Fred Thompson backers start second-guessing their man

There was a point a few months ago in which the anticipation in Republican circles about Fred Thompson’s candidacy was palpable. The GOP’s three most-competitive candidates — Romney, Giuliani, and McCain — each caused consternation, for one reason or another, among conservatives, and Thompson was going to be the guy on the white horse who would save the day.

Fairly quickly, 21 congressional Republicans endorsed the former senator, which is nearly as many endorsements as McCain and Giuliani. Polls showed him surging to second place nationally, nearly second in Iowa, a strong fourth in New Hampshire, and a strong second in South Carolina. That, coupled with support from the still-searching religious right suggested Thompson would make a credible run for the nomination.

That was the late-summer. Now, even some of Thompson’s backers are wondering whether they’ve bet on the wrong horse.

Several House Republicans who endorsed Fred Thompson for president now say that they are frustrated with what they view as an apathetic campaign, and at least one regrets having committed to the former Tennessee senator.

“I think he’s kind of done a belly flop,” said an estranged Thompson backer who indicated he will not pull his public support before the “Super Tuesday” primaries. “We’ll just wait till after Feb. 5 because I think he’s going to get beat.”

The disaffected members of team Thompson say he has failed to put to rest whispers that he is unwilling to campaign hard enough to win the presidency.

“He seems to be perpetuating it instead of defeating it,” another dissatisfied Thompson backer said. “I can’t see me bailing on him, but there’s some frustration.”

Another GOP lawmaker said, “I’ve kind of pulled back. I’m not not supporting him, but I’m not doing anything.” With six weeks to go before the first contest, that’s not quite the enthusiasm a presidential hopeful wants to hear.

The belly flop metaphor is borne out in the polls. Take a close look at the polls in Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina, and in each instance, you practically see an upside-down U — Thompson went down nearly as quickly as he went up. There was excitement; Thompson announced; and the excitement disappeared. His poll momentum is completely gone.

It’s clearly not over, and Thompson’s endorsement from the National Right to Life was a big shot in the arm, but it’s not exactly a mystery as to why Thompson has gone from a possible nominee to a disappointment.

One Republican lawmaker who backed Thompson said he’s been hearing from activists outside DC who are saying, “Now they’re calling me and saying ‘What’s he doing?’ It’s almost like he doesn’t want it.”

If Thompson comes up short in the primaries, as I suspect he will, the campaign will probably look back and wonder what might have been if Thompson had been a more active candidate out of the gate. Just a week after announcing, Thompson was already taking it pretty easy, limiting himself to no more than three campaign stops a day (Romney often holds six town-hall-style forums a day when in Iowa) and having no public events at all in his second week as a candidate.

It’s a pattern that’s held up, with Thompson just not hitting the trail the way his GOP rivals have.

I won’t pretend to understand why Thompson has decided not to campaign aggressively. As a late entrant, he should be hustling to do more events than his rivals, but he’s chosen a very laid-back path.

I assume when he drops out of the race next year, though, Thompson will look nice and relaxed.

“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.” Abraham Lincoln

  • CB wrote:

    I assume when he drops out of the race next year, though, Thompson will look nice and relaxed.

    Relaxation is the spice of life.

  • When talking with my mother last night she asked me what I thought of Thompson and I told her I had no idea why he was running for President. I don’t think Thompson does either.

  • Just speculating, but what could have happened was Jeri harangued Fred so much about running for Prez (so she could be First Lady), he said Okay dear, and then really didn’t go much out of his way to do anything about it (but perhaps it did get her to back off). Soon he can go back to being a TV celeb and speaking at conservative banquets.

  • UnAware Fred is still unaware—but apparently, a good many of his supporters are developing a sense of political awareness. They’re discovering that all the other candidates—Ghouliani, Mittens, Hucksterbee, and Rampstrike—have the “oomph” that UnAware Fred clearly lacks. It’ll be interesting to see how the UnAware Fred support network divvies itself up among the remaining four GOP critters in the Reskunklican dog-and-pony show….

  • I just never really was expecting great things from old Fred. I mean c’mon, he hasn’t has a hit in years.

  • Truly love to see the anonymous “supporter” comments.

    Instead of listening to what the man has said, they’re looking for him to run around the country pressing flesh with a few hundred rather than doing interviews, video clips and blogs that reach a potential of 125 Million?? LMHO, whatever.

    Fred solves the Social Security problem and they talk about “aggressive campaigning”??

    Fred offers No Amnesty and they talk about being not entertained by “enthusiasm”??

    Even if these supporters do exist, they’re not worth the space they take up.

  • I was born in Hornell, New York; raised in Bishopville, New York; and attended school at Arkport Central, graduating in 1974. I attended the USAF Academy, graduating in 1978, and went on to serve 20 years on active duty, retiring as a full Colonel. During my years of service I resided in, or had duty in, the follow states: Colorado, Delaware, Texas, California, Mississippi, Nebraska, Iowa, Illinois, Hawaii, Arizona, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Alabama, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Idaho, Missouri, Maine, Florida and Oregon.

    I have put together a strategy and staff in the attached “If I Were President” document. To that end I was wondering if you might share it with folks in the county to get their comments and input. I will be sending this out to all the county chairs in the states in which I resided, or had duty, in an attempt to get these ideas out there and part of the debate for this election.

    Please do pass this on and request folks respond to me at greg_hollister@msn.com. Of course I would very much like to hear what your thoughts are as well.

    All the Best

    Greg “Holly” Hollister, Colonel, USAF, Retired

    If I Were President

    During the budget battle of 1995, I acquired a copy of the CBO grading of the Federal Budget. I learned that MEDICARE and MEDICAID actually increased above the inflation rate and that Clinton, Gore, Daschle and Gephardt lied to the American people about so called “cuts” and “gutting” of these programs. In the meantime, entitlements have continued to grow at a rate that will essentially leave no discretionary spending for Defense by the year 2020. In parallel, Social Security will become insolvent as the baby boomer generation retires and the increased reliance on foreign oil and its rising prices will continue to remain a national security issue while it constrains growth, and possibly generates a recession on the Global Economy. All of this occurs while we are fighting a Global War on Terror. While this looks pretty gloomy at first blush, if we take these issues on directly, and with a sense of urgency, we will overcome and create an even stronger, more vibrant America that continues to lead the world in peace, security and prosperity. How will we do this?

    First, we need to continue to take the fight to the terrorists but we need to do it in a balanced, strategic manner. There are three critical components to international policy with which we have to work: political, military and economic (I earned dual degrees at the USAF Academy – one in management and the other in economics – and served 20 years on active duty in the USAF). This model was studied extensively in each mid level and senior service school I completed – Marine Corps Command and Staff College, Air Command and Staff College, Armed Forces Staff College, Air War College and Army War College. Our strategy has been overreliant on use of Force without sufficient leverage of Political and Economic leverage. This needs to change.

    We need to get NATO (especially France and Turkey), Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait directly engaged in stabilizing Iraq. We need to leverage Political and Economic strength to make this a reality. We should leverage requirements such as the Air Force Tanker Fleet Replacement Program (KCX) to convince NATO to participate with troop and envoy placement in Iraq. Essentially, we give up some market share to the European based EADS Aircraft manufacturer in exchange for a significant number of NATO troops and envoys. A deal could be struck to guarantee that half of the tanker fleet will be acquired from EADS North America, with a guarantee that the Aircraft will be constructed in the United States and that NATO would provide 45,000 ground troops and 50 additional envoys to work in provinces within Iraq. France is part of the EADS consortium and would benefit from that business deal as well and would send a contingent of 10,000 troops in exchange for this business proposition.

    Turkey should be heavily consulted in an attempt to better understand how to best deal with sectarian differences in the region. For example, Attaturk conceived and implemented an approach that repatriated Christians to Greece from Turkey and Muslims from Greece to Turkey to minimize ethnic violence and help unify both countries. A similar approach should be studied, modified and implemented in the region.

    While Russia has been cooperative with control and destruction of weapons grade nuclear material, we can do more to assist them financially for a Russian troop presence in Iraq. Expansion of efforts the Nuclear Threat Initiative has begun under the leadership of former Senator Sam Nunn and Senator Richard Lugar in the form of financial compensation should be increased. In addition, sharing of missile defense technology with Russia should be used as an incentive for Russia to bring troops into Iraq.

    Finally, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait should be expected and requested to provide troops as well from a geographic juxtaposition perspective as well as an understanding of the culture. These initiatives would provide a good start in balancing our approach across all three incentive areas – political, military and economic – all the while improving the rotation rate for our troops and getting skin in the game from these countries and organizations for a successful transition to Iraqi provided security in the country.

    With regard to entitlements, we need to do a rapid evolutionary change to the current structure. When I was a student at the Army War College in 1993, I did my own analysis and discovered that if MEDICARE and MEDICAID were incorporated into the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program, that savings up to $956billion could be realized in as little as 4 years. As part of my analysis prior to implementing change, I would sit down with the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Health Care Finance Administration, and develop a realistic, phased approach to achieve such a goal.

    Concurrently, I would use the model of Health Savings Accounts implemented at Whole Foods as a means to provide affordable Health Care to citizens in a competitive market place. Health Savings Accounts are owned by the individual, or family, and are carried into the next year if not spent in the current medical year. These accounts, coupled with catastrophic insurance for things like cancer, diabetes treatment, and heart attacks, ensure that individual savings are not wiped out while providing a market based approach to health care overall. This approach provides an economic incentive for citizens to save, providing additional cash in the economy for investment and, in the end, overall growth. This restructuring would allow for reallocation of treasury funds for recapitalization of our defense capabilities as well as our roads and bridges.

    Social Security will become insolvent in the not so distant future. We need to make some tough choices here from indexing, to means testing to partial privatization. This must be done to ensure programs like Social Security Disability are there as a safety net for all Americans who need that net. This also means that if someone is making $200,000, or more, in retirement income, they should not and would not receive Social Security benefits. In the long run, partial privatization allows for the growth of real wealth on the part of future generations and gradually weans people off the current system. Again, this allows for revenue to be reallocated to funding Defense, investment in our roads and bridges, and buying down the national debt.

    Energy independence is key to all this. France decided in 1973 to become energy independent and is well on its way with 80 percent of its energy being produced by nuclear power plants. The United States needs to take a heterogeneous mix approach to become energy independent. This includes revitalizing the use of nuclear energy as well as harvesting current oil, oil shale, and coal deposits and marrying them up with clean burning technology. We also need to harness renewable energy such as wind and solar. Employment of superconductive nanotechnology material will reduce loss in transmission media and make power lines more efficient, reducing loss there, as well as improving the power generation capability of solar cells.

    To effectively fight the Global War on Terror, we need to return to more of a helping hand presence rather than one of domination around the globe – particularly in Southwest Asia. Increasing the presence of other countries as mentioned earlier and repatriating Iraq will do this. While eliminating our presence in toto in the near term in not realistic, there is much that can be done to reduce our footprint, ergo the perception that we are an occupation force. Concurrent with the drawdown in Southwest Asia from an overt perspective, we need to increase our covert and clandestine capabilities in Southwest Asia and around the globe so that we make informed decisions on hard evidence rather than someone’s arbitrary shaping of the data. In order to do this we need an overall increase in Defense and National Agencies from 4.3% of GDP up to approximately 5.1% to begin with and then scale up or down as we move forward. As part of this process, in addition to restructuring outlays, we need to keep tax cuts in place and reduce the rate of growth in government.

    In order to implement such an approach I would need a strong team in place with the understanding of the problems and a will to see things through to a successful conclusion. To that end I would staff certain key positions with the following people:

    Special Advisors to the President
    Former Senator Bob Dole, Senator Dan Inouye, Senator John Warner

    Vice President – former Congressman JC Watts
    National Security Advisor – former Senator Sam Nunn
    Chief of Staff – former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and Secretary of State Colin Powell
    Secretary of State – Senator Richard Lugar
    Secretary of Defense – Senator John McCain
    Assistant Secretary of Defense – Senator Jim Webb
    Secretary of the Navy – Congressman Gene Taylor
    Secretary of the Army – former Chief of Staff of the Army General Eric Shinseki
    Secretary of the Air Force – former Chief of Staff of the Air Force General Ron Fogleman
    Secretary of Commerce – former Governor Mitt Romney
    Secretary of Health and Human Services – former Governor Dick Lamm
    Ambassador to the UN – former Senator and Medal of Honor Recipient Bob Kerrey
    Ambassador to Iraq – Governor Bill Richardson
    Veterans Administration – former Senator Max Cleland
    Director of INS – Congressman Tom Tancredo
    Secretary of the Treasury – Congressman Ron Paul
    Attorney General – former Senator Fred Thompson
    Secretary of Energy – Congresswoman Heather Wilson
    Secretary of Domestic Policy – former Senator Rick Santorum
    Secretary of Housing and Urban Development – former Governor Mike Huckabee
    Department of Homeland Security – Mayor Rudy Giuliani
    Secretary of Agriculture – Congressman Randy Kuhl
    Secretary of the Interior – General Norman Schwarzkopf
    Department of Transportation – Colonel Ed Houle
    Federal Aviation Administration – Colonel Al Overbey
    Secretary of Labor – First Lady of California Maria Shriver Schwarzenegger
    Buerau of Indian Affairs – Former Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell
    US Trade Representative – Congressman Duncan Hunter
    Special Envoy to NATO – General Wesley Clark
    Office of Management and Budget – Bob Henry, COO of Harris Corporation
    EPA – Ralph Nader
    Department of Education – Dr Everett R. Hollister
    Office of Drug Control Policy – Alan Keyes
    National Reconnaissance Office – W. David Thompson, former CEO and Owner of Spectrum Astro

    While this in no way is a complete strategy or staff, it is a start in the right direction and is a team comprised of seasoned personnel in each area – people who care about doing the right thing, the right way, in a manner that is in the best interests of the United States of America.

    Gregory S. Hollister, Colonel, USAF, Retired
    6730 Connaught Drive
    Colorado Springs, CO 80908
    719-359-2185

  • ***Secretary of Defense – Senator John McCain; Secretary of the Air Force – former Chief of Staff of the Air Force General Ron Fogleman; Secretary of Commerce – former Governor Mitt Romney; Director of INS – Congressman Tom Tancredo; Secretary of the Treasury – Congressman Ron Paul; Attorney General –former Senator Fred Thompson; Secretary of Energy – Congresswoman Heather Wilson; Secretary of Domestic Policy – former Senator Rick Santorum; Department of Homeland Security – Mayor Rudy Giuliani; Department of Transportation – Colonel Ed Houle; Federal Aviation Administration – Colonel Al Overbey; Buerau of Indian Affairs – Former Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell; US Trade Representative – Congressman Duncan Hunter; Office of Management and Budget – Bob Henry, COO of Harris Corporation; EPA – Ralph Nader; Department of Education – Dr Everett R. Hollister; Office of Drug Control Policy – Alan Keyes; National Reconnaissance Office – W. David Thompson, former CEO and Owner of Spectrum Astro***

    After a brief, yet thorough review of these individuals and their public-service records, I can only surmise that the retired “Colonel” might be better off estabishing himself in the private sector. Something, perhaps, other than fried chicken, however; it’s already been done.

    McCain lacks the intellectual “multi-facets” necessary to be DefSec. Fogleman’s demonstrated a short fuse in the past. A good ComSec needs to understand the underlying dangers of unbridled commerce; Mittens hasn’t got a clue. Tancredo for INS is akin to planting thermonuclear minefields all along our borders—and then experiencing the after-effects of their detonating when US soil is downwind. Gone Paul at Treasury? Wouldn’t we all be better off with our pockets stuffed with Monopoly money? His “gold standard” would immediately put approximately 70-75% of American households—those who physically cannot afford to own those “precious metal Paul dollars”—out in the street. UnAware Fred would never make a valid AG; he’d need a script, a gaggle of writers, and a wardrobe department. Wilson lacks foundational innovation. Sanitorium stole from the taxpayers of Pennsylvania to pay for homeschooling his kids in Virginia—and you want him running domestic policy? Ghouliani at DHS would make Heinrich Himmler look docile by comparison. As for Houle and Overbey—switch them around. They’re too biased in the positions you’ve given them, and both sectors need pessimism right now if we’re to defeat the national addiction to oil. BIA—find someone else; “Nighthorse” is your keystone for INS. Duncan Hunter as T-Rep is an open invitation to the entire world to take their business elsewhere; not a good thing when about two-thirds of our national consumption is imported. OMB is desperate for a finance man; you need to find a good, honest CFO for the spot. Nader is a decrepit, senile howler monkey. I could pick up a year’s supply of old “Mother Earth News” magazines and find you about 30 or 40 people who would be better at EPA than a decrepit, senile howler monkey. Education needs someone who can envision the social/emotional backlash of schooling—and can see children as “gifts” rather than merely desk-occupying bodies. Try this one on for size—James E. DeLisle. You should be able to find him at Kent State. Alan Keyes is too emotionally impalanced for DC—period. Thompson has a bad habit of reading the tea-leaves after he has decided what he wants them to say. That’s a dangerous habit for an NRO man.

  • Fred is loosing support because he was touted as the super conservative. When he finally decided to enter it was discovered who wasn’t quite so conservative.
    On The wRite SideRight Wing Conservative News, Action and Commentary

  • Comments are closed.