Elizabeth Edwards highlights (one of) the flaws in McCain’s healthcare plan

Maybe it’s just me, but I tend to think this observation might resonate with voters: John McCain could be denied coverage under John McCain’s healthcare plan. It’s a point Elizabeth Edwards drove home very well over the weekend.

Elizabeth Edwards, the wife of former Democratic presidential contender John Edwards, said she and John McCain have one thing in common: “Neither one of us would be covered by his health policy.”

Edwards lodged her criticism of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee’s proposal Saturday at the annual meeting of the Assn. of Health Care Journalists.

Under McCain’s plan, insurance companies “wouldn’t have to cover preexisting conditions like melanoma and breast cancer,” she said.

McCain has been treated for melanoma, the most serious type of skin malignancy. Edwards in 2004 was diagnosed with breast cancer, and announced a year ago that it had returned and spread into her bones, meaning it no longer could be cured.

McCain’s plan focuses on offering new tax breaks for individuals who buy their own health insurance. But critics say the Arizona senator’s proposal avoids giving insurers requirements on whom they must cover and how much they may charge.

At the risk of sounding picky, “critics say” McCain’s plan avoids requirements for insurance companies because McCain’s plan avoids requirements for insurance companies. It’s an objective fact, not a point of contention.

Indeed, it points to an ideological problem underpinning the debate.

McCain seems to realize that his plan leaves millions of vulnerable Americans behind, but he also realize that the alternative is government regulation — specifically, telling insurers that they can’t exclude people with pre-existing conditions, and can’t price these people out of coverage. Given a choice between a large gap of uninsured and government-imposed safeguards for Americans, McCain prefers the prior.

That means the self-employed and others seeking individual coverage would be subject to a marketplace in which insurers generally pick the healthiest applicants and turn the rest away. Cancer survivors — even if they have been free of disease for several years — are routinely denied health insurance when they try to purchase it as individuals.

Even if coverage is offered, it often comes with restrictions or high premiums that many find unaffordable.

The problem with Democratic plans is that, up front, they’re expensive. The problem with the Republicans’ policies is that sick people of modest means can’t get health insurance. If that means someone with John McCain’s identical medical history would get denied coverage, so be it.

Expect to hear quite a bit more about this as the campaign moves on.

McCain and his ilk live longer while you poor pathetic proles die from the pollution pouring out of their goverment subsidized factories .
The Rich do live longer and new technologies , which cost more , will increase their life span , while being denied care will decrease yours .

  • Under McCain’s plan, insurance companies “wouldn’t have to cover preexisting conditions like melanoma and breast cancer,” she said.

    Powerful stuff.
    To bad it won’t resonate. Why?

    Because the media is focused on the spectacle of the Clintons, and whether or not they can win, and whether or not they should quit the race:

    Clinton angst. Clinton drama. Clinton BS. Clinton this. Clinton that.
    Clinton shouldn’t quit. Clinton should quit.
    Clinton says we should chill.
    Clintons is broke.
    Clinton is screaming something about “Shame on you Barack!”
    Clinton. Clinton. Clinton.

    Her dog-dumb losing campaign should pack it up and quit.
    That way when juicy plums like this come along…
    We can shove them down McAin’ts old maw until he chokes.

    Another golden opportunity gone…
    Because we must honor our Clintons…

    Fuck!

  • Leaving people out doesn’t concern McCain, because even if he weren’t really rich (which he is by virtue of his second marriage) he would have incredible access to free or virtually free health care because not only is he a member of the Senate, he is also a disabled combat veteran.

    Under the circumstances — why the hell should he care about everyday working people? Oh, that’s right, he doesn’t.

  • McCain has the same attitude toward health care as he does on the mortgage crisis – go f*ck yourself, unless you’re a corporation then I’ll stand for your interests.

    It’s odd that this nation will treat corporations as an individual citizen, if it is advantageous to the company to do so, but will otherwise accord corporations privileges not accessible to the average person. The easiest solution to the healthcare crisis appears to be making every citizen a corporation so that way Republican government will work for us too.

    McCain epitomizes a new brand of government: brutalism. It’s prime directive is that anything that creates the most pain for the greatest number of people is the correct solution.

  • Of course John McCain knows that he is not covered under his own health plan. However, as President he will have excellent health coverage.

    Elect John McCain. He needs the health coverage.

  • as ‘oxonhoya’ said in post #4 ; the difference in coverage between what Senators get and what the rest of us get, is enormous.

    This issue needs to be pointed out over and over and over again… Maybe some of those Fox News watchers/Reflexive Republican voters/Conservatives will finally see the connection between voting for a Republican who automatically gets the best health care coverage in America pretty much for free while at the same time denying it to everybody else.

  • I thought elected officials were servants of the people. Don’t you think we need to say “hey, you either give us the excellent healthcare that’s available to you OR you get the same healthcare package that you make available to us – same program.”

    It won’t happen of course…wish I got the pay raises they seem to enjoy giving to themselves too….

  • “Neither one of us would be covered by his health policy.”

    She’s saying that Hillary’s plan would. Apparently her and her little puppet Bubba have been thrown a bone.

  • Edwards (John) has tried to drive that point home all the time he was running and, with the exception of a few lefty blogs, nobody paid it a blind bit of attention. What makes you (CB) think that, all of a sudden, this is going to change?

  • Ms. Edwards is wrong. McCain would have health care under his plan. He would be on Medicare.

  • So when can we expect the MSM to actually press the candidates on issues like pre-existing conditions instead of just letting them talk about how great their plans all are?

  • So Typical Of the Left Hemisphere

    To be unable or unwilling to point out here that Edwards ALSO gave her stamp of approval to Hillary Clinton’s health care plan in this article you are quoting.

    God forbid that Hillary Clinton’s name ever cross your lips except as the lede to a slur or a smear.

    Just proves my theory that there is no such thing as fair, balanced or honest media — even on the Internet. Too bad, too. But I guess if the right-wing fascists get to control the MSM, the left-wing fascists get to control the “new” media, thus pushing the “average” citizen into the hinterlands. If this doesn’t show that you don’t give a crap about the electorate, or the problems facing most Americans, nothing will.

  • Thank you, Elizabeth Edwards!!! America needs your voice and we appreciate your continued service to this country. As for the remaining candidates, this is one issue on which Clinton and Obama agree: That Americans with pre-existing illnesses will be able to have truly affordable health insurance. McCain, on the other hand, is living in fantasyland when he states that less government regulation is somehow going to miraculously make profit-driven insurance companies start offering affordale health care plans to everyone.

  • Many people think that healthcare is a privelege and not a right . If that is the case then I want the government to stop wasting my tax money on subsidizing oil companies, etc. , stop spending my tax my healthcare for illegal aliens, stop spending my tax money on all the stupid pet projects they have. Let me keep it. Oh I know it won’t be enough for great healthcare for myself but it would help some. I now spend $10. per minute to see my GP. He spends about 7 minutes with me and the visit is 70.00. I can’t afford the tests he wants to run. Luckily so far I don’t take much medication and have been able to afford the 50.00 it costs me. Others are not so lucky. Fortunately I am not making minimum wage, I make quite a bit more but it doesn’t mean that I am not concerned for those who do.
    My questions are to the people who think only the financially well off get the healthcare (privelege) What happens when all the workers making minimum wage to say 30 dollars an hour get really sick? When they can’t afford the insurance that averages 12000 a year for a family of four (or God forbid they have a pre existing condition) Who is going to take of your clothes at the dry cleaners? Who is going to hold the door open for your at the theatre? Who will make the sprinklers to put on your nice lawn? What happens when all of us “poor working folks” are sick and can’t afford to see a doctor. Then we can’t work. Then there is no one available to do all your menial tasks or produce all your toys. Just remember people who are financially well off don’t always stay that way!
    I guess it would be fun to get to watch some of you who think y ou are so high above us get a chance to flip your own burgers 🙂

  • Comments are closed.