in wanting to destroy Iran.

    al-Qaeda endorses McCain.

    Hamas endorses Obama.

    Now which organization is it that attacked America?

  • Come on, we all know how much ethics cred McCain has with his base in the media.

  • Now that the Democratic race is all but over, it’s about time for McCain to get more attention – even from the once-friendly media.

    In the spotlight, he’s going to disappear like an ice cube in the summer sun. This is someone who can’t stand close scrutiny.

  • The issue of bundling campaign donations has obviously not gained the scrutiny it deserves. This practice has neutered most of the reforms created by the McCain/Feingold campaign finance legislation. The conflict of interest between bundlers and recipients are glaring but seldom revealed by the press and when it is in rare instances like this WaPo article, it gains little traction.

    The environmental implications of this latest land swap remain to be seen. As part of the legislation to make this land swap possible, a study group or commission is supposed to determine the impact on water resources including the Verde River. But, as the WaPo article revealed, this group has not received the congressional funding proposed in the legislation.

    In the much larger environmental context, this kind of dealing has tremendous impacts on future sustainability of our nation. This unchecked growth stimulated by the incentive for quick profit by a politically connected few is environmentally and ecologically untenable in a region potentially threatened by severe water shortages. In the end, it is us, the taxpayers, who will be footing the bill to pay for this blind stampede to develop the arid west. Another case of crony capitalism making the system work for the few.

  • What does one have to do to be rebukes by the senate ethics committee? Use prostitutes in violation of the law? No. Plead guilty to a crime in a mens bathroom? No
    Yet McCain was rebuked. He must have really broken the law.

  • Laura said: “This stuff is clearly unethical. But out of curiousity, is it illegal?”

    Rule #1: If a republican does it, it is ‘out of bounds’ to ask if it is illegal.

    Rule #2: If a republican does it, until you have proof that would stand up in court, it is ‘out of bounds’ to even discuss it.

    Rule #3: If a republican does it, as long as there is ‘an interpretation of the law’ that puts it into a ‘gray’ category, it is ok to do.

    Rule #4: If a democrat does it or Matt Drudge dreams that he/she did it, then it is a topic that should be discussed in detail. But only with ‘pundits’ discussing it on an equally weighted ‘he said/he said’ basis.

    Rule #5: Under a republican unitary presidency, f**k the Constitution and f**k the law!

  • beans said:
    “What ever happened to Vicki Iseman story? Remember this?”

    Not fair to bring this up.

    Our Corporate News Media have thoroughly vetted this story and everything else about McInsane. They have determined that he is an independent ‘straight talker’ whose ethics border on saintly.

    Take their word for it and stop your unpatriotic questioning of anything that Saint John has ever said or done…

  • You guys are friggin nuts. I realize it is hard to be at least partly neutral, however, you are blind to the media bias on the other side also. The Democrats get huge positive press for Obama. I have seen so many puff pieces on him I would get sick. If you take a fine tooth comb to any politician in office for the last 25 years you will find areas where it looks like impropriety happens. Look up Ted Kennedy or Nancy Pelosi’s record in detail and I am sure you will find areas in which it looks like they have been unethical either. That is why Obama has a huge advantage. He has almost no record to worry about. He hasn’t done anything. That is unfortunately a blessing and a curse (lack of experience). By the way Republicans aren’t evil. We are just pragmatic and unfortunately a few bad apples ruined it for us.

  • With this brief glimpse of land development history, you can see that Arizona is being transformed from a pleasent, more rural region into another clone of the Eastern urban ideal. Greed developers have been allowed to subdivide and sell DESERT as if it were prime real estate in California, despite the noted lack of little un-American things — like water. Or jobs. Forcing development so that corporations like Great American Life Insurance can make a quick profit is SO today.

  • Comments are closed.