Today’s edition of quick hits.
* Hillary tells Bill to please stop talking: “Sen. Hillary Clinton wants her husband to quit talking about her trip to Bosnia in 1996, the former president said Friday. ‘Hillary called me and said, ‘I misstated it, you said I misstated it, but you got to let me handle it because you don’t remember it either’ … I said ‘Yes ma’am,” Bill Clinton said in Terre Haute, Indiana.”
* Discouraging economic news: “Consumer sentiment sunk to its lowest level in 26 years in early April, according to a report on Friday from University of Michigan/Reuters, as worries about the economy, unemployment and inflation deflated hopes for future. U.S. consumer sentiment index fell to 63.2 in early April from 69.5 in March. Sentiment is at its lowest level since March 1982. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch were looking for an April result of 68.8.”
* Remember that Wecht case I mentioned earlier? This is really bizarre: “Two jurors said Thursday they were unnerved by FBI requests for home visits to explain why they deadlocked in the federal public corruption trial of former Allegheny County coroner Cyril H. Wecht. Experts said the practice of using FBI agents to contact and interview jurors in their homes after mistrials was unusual, but the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Pittsburgh characterized it as ‘commonplace.'”
* At least it’s not a Peabody: “Barry Nolan, a local Boston news reporter, is mounting a campaign to protest the fact that Bill O’Reilly will be awarded an Emmy Award by the Boston/New England Chapter next month. Nolan insists that O’Reilly is ‘a mental case’ who shouldn’t be held up as an example of journalistic integrity.”
* If McCain is going to go after Soros-funded outfits, he might want to look a little closer to home, Part I and Part II.
* Wouldn’t this be entertaining: “Earlier this week, House Judiciary Committee Chair John Conyers (D-MI) invited John Yoo to testify before the committee on May 6th about the infamous legal memos on torture that he issued while with the Department of Justice. If Yoo did not want to appear, Conyers wrote, then the panel would subpoena him. Now Conyers, following up on the reports in the last couple of weeks about the role of top administration officials in authorizing the use of “enhanced interrogation” techniques including waterboarding, has invited a slew of current and former officials to testify at the hearing. Among those invited are former Attorney General John Ashcroft, former CIA Director George Tenet, former Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith, Chief of Staff to the Vice President David Addington, and former Assistant Attorney General Daniel Levin, who headed up the Office of Legal Counsel for a brief time.”
* Speaking of Conyers, he’s interested in the Wecht case, too.
* One wonders if Mark Penn had any friends in the Clinton camp at all. Here’s Paul Begala on Penn: “I have nothing but contempt for Mr. Penn. And for those of us who wanted to see him out from the beginning, it became almost a Rumsfeldian thing. And he is not even fired. He has been demoted. How could this be?”
* There is a parallel: “Lawyers for the House Judiciary Committee compared President Bush to the late President Richard Nixon in a legal motion filed today in federal court as part of their civil contempt lawsuit against White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and former White House Counsel Harriet Miers for failing to comply with panel subpoenas. The subpoenas were issued as part of the committee’s probe into the firing of nine U.S. attorneys in 2006.”
* The “nuclear option” is one of theirs, not one of ours.
* Note to the LA Times: unhinged, right-wing blogs who peddle ridiculous smears shouldn’t be used as sources for news articles.
* Nice metaphor: “But the administration’s critics (and even some sympathizers) see the current policy as the equivalent of constructing an expensive road, under hazardous conditions, without being able to explain where the road will lead. The road becomes an end in itself. The point is to keep building it in the hope that it will eventually arrive at some lovely destination.”
* And finally, you may have heard about the odd image, possibly of a naked woman, in the reflection of Dick Cheney’s sunglasses. The mystery seems to have been resolved: “McClatchy/Tribune Information Services photo editor George Bridges used the latest digital technology to enlarge the picture, took a close look at Cheney’s sunglasses and concluded that Mitchell was telling the truth. The image is of the vice president’s hand on his fly rod. ‘In one lens of his sunglasses you can clearly tell it is a sleeved arm of Cheney or a fishing companion. The other lens has an extreme distortion that, without looking at it closely, could be misconstrued,’ said investigative photo editor Bridges.” Good to know.
Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.