‘Do not believe anyone who tells you that the situation is getting better’

When it comes to foreign policy, Lawrence J. Korb is unquestionably a credible expert. He was assistant Defense Secretary in the Reagan administration and is now a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. Last year, when congressional Democrats began embracing a redeployment plan for Iraq, it was Korb who wrote the proposal and came up with the idea of “strategic redeployment.”

So, now that Korb has returned from a 10-day visit in Iraq, a lot of people are anxious to hear what he learned. Unfortunately, all of the news is discouraging.

Center for American Progress senior fellow and former Reagan Pentagon official Lawrence Korb recently returned from a 10-day visit to Baghdad to “assist the government of Iraq’s efforts to strengthen public administration in its civilian ministries” and uncovered results that only affirm that “the surge is not working.”

Korb noted that U.S. defense contractors, who have benefited heavily from the Iraq war, were curiously restrained in talking about the situation on the ground on the record. Major defense contractors, including those from Blackwater and Halliburton, were mum about the troop escalation only until Korb emphasized that he was not affiliated with the media:

“The long wait [getting through Iraqi customs] did allow me to speak to some of the contractors about the situation on the ground. When I assured them I was not a member of the press, they were unanimous that the surge was not working. One of them said that members of Muqtada Al-Sadr’s militia have sold their guns and melted back into the population in Sadr City and will buy back their guns at the appropriate time (our own security guard said something similar).”

The line from McCain and other war supporters is that there’s a disconnect between the reality on the ground and the news reports we Americans learn through the media. Korb’s report, which is really worth reading in its entirety, points to an entirely different disconnect — between propaganda from administration and Iraqi officials and the day-to-day reality on the streets of Iraq.

Korb, for example, was particularly focused on gauging the efficacy of the president’s escalation strategy.

The most optimistic projection was “maybe temporarily.” But most people speaking off the record believe that the insurgents will shift to other areas and lay low for a while in Baghdad.

…No one in or out of the American or Iraqi government seemed to have a good answer to my question: “how does it end?” On the back of this visit, I am more and more convinced that we must take control of our own destiny by setting a specific timetable for withdrawal. Currently, our fate is in the hands of an Iraqi government that does not have any real incentive to get its act together and does not even seem to understand the gravity of the situation or the declining level of support in the United States.

Bottom line: “Do not believe anyone who tells you that the situation is getting better.” Good advice.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070418/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_abortion

Supreme Court rules against women’s rights.

Let’s hear once again from Ralph Nader, and especially from the 2000 Nader-voting-liberated-women in Florida, how “there’s not a dimes worth of difference between the Democrats and the Republicans.”

  • Geez, doesn’t anyone read history books in the admin? To answer my own question, it is clear that no one reads history let alone adult books in the Bush admin.

    This is classic guerrilla Sun Tzu as interpreted by Mao. “When they appear strong, we appear weak” and so on and so forth.

    To succeed in Counter Insurgency Warfare you need to have smart people at all levels and areas who really understand the culture of the enemy, not the equivalent of politically connected pin headed bible thumping ice cream truck drivers, “graduates” from Regent or other crap bible skule or half witted MBAs with delusions of grandeur.

  • But… but… Richard Perle says it’s getting better! He says it’s all about freedom and Democracy, and that we need to stand firm!

    Anyone else watch the 1 hour Perle Infomercial on PBS last night?

    It made me want to vomit. The guy asserts, and is not rebutted in any way, that Saddam was training al Qaeda terrorists.

    Unbelievable. PBS needs to be hosed out, whoever let that shit get broadcast needs to be FIRED.

  • I’ll believe them when Bush, Cheney, Rove, and Petraeus go on camera dressed like Sgt. Peppers Band and sing ‘ Getting Better’.

  • The most optimistic projection was “maybe temporarily.”

    The sick thing is, that’s all BushCo (TM) wants at this moment. The first week it’s quiet will be the week ShrubBuster claims Victory and yanks the troops out of there. If the country goes up in a fireball the next week Rice will proclaim “No one could have forseen the civil war would break out with more intensity, gibber, babble mooo!”

    Of course a quick glance at the news this AM tells me the only way they’re going to get a quiet week is if they find an areosol tranquilizer and spritz it over the entire country.

    I would take the statement that we should not trust anyone who says it’s getting better and add don’t trust anyone who believes anyone who says it’s getting better.

    PBS needs to be hosed out, whoever let that shit get broadcast needs to be FIRED.

    Bu-but, PBS protects our children from cartoon rabbits that fraternize with lesbians!

  • What someone needs to write is the official roster of who is fighting over in Iraq and what are they fighting for. We’re so used to terms like “insurgents” yet does anyone know who this insurgency consists of, if indeed there is only one insurgency?

    I don’t think any of us really knows just what the cause is that people are willing to strap explosives on themselves and blow themselves, an countless innocent others, up for. Is it to get the US out of Iraq? Is it for Sunni or Shia supremeacy or parity? Is it for the creation of a religious state in Iraq? Is it something else or many other things? Until we have an understanding of what all the various factions are fighting for, we’ll never know the key to ending the violence over there. It doesn’t help that our government looks at this situation in such simplistic terms.

  • PBS is no longer a bastion of truth. Even NPR seems to have rolled over, played dead before the Republican onslaught. Apparently they didn’t get the memo about the outcome of the last election. Don’t they know their funding won’t be cut for being critical of the administration?????

  • LEAKED RNC E-MAIL

    From: Karl Rove
    To: wingnuts@rnc.com

    Folks – Cheney has personally asked me to take care of this Korb guy. So here are your talking points:

    “Larry Korb works for the Center for American Progress, an evil ultraliberal 527 that supports gay marriage, abortion and surrendering to terrorists. Oh and by the way, George Soros bankrolls this operation.

    “If somebody brings up Korb’s credentials in the Reagan administration, just say Soros/Korb/Soros/Korb in fast succession. That always works.”

    Thanks,
    Karl

  • Actually the Perle segment on PBS followed three earlier segments that showed how things really are on the ground in Iraq which made Perle look like a total ass when he came on. They were hosted by Robert MacNeil and were outstanding in their honesty and integrity.

    Please don’t judge PBS until you’ve seen the whole series. It was really good.

  • Curmudgeon is partly right, the PBS series does contain some really good stuff. My point is that the entire hour of Perle’s lies was left standing, without rebuttal. Saying that another segment proves Perle is a liar doesn’t really undo the damage they did by broadcasting what are obvious lies to millions of people.

    Some info about the PBS series and the CPB:

    …A few miles away from where Isikoff was being feted by PBS for his work in exposing “Muslim terrorists,” Sami Al-Arian (who has never been convicted of any crime, but who has spoken out passionately in favor of Palestinian rights) is spending his fourth year in prison, largely in solitary confinement. Perhaps Isikoff will now turn his investigative skills to examining the role of Israel and its partisans in Al-Arian’s persecution and in the Crossroads series itself. He may wish to begin with CPB’s head, Cheryl Halpern, a former chairwoman for the Republican Jewish Coalition, who, according to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, currently sits on the board of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (a spin-off of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee), whose husband is a member of AIPAC, and whose family has business interests in Israel. Her predecessor at CPB was similarly solicitous of Israel, as are so many of the neocons now associated with the organization…

    http://www.mediachannel.org/wordpress/2007/04/18/pbs-swings-right/

  • The only part of this PBS waste-of-bandwidth that had any value was the second half on Monday, which had the material from the vets-turned-writers. The first half of that was a documentary from frickin’ 2005 that was supposed to show what things are like (now). The material on “Gangs of Iraq” was mostly inaccurate rightie-talking points and the only thing that would have been good in the Perle segment would have been on-screen footage of someone blowing the bastard’s head off. PBS and NPR will get my money again when they stop being shills for Republicans and corporations. Although I do recommend the Bill Moyers special next Wednesday.

  • “Bu-but, PBS protects our children from cartoon rabbits that fraternize with lesbians!” – TAIO

    Actually, that Margeret Spelling at the Department of Education. The larger problem is of course the politicization of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

  • I saw the Perle episode on PBS last night, along with a terrific Frontline report. Anyone — ANYONE — who has any faith in victory in Iraq would have given up after watching that program.

    The Perle episode was part of a series (that I haven’t followed). I have despised Perle for years, but the program did show me that Perle at least is true believer in what he espouses. I had always assumed he was very cynical and insincere.

    It’s not quite accurate to say Perle’s version of things was not questioned. First, I think the concept of the series is to present people on their own, without comment. By letting Perle narrate, a viewer could see Perle as Perle sees himself and his beliefs.

    Second, Perle’s views WERE questioned, and within the program, by a major British Perle critic, an Iraqi critic, Richard Holbrooke, and by Pat Buchanan. The disagreements were not very diplomatic and mannerly in a couple of cases. More important, these were face-to-face with Perle, not some soundbite response.

    Both programs were well-produced and informative.

  • Comments are closed.