Far-right offers hints to McCain on how to win their support

Earlier this week, a TPM Cafe writer had a very amusing item, urging Obama’s and Clinton’s most fervent supporters to “drop out of the race.” Noting that both have become “incredibly annoying,” the writer argued that “anything” is preferable to “your insistent and continual droning on and on about how perfect your candidate is.”

It struck a chord for obvious reasons — the candidates’ most enthusiastic backers can get rather grating. But I’d just add that even more annoying than Obama and Clinton loyalists are conservative activists who continue to insist, “If John McCain doesn’t make us happy, he’ll lose.”

For example, L. Brent Bozell, a conservative media critic and former head of the Parents Television Council, has a lengthy item in the Washington Post today, explaining how and why the Republican Party’s far-right base holds McCain in low regard — a familiar subject, to be sure — and what the senator can do about it. On the latter point:

McCain must present a strategy to defeat the threat of radical Islam. He needs to call on the United States to rebuild its military infrastructure, so devastated by the Clinton administration. […]

He … should pledge to end the estate tax and lower the corporate tax rate to 25 percent. In fact, he should call for an overhaul of the tax system. The flat tax or the fair tax — either is preferable to the monstrosity that is the Internal Revenue Service. […]

He should champion private retirement accounts and health savings accounts. McCain should place the left on notice — now — that if elected, he will not tolerate congressional obstructionism of his nominations to the federal judiciary.

Our culture is decaying from within, and most Republicans have been shamefully AWOL on this issue. McCain could begin a national conversation about parents, not the state, taking responsibility for their children and their communities. He should call on the entertainment industry to stop polluting America’s youth with its videos and its music and on the Internet. We wait to hear him call for the United States to honor the sanctity of life, the sanctity of marriage and family, and to return God to the public square.

I have to say, all of this sounds kind of familiar.

For one thing, the notion that Clinton “devastated” our military infrastructure is quite silly, given what Bush has done over-stretch our forces. For another, McCain already supports eliminating estate tax and lowering the corporate tax rate to 25%.

But the rest of this is pretty much Bush boilerplate, from the last two presidential elections, isn’t it? Bozell’s recipe for success, in other words, is for McCain to not only emulate Bush, but to run on his platforms.

Dems should be so lucky.

It’s kind of irrelevant, but Bozell’s piece also includes a rather creative look at recent political history. As he sees it, the only way for Republicans to succeed on the national stage is to avoid moderation at all costs.

In 1996, a new crop of conservative leaders presented themselves as presidential candidates, but again the party establishment would have none of Buchanan, Steve Forbes, Phil Gramm or Dan Quayle. Instead, they pooled their resources behind Dole, who offered nothing to energize the conservative base while the professional class confidently clucked that conservatives had “nowhere else to go.” Again we stayed home. There was no enthusiasm for volunteer action. Again the moderate candidate was routed.

How disgruntled was the conservative base? Two years later, the GOP lost five seats in the House, the first time since 1822 that a party not in control of the White House had failed to gain seats in the midterm election of a president’s second term.

Hmm, I recall those cycles pretty well, and it seems to me that Clinton won in 1996 because the economy was booming, not because Dole was insufficiently right-wing. And Dems excelled in 1998, not because of two-year-old dissatisfaction with Dole among conservatives, but because the country was disgusted with Gingrich-DeLay and a misguided impeachment crusade.

But I digress. Bozell’s point is that the right is mad as hell and isn’t going to take it anymore. If McCain doesn’t offer conservatives what they want to hear, he’s through.

I don’t buy it. Far-right lawmakers who loathed McCain in January are endorsing him now. Fred Barnes recently argued that McCain needn’t worry, because “while they love to grumble and grouse, conservatives tend to be loyal Republicans who wind up voting for their party’s candidate.”

I hate to agree with Barnes too often, but on this, Bozell sounds like he’s tilting at windmills.

For a while I thought this “We lost because we weren’t true to our core conservative principles” line was just a talking point, but it’s clear that the righties have actually persuaded themselves that it’s true. That makes me very happy — they won’t win if they swallow their own BS.

  • Virtually every success the Republicans have had in the past 25 years has been due to their downplaying of the culture war themes.

    Reagan in 1980 and 1984 gave them only lip service, same with Bush in 1988. The Contract with America pointedly downplayed social conservatism in ’94 andf that worked, as did Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” lie of 2000. For all the noise originally made about “values voters” in 2004, exit polls showed it was really Iraq/national security/terrorism that was the key.

    The Bozell-Buchanan wing got their way twice — first in ’92 and more so in ’96, drafting a platform that Garry Wills accurately called “an executioners’ platform” for gays and atheists and forcing Dole to run on it. Both times they went down to massive defeats.

  • This is hilarious. The far Right lives in some kind of parallel universe.

    The military forces that Clinton supposedly disemboweled through the year 2000 did a fantastic job in Afghanistan in 2001, kicking out the Taliban in a conflict halfway around the world. Our right-wing friends seem to have forgotten about that.

    Off topic, but would you like to know why Obama’s victory in Wyoming doesn’t count?

    http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=205033.msg2825072#msg2825072

  • How’s this for an ideal weapon the Kulturkrieg Zealots and True Believers would love to see deployed upon the Lower Classes, if only for the sake of sick, hubris-weighted humour @ the expense of the vulnerable?

    Aesop was right: “The smaller the mind, the greater the conceit.”

  • The very best part about the Bozo, er, Bozell agenda is that Bush has already tried to implement it and each time he tried to move part of it his numbers dropped farther.

    Private retirement accounts? (And you gotta love the nerve of running that one in the middle of a stock market crash!)

    These folks have delightfully short memories.

  • More Republican lies! He needs to call on the United States to rebuild its military infrastructure, so devastated by the Clinton administration.

    The following is from Dick Cheney’s bio.
    Early in 1991 the secretary unveiled a plan to reduce military strength by the mid-1990s to 1.6 million, compared to 2.2 million when he entered office. In his budget proposal for FY 1993, his last one, Cheney asked for termination of the B-2 program at 20 aircraft, cancellation of the Midgetman, and limitations on advanced cruise missile purchases to those already authorized.

  • My question is why is a joker like Brent Bozell gets space in WaPO…what is the Wash Times suddenly not good enough to push conservative drivel…

  • I’m always amazed people like Bozell can sustain such outrage without self-combusting.

  • As a comitted independant who wants to give Mr. McCain some helpfull sugestions, I and my many friends have to say that the only thing that would keep us from voting for Hilary this fall would be if Senator McCain promised that we’d be in Iraq until we sucked it’s oil dry for free, plus an English-only amendmant, and he should propose some righteous tough-minded policies against gays, imiggrents, foriegners, commies, blacks, jews, flag-burning, gay marrige, athiests, women, taxes, out-of-control teens, Hispanicks, criminells (except convickted Republican polliticians, of course), abortion, Democrats, and did I say gays. Plus he’d better come out for God and the Gold Standard and a DEAL BRAKER would be him not supporting Hagee and Dobson for Supreme Court positions. And I want to see Ten Commandments everywhere. And bring back stoning for adultery. I’m sure this would get him the votes he deserves.

  • once again, conservatism can NEVER fail. only conservatives fail by not being conservative enough!

    otoh, i’d purely love some of what l. brent has been smoking.

  • I for one look forward for the Hagee and Dobson confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary committee. I wonder what their respective ABA ratings would be.

    #10 is a parody troll. Even after the Reagan-era gutting of the mental health system in the states no one that whack is left to roam the streets at large. Between modern psychotropics and the explosive growth in the prison industry,, it just doesn’t happen.

  • To expand on #8
    Has anyone anywhere ever taken Bozell seriously? He’s some movement legacy who gets lots of coverage for saying demostrably false and stupid things. I know there are lots of them out there, but what has Bozell ever accomplished other than maybe getting the FCC to fine some TV stations over a “wardrobe malfunction?”

  • Eight years later and the state of the military is still Clinton’s fault? Um, whattheheck has the Bush admin being doing to “fix” it, if it’s really such a problem? Oh wait, I know…divebombing around Crawford on a bicycle.

  • a “pre-Bushylvanian” military infrastructure was a sound, functional military infrastructure. Our current Bushylvanian military infrastructure would be seriously challenged in defeating Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia (post-Gettysburg) in a head-on land engagement. They’ve been in Iraq for what now—about 5 years—and they can’t even secure the area around their precious little “Green Zone?”

    “Wrong-Way” McCain won’t be any better; he’s part-&-parcel of the napalm-’em-into-the-stone-age” crowd. Massed carpet-bombing with incendiaries will not work—unless he proposes to “win in Iraq” by blasting it clean off the map, and “defeat the Islamofascist scary brown people” by annihilating roughly two-thirds of the planet….

  • Has anyone anywhere ever taken Bozell seriously?

    Not since he ghost-wrote Goldwater’s “Conscience of a Conservative.” He’s been coasting on that one for a half century now.

  • What does Brent Bozell think Bob Dole’s campaign focused on in 1996? I seem to remember promises of a massive tax cut and a bridge to our past that would help restore morality and traditional values. How can he fault Dole for losing on precisely the conservative platform Bozell advocates? I know I shouldn’t be expecting someone like Bozell to be even minimally honest or intellectually consistent, but this really is nutty.

  • I believe the republicans have been front and center on the decay. That is based on the number of sex scandals, felony convictions, investigations, torture support, two failed military campaigns, stifling of science, increase in poverty, loss of world respect, increase in debt, lack of oversight that has led to poisoned food, water, toys, tons of money gone, financial fraud, a weakened military and a recession. I’m not seeing where they went AWOL at all. lol

  • We wait to hear him call for the United States to honor the sanctity of life, the sanctity of marriage and family, and to return God to the public square.

    Sanctity of marriage eh? I guess Il Bozo has given McCainiac a dispensation for ditching his first wife.

    The return God to the public square thing has always puzzled me too. If one believes God is omnipresent and omnipotent, you believe He’s already in the public square and he sure as hell doesn’t need any two-legged hairless apes to help put him there.

    Oh well. The more the ReThugs harp on Values, the more likely one of their number is to tumble out of a bathroom stall with a crack pipe in one hand and a goat in the other.

  • Not since he ghost-wrote Goldwater’s “Conscience of a Conservative.” He’s been coasting on that one for a half century now.

    Wasn’t that Brent Bozell II, the current guy’s father? Brent has been riding on the family name his whole life, as far as I can tell.

  • The ideas that were pushed nearly a half-century ago by Goldwater, the agendas of today, and the similar complaints that were present a century ago are all pretty much the same. Conservatism doesn’t seem like a political ideology. In this country it seems more like a religion. —And like the average person who begins to uncomfortably itch when annoyed by a true believer, the public has gotten tired of right-wing proselytizing — for a time. This is, after all, a country that believes in angels and a six-thousand year old planet Earth.

  • To Martin 21-It was indeed the elder Bozell who ghost-wrote Barry Goldwater’s “Conscience of a Conservative.” Bozell the younger has indeed ridden on his family name-as his father was not only L. Brent Bozell II, but his mother was Patricia Buckley Bozell, William F. Buckley’s sister. Jonah Goldberg is simply the latest manifestation of trading on one’s family name.

  • I think Bozell is ignoring the cuts to our Armed Forces that Dick Cheney made when he was Secretary of Defense.

  • I’m with Bozell. Every day, McCain should trumpet his intention to privatize Social Security!

  • Wow, his whole article is just a hoot:

    “McCain must present a strategy to defeat the threat of radical Islam.”

    What,wanting to occupy Iraq for 100 years and bomb Iran not enough for you?

    “He needs to call on the United States to rebuild its military infrastructure, so devastated by the Clinton administration. ”

    Clinton’s been in charge of the military for the past seven years? Whaaaa….?

    “He should secure our borders by a date certain.”

    Exactly how? Take all of the stuff that East Germany had on their border and just have it point outward?

    “In every great struggle, the citizenry — everyone, not just the country’s military — has been challenged to participate. McCain could make this the clarion call for volunteerism, for national service. ”

    In the words of Spongebob Squarepants: “Well, good luck with that.” The current occupations overseas haven’t done a great job of promoting more recruiting as it is.

    “If McCain believes in freedom, he should promise to take the yoke off the American taxpayer. He has embraced making the Bush tax cuts permanent. Good. Now he should pledge to end the estate tax and lower the corporate tax rate to 25 percent. ”

    Which will make paying for his earlier points even the more interesting. Reagan tried that in 1981, which led to exploding deficits.

    “McCain should place the left on notice — now — that if elected, he will not tolerate congressional obstructionism of his nominations to the federal judiciary. ”

    Or else, what? He’ll say “Halt!” again?

    “McCain could begin a national conversation about parents, not the state, taking responsibility for their children and their communities. He should call on the entertainment industry to stop polluting America’s youth with its videos and its music and on the Internet. ”

    But if parents are taking responsibilty for their children, then there’s no need to worry about what the entertainment industry is “polluting” America’s youth with, right?

    “We wait to hear him call for the United States to honor the sanctity of life, the sanctity of marriage and family, and to return God to the public square.”

    Unless that “life” is poor people, then screw ’em. It’s what Jesus would want.

    As for the sanctity of marriage, does that include supporting wives who’s husbands (coughMcCaincough) cheated on them?

    And like TAIO said earlier, how could mere mortals kick God out of the public square?

  • Jonah Goldberg is simply the latest manifestation of trading on one’s family name.

    Hmmmm, Goldberg, Bozell, Bush. Must mean something about the dangers of Conservatives in-breeding;>

  • L. Brent the Bozo IV is the son of L. Brent the Bozo III, a far right idiot so idiotic that no less than William F. Buckley personally kicked him off of the National Review. Both Bozos are (were in Bozo III’s case, since he has now gone to the greast rightie swamp in the…. someplace not nice) deniers of the Vatican II reforms and both still say the Church should call the Jews Christ-killers.

    As anyone who has seen Brent the Bozo in action knows, he is the epitome of the spittle-flecked rightie. He’s fat and his face alternatives between looking like a pig when he’s merely annoyed to looking like a prune when he’s in full spitting mode and covered with a patina of spittle.

    The only thing more pathetic than this guy is the people too fucking stupid to not see him for the idiot he is.

  • “most Republicans have been shamefully AWOL on this issue.” – L. Brent Bozell

    Am I living in crazyville, the R’s have been doing exactly what Bozwell is demanding and it seems to have failed miserably. (lower taxes, eliminate cursing & nudity, hate on gays)

    Is this what we can expect in the future, the hardcore conservatives claiming Bush and Co wasn’t conservative enough. Ya, OK, please sir, keep this strategy front and center, it’s working fantastic. How can we help get your message out ??

    But stupid ass McCain will still pander against his best interest. AWESOME.

  • Pingback: www.buzzflash.net
  • So they want McCain to embrace all of the things Bush and his Republican Congress didn’t get done while they were in charge? I’m all for this, especially the Social Security thing. Cause it worked so well when Bush tried to destroy it and even he was too smart to campaign on that objective. How could the reprise possibly go wrong?

  • Comments are closed.