Fox News’ nosedive continues

We learned in August that all was not well in Fox News Land, at least as far as the Republicans’ network’s ratings were concerned. Apparently, matters have not improved since.

Fox News is showing serious signs of aging, led by steep audience declines.

Fox News’s total audience fell 24 percent in the past year, to 1.3 million viewers from 1.7 million, and its key primetime audience, viewers ages 25-54, was down 7 percent in October on a year-to-year basis, to an average 363,000 viewers, according to Nielsen Media Research data.

In third quarter, Fox News suffered a 38 percent decline in 25-54s, to 409,000. In second quarter, that audience was down 22 percent and in first quarter it slid 28 percent.

To be sure, the decline has not been enough to topple Fox News from its perch atop the cable news networks, but it’s nevertheless a sign of progress.

Fox News execs suggest fewer people are tuning in to all cable news, so their decline is not surprising. That might be a compelling explanation, if it were true, but it’s not. Both Headline News and MSNBC were actually up among the 25-54 demo, and while CNN lost viewers, its decline wasn’t nearly as steep as Fox News’.

The next two questions, of course, are why Fox News viewers are going elsewhere and what the far-right network plans to do about it.

On the first point, Media Life suggests disillusionment among the GOP base is causing problems for the news channel.

The news formula that worked for so long is now working against it, they say, as fewer of those disenchanted viewers bother to tune in to watch the news.

“What Fox did so brilliantly was assess both the political and cultural realities of the times when it came on, and then designed a service that perfectly fit a certain niche,” says Robert Thompson, director of the Center for the Study of Popular Television at Syracuse University.

“The problem with coming up with a perfect niche that is perfect for the time is that time and culture change. Potentially, you end up positioned with an identity that no longer reflects the reality of the times.”

Judy Daubenmier of News Hounds, a web site often critical of Fox News, agrees.

“Fox News has tied itself so closely to George Bush that when his approval ratings go down people don’t want to hear about him, so they don’t want to watch Fox News,” she says.

That sounds right to me. Republicans who tune in to Fox News for marching orders are disappointed and disheartened, so it stands to reason they’ll be less inclined to get their daily talking points.

It led Billmon to wonder if maybe, just maybe, Fox News will lay off the blatant partisanship.

[T]he problem with Fox News is that it is so identified with the Grand Old Prostitutes and the partisan core of the conservative movement that it it’s hard to imagine how you could tinker with the format or the built-in bias without alienating the channel’s most devoted and loyal viewers.

But when realpolitik and ratings are both pulling in the same direction, you do have to wonder how long the status quo can last. I wouldn’t expect to turn on the tube and find Molly Ivins sitting in Bill O’Reilly’s chair, but I also wouldn’t be surprised if sometime after Nov. 7 the corporate word is quietly handed down to chill the obvious partisanship a little bit. You know: tell Sean Hannity to quit and run for Congress if he wants to spend all his time on the campaign trail, or dump Fred Barnes and bring in some slightly less reactionary gasbag to headline the political BOGSAT shows.

Maybe. Then again, if Dems take back Congress, and the Republican base is enthralled by having someone to hate again, maybe they’ll be storming right back to Fox News to tell them how awful the defeatocrats are.

Stay tuned, so to speak.

Nope, the correct answer is that they allow far too many “liberal” and “moderate” voices to speak right now. There has to be a purge. No more Andrew Sullivan (if he ever was, don’t mean to libel the guy) or other fellow-travelers like him.

Clearly, what Faux needs is clarity of vision, and having Buchanan and Blankley both on just doesn’t work. 😉

  • Lance,

    so you’re suggesting they need to have a Hannity and Malkin show replace the laughably “balanced” Hannity and Colmes?

  • Ratings down, this past year ??
    Think of the people who they have for guests, practically the whole White House this year.

    If any other major news organization scored those kinds of appearances, their ratings would be off the charts.

    When Fox started its ‘balanced’ news coverage was pretty subtle. But slowly it went from subtle to in-your-face. It’s one thing to lean right, but lately Fox has been so far off in rightlandia that only the true Kool Aid drinkers actually believe the hype.

  • Don Henley’s Dirty Laundry (Faux Style)
    I make my living off the evening news
    Just give me something-something I can use
    Repubs love it when Dems lose,
    They love Staying on Message

    Well, I was an aide of Nixon, but I wound up here
    I just have talking points, I dont have to be clear
    Come and whisper in my ear
    Give us Staying on Message

    Spin em when theyre up
    Spin em when theyre down
    Spin em when theyre up
    Spin em when theyre down
    Spin em when theyre up
    Spin em when theyre down
    Spin em when theyre up
    Spin em all around

    We got the ranting-psycho-bleach-blonde who
    Comes on at five
    She can tell you bout dem Liberal lies with a gleam
    In his eye
    Its interesting when people lie-
    Give us Staying on Message

    Can we film the combat operation?
    Is Osama dead yet?
    You know, the boys in the newsroom got a
    Running bet
    Run that Bush in flightsuit photo set!
    We’re the GOP’s Newsnet!

    You dont really need to find out whats going on
    WE DON’T really want you to know just how far its gone
    Just leave well enough alone
    Try to ignore that dirty Foley!

    Spin em when theyre up
    Spin em when theyre down
    Spin em when theyre up
    Spin em when theyre down

    Spin em when theyre up
    Spin em when theyre down
    Spin em when theyre stiff
    Spin em all around

    Dirty GOP secrets
    Dirty GOP lies
    Instead we have photos of Pelosi’s Crazy eyes
    We can’t cut Clinton down to size
    We ignore GOP Dirty Laundry

    We can do the innuendo
    We can rant and spin
    When its said and done we havent told you a thing
    We all know crap is our thing
    All covered in GOP Dirty Laundry

  • Could it be Fox Snooze has finally reached the point where its target audience is too stupid to operate a television set? Maybe.

    Just remember, their sole concern is the almighty $. If they think a shift towards the middle will gain 2 million viewers, they won’t care if they lose the remaining faithful. Their problem of course is years of hard-core pandering will make it hard to convince viewers Fox is slighly less unfair and unbalanced. They might, like the cretins they’ve appeared to worship, be stuck with their image, only a corporation can shuck its past more easily than a person. Perhaps we’ll see Fox born again under another name and logo.

  • Nice Dan, as usual.

    Yes Edo, that is just what I expect. Purging and purification. They have clearly been presenting far too many sides of the story when in the end their is only Boy George II’s (or actually Cheney’s).

  • Bravo Dan.

    Yeah, Lance, the Bushies’ stories change so much they should be all Fox needs. And what an appropriate way to tell these creeps’ stores…with screen crawls. They should save their Halloween fonts to tell the stories.:-)

  • Question, since I could not find the stats: Despite the fall off, doesn’t Fox still have siginificantly more viewers than MSNBC and CNN COMBINED?

  • The real question is: Is Rupert Murdoch willing to lose profits to his cable news competitors?

    Murdoch could damn the size of the viewership (and the profits) and just maintain a sizeable presence on cable. It would be choice of ideology over profit–something akin to the concept “loss leader” found in the retail sales world.

    Of course, things can cut both ways: The smaller the audience, the smaller the amount of influence. (insert smiley face here)

  • Dale,

    I think I threw up a little bit just thinking about it. About the only thing that could make me forget would have been the Crystal Meth that Haggart allegedly smokes.

    For those wondering (more probably not), the line:
    “In his eye” was not a typo. Just a less than subtle jab to Mann Coulter.

  • Prediction:
    Fox News will be the channel to watch as the GOP tear themselves to pieces after being shutout on Nov 7. Ratings will go thru the roof as everyone tunes in to watch the fun.

  • Dan! You’re off the “bad boy” list!!!! That song is mahhhhvelous!!

    In fact I’d like to post it at That’s Another Fine Mess, so please let me know if I can.

  • JRSJr,

    http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/on/aug_s_2554_demo_vs_aug_2005_42896.asp

    I found this from August year over year. CNN and MSNBC combined had slightly higher numbers than Fox. Fox still looks like the #1 network here, but think about it. If we assume (based on voting in the last two presidential elections) 50% of the people are Repubs then they should give about 50% of the eyeballs to Fox. Concidering that the GOP has been railig about liberal media bias for decades no Republican should even dare watch the network news or god forbid PBS.

    I doubt that many Dems watch Fox, unless they have strong constitutions and want to see what the latest Bush talking points are. If FOx is slipping against it’s own numbers that may be a reflection of declining interest among Repubs. A person can only swallow so much crap before turning away.

  • …if Dems take back Congress, and the Republican base is enthralled by having someone to hate again, maybe they’ll be storming right back to Fox News to tell them how awful the defeatocrats are.

    Bingo.

  • It’s hard to escape the consequences being associated with Bush the Destroyer. Bush who has ruined everything he has touched can now add Fox News to the list.

  • Thanks, MNP. I found one with total primetime viewers that had FOX viewers ahead of both combined.

    You analysis might be flawed as I’m not sure every GOP member is a avid FOX watcher. I mean, I know many who tilt right that watch different networks (both cable and traditional, even PBS) given which shows/guests are on the respective network. I’m sure there’s some lefties that flip on FOX as well from time to time.

    Don’t forget, FOX’s quick and massive success came under the Clinton regime, so it can bash the left as well as it can pass along the “good guys” talking points, so that’s why I don’t think it will change much.

    The reason I ask is that FOX is up for carriage contract renewals with the cable and satellite providers. They just signed a contract with Cablevision in the last two weeks, with a very nice fee increase for FOX and was wondering if that would continue among all distribution providers.

  • I used to work at a small lefty radio station that was almost out of business by the 1980s. You know what saved us? Reagan. For our listeners he was the Man You Love to Hate, and people started tuning in more. Something like this could happen to Fox if Democrats take over Congress. I mean, didn’t Rush Limbaugh become huge (if you’ll pardon the expression) when Clinton was in power?

  • People need to stop comparing Fox News’ ratings to CNN’s and MSNBC’s. It’s like comparing ESPN to the Travel Channel, or PBS and MTV2.

    Fox has a completely different format and mission from CNN and MSNBC. They do little reporting and put all their focus on on-air personalities and op-ed shows.

  • Don’t overlook the obvious.

    Millions of Fux News viewers are dead – the reprobate wrinklies and the poor underclass in the armed services (armed but not amoured).

    .

  • It’s only been 12 years since ’94 when RepubCo was handed it’s congressional baseball bat with which to beat America and the Democrats. It’s only been 6 since they hit their stride with Sock Puppet Shrub taking over mental duties for a relieved Finger Puppet Congress. Neither period is all that long and it’s easy to see that far into the future and imagine RepubCo redux. Faux is pathologically driven to lie like hell and twist reality into knots. And they can afford to keep their eye on the bubble that lovingly cradles the wealthy and well connected in order to try to shorten the time before RepubCo regroups and rises again, (if it indeed has to do that).

    Faux wants to be the official voice of an authoritarian Amerikan gov’t. They are the #1 catapulter of propaganda. Both forwarded from ShrubCo and created in house. Tuesday could be a big day for Dem electoral wins but even if it is, the authoritarian/corporatist mindset that motivates Faux and all the rightwing media isn’t going anywhere except under the radar just far enough to claim they are wanting to come in from their exile in the miserable and undeserved wilderness that they have been unjustly and dishonestly sent to.

    How pure B.S. equals credibility I’m not really sure. But Faux’s brand of B.S. is the only thing that makes their sorry lives worth living. They can’t change. They’d choke on the truth.

  • Comments are closed.