Friday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Oh my: “Dangerous cracks are appearing in the nation’s job market. Employers slashed jobs by the largest amount in five years — and hundreds of thousands of people dropped out of the labor force — an ominous sign that the country is falling toward a recession or has already toppled into one. For the second straight month, nervous employers got rid of jobs nationwide. In February, they sliced payrolls by 63,000, even deeper than the 22,000 positions cut in January, the Labor Department reported Friday. The grim snapshot of the country’s employment climate underscored the heavy toll the housing and credit debacles are taking on companies, jobseekers and the economy as a whole.”

* Finding an analyst who doesn’t think we’re in a recession has become rather difficult.

* And then, of course, there’s the market: “Stocks tumbled for a second consecutive session Friday after the government’s February jobs report revealed employers slashed payrolls last month, compounding fears that the U.S. economy is succumbing to recession. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 146 points, bringing its two-day slide to 370. This week’s declines in the three major stock indexes to their lowest settlements since 2006 came despite the Federal Reserve’s announcement that it would take steps to aid the credit markets.”

* Consumer debt has hit $2.52 trillion. Wow.

* The New York Observer talked to former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, an Obama supporter, about the Samantha Power controversy. Brzezinski thinks she got a raw deal, adding, “I don’t think she should have resigned.”

* On a related note, the Clinton campaign acted with amazing speed to turn the Power controversy into yet another fundraising opportunity.

* WaPo: “A new National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq is scheduled to be completed this month.” Whether anyone gets to see it is another matter entirely.

* It’s about damn time: “The Senate yesterday approved the most far-reaching changes to the nation’s product safety system in a generation, responding to recalls of millions of lead-laced toys that rattled consumers last year.” The Bush administration rejects the very idea of protecting consumer safety through government regulation; fortunately there’s a Democratic Congress.

* This hasn’t generated a lot of attention yet, but come January, neither Gen. David Petraeus nor U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker will be in Iraq; they’ll be back home.

* Creationists probably won’t care for this at all.

* I wonder what the story is here: “Later today, Bradley Blakeman will step aside as president of Freedom’s Watch, an independent conservative organization expected to play a major role in the 2008 election. ‘I will stay through transition and then I will go back to my consulting business,’ Blakeman said in a brief interview today. ‘I resigned, they didn’t ask for my resignation.’ Blakeman spent several years earlier this decade serving in the administration of President George W. Bush.”

* Did the Clinton campaign darken an image of Obama for an attack ad? Kevin Drum isn’t buying it: “Hillary Clinton is running a rough campaign, and I’m pretty unhappy with some of her tactics, but that’s no reason to start hauling out all the old Clinton-hating artillery we came to know and love in the 90s. This ad isn’t evidence of race-baiting or anything else. Time to move on.”

* The other side loves the 3 a.m. ad: “At a Council on Foreign Relations event in D.C. today, as a Hillary adviser touted Clinton’s foreign policy experience, McCain adviser Randy Scheunemann reportedly chimed in with: ‘Please keep running those 3 a.m. ads about who you want to answer the phone, because we like those.'”

* McCain sure does have some interesting friends: “Rep. Rick Renzi, R-Ariz., allegedly defrauded dozens of pro-life organizations for hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund his first congressional bid, according to an analysis of the recent indictment against him, a state insurance claim and an interview with an insurance lawyer involved in the case.”

* Interesting: “A longtime protege of President Bush told former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias that he was fired for political reasons and that he shouldn’t fight his ouster, Iglesias says in a new book. ‘This is political,’ Iglesias recalls Texas U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton telling him shortly after he was ousted. ‘If I were you, I’d just go quietly.'”

* And finally, don’t miss Katha Pollitt’s response to Charlotte Allen’s ridiculous anti-woman hit job from the other day: “Why did The Post publish this nonsense? I can’t imagine a great newspaper airing comparable trash talk about any other group. ‘Asians Really Do Just Copy’ ‘No Wonder Africa’s Such a Mess: It’s Full of Black People!’ Misogyny is the last acceptable prejudice, and nowhere more so than in our nation’s clueless and overwhelmingly white-male-controlled media. I can just picture the edit meeting: This time, let’s get a woman to say women are dumb and silly! If readers raise too big a ruckus, Outlook editor John Pomfret can say it was all ‘tongue in cheek.’ Women are dingbats! Get it? Ha. Ha. Ha. Here’s a thought. Maybe there’s another thing women can do besides fluff up their husbands’ pillows: Fill more important jobs at The Washington Post.”

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

With all the bad economic news, McCain has already got to be regretting the Bush endorsement.

  • TR (1): With all the bad economic news, McCain has already got to be regretting the Bush endorsement.

    Are you kidding? How many MBA friends with an undergrad degree in History do you think McCain has? He should be able to explain the laugher curve, if nothing else.

  • “On a related note, the Clinton campaign acted with amazing speed to turn the Power controversy into yet another fundraising opportunity.”

    How do you suppose either candidate gets to $55 million? Both are taking advantage of every opportunity. Or are you going to suggest that fundraising is dirty campaigning too? Why don’t you just come out and endorse Obama? Taking potshots at Clinton through the news recaps stinks. Or am I supposed to think you are praising her speediness?

  • Just a speech? Okay, but have you ever read it? I hadn’t — but before clicking the link you have to promise not to hijack the thread with a hundred Clinton/Obama comments. Remember, it’s just a speech and I’m guessing there are folks out there like me who hadn’t read it but would like to With that out of the way, here’s the link. Don’t forget, you promised!

  • Americablog and DailyKos clearly proved they darkened and widened his face. Evidence of race-baiting? That’s at least debatable, but the editing is not.

  • Bill Bradley via Kleiman via Yglesias

    I think Barack Obama has a much stronger chance of beating John McCain in the general election. I think Hillary is flawed in many ways, and particularly if you look at her husband’s unwillingness to release the names of the people who contributed to his presidential library. And the reason that is important — you know, are there favors attached to $500,000 or $1 million contributions? And what do I mean by favors? I mean, pardons that are granted; investigations that are squelched; contracts that are awarded; regulations that are delayed.

    http://www.samefacts.com/archives/corruption_in_washington_/2008/03/pardon_me_mr_president.php

  • @ libra:

    He has said his cabinet is going to be composed of dissenting voices. He has said he is going to listen to various arguments. If you want a thriving tribe of yes-men and yes-woman then Clinton is the beast to ride.

  • CNN reported that the February job loss was only 63,000 because the government added 50,000 jobs in February. So in reality, non farming, and non-government jobs REALLY DROPPED 113,000 in February. Compare this to the Clinton administration, which AVERAGED over 200,000 + each month, for 8 years.

  • The state of the campaign sort of makes me wish for one of those old-fashioned Bill Clinton Screw-ups, if you know what I mean.

    All Obama’s troubles seemed to start with that wonky victory speech. He should have kept on inspiring. Does Clinton think she can beat McCain with second hand Republican tactics. They wrote the book on that stuff.

    Up-ticket. We hear about prez candidates helping or hurting down-ticket candidates. Well, if we get more blue dogs running we’ll be hurting the upticket.

  • The above post is in no way an endorsement of Hillary. I am so pissed off at her using REPUG scum tactics to try to take down Obama. The above post was an endorsement for a Democratic administration, that seems to be much better at job growth than the current monarchy we currently have

  • Samantha Power referred to a presidential candidate of her own party as a “monster” to the foreign press.That, in itself proves her lack of maturity and her lack of qualifications for any sensitive foreign relations position. Of course, she should have resigned, if for no other reason, than the potential damage to her candidate, had she remained.

  • * Creationists probably won’t care for this at all.

    Au contrare. The creationist love it when real scientist disagree. To the creationist when science disagrees, that means it is invalidated and therefore creationism has been proved.

  • In what many in the GOP came to view as the 11th Commandment, Ronald Reagan famously said,” Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican.” Hillary Clinton, it would now appear, is taking his advice to heart. Not content to merely lambast the supposed inexperience of Barack Obama, Clinton’s scorched-earth campaign has lavished praise on John McCain as the embodiment of a commander-in-chief. Desperate to resurrect her once-fading candidacy, it is Hillary Clinton who has sadly emerged as the embodiment of Reagan’s Law.

    For the details, see:
    “Hillary Clinton Follows Reagan’s 11th Commandment.”

  • What do y’all think Obama and his people are saying up there in the Chicago strategy meetings.

    *Let’s not over react. Let’s stick with our core values.
    *How can we campaign against Clinton ad McCain at the same time. Tie them together since she is sounding like him.
    *How can we get some positive news cycles. Will winning Miss and Wyoming get us back on the top of the news cycle or will her attempt at getting a few delegates by the story the MSM will push?
    *Do we ‘go there’ on the past Clinton scandals? Can we differentiate new questions about her from the rightwing harassment she has received?

    I saw an article that the Iowa delegates are very much up in the air and that Obama is the only working that crowd.

  • Re: Creationists probably won’t care for this at all.

    Probably not, because to them it doesn’t matter. All science that contradicts their beliefs is flawed, regardless of the amount of evidence you show them. They can resolve the cognitive dissonance simply by burrowing more deeply into their delusions.

    #4: Why don’t you just come out and endorse Obama?

    God yes, please just go ahead and do this so she’ll shut up about it.

    #13: [Impartial strikes again]

    You know, if you have to use the word “Impartial” as a screen name, it’s pretty much a dead giveaway that it’s the only impartial thing about you (reminiscent of “Truthsquad” and his(?) barely-passing acquaintance with reality). I’ll bet, with a screen name like that, you’re just all over the Clinton-focused blogs keeping them courteous and respectful toward Sen. Obama.

    Aintcha?

  • Can’t get over your bias, can you? I respect Senator Obama. It’s some of his immature supporters who need to look at reality.

  • I didn’t realize that you had to agree lock step in order to post on this blog. My mistake.

  • This hasn’t generated a lot of attention yet, but come January, neither Gen. David Petraeus nor U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker will be in Iraq; they’ll be back home. — CB

    Come January — the blessed relief of the 20th — I’d expect *all* Ambassadors to be replaced. Just all the Secretaries and US Attorneys will be, since change of guards happens not just at the very tip of the top. So, no surprises here. Unless, of course, Hillary gets the nomination in August, McSame wins in November and Crocker changes his mind in December.

  • Can we all just agree that whoever the nominee is we will go to the mat for them

  • Impartial has said many times that we all can get along, but many here have venom to spill

  • Later today, Bradley Blakeman will step aside as president of Freedom’s Watch, an independent conservative organization expected to play a major role in the 2008 election.

    Since this is one of those ‘late on a Friday afternoon’ announcements, I wonder what trouble he got himself into? Could it be the live boy / dead girl in the closet type scandal?

    Considering the company he’s keeping it’s entirely plausible.

  • ROTF@9 said, “If you want a thriving tribe of yes-men and yes-woman then Clinton is the beast to ride.”

    That’s it! We can tie Clinton to knuckledragging bestiality addicts!!! (Although I now have to explain to my children what “riding the beast” means).

    And Furious, your theory is flawed. Clinton has repeatedly spoken ill of the many Republicans who crossed the bridge to vote for Obama. She’s neither Republican nor Democrat. She’s a Clintonian—slightly lower on the evolutionary scale than “whale poo….”

  • ROTF, @9

    Dissenting voices (and advice) are extremely valuable — in private — because differing POVs let you consider the same subject from different angles, some of which you may not have thought about by yourself. A dissenting voice which undermines your message in public, OTOH…

  • Kudlow
    does’ nt believe it if as he says the reason for the declining stock market is not a credit crunch, subprime debt, housing slump, loss of jobs 2 months in a row, no housing construction,no savings ,high gas , 10 billion a month on war , low wages , (I could go on )no the reason is the prospect of a democratic president.
    Too much.

  • Sent $25 to Obama today in support of Samantha Power. Power resigned for criticizing a Dem. When is Clinton going to do the same?

    BTW, I was listening to Randi Rhodes on Air America on XM today and Randi was ripping Clinton a new asshole when suddenly, the sound went out. Coincidence? maybe, maybe not.

  • #20: Can’t get over your bias, can you? I respect Senator Obama. It’s some of his immature supporters who need to look at reality.

    My bias is the result of both research and personal preference. As such, until I see a good reason to do so, no, I’ve no interest in getting over my bias.

    And good on you! For my part, I respect Sen. Clinton. But there’s plenty of immaturity on both sides to go around.

    Back to the original issue, Power stuck her foot in her mouth in spectacular fashion, and promptly resigned (justly so). That seemed like a mature response, and her qualifications are no different now than they were a few days ago (though the whole “adviser to Sen. Obama” section of her resume probably needs some editing).

    Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign compares Obama to that voyeuristic retard Ken Starr, demonstrating that saying stupid and inflammatory things is not limited to one campaign alone. But there’s no forthcoming apology or resignation, neither will there be one.

  • ‘I resigned, they didn’t ask for my resignation.’

    Hookers and wetsuits and meth! O my!

  • Sen. Clinton and her team have smeared Sen. Obama within the last few weeks, throwing more than the Kitchen Sink, a few Stink Bombs too, and they call themselves Good People – Agents of Change. It is politicians like them that make average Americans distrust and hate politics and politicians. What Ms. Powers meant is that Sen. Clinton’s actions over this whole campaign process has been “monstrous”, and that it has! It is and should be a part of the past and left behind as we move towards more goodwill, compassion, cooperation and holistic ways of living. America’s is in process of reclaiming her Soul.

  • * This hasn’t generated a lot of attention yet, but come January, neither Gen. David Petraeus nor U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker will be in Iraq; they’ll be back home. This quote from the linked WaPo is telling:

    “A lot of people would concur that it’s the best team we’ve had there,” said Daniel P. Serwer, a former diplomat who oversaw the Iraq Study Group project that recommended revisions in U.S. policy. “Why switch people out when you’re having relative success? But then, there’s not a good time.”

    It does need to be mentioned more often.

    * The other side loves the 3 a.m. ad: “At a Council on Foreign Relations event in D.C. today, as a Hillary adviser touted Clinton’s foreign policy experience, McCain adviser Randy Scheunemann reportedly chimed in with: ‘Please keep running those 3 a.m. ads about who you want to answer the phone, because we like those.’” I concur; please keep those ads going.

    * Interesting: “A longtime protege of President Bush told former U.S. Attorney David Iglesias that he was fired for political reasons and that he shouldn’t fight his ouster, Iglesias says in a new book. ‘This is political,’ Iglesias recalls Texas U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton telling him shortly after he was ousted. ‘If I were you, I’d just go quietly.’” Sutton is hated, virulently, by the conservatives. He was the jerk who got border patrol officers Ramos and Campeon ridiculous 11 year prison terms for shooting an illegal alien drug dealer in the ass when said dealer, who was armed, was trying to get back into Mexico. Bush has been chastised for not getting rid of Sutton.

  • Comments are closed.