Down goes Reed

[tag]Ralph Reed[/tag], a man who once bragged about leaving his political opponents in “body bags,” saw his political career come to a screeching halt last night. In fact, it wasn’t even close.

Ralph Reed, the former director of the [tag]Christian Coalition[/tag] and a former Republican lobbyist involved in the Jack Abramoff scandal, suffered an embarrassing defeat in his effort to win the Republican nomination for lieutenant governor on Tuesday.

Mr. [tag]Reed[/tag] conceded defeat before 10 p.m., with his opponent leading by more than 10 percentage points.

Early Wednesday, with more than 92 percent of precincts reporting, Mr. Reed’s opponent, State Senator [tag]Casey Cagle[/tag], led with 56 percent of the vote.

A year ago, Reed was expected to not only win the primary, but cruise to an easy victory. A week ago, Reed was neck and neck with Cagle. And 12 hours ago, Reed lost by double digits. Ouch.

This may have been a GOP [tag]primary[/tag] for a lieutenant governor’s race in [tag]Georgia[/tag], but Reed’s embarrassing defeat has national implications: Reed has been one of the leading figures in the Jack [tag]Abramoff[/tag] scandal for months. The GOP line has been that the culture-of-corruption issue isn’t connecting with voters and that Abramoff’s name is not a big deal outside the beltway. Reed’s vote total suggests otherwise. Indeed, as Jesse Lee noted, Reps. John Doolittle, Richard Pombo, Jerry Lewis, Bob Ney, and Charles Taylor can’t be pleased with yesterday’s results.

As for Reed personally, this race was supposed to be the start of a very successful career in elected office. The far-right Washington Times reported last year that Reed planned to win this race in ’06, run for governor in 2010, and then run for president after that. Seriously. Yesterday’s results will probably put a crimp in those plans.

Oddly enough, the happiest people in the country about Reed’s defeat are probably Republican leaders in Georgia.

“It may mean that Democrats lose the lieutenant governor’s race,” said William Boone, a political science professor at Clark-Atlanta University. “It certainly takes away the issue of corruption that the Democrats nationally have been using.”

In recent months, most of Georgia’s GOP establishment endorsed Cagle. Gov. Sunny Purdue (R) made clear he preferred to seek re-election without four months of stories about Reed’s over-the-top corruption making headlines. I know a lot of Dems in Georgia who wanted nothing more than a Reed victory yesterday because it might have helped boost the Dem ticket statewide.

Maybe. But in the meantime, seeing Reed humiliated in his home state by a virtual unknown helps restore my faith in the electorate, at least a little.

I don’t know how much this shows about running against corruption. All is shows is that, given the choice between a corrupt Republican and a clean Republican (is there still such a thing?), Republican primary voters will choose the clean one. Given the choice between a corrupt Republican and a Democrat, who knows what the larger electorate will do?

  • Couldn’t have happened to a more deserving guy. SP, I agree with you and I think that this shows that Republican voters are turning from corruption but that does not mean Republican office holders are turning from corruption.

    Ga Dems need to come out and say how pleased they are Reed lost and that they are glad they can not focus on issues important to Georgia in the general election ect. ect. They cannot let the Republicans make lemonade out of the fact they did not back a corrupt wingnut.

  • “It certainly takes away the issue of corruption that the Democrats nationally have been using.”

    It does? Better tell that to Reps. John Doolittle, Richard Pombo, Jerry Lewis, Bob Ney, and Charles Taylor. Seem to me that it re-enforces the notion that Republicans are corrupt … and that those who aren’t are comfortable corruption.

  • It pleases me to no end that Reed lost. I’d like to see some polling data on whether it was his corrupt associations or his extremist Theocratic Reactionarism that defeated him. But for now, it’s good to see him gone.

    Now, if we can just get a few more of those corrupt Republican’ts 😉

  • This could be the tipping-point; the moment where the high tide of theocratic dominionism ebbs, and begins to fall away from the shore. Does it mean the Georgia might have a Republican for lieutenant governor? Maybe—but when combined with the embarrassing losses by Moore, Wallace, and others, there’s a wee chance that the whole South can rise out of the muck that is the conservative GOP…

  • Hmmmmm…or this could mean that Diebold won’t intercede for a primary candidate that gives Dems Abramoff ammunition.

  • I can only hope that Ralph Reed’s aspirations for national political office have been thoroughly dashed. I fear, however, that Ralph is but another in the ranks of the Republican UNDEAD, and he will somehow rise again. Even after all the exposure of Ralph’s hypocrisy and greed in the Abramoff scandal, he still managed to garner over 40% of the vote. Although this is a stinging rebuke, I would feel more at ease with a more absolute stake through the heart of his political ambitions. That said, I’m raising a glass to the set-back and hoping his smarmy baby-face disappears from the national political stage. Now if only Grover Norquist could suffer similar consequences for his little indiscretions…

  • It needs to be emphasized that the problem is the REPUBLICAN CULTURE OF CORRUPTION. Electing more Republicans will only suck new fodder into the machine. The way to kill the Republican culture of corruption is to stop electing Republicans.

  • Comments are closed.