‘Free Ride’ Myth #2: McCain the Moderate

John McCain, for several years now, has told everyone who will listen that his record is one of “mainstream conservative.” As a presidential candidate, he offers voters “a clearly conservative approach to governing.”

And yet, reporters at major news outlets don’t believe him, and feel the need to tell the public that McCain isn’t especially conservative at all. Just this week, the Boston Globe reported that the senator’s “opposition to Bush on a range of issues, combined with his nonideological voting record, gives him an image of moderation.” An image, of course, that the media seems anxious to reinforce.

Consider another example. About a week ago, in the midst of a discussion on Jeremiah Wright, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough insisted that McCain “has never attached himself to these people on the far right that say if you’re gay, you’re going to hell, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.” Scarborough’s observation was completely right — just so long as one overlooks McCain attaching himself to radical televangelists like John Hagee, Rod Parsely, and the late Jerry Falwell.

I mention this not just because it’s maddening, but because it’s a subject covered very well in a new book, “Free Ride: John McCain and the Media,” written by Media Matters’ David Brock and Paul Waldman. As part of the release of the book, some blogging colleagues and I are featuring various myths tackled by the authors. Atrios covered Myth #1 the other day: “John McCain is a maverick.”

Today, I’m highlighting Myth #2: “John McCain is a moderate.”

It’s a myth that is in desperate need of debunking.

Since his rise to prominence on the national scene, McCain has been routinely referred to as a moderate — despite the fact that both his voting record and McCain himself attest that he is a reliable conservative. Take abortion. Over the years, McCain has voted for cutting federal funding of family planning clinics that counseled pregnant women on abortion and has supported a ban on late-term abortion. He has consistently received zero ratings from NARAL Pro-Choice America and Planned Parenthood. In 2000, hard-line social conservative Gary Bauer actually endorsed McCain over Bush because he said McCain assured him he would appoint pro-life judges to the Supreme Court (Free Ride, Page 139).

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. He has opposed extending the assault weapons ban, federal hate crimes legislation, the establishment of the International Criminal Court, the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, pro-labor legislation, ergonomics rules, lawsuits against gun manufacturers, and benefits for gay partners. He has supported privatizing Social Security, conservative judicial appointments, the teaching of intelligent design in public schools, tax cuts for the wealthy, and the posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools (Free Ride, Pages 139-140). On national security, McCain has consistently proven himself to be one of our most hawkish senators. Conservative groups such as the American Conservative Union and the Christian Coalition of America routinely give McCain high marks (Free Ride, Pages 145-146).

Some of this came before his metamorphosis into the consistently conservative candidate we see today, some of it during. Either way, to characterize McCain as some kind of “moderate” is absurd.

Free Ride” covers this and other myths extremely well, and I can’t recommend the book highly enough. McCain’s relationship with the media — or, as it’s better known, “McCain’s base” — is going to be one of the most important angles to the 2008 presidential campaign. Brock and Waldman know this issue better than anyone, and their book deserves to be read by reporters, staffers, and voters.

The Corporate/Repiglican media is really akin to some kind of mafia. It is they that determine the ‘media narratives’ that then attempt to manipulate public perception and understandings of anything. And of course these narratives are determined by the Corporations themselves who then hire the souless baffoons who will mouth what they are paid to mouth in order to advance the corporate agenda which starts with profits for the corporations themselves. Thus we have General Electric who of course own NBC and MSNBC. And, gee, how come all of their ‘reporters’ and ‘ journalists’ are all REPIGLICANS .. all of them minus Keith Oberman. And so there you have the likes of the evil puss called Joe Scarbourgh sitting there on your TV screen making up the propaganda, the lies, all the while looking at you with a straight face thru your TV screen. You have the ken doll called Brian Williams masturbating under his marble plated desk while telling us over and over ‘the surge is working’. You have the corporate hemmroids in the form of Russet, Gregory, Matthews and all the rest of them spluttering their GE generated narratives equalling propaganda all the while collecting their million dollar paydays. The entire Corporate Mafia, um .. i mean the ‘media elite’ .. doing all they can to get their corporate boy McBush installed as the next president so that a government by and for the few … greed…can be sustained. This corporate media is the ‘new axis of evil’ and are in fact a clear and present danger to what is left of this once great country we call America. They are a clear and present danger to what is left of our democracy. They , in mass, should be charge, tried, and convicted for purposeful, criminal, fraud committed against the American People.

  • John McCain never was, isn’t and will never be a “moderate”.

    He is military through and through. There is certainly a time and place for him but his place is not that of leading the nation and it definitely isn’t now.

    He certainly has had a difficult life. He appears to have rebelled against the “military system” while in school and then he spent horrendous years in captivity, unwilling to succumb to the tremendous pressures to break him.

    We have all probably encountered people who’ve endured great stresses in life and have either borne them or been broken. Either way, there is certainly an inescapable scarring that has taken place. Generally we would not choose to put that person back in the same or similar conditions. We would question the person’s capacity for bearing the strain again and if we did not consider this we would not be deemed very humane.

    Senator McCain does exhibit a certain lack of control of his temper and perhaps he does get rather confused at times. Isn’t that to be expected given the circumstances? That does not make him a lesser mortal, it is only indicative of his past occurances. But is he what we need as a president to try to get us out of a god-awful mess? Should we even expect that he could, this man of 72, ravaged by time and war?

  • You have the corporate hemmroids in the form of Russet, Gregory, Matthews and all the rest of them spluttering their GE generated narratives equalling propaganda all the while collecting their million dollar paydays. The entire Corporate Mafia, um .. i mean the ‘media elite’ .. doing all they can to get their corporate boy McBush installed as the next president so that a government by and for the few … greed…can be sustained.

    Sorry to tell but Chris Mathews is an Obama lover like no other. A good example is how he cried when Obama gave his speech on race saying it was the best speech on race of all time; better than Gettysburg Address and is constantly praising Obama. The man’s got serious Obama Man-Love issues

  • John McCain recently threw a BBQ for the press at his Sedona, AZ ranch. You can see the good times on Meghan McCain’s blog.

    Apparently the press doesn’t have any ethics/standards regarding fraternizing with our public servants (and their hot daughters) who they’re supposedly covering objectively.

  • Sorry to tell but Chris Mathews is an Obama lover like no other. -Manny

    I’ll see your Chris Matthews and raise you a Rupert Murdoch.

  • 7.
    On March 28th, 2008 at 12:09 pm, doubtful said:

    Sorry to tell but Chris Mathews is an Obama lover like no other. -Manny

    I’ll see your Chris Matthews and raise you a Rupert Murdoch.

    ************

    not to mention how McBush is in Matthews ‘heart’ … ‘your are in my heart senator’ .. not to mention the birthday bash that the media had in secret for their corporate boy McCain .. notice as you read thru this the ‘who’s who’ of the ‘media elite’ including the corporate fart called Matthews ………..

    Daily Howler logo
    THIS IS YOUR PROFESSOR ON YOUTUBE! The saddest part of Patterson’s piece is the part which explains who he is: // link // print // previous // next //
    TUESDAY, MARCH 11, 2008

    THE HAPPY BIRTHDAY EXPRESS: “I honestly don’t know what to say about this.” Those were Brother Greenwald’s words when he posted the videotape of the press corps’ recent fete at John McCain’s crib in Sedona. For ourselves, we recalled a grander affair, conducted during the 2004 Republican convention in New York. A certain saint threw himself a birthday bash—and darlings, forget about Holly Bailey! When the sanctified solon turned 68, the firmament’s biggest stars were there! To his credit (explanation below), Richard Leiby did the play-by-play for the Washington Post. This is your press corps on creme brulee—French tarts, loin of lamb, lobster salad:

    LEIBY (8/31/04): Sen. John McCain tended to his political base Sunday night: the entire national media. The maverick Arizona Republican, once (and future?) presidential aspirant and press secretary’s dream hosted a hyper-exclusive 68th birthday party for himself at La Goulue on Madison Avenue, leaving no media icon behind. Guests included NBC’s Tom Brokaw and Tim Russert, ABC’s Peter Jennings, Barbara Walters, Ted Koppel and George Stephanopoulos, CBS’s Mike Wallace, Dan Rather and Bob Schieffer, CBS News President Andrew Heyward, ABC News chief David Westin, Time Warner CEO Richard Parsons, CNN’s Judy Woodruff and Jeff Greenfield, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, CNBC’s Gloria Borger, PBS’s Charlie Rose—pause here to exhale—and U.S. News & World Report publisher Mort Zuckerman, Washington Post Chairman Don Graham, New York Times columnists William Safire and David Brooks, author Michael Lewis and USA Today columnist Walter Shapiro. They and others dined on lobster salad, loin of lamb, assorted wines, creme brulee, lemon souffle and French tarts.

    […]

    One guest, who asked not to be identified, described invitees as “the Journalistic Committee for a Government of National Unity.” After singing “Happy Birthday” to McCain, many of the guests—Russert, Borger and Shapiro, among others—cabbed to Elaine’s, where Zuckerman hosted a mob scene that included Fox’s Bill O’Reilly, PBS’s John McLaughlin and New York Gov. George Pataki, The Post’s Mark Leibovich reports. By 11 p.m. the Second Avenue landmark—with red carpet outside—was elbow-to-elbow with martini-sipping guests. Thus commenced Campaign 2008 (we think).

    Somehow, it was the singing of “Happy Birthday” which always struck us as most wrong: At any rate, free food! And plenty of pandering! And after they sang “Happy Birthday” to Mac, the gang cabbed it up to Elaine’s.

    If you don’t understand the press corps’ coverage of McCain, perhaps you can find a hint or two in Leiby’s dispatch.

    Last Friday, Jamison Foser did a superlative post about the way this gang of hopeless galoots insists on calling McCain a “war hero”—even when the designation bears no resemblance to the issue at hand. Beyond that, reporters love to work McCain’s “straight talk” slogan into “reporting.” Stephanopoulos sang “Happy Birthday” that night—and soon was asking the saintly solon for “straight talk answers” on ABC’s air. To judge from Leiby’s guest list, E. J. Dionne wasn’t big enough to make the affair at La Goulue (French for “glutton”), but today he describes his ongoing love for the Great McCain—and he shamelessly equates Obama and Farrakhan to McCain and Hagee. It’s hard to be more disingenuous that that, as many others have already noted. But so what? This has gone on for the past dozen years, and may well decide this year’s race.

    But readers, back to the birthday brawl! We first posted Leiby’s text in October 2004, after Ted Koppel attended a fete for Colin Powell instead of prepping for a critical Nightline (see THE DAILY HOWLER, 10/19/04).On that date, we offered links to past HOWLER posts which showed the big stars of the mainstream “press corps” at play with the people they “cover.” We saw Russert at Rumsfeld’s Christmas party, bragging that he had foreseen Saddam’s capture. (He had seen it in a dream!) We saw Koppel attending that Powell bash, then failing on that night’s critical program. We saw Gwen Ifill dining with Darling Condi, then rolling over for her gal pal in a major interview.

    Yes. This is the way your “press corps” works—though Kevin and Josh and Matt won’t tell you. Sedona was just a suggestion, a cook-out, a small affair thrown for the proles.

    By the way—why the praise for Leiby’s report? (It appeared in “Reliable Source.”) Here’s why: The “press corps” didn’t just sing “Happy Birthday” to McCain in 2004—they gave him a subsequent birthday gift. You see, despite the star power at that bash, almost no one reported it! Lloyd Grove did a brief piece in the Daily News, saying McCain had thrown “a smallish dinner” (text below). But almost no one else in the press corps mentioned this event at all. You see, they luvv to do celebrity stories—unless the celebrities involved are themselves. In that case, they know they must hide their behavior—the behavior of their group’s biggest players. The comical story of Jack Welch’s “Lost Boys of the Sconset?” That comical—and revealing—story has almost never appeared in print. Within the clan, housebroken pool boys know they must hide the truth about how the “press” lives and functions.

    They sing Happy Birthday to those they adore—and then, they pimp to get them elected. Dionne is pimping again today, just as he’s done in the past. The comparison to Obama is disgracefully fake. But so what? Saint John gets a toast.

    Lloyd Grove’s smallish dinner: In the Daily News, Grove seemed to get the scope of things wrong. That said, we don’t mean to criticize Grove. Few others said word the first:

    GROVE (8/31/04): McCAIN FOR SOMETHING! The media elite met to eat at La Goulue Sunday at a smallish dinner hosted by media favorite John McCain and wife Cindy.

    The buzz was that the press-friendly Arizona senator, who was celebrating his 68th birthday, is considering another run for President four years from now.

    “This is like any other trade convention—everybody’s talking about what the new power mower might be,” quipped McCain ad-maker Mike Murphy. Among the guests were Tom Brokaw, Peter Jennings, Ted Koppel and Dan Rather, Barbara Walters, Jeff Greenfield and even New York Times book critic Michiko Kakutani.

    “Oh I see,” one diner remarked on surveying the crowd. “It’s a party for the base.

    That was Grove’s entire item. According to Nexis, this was the second longest account of this heady, newsworthy affair.

  • yep, and if that is not enough this is just from today’s ‘corporate mafia’ called the corporate news ………..

    On MSNBC, Tucker Carlson described statements on the “pastor’s pages” section of Sen. Barack Obama’s church’s newsletter as “wild,” “anti-Israeli statements” and asserted: “I think Obama will feel the need to address that directly fairly soon.” But no one mentioned Obama’s prior condemnation of his pastor’s “views on Israel” and the church’s republication of an op-ed by a Hamas official. Read More

    The Associated Press quoted Sen. John McCain claiming that Sen. Barack Obama will “raise taxes” on homeowners. In fact, Obama has proposed “at least $80 billion a year in tax cuts to middle-class workers, homeowners and retirees,” and specifically called for “extending a mortgage credit to taxpayers who do not itemize, generating about $500 in savings for 10 million people.” Read More

    Politico’s Mike Allen wrote, “It looks like [John] McCain will resist pandering when he speaks later today on the housing crisis.” But Allen has yet to note that McCain said he does not think the Federal Reserve acted improperly by extending a $30 billion line of credit to facilitate the acquisition of the near-bankrupt investment bank Bear Stearns by JP Morgan Chase. Read More

  • I’ve always taken John McCain at his word. He is a conservative.

    He only disagrees with Boy George II because McCain is MORE conservative than the President.

    Not cutting taxes in the middle of a war is Fiscal Conservatism.

    etc.,

    That said, it is educational to compare modern Republican conservatism to post-Mohammed Islam. After the death of the prophet there was a break between his chief companions and his family about who would be the source of religious authority. Similarly, after the mental decline of Saint Ronald Reagan there is a break in Republican Conservatism about who is the source of political authority to speak for and define conservatism. That break is between Nancy Reagan and her followers, which includes John McCain, and party elders like James Baker III. In 2000 the elders succeeded in putting their tool, Boy George II, in the White House at the expense of John McCain’s reputation. Now in 2008 it seems that the Family is pervailing.

    However, there is not a lot of likelihood that the Republican’ts can win in November with an unpopular war and a tanking economy. Which leads me to believe that the Party Elders are just letting the Family have the nomination just to watch the candidate crash and burn. Note the fact that Obama got $55 Mil in donations in February, Clinton got $34 Mil, and McCain got $11 Mil.

    Just for your further edification, note that the descendants of the followers of the Family of Mohammed are today called Shiites and the descendants of the followers of his companions are called Sunnis. And ever since the Sunnis killed Mohammed’s son-in-law Hussein they’ve been at each other’s throats.

    Which is about what I would expect to happen to Republican Conservatism if John McCain loses in November because Reagan’s Companions betray him.

  • Doubtful

    I’ll see your Chris Matthews and raise you a Rupert Murdoch.

    You may have a point

  • Comments are closed.