Estate tax ‘lunacy’

It’s been coming down the pike for a while now, but next week, a repeal of the [tag]estate tax[/tag] will reach the [tag]Senate[/tag] floor. Harold Meyerson makes a compelling case today that the Republican proposal is nothing short of “lunacy,” and the measure is indicative of [tag]Congress[/tag] loosing “any scintilla of sense” it has left.

The Senate…is scheduled next week to take up legislation by Arizona Republican Jon Kyl that would permanently repeal the estate tax on the [tag]wealthiest[/tag] Americans. If enacted, Kyl’s bill would plunge the government another trillion dollars into the red during the first decade (2011-2021) that it would be in effect.

There are a few angles to this debate that are worth keeping in mind over the next week. First, no one should lose sight of the fact that congressional Republicans are fighting hard for still more tax cuts for [tag]millionaires[/tag] and [tag]billionaires[/tag], while blowing off extensions of lower rates for middle-class families. Second, while Republicans are aiming to eliminate the estate tax altogether, they’re also raising taxes on Americans living abroad and tripling the tax rates for teenagers with college savings funds.

What’s more, just yesterday we learned that the real beneficiaries aren’t just faceless fat-cats — Bush, Cheney, and the president’s cabinet stand to personally benefit by as much as $344 million dollars if the estate tax repeal goes through.

Of course, it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the hyper-wealthy interests who have fueled this campaign all along.

As the Senate nears a planned vote on abolishing the estate tax, a leading government-watchdog group yesterday released a report cataloging the efforts of 18 business-dynasty families to bankroll lobbying campaigns against the tax.

Lobbying against the estate tax has grown into a cottage industry since the late 1990s, fueled by conservative groups opposed on ideological grounds and business magnates seeking the freedom to pass on assets to future generations. Foes successfully tagged the levy “the death tax” and played up its effect on family farms and small-business owners, winning passage of a phased estate-tax repeal as part of 2001’s tax-cut package.

Yesterday’s report, compiled by Public Citizen and United for a Fair Economy, lists 18 families that have made traceable contributions to the network of lobbying coalitions and advocacy groups at the forefront of the anti-estate-tax movement.

Among those singled out are the Waltons, who own a large stake of Wal-Mart; the Wegmans, whose self-titled supermarket chain has several branches in the Washington area; the Nordstrom department-store heirs; and Frank Blethen, the Seattle Times owner who donated ad space to the Family Business Estate Tax Coalition’s (FBETC) campaign against the tax.

“The families hid behind trade associations and lobbyists to make their pitch … essentially buying what they wanted in Washington since 1998,” Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook said at the report’s unveiling.

Overall, Public Citizen found that these 18 families, worth a total of $185.5 billion, have effectively led a decade-long effort to repeal the estate tax, which would “collectively net them a windfall of $71.6 billion.” They also tried to keep all their efforts under wraps, so you wouldn’t know about it.

And now Senate Republicans are intent on doing their bidding next week. Stay tuned.

Economic theory says that if you tax something you get less of it.

So I guess repealing the death tax makes the Republicans the “death party”..

  • It’s kind of staggering that they would consider subjecting our country to such a financial hit to benefit so few people. How do they sleep at night? Check that – as we all know, vampires do not sleep at night.

  • You know I tried to think of a smartass remark, but this issue more than anything else enrages me. If they have the right to seize the majority of the wealth, people should have the right to kill them and take it back. It’s all about power, and in our ‘civilized’ society money is legitimate power. They DO live like the nobles of old, and claim that it is theirs by right. The right to live a life of luxury… while there are people working 3 jobs to try and feed their children. Yeah, the unbalance is obvious for all too see so I won’t harp on it. But for the sake of justice – when is the revolution??? Screw elections… a good old fashioned beheading at the hands of an enraged populace is a far purer form of democracy. Maybe not civil, but civility can take a backseat to an urgent need for justice. Afterall, by hoarding the wealth, the rich are killing countless citizens.

    Ever notice how people complain about the money stars make – be it movie, sports, whatever. How many people can name the top 10 richest Americans without consulting Forbes? They pay very well to remain hidden, and well they should. Bah! Grrrrrr! @&#%&^%!!!!!

  • What really galls me is that apparently the Dem senior on the Senate Committee on Finance, Max Baucus, is trying to herd a number of Democratic Senators into voting for estate tax repeal. What sheer idiocy.

    With Democrats like these, who needs the Democratic party?

  • Thought this item, “CEO Pay,” from Malcolm Gladwell’s blog would add some perspective on this discussion.

    “After reading the article in the New York Times yesterday on the hundreds of millions of dollars in compensation given over the past few years to the CEO of Home Depot, I ran across this: in 1949, the highest paid CEO in America was Charlie Wilson of General Motors, who earned $586,100 in salary, bonus and stock. That’s roughly equivalent to what some of the better-compensated CEO’s are making today.

    “But what did Wilson pay in taxes? $430,350.

    “Times have changed.”

    I wonder what he paid in estate taxes.

  • Don’t forget abolishing the estate tax would result in a huge hit to donations to charities, foundations, museums, libraries, universities, … not to mention the estate planning industry.

  • Groups like Club for Growth are always scaring people here in Nebraska to believe that the tax causes poor farm families to have to sell off their land to pay for “the death tax” once the head of the household dies.

    I haven’t found one case where a family had to sell off their farm to pay this tax, but this myth is allowed to continue to exist.

    The main reason this tax was passed back in early twentieth century was because too much of our nation’s wealth was being controlled by a few wealthy families, and there was fear that our nation would turn into a European aristocracy.

    Groups that support repealling the tax, I think, are wanting to return our country back into the Gilded Age, a land of unchecked wealth for a tiny few, and an unsure future and desperate poverty for everybody else

  • Their goal is to pass as many tax cuts for the rich as possible, regardless of fiscal responsibility, so they can:

    1. Run in November on their record of cutting taxes (the drop in revenues will not have registered by then).

    2. Force the incoming Dems restore fiscal sanity and take the political hit for “raising taxes.”

  • The extension is regular legislation and not Budget Reconciliation – so there is a good chance that it will face fillibuster/not passing and is conceivably being pushed through to use as a campaign weapon against the Dems in November as most Americans seem to have bought the “death tax” hooey.

  • conceivably being pushed through to use as a campaign weapon

    Good point… filibuster or nay votes will be used as a weapon. Maybe Dems can attach useful poison-pill amendments… Pay-go? AMT fix? minimum wage increase?

  • Your figure for how much it will save the cabinet is out of date.

    The chairman of Goldman Sachs has got to be a lot wealthier than the chairman of a railroad.

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    What I don’t understand is why our current estate tax doesn’t work properly.

    Ned Johnson of Fidelity has managed to give his daughter a huge chunk of the company. I think she is now worth $4 billion. So how is it possible that her father gave Abigail BILLIONS without paying any estate or gift tax???

  • The question arises about just how much of that wealth is actually “earned” by these “self made” men?

  • The “report, compiled by Public Citizen and United for a Fair Economy, lists 18 families that have made traceable contributions to the network of lobbying coalitions and advocacy groups at the forefront of the anti-estate-tax movement.”

    I notice the release of this report in late April. While I wholly endorsed the report. I think that Public Citizen and company missed a key talking point: No matter how much that the Republicans call the estate tax “the death tax,” the estate tax is in reality “a wealth transfer tax.”

    A wealth transfer tax can come in two forms: an estate tax and an inheritance tax. In one form the estate of the deceased is taxed, in the other the heirs of the estate are taxed for receiving the inheritance. The death tax phrase is a propagandic misnomer; the federal estate tax is a WEALTH TRANSFER TAX–which exempts all but a few estates. Estates taxes imposed by any of the fifty states is another matter.

  • Almost four hours later and no additional comments? Huh? I guess the shelf life of some subjects is quite short.

  • I have a family business and all our assests are tied up in our property. With paying taxes, our employees and inventory, there isn’t much more to pay ourselves. But we do have our properties and that is what we work and fight for. In 2011 the “death tax” kicks back in and our total value including everything we own is 3.5 million. My kids have worked all their lives with us and when we die (2011 or later) they will get a 650,000 exemption and then be taxes 55% on everything else we own. That means they have to sell the properties that we use to run the business or go into debt to keep the properties.
    It’s not worth keeping the business when it’s just bringing in enough to pay for the properties.They will have to close the business and let the employees go. Some have worked with us for 15 years. It is sad no one cares about a family business and the hard work that goes into this.
    3.5 million is a lifetime of work and half of it is taken away in 9 months time by people like Clinton who have made 100 million in 5 years time. Of course they don’t care about the “death tax”…I mean 50 million is an amazing amout of money and that is just money sitting in the bank. They aren’t using that money to run a business. That is a huge difference. My kids won’t be able to make that type of money, our business is changing. Huge corporations have come in and you just can’t compete against them. Why take away a lifetime of work in 9 months time?

    But for us middle class families trying to grow a company. Working 7-7 everyday. It just isn’t fair.

  • Comments are closed.