Fox News runs column attacking U.S. military generals

In light of the controversies surrounding the MoveOn.org “Betray Us” ad and Rush Limbaugh slamming U.S. troops who support withdrawal as “phony soldiers,” you’d think Fox News wouldn’t publish a piece called, “Top Military Officials are a Disgrace to Those They Lead.”

And yet, as Glenn Greenwald noted, that’s the headline on the latest piece from Col. David Hunt, who wrote, “Our generals are betraying our soldiers … again”

Now, Hunt’s argument is that the “politically correct” U.S. military shouldn’t punish troops for using tactics such as “baiting” — leaving munitions in a public area, and then shooting those who try to pick it up. Because top officials are cracking down on these tactics — something about winning “hearts and minds” — Hunt is condemning U.S. generals, accusing them of “betraying” the troops.

Indeed, the rest of the Fox News piece continues in the same vein. Hunt argues that our generals “have cared more about their precious careers and reputations than their soldiers and Marines under them,” and deserve to put “on trial” for their decisions.

Given the current climate, I don’t imagine the Fox News contributor could have chosen more provocative language. As Glenn argued:

To accuse a general of “betrayal” is, in military parlance, the equivalent of accusing him of treason to his country. Yet that is what this Fox News article does in the very first paragraph with regard to many of our brave Generals risking their lives for our country in a Time of War — and it not only accuses Our Military Commanders of “betrayal,” but betrayal of their own troops.

I shudder to think what the reaction would have been from our friends on the right if an outlet other than Fox News published this right now.

Indeed, the resolution passed by lawmakers condemning MoveOn insists that we must never “attack the honor and integrity … of members of the United States Armed Forces.” If you wear the uniform, you deserve respect, not condemnations.

Here’s the perspective of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ken.):

It’s been more than a week since the Junior Senator from Texas offered an amendment condemning an ad by MoveOn.Org that appeared last Monday in The New York Times.

The ad was, by any standard, abhorrent.

It accused a four star general who has the trust and respect of 160,000 men and women in Iraq of betraying that mission and those troops, of lying to them and to us.

Who would have ever expected anybody to go after a general in the field at a time of war, launch a smear campaign against a man we’ve entrusted with our mission in Iraq.

Any group that does this sort of thing ought to be condemned

Isn’t Hunt’s Fox News piece just as bad?

I really don’t want a never-ending argument about every military criticism from anyone in public life. This is pointless and exhausting, but if the right thinks this is a worthwhile endeavor, the left can give as well as it gets….

I trust the troops “on the ground” or “the phony soldiers” as Flush Rimjaughb likes to call them.

The leadership of this country is betraying the American People and the Constitution by trying to tell us that imposing a totalitarian police state in Iraq is somehow the “cause of freedom” for America.

  • American Conservative has a Cover story about the bad awful horrible traitorous generals too. Are they gonna spank Pat Buchanan as well?

    Beuller, Beuller……..

    Consistancy anyone? Effing hypocrits.

  • These arseholes saw how well the Resolution of Finger Wagging worked for MO.O and they’re trying to get a piece of the action.

    This is pointless and exhausting, but if the right thinks this is a worthwhile endeavor, the left can give as well as it gets….

    Give what? How, if a bunch of spineless Democrats voted to condemn MO.O, is it a left/right thing?

    It’s a fucking stupid thing and anyone who wants to condemn anyone for being nasty to the soldiers should first go after the Chimperor-in-Chief and his minions.

  • Time to roll out the Congressional tut-tutting machine to condemn this as well.

    Maybe one day this nation will step out of the long shadow of over-compensating for perceived attitudes that were on display during the Viet Nam War era. We used to just have political correctness but now we have military correctness to deal with these days as well. I pine for the day when reasonable discoure and criticism can be judged as reasonable discourse and criticism and when a clever pun on a general’s name is just that. General Hunt is an ass. I won’t restrict his right to say what he did, but I am all for his insipid comments falling on their face from the weight of their own stupidity rather than having to publicly condemned by Congress.

  • TAIO (@8),

    Does it start with a “c”? I’m still trying to improve my English, you know… I’m barred forever from becoming a US President but, one of these days, I’m gonna be as good at English as he is…

  • If anyone from the Fox “News” Channel is asked about Hun’ts column, he/she will probably give some b.s. about how the Move.on.Org newspaper ad was a “smear,” while Hunt was just giving “strongly worded constructive criticism.”

  • well, ya know, he may be right about the generals betraying our soldiers…not the not supporting them after telling them to plant bait…but in asking them to plant bait in the first place…the soldiers just trying to survive the environment and the conflicting orders…though I guess you could say the same of the generals…

  • The New York Times should be leading the charge against this Fox News piece, even more than the left should. What we all seem to be missing in these tales of right wing attacks upon CBS, NBC, The New York Times and so on, is that the story is not just one about political “sides” influencing media decisions. It is also about Fox News (and other right wing media organizations) waging war of a business nature on their market competitors.

    The fact that CBS, New York Times, etc. haven’t realized that their competition is whirling up a sandstorm of brand-diminishing controversy at every opportunity, hamstringing their advertising decisions, means they buy into the idea that it is only the Fox partisan message that is being wielded here, rather than a canny attempt by Fox to also gain market share. Remember who we are dealing with, Murdoch, who conquered Fleet Street.

  • For those of you who are around my age and lived through WWII and remember what took place, and not relying on the movies or TV interpretations, you might recall that General George Patton was severly criticized for sltriking a GI in a hospital and calling him a coward. This probably helped ace him out of a fourth star. General Mark Clark was roundly condemned for the mess he made of the Azio landing in Italy. General George Marshall was kept busy, throughout the war, removing generals and other high ranking officers because of incompetence. Many, many other examples could be cited, but time and space do not allow.

    HRM

  • Comments are closed.