Foleygate leaves GOP disoriented

The revelations about the Mark Foley sex scandal, and the possible cover-up by congressional Republicans, have been coming at a near-constant clip over the last three days. Today’s Republican Party has, in general, become rather accustomed to dealing with serious and embarrassing scandals, and their vaunted political/communications machine is supposed to kick in rather quickly to help minimize the damage.

Except, in the Foley disaster, the GOP is reeling. They’re blaming each other, they’re contradicting each other, and they just don’t know what to say.

The Democratic National Committee seized on the scandal, sending out a scathing statement that raised pointed questions about Mr. Hastert and other Republican leaders. In bold red type, the dispatch asked: “What did Coach H and his buddies know and when did they know it?”

It was a rare instance in this fierce political season that Republicans were not quick to respond. The Republican National Committee has not commented on the scandal, and nearly a dozen Republican members of Congress either declined to be interviewed or did not return telephone calls about the matter on Sunday.

None of the usual conservative rhetorical tricks work. They can’t exploit 9/11; they can’t come up with some inane bumper-sticker slogan that smears Democrats; and they can’t twist this into some kind of bi-partisan affair in which Republicans are just as bad as Dems. Indeed, they can’t even sufficiently defend, or even explain, their own conduct.

It’s practically the political equivalent of a perfect-storm scandal: it hits the GOP at an awful time (just as Congress is adjourning and candidates hit the campaign trail in earnest); on key issues (protecting innocent kids and moral superiority); and with no real defense. There’s a half-hearted attempt to suggest Dems shouldn’t try to score political points off this scandal, but no one’s buying it: even Republicans concede they’d be doing the same thing if the IM messages were on the other foot.

If you haven’t been glued to the news over the last 24 hours, here are the updates you’ll need to know:

* Republicans have known about Foley’s page problem for several years, but did little to intervene. ABC News reported yesterday that a Republican staff member warned congressional pages five years ago to watch out for Foley. This makes it harder for GOP leaders to suggest the party was somehow in the dark about the sexual predator in their midst.

* While Republican teenagers were warned about Foley, young Democratic pages were not. Apparently, under-age Dems were supposed to fend for themselves.

* GOP leaders can’t keep their story straight about who saw the Foley emails and when.

* National Republican Campaign Committee Chairman Tom Reynolds, who was inexplicably alerted to the scandal early on, continued to take large donations from Foley, including a $100,000 check, even after he learned of Foley’s “problem.” It suggests that perhaps Reynolds stayed quiet because Foley was buying his silence.

* Reynolds and Hastert appear anxious to pin the blame on one another. Reynolds, in particular, singled out Hastert when the Speaker’s office appeared willing to let Reynolds take the fall. A House GOP leadership aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing his job, said that Reynolds realizes he has taken a shot at his leader but that it is understandable. “This is what happens when one member tries to throw another member under a bus,” the aide said. Josh Marshall added, “When you see Majority Leaders and Speakers and Committee chairs calling each other liars in public you know that the underlying story is very bad, that the system of coordination and hierarchy has broken down and that each player believes he’s in a fight for his life.”

* Rep. Chris Shays (R-Conn.) became the first House Republican to suggest that this scandal could bring down the House leadership, and publicly said any leader who had been aware of Foley’s behavior and failed to take action should step down. “If they knew or should have known the extent of this problem, they should not serve in leadership,” Shays said.

* ABC News’ report last night is rather devastating, referring to this as a “metastasizing” scandal, and noting that the number of pages targeted by Foley continues to grow.

Stay tuned.

“While Republican teenagers were warned about Foley, young Democratic pages were not. Apparently, under-age Dems were supposed to fend for themselves.”

More evidence of a cover-up. Had Dem pages been told, Dem legislators would have been informed of the problem by the Dem pages.

  • Go to Hastert’s website. Unless they’ve had the good sense to get rid of it already, the lead item under “Recent News”, at the very top of the page, is “Hastert Drives Effort To ‘Keep Kids Safe In Cyberspace’ (8/29/2006)”.

    Long after he knew about GOP Deputy Whip Foley sexually stalking his 16-year-old Congressional Page(s),

    Congressman J. Dennis Hastert brought national experts together with community leaders and parents on Tuesday for a 14th District Community Meeting to share information and insights on protecting children from Online predators.

    … “Recent news stories remind us that there are predators using the Internet to target children,” Hastert said. “And just as we warn our children about ‘stranger danger’ when they are at the park or answering the door or telephone, we need to be aware of potential dangers in Cyberspace.”

    Wonder how long it’ll take for this vile hypocrite, this whitened sepulcher, to cover up his coverup and remove this embarrassing story.

  • And this quote just about sums up/reflects the GOP (from Political Wire):

    “It’s more sad than anything else, to see someone with such potential throw it all down the drain because of a sexual addiction.”

    — Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL), quoted by the Palm Beach Post, on Bill Clinton and the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

  • On CNN this morning, Tony Snow tried to dismiss the problem as merely ‘naughty emails’, and that things ‘aren’t always pretty on the hill’. To her credit, Soledad O’Brien would have none of it. There’s no transcript available yet, but she made the point that the term ‘overly friendly’ is a huge red flag that terrifies anyone who has children.

  • And then there’s the spectacle of that , Tony Snowjob, clucking his damn tongue about people trying to take “political advantage” of this shameful Republican mess as if the Refuckwad party didn’t spend Bill Clinton’s second term doing exactly the same thing.

    Evidently the word ‘hypocrisy’ doesn’t appear in Repuke dictionaries. The Party of Moral Rectitude is sham.

  • In contrast to the year-long Republican coverup of Foleygate, Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic leadership moved as swiftly as possible to remove former Congressman William Jefferson from his committee seats and his congressional seat.

    Pelosi versus Hastert — a classic study in contrasting styles of governing “the people’s house”.

  • The first of the ex-wife’s boyfriends to molest my daughter got away with it… some slick swarmy lawyer (yeah, I went to law school) successfully argued that given the chaos of her meth fueled lifestyle there was indeed a reasonable doubt as to the idendity of the assailant, and the jury agreed. The sweet spot is that at the time our relationship had deteriorated so badly that this punk didn’t know me from Adam, had nothing to suspect when I struck up a conversation at the local dive bar, had no idea when we stepped out back to smoke a joint that you could smash the headlights out of a nineteen seventy-one Chevy pickup with a human forehead.

    Rational Anarchy: don’t mess with me, I won’t mess with you. Mess with me, I’ll mess back, and there ain’t much I’m unwilling to do.

  • The Republican Party and all its members, save me, are morally bankrupt. It is as plain as day for any American to see the current Republican leadership, both in the WH and in Congress, as powermongering whores who would cover-up egregious behavor of one of its own just to keep a seat in the House of power. Where is their indignation? Why have some of their surrogates at FOXNEWS begun to draw in Mr. Clinton and Mr. Frank when the biggest difference between their daliances and Mr. Foley’s is the age factor. Both Clinton and Frank were involved with consenting adults. Mr. Foley used his power and position to work an underage paige (16 years old!). Then, to top it off, Foley’s Republican leadership did nothing but stay quiet! Well, Mr. Hastert et al., I will not, and I hope vast amounts of other voters will join me, allow you to make a mockery of my democracy. I will work to vote all Republicans from office. The Republican party, the one I have been affiliated with for over 25 years, is a front for social malcontents at this time. It has had since 1994 to clean up Congress, and it has failed miserably, and said Party has also simply achieved a different path of moral corruption than the Demo leadership of the late 20th century. This Repbulican watch has been rife with legislation for profit, curtailment of our civil liberties, and now, cover-up of lurid behavior for political gain.

    Vote the Rascals Out in ’06 and ’08! -Kevo

  • We have always been frustrated by the media’s lack of criticism over “boring” topics such as war profiteering, voting machines etc etc…

    Finally the GOP is caught up in a coverup of a pervert. Now that makes good TV (just ask Dateline NBC). So finally, (not to minimize Foley’s wrongdoing, but) over one Congressman’s crimes and the subsequent coverup, the GOP’s violation of PUBLIC TRUST is finally coming under question.

    I can build a whole list of items where the current bunch of neocons have violated public trust, but if this is what the media wants to focus on, I’m absolutely cool with it. GOOD RIDDANCE.

    http://www.paintohioblue.com

  • Foleygate also reminds me of the classic Edwin Ewards quote: “The only way I can lose this election is if I’m caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy.”

    Maybe “or covering for someone caught in bed with a live boy” should be added to the end of that.

  • I have not seen this appellation for the GOP.

    ,I officially claim it at of 9:46 EST. All Rights Reserved and I will post it on my website this date.

    http://desertoftherealecononomicanalysis.blogspot.com/

    The Repedophile Party (Copyright 2006 Robert C. Feightner),

    a party that until January 2007 held majoirty status in the United States House of Representative and the United States Senate.

    The Repedophile party is not to be confused with the Republican Party, an organization that once effectively convinced American voters that it held the moral standard in the United States of America.

  • Enron, K Street Project, Abramoff, “Duke”, DeLay, Ney, now Foley. Had enough?

    Q. Why was Mark Foley banned from the congressional library?
    A. He kept bending all the pages.

  • Now, now. I’m sure that when the history of this Congress is written, Foleygate will be little more than a comma. 😉

  • SEX. SEX. SEX. My God. The Democrats have the biggest scandal in American history they could be hammering the Republicans with. 9/11. And what really gets the juices flowing is another sex scandal.

    Don’t misunderstand me. I feel outrage for those who preyed on children and incredible empathy for those victimized. But, strategically I think it’s a huge mistake to exploit the Republicans Foley Follies…even if it is successful in winning a majority. The Democrats will simply be continuing the vicious cycle of demonizing an entire party for the sins of one member. Do they really want to go there?

    I’ve raised 9/11 twice the past few days not because I’m a conspiracy theorist, but because I think it’s the only strategy the Dems can use to win. It is the single biggest strength of this President and Republican controlled Congress and has been used repeatedly to justify everything we hate. From torture to drilling in Alaska. I’m not suggesting Dems try to explain what happened on 9/11. They simply need to raise reasonable doubt in voters by pointing out this President resisted calls for an investigation for more than a year. Then refused to testify under oath and without his puppet master Cheney being present. And then the final report excludes FBI testimony, fails to address many of the vicitm’s family member’s questions, and doesn’t even mention the collapse of building 7. In short this President did not do his job before 9/11 and sure as hell didn’t do it afterwards.

    I’d hoped for some feedback. Instead it’s a flashback to Bill Clinton and the Republican’s sex-obsessed feeding frenzy. Yes, condemn Foley’s actions and demand answers. But we all know that eventually there will be a Democrat caught with his pants down or her skirt hiked up. And this voter disillusioning cycle will continue until democracy is dead.

    Wouldn’t it be better to attack, attack, attack, on an issue that (hopefully) no Democrat would ever be guilty of?

  • Of course, all this Foley stuff hurts the GOP as a whole. On the other hand, the timing of the scandal means that Bob Woodward’s revelations will get completely drowned out — convenient for the White House. Do you think it was Karl Rove who tipped off ABC News?

    I love conspiracy theories…

  • I was driving in with my (very conservative) wife this morning and trying to explain the whole Foley scandel. She had not seen any of the IM’s, so for her the story was only about “overly friendly” emails to the kid in Florida and she wasn’t sure it was that big a deal. By the end of our discussion (and reading some of WaPo) we both understood that Foley’s modus operandi is to strike up friendships with pages while they are working at Congress, then follow up with emails after they leave, emails that get ever more suggestive. Finally, if he hooks some page (now seventeen or eighteen in all likelihood) he begins a rather graphic exchange of IM’s.

    The rather amusing thing I pointed out to Cathy is that if, as the age of consent in D.C. is sixteen, he had just had sex with the kids, he might have broken the house rules for improper conduct with a page but he would not have broken the law. But as he exchanged IMs and emails with these kids after they went home, he’s been caught violating the very laws he and Denny H. brag so much about creating 😉

    But it is amazing that Reynolds, knowing this stuff, didn’t try to replace Foley earlier. And it is amazing that Hassert did nothing with the information. And it is a scandel that they told this stuff to the chairman of the page committee but not the democratic member (there are only three people on the committee for heaven’s sake). But I suppose this proves that the Republican’ts are more concerned with power than they are with values.

    I’ve always wondered what kind of homosexual would join the Republican’t party and why. Now I know. The predatory type who hunts teenage boys joins the Republican’t party because the party will look the other way when he ponies up $100,000 contributions. We just get the flamers who stick to adult relationships 😉

    If this does not turn off THE BASE this November, they are simply too poisoned by the kool aid.

  • I, too, am concerned about losing focus on the issues that should define the November election, like Iraq, torture, the rule of law, 9/11, corruption, and defending Social Security, in favor of … ones… that… umm… could totally demoralize their base… hmm.

    Contest: GOP stands for….
    (1) Ghoulish Old Perverts
    (2) Gang Of Pedophiles
    (3) Perverts o’ Torture (keeping the Party of Torture thing going)
    (4) Grossing Out Pages
    (5) Godless Oily Predators

    Carry on.

  • >the timing of the scandal means that Bob Woodward’s revelations will get completely drowned out

    I see it this way… it’s a “twofer”. Those whose curiosities drive them to follow policy will absorb Woodward, and many, many fence-sitters will reach the tipping point.

    Those who respond only to something salacious will finally be swayed by the Foley/Hastert matter.

  • Foley Catheter update:

    Aww, the poor lil’ guy’s checked into rehab for alcohol addiction (insert stream of curse words here). How long until he slithers out saying he had a problem but he’s all better now? (More curse words.)

    Washington Post Front Page du Jour:

    Left side above the fold: Two column piece about B Woodward’s State of Denial focusing on Rumsfeld.

    Right side above the fold: Foley scandal (day three on the front page).

    I could make an unforgivably vile joke about giving it to the Reps from both sides, but I won’t.

    GOP = Greedy Onanists Party

  • Dale: good one!

    Steve: Except, in the Foley disaster, the GOP is reeling. They’re blaming each other, they’re contradicting each other, and they just don’t know what to say.

    That’s because they’ve relied on Karl Rove and Dick Cheney to do all their thinking for them for way too long. And when most of the country was divided between making love or war in the Sixties, Karl and Dick were completely stymied by strategies and zippers.

  • I understand the Newt Gingrich actually told Faux Wallace on FOX news that if the House Leadershiphad handled the Foley problem more agressively when they first heard about it they would have been accused of gay bashing. I swear to god I heard it on Bill Press this morning! To his credit Wallace did not let him get away with it. It have to be pretty outrageous for a Fox News anchor to tell a GOP elder statesman his rhetoric is not credible.

    These guys….whew. I have a feeling they are going to learn a lesson the Dems learned a few years ago about how the only scandal that matters is one about sex.

  • Well, if the Catholic church tries to cover for pedophiles, you can bet the Republicans would do the same.

    Now might be a good time to investigate all goings-on with pages-who knows, Foley might not be the only one.

  • This serves as perfect evidence that, when it comes to protecting minors from sexual predation, the GOP is truly “the cut-n-run party.”

    Attack…attack…attack, until you hear the sounds of many windows opening above you, followed by the sounds of bodies landing on the sidewalk in front a a tall, tall building.

    Who could have ever imagined that Karl Rove’s “October Surprise” would be a Republican “extinction event?”

  • Note the sly reference to “Coach” H.

    Rumors circulated for a long time about Hastert as a wrestling coach.

  • “Well, if the Catholic church tries to cover for pedophiles, you can bet the Republicans would do the same.” – Addison

    The Catholic church has such a big problem with their rule on “celebate” priests not being allowed to marry, that they forced themselves to “treat and reassign” pedophile and gay priests rather than defrock them, as they should have.

    What is the Republican’ts problem? Are there no other Republican’ts in Foley district who could have run for his seat? Of was it the money that Foley brought in for Reynolds and the NRCC that kept him inviolate?

  • I’ve heard several references today to the Democrats sex scandals in the early 80s. As usual, memories get garbled or cherry picked. Here‘s the Wikipedia quick summation:

    The 1983 Congressional page sex scandal was a political scandal in the United States involving members of the United States House of Representatives.

    On July 14, 1983 the House Ethics Committee concluded that Rep. Dan Crane (R-Ill.) and Rep. Gerry Studds (D-Mass.) had engaged in sexual relationships with minors, specifically 17-year-old congressional pages. In Crane’s case, it was a 1980 relationship with a female page and in Studds’s case, it was a 1973 relationship with a male page. Both representatives immediately pleaded guilty to the charges and the committee decided to simply reprimand the two.

    However, Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) demanded their expulsion. On July 20, 1983 the House voted for censure, the first time that censure had been imposed for sexual misconduct. Crane, who tearfully apologized for his transgression, lost his bid for reelection in 1984. Studds, however, refused to apologize and even turned his back and ignored the censure being read to him. He called a press conference with the former page, in which both stated that they were consenting adults at the time of the relationship (the page was 17 at the time) and that it was therefore not the business of others to censure them for their private ephebophilic relationship, and he continued to be reelected until his retirement in 1996.[1]

    Links in the original have not been reproduced here. Suffice to say that the scandal was bi-partisan and in the Democrat’s case, consensual rather than creepy or predatory. Also worth noting that the age of consent in DC is 16.

  • While I, too, would prefer that the focus stays on things other than a sex scandal, I have no quarrel with this particular one. It’s no longer so much about what *Foley* has done; it’s about what others — who’d known about him — had *not* done. Foley may have been the rolling ball but, if he knocks some pins in the process, I, for one, will have no objections.

    PS According to TPMmuckraker, Kildee (the sole Dem on the 3-person panel in charge of the Page program) was not the only one excluded from any knowledge of the e-mails. The third person, Capito (R – WV) wasn’t told, either. IOW, it was only Shimkus who knew. They probably figured that she wouldn’t keep her mouth shut, either, if for different (not parisan) reasons.

  • Watching the preachy self-righteous scumbags fumble for words has been a treat. I only hope that the outrage lasts long enough that come November the damage brings them to their knees at the polls.

    Foley dissappearing into rehab and having his lawyer testify to Foley’s being abused by the clergy as a child is a new low. Maybe if they had done that before first trying to strike a deal with ABC to supress the story, then issuing denials, and only then seeing the writing on the wall resigning. But if crass attempts at self-preservation don’t work you can always fall back on the soothing vocabulary of addition and victimhood. Maybe next he will start a support group.

    What exactly do they do over there at the Center for Missing and Exploited Children? Will they deliver a missing and exploited child to your doorstep in 30 minutes or less or it is free? I am a little worried that they make child prostitutes like Domino’s makes pizza. That Republicans put this guy in a position like that boggles the mind.

    Does anybody else remember when White House Press Corps reporter Jeff Gannon was outed as not being a reporter at all but a homosexual escort? What ever happened to that story?

  • Comments are closed.