Friday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* The good news: “The Pentagon announced Friday the capture of one of al-Qaida’s most senior and most experienced operatives, an Iraqi who was trying to return to his native country when he was captured.”

* The bad news: the terrorist was actually captured late last year, but the announcement wasn’t made until “the exact moment when Democrats are mounting their strongest challenge to Bush’s foreign policy.”

* Yesterday, the WaPo’s David Broder said some Senate Democrats wanted to replace Harry Reid as Senate Majority Leader. Today, every single member of the Dem Senate caucus — including Lieberman — signed a joint statement praising Reid enthusiastically. “In contrast to Mr. Broder’s insinuations, we believe Mr. Reid is an extraordinary leader who has effectively guided the new Democratic majority through these first few months with skill and aplomb.” How soon can we expect Broder’s correction?

* In case anyone thought several recent polls were all outliers, the latest CBS/NYT poll (.pdf) asked respondents, “Who do you think should have the final say about troop levels in Iraq, the President or Congress?” Congress beat Bush easily, 57% to 35%. Asked if the United States should set a timeline for withdrawal from Iraq, the results were two-to-one: 64% to 32%.

* Former CIA director George Tenet’s new book seems to have caught the attention of House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) who invited Tenet to testify next month on the administration’s bogus Niger claims. (Note to Tenet: think about the great publicity for your book!)

* More digging from McClatchy: “Congressional sources who have seen unedited internal documents say the Bush administration considered firing at least a dozen U.S. attorneys before paring down its list to eight late last year. The four who escaped dismissal came from states considered political battlegrounds in the last presidential election: Minnesota, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.” TPM has more.

* Sen. Anonymous strikes again. “The infamous unnamed senator (or senators) has for more than a week blocked passage of legislation that would require Senate candidates to file campaign finance reports electronically,” the Washington Post reports. “When Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) first brought the bill to the floor last week… he was told that an unnamed lawmaker objected.” On Thursday, “the bill’s sponsor tried again. And again, the Republican floor leader objected.”

* Former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) received some good legal news yesterday: “Ending an investigation that clouded the tenure of former Senate majority leader Bill Frist, federal prosecutors have decided not to file insider-trading charges against the Tennessee Republican for his sales of stock in a family-owned chain of hospitals. The U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York and Securities and Exchange Commission staff sent Frist letters last week signaling that they had closed their joint, 18-month investigation. The letters essentially cleared him of wrongdoing.”

* Right-wing cartoonist turns to using blackface? Seriously?

* The controversy over Pat Tillman’s death is far from over: “Lawmakers requested documents from the White House and Pentagon Friday describing how and when the Bush administration learned the circumstances of Pat Tillman’s death. The House oversight committee, headed by California Democratic Rep. Henry Waxman, wrote to White House Counsel Fred Fielding requesting ‘all documents received or generated by any official in the Executive Office of the President … that relate to Corporal Tillman.'”

* Economic growth in the first quarter of 2007 was … not good.

* The Bush administration is still trying to screw over Katrina victims in New Orleans.

* Every time O’Reilly lashes out at Media Matters, he’s wrong. Literally, every time. It’s quite comical.

* And finally, if you thought Don Imus’ comments about Rutgers’ basketball team were racially offensive, wait until you hear what Rush Limbaugh has been up to this week with Barack Obama and Al Sharpton. And when you do, keep in mind: White House officials, including the Vice President, bolster this racist clown by appearing on his show all the time.

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

“The bad news: the terrorist was actually captured over a year ago…”

Not to be picky, but is “late last year” really over a year ago? That said, my first thought when I heard the news on the radio was, “Hmmm…I wonder when they picked him up?”

  • I suppose one shouldn’t hold one’s breath waiting for the WaPo’s ombudsperson to mention that its senior columnist is pulling ‘facts’ out of his own delusions?

    It’s kinda embarrassing when, on the heels of a column saying that Democrats are bothered by Reid, they all sign a public letter saying it ain’t so.

    Meanwhile, why did they have announce the captured al Qaeda guy today? It seems kinda wasted. Though I guess it primes the rhetorical pumps for the Sunday shows, where there will probably be an effort to pre-empt the embarrassment of Tuesday’s anniversary of “Mission Accomplished”, and the veto of the spending bill.

  • AK liberal: not only did they pick him up last year, but they also transferred him from CIA custody earlier in the week and that’s substantially what the announcement was about. The question that popped into my head was quite different–it’s Friday and they announce capture of a terrorist. What else will come out today that they are trying to hide? Any guesses? Note that I am not the only one who asked that question (see TPM for details).

  • Multiple Friday afternoon stories that might have served as a reason for the distracting PR on the terrorist “capture”. A DOJ official resigns, a USAID director resigns, multiple development in Abramoff investigations, yet another Friday afternoon DOJ document dump, bad economic news. And all of this the day after the White House/Pentagon strategy of underreporting Iraqi casualties has been unmasked. There are plenty of reasons to try to channel the media to “good news”. It seems they are no longer biting. (Although Romney still got a pass for his bin Laden comment.)

  • Not to be picky…

    Not at all. Concern for accuracy is not a sign of being picky.

    I appreciate the catch and corrected the post.

  • It seems to me that the really bad news relating to the Al Qaida terrorist is that (according to ABC evening news) he’d been held in a “black” prisons with “rigorous” questioning. What has our nation become when we do such things?

  • In that link CB had on the very low economic numbers, one of the principal points was that the consumers are holding up the economy. Considering US consumers have had a negative savings rate for nearly a year, I can’t imagine mining home equity or maxing out the credit cards can go much further. I expect the consumer to have a tight spending summer, especially with the way gas prices are.

    On the O’Reilly issue, when I first ran across Media Matters years ago, I thought it too weak since they used no hyperbole or epithets and merely stuck to just reporting what was said and counter-reporting what they facts truly were. I thought more agression would be better. But Media Matters was more about geology than revenge. I say geology because it studies the effects of time and pressure and over time the steadily erosive effects of the truth are wearing on Billo. Congratulations to Eric Boehlert and crew. Honesty is truly the best revenge.

  • Taio, @ 11

    Lame jokes about giving foreign aid and receiving AIDS are almost inescapable, no?

    What struck me as particularly bitter irony, when I tried to put myself in the guy’s place, was that he was no longer Palfrey’s client; he’d switched to a more exotic (Central America) service…

  • Comments are closed.