Experts need not apply

When it comes to Middle East policy, career U.S. intelligence officer Patrick Lang is hardly a slouch. He was in charge of the Middle East, South Asia, and terrorism for the Defense Intelligence Agency in the 1990s, and was later tapped to run the Pentagon’s international spying operations.

So when he sat down in 2001 with Doug Feith for a job interview, Feith probably should have been anxious to bring someone with Lang’s experience, stature, and expertise into the young Bush administration. Feith needed someone to run the Pentagon’s office of special operations and low-intensity warfare, and Lang had been recommended for the position. The interview didn’t go well. (via TP)

Lang went to see him, he recalled during a May 7 panel discussion at the University of the District of Columbia.

“He was sitting there munching a sandwich while he was talking to me,” Lang recalled, “which I thought was remarkable in itself, but he also had these briefing papers — they always had briefing papers, you know — about me.

“He’s looking at this stuff, and he says, ‘I’ve heard of you. I heard of you.’

“He says, ‘Is it really true that you really know the Arabs this well, and that you speak Arabic this well? Is that really true? Is that really true?’

“And I said, ‘Yeah, that’s really true.’

“That’s too bad,” Feith said.

The audience howled.

“That was the end of the interview,” Lang said. “I’m not quite sure what he meant, but you can work it out.”

It’s best not to have too many qualified experts cluttering up the administration. Who knows what kind of reality-based policies they might have pursued.

Odds are that Bush Inc. would reject an expert because they already had plans to invade Iraq and feared the expert would disagree with them and possibly speak out about it.

  • This entire administration has, form the get-go, been conducted on the principles laid down in Murphey’s Law of Lab Reports: “For best grades, draw all curves before plotting any data”.

  • Unbelievable it is that the Bush administration would purposely disqualify and reject those most qualified for the post being applied for. Are they so set on specific political objectives, “loyalty” (to an administration not their country), and “fidelity” (to a political cause), that they would reject those most qualified for the job at hand? Truly unbelievable if so and, perhaps, treasonous–and un-American/unpatriotic–to what’s good for the nation and its citizens. Would this qualify for hearings on impeachment based on criminal malfeasance?

  • “they always had briefing papers”
    Their illusion of mastery and self-delusion of competence set the stage for the great mistakes to follow.
    Too bad…. for Feith’s arrogant stupidity.

  • As one of the TP commentators pointed out, Tommy Franks called Feith “the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth.”

  • I think it’s safe to say that, when this nation finally sets out to conduct its own version of the Nuremburg Trials, Doug Feith will find himself in a rather uncomfortable position—and his “masters” won’t be able to save him with a meager little “pardon,” either….

  • Who the f–k wrote those briefing papers? “They always had briefing papers.” I’d really love to know who was spoon-feeding these idiots the sh-t they were eating. …Not that I don’t have ideas of my own.

    Like 2Manchu, the Tommy Franks quote came to mind as I was reading this.

    “‘Is it really true that you really know the Arabs this well, and that you speak Arabic this well?… That’s too bad,’ Feith said.” You have to really try to imbue a government with this much incompetence, and the results really, really show.

    I fear the heartburn that will come as ever more of the curtain obscuring this administration’s ways gets lifted.

  • “He says, ‘Is it really true that you really know the Arabs this well, and that you speak Arabic this well? Is that really true? Is that really true?’

    “And I said, ‘Yeah, that’s really true.’

    “That’s too bad,” Feith said.

    Three components to Feith’s “alas”:
    1) Lang knows Arabs well. That’s “too bad”, because he’s likely to recognise BS on tthat subject, when it’s being spoon-fed to him.
    2) Lang speaks Arabic well. That’s “too bad”, because he could develop lines of communication independent of those controlled by the WH/Feith
    3) It’s *all* “too bad” because, at some level, it would be nice to have an expert opinion on your side, to be able to wave in the public’s eyes.

    *If only* Bush’s malAd could have experts who were — simultaneously — clever and dim-witted…

  • Comments are closed.