Friday’s Mini-Report

Today’s edition of quick hits.

* Insult to injury: “Burma’s ruling military junta today impounded United Nations food shipments bound for the storm-ravaged Irrawaddy Delta, forcing a temporary suspension of U.N. aid deliveries. A U.N. official later said shipments would resume tomorrow, and the United States said it has received approval to fly in a single cargo plane on Monday.”

* On a related note, confused about “Burma” vs. “Myanmar”? That’s understandable.

* AP: “Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says Hezbollah, backed by Syria and Iran, is killing and injuring innocent civilians in Lebanon. Rice says that Hezbollah is trying to protect its ‘state-within-a-state.'”

* Involuntary service: “The number of soldiers forced to remain in the Army involuntarily under the military’s controversial ‘stop-loss’ program has risen sharply since the Pentagon extended combat tours last year, officials said Thursday. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates was briefed about the program by Army officials who said that thousands of new stop-loss orders were issued to keep soldiers from leaving the service after Gates ordered combat tours extended from 12 to 15 months last spring.”

* Joe Lieberman defended John McCain today, using a very odd choice of words: “I just want to report that this morning I personally checked John McCain’s bearings. He has not lost any of them. They are all in really great shape.” That’s kind of creepy.

* This really is ridiculous. “Even with countless media outlets available these days, a Sunday New York Times cover story could always be counted on to send a jolt through the television news cycle. But apparently that’s no longer the case. Indeed, reporter David Barstow’s 7,600-word investigation of the Pentagon’s military analyst program — whereby ex-military talking heads, often with direct ties to contractors, parroted Defense Department talking points on the air — has been noticeably absent from television airwaves since the story broke on April 20.”

* Another indicator: “In yet another sign that Democratic forces are starting to view Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) as their party’s presumptive nominee, a group of state party chairmen are gathering in Chicago at Obama’s headquarters Friday.”

* What if Iranian weapons that turned up in Iraq aren’t Iranian?

* Dick Cheney said things are going “swimmingly” in Iraq. The poor guy just isn’t well.

* Rasmussen Reports believes the race for the Democratic nomination is over, and has stopped polling the Clinton-Obama race.

* Congressional Republicans still want to pass the Colombian trade deal House Dems blocked a few weeks ago.

* Renewing the Plame case? “Former CIA operative Valerie Plame is trying to resurrect a lawsuit against those in the Bush administration she says illegally disclosed her identity.”

* The Senate Ethics Committee dismissed the complaint against David Vitter.

* From time to time, unhinged right-wing activists insist that Obama and Joe Biden are working on a plan to impose a “global tax that would require America to pay tax to the U.N.” In case anyone hears about this, rest assured, it’s not true.

* The KBR nightmare continues: “Government contracting giant KBR rehired a man its own officials had fired after catching him with what they believed could be child pornography. KBR rehired Ira Waltrip just a few months later to work as a truck driver in Iraq. He was apprehended there last month with a massive collection of child pornography, prosecutors say, including graphic photographs of men having sex with girls as young as six years old.”

* An interesting explanation of the difference between liberal populism and conservative populism.

* NYT: “[Sen. Richard Shelby, Republican of Alabama] does not run a key Congressional committee. Instead, as the ranking Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, he is using his clout and the Democrats’ slim majority in the Senate to help determine what gets in, or almost as important, what is left out, of legislation. He will soon play a major role in deciding the fate of one such bill, to help struggling homeowners, that the House passed, 266 to 154, on Thursday. But over the years, his critics say, Mr. Shelby’s ties to the mortgage industry and the Alabama real estate market, and the generous campaign donations he receives from financial services companies, have distorted his perspective and led him to delay critical legislative remedies.”

* I guess we won’t see Lanny Davis on CNN again soon.

* Far-right blogs aren’t big on policy. What a surprise.

* Fox News staffers are supposed to support Republicans, but they’re not supposed to admit they support Republicans.

* And finally, some right-wing group is going to boycott Starbucks because of its logo. Apparently, a mermaid is a little too racy?

Anything to add? Consider this an end-of-the-day open thread.

By pointing out that Cindy McCain refuses to release any financial records, Mr. Benen implies Ms. McCain is hiding financial improprietites. In fact, none of the recrods available to the public suggest McCain has anything to hide.

  • Considering where Joe Lieberman’s lips are located these days, I’m not surprised he would know that John’s Ball Bearings are just fine.

  • Joe Lieberman defended John McCain today, using a very odd choice of words: “I just want to report that this morning I personally checked John McCain’s bearings. He has not lost any of them. They are all in really great shape.” That’s kind of creepy.

    Especially if he’s referring to ball bearings.

  • No, I believe the point of requesting Cindy McCain to divulge her tax records is the hold the presumptive Repubican nominee to the same standards that the Republicans demanded of Theresa Heinz Kerry in 2004.

  • I guess we won’t see Lanny Davis on CNN again soon

    Lanny Davis is an idiot, I would start watching CNN again if I never had to worry about seeing him. Still, Davis’ role has been to attack Obama. If he is willing to continue that role with Clinton out of the race I am sure CNN’s producers will be willing to give him far more air time than any of Obama’s supporters. It wasn’t Clinton’s night, I don’t see how he could be upset that they focused so much on Obama since his win and near-win were in fact the major story.

  • What if Iranian weapons that turned up in Iraq aren’t Iranian?

    That’s basically a “sure-bet” – if the neocons, military-industrial complex, and criminal cabal behind dur chimpfurher had anything on Iran, we would have bombed the sh@t out of them long ago.

    Now that we are coming don’ the stretch – hopefully an end of their reign of terror, they need anything to create an event to make them relevant again and perhaps even stay in power.

    Nothing should surprise anyone – great crimes demand even greater criminality.

  • In fact, none of the recrods available to the public suggest McCain has anything to hide.

    You obviously don’t remember (or choose to hide) the HUGE role mclame played in the savings & loan scandal – he was really part of the “keating 5”.

    Nothin’ to see here, move along, keep moving, nothing to see…

    Whadda marooooooooooon

    And records that don’t get released (even though the MSM expects them from every DEM candidate) tell no stories either, right?

  • It embarasses me that so many who post here as alleged liberals are so lacking a sense of humor or ability to ferret out sarcasm. maybe that is a good test: perhaps those who screechingly respond with angry seriousness to facetious posts are not truly liberals, but rather are freepers just here to stir the pot.

    just sayin.

  • Ignoring how creepy Lieberman’s choice of phrase is, I’d just like to point out that his assurance about John McCain is worth less than nothing. The only thing it reassures me of is that Obama’s statement is likely true.

  • mark pencil – the “concern” of a concern troll is directly proportional to the outrage they express towards others, especially when that outrage is directed to those having fun and making comments in jest or with sarcasm.

  • Shade Tail – what we need for the 2008 election is a mobile statue of LIE-berman with his tongue down maclame’s throat.

  • Mark Pencil – unfortunately it has long been a fact of politics that many who are deeply involved in said activity see it as Very Serious Indeed and cannot deal with those who fail to match their level of Serious Committment. Sadly, apparatchiks and apparatchiks are apparatchiks.

    I regret the departure of Insane Fake Professor, if only for her inerring ability to ferret out those in need of a 40 hour intevenention dealing with the recognition of irony and parody.

    Sadly, many of them are indeed lefties, proving that certain continuums are circular rather than linear.

  • “An interesting explanation of the difference between liberal populism and conservative populism.” I found this explanation to be a bit, well, gulp, elitist.

    I kind of like a simpler explanation. Liberal populism promotes the general welfare of all the people. It presumes, however, that the top can take care of themselves, and have done so, and in fact have vastly overreached, by arrogating too much to themselves at the expense of everyone else. Reverse Robinhood, in other words. Liberal populism recognizes that the rich not only have all the money, but the power to keep it that way.

    Seems to me conservative populism appeals to the basest level of the people, stirring a cauldron of intolerance, suspicion, blind nationalism, militarism, and religious fanaticism in order to keep the people’s minds off the fact that they’re being had by the people who are exploiting them. Divide and conquer, in other words.

  • ““I just want to report that this morning I personally checked John McCain’s bearings. He has not lost any of them. They are all in really great shape.””

    Oh my God, is that all this campaign is going to be? Nothing but he said/he said? That’s all the media is going to do whenever there is a brief foray into real issues – pounce on the word choice of the candidates instead of the substance of their remarks?

    This is frustrating and exasperating beyond words.

  • * And finally, some right-wing group is going to boycott Starbucks because of its logo. Apparently, a mermaid is a little too racy?

    Funny you should mention this… In my spare (from lefty-blogs reading) time, I study early (16th and 17th century) lace. The two-tailed mermaid element was extremely popular in that period, especially for items like bed coverlets, wedding aprons and the like. That’s because a two-tailed mermaid was considered a symbol of fertility (one fish roe makes hundreds of little fishes). The two-tailed mermaids were usually surrounded by rampantly abundant life (birds, flowers, curling vines etc). They were presented as crowned and big-breasted (some of the images would have made Jane Mansfield weep with envy). And those two tails… half of the time, there’s something looking suspiciously like scrotum between them. So, that right-wing nut group wasn’t all that far off in their assessment though I expect it was instinctive rather than informed objection.

    Mark Pencil, @9,
    I agree, 100%; it *is* embarrassing to see people on one’s own side being so humour-deficient. Earnest (zealous, even), and maybe even decent human beings but with the fatal flaw of being unable to laugh at oneself. I used to think it was a feature of all Americans (back in Poland, I saw it only among the most dedicated party members) but eventually realised that it’s limited to mostly Repubs. It distresses me to see it also among the Dems.

  • I don’t know why ya’ll are so focused on corruption, scandal, double-standards, policy, and politics when it’s obvious that the real threat to our civilization is that morally depraved and alarmingly elitist new Starbucks logo. It’s a slippery slope from mermaids to menage-et-trois, and I’m ever so glad the good Christian Resistance is working so hard to save us from a caffeine-fueled overthrow of America’s core values! How long must we wait before Obama is exposed as a mermaid-fondling latte-rrorist? Man the barricades!

    /snark

    These people frighten me.

  • re: myanmar:

    interesting to hear bill richardson talk to day about “alternative strategies” to get aid to the victims. i said before, and i’ll say it again. fuck the damn government there, the victims are more important. do whatever you need to do to get them some help. sorry to say this, but even if we have to ship in soldiers to make sure that these poor people get the aid they need. to hell with their leaders.

    damn the military leaders of myanmar.

    long live the buddist monks who are helping as well as they can

  • The definition of “conservative populist” proves that there are only two kinds of Publicans – millionaires and suckers.

  • OP: An interesting explanation of the difference between liberal populism and conservative populism.

    For a real damn treat, go read some of the responses to that TNR article. What the hell has happened to the Democratic Party?

    For example: Hillary is correct that America will never elect as its President an emaciated arugula-eating metrosexual whose father was a Muslim goatherd and whose spiritual mentor for 20 years beseeched God to damn America.

    W.T.F? Is it too much to hope that that’s some damn troll that wandered over from Stormfront or something?

    Another dandy: Obama supporters and the media make it so much easier for us Hillary Clinton fans to practice saying “President John McCain”.

    And it sounds almost gleeful, like they’re looking forward to their upcoming martyrdom. “See, this wouldn’t have had to happen if you had all just voted for Clinton like you were supposed to. Now we all have to suffer because you made me vote for McCain.”

    Words fail.

  • While Cindy McCain readily acknowledges her addiction to drugs in the early ’90s, she and the McCain campaign never admit that Cindy was an addict when she impulsively decided to bring two sick Bangladeshi babies to the USA in 1991. Thankfully, both babies were adopted, one by the McCains and the other by Wes Gullett who was John McCain’s administrative assistant in 1991. Gullett went on to become McCain’s campaign manager in 1992 and one of his his campaign advisors in 2000 and 2008.

    In a recent WSJ article, Karl Rove lauded Wes Gullett for adopting Cindy McCain’s Bangladesh Baby #2. But what if Gullett adopted the baby to stave criticism of Cindy McCain’s rash, drug-fueled decision to bring the babies back to to the USA? How many young Senate admin assistants are in a position to adopt foreign-born, sick babies?

    Just asking.

  • just bill –

    unfortunately we dont have any soldiers available for such a humanitarian mission.

    they’re all busy policing a civil war that we started.

  • Waited two hours and got tickets to an Obama Town Hall meeting for tomorrow! It’s finally Oregon’s turn and maybe we can put him over the top.

    Excited, if you can’t tell… 🙂
    Hannah

  • I’ve long that the wingnuts had something on Hillary Clinton. I suspected that Bill Clinton’s pardon of the New Square Four was ripe for investigation because Rockland County Dem Chairman Paul Adler was convicted on corruption charges in 2001. Adler was very close to the Clintons, especially Hillary, and he was friends with Ehud Barak.

  • “Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says Hezbollah, backed by Syria and Iran, is killing and injuring innocent civilians in Lebanon. — CB

    Yeah, those innocent civilians are so much more dead than the ones killed by Israel in the summer of ’06, while Condi was holding off on condemning the invasion. Hezbollah, BTW, seems to be doing a more efficient job of conquering Beirut than Israel ever did. Whatever happened to that Israel, which surgically dealt with Entebbe? Israel which tracked Eichmann in Argentina and brought him to justice? The current crop at the top of the govt there seems to be as misguided and as inept as our own dear leader.

    And, sure-as-sure, I think that poor Lebanon has had its share and to spare of misfortunes… It seems that, throughout my entire adult life, its people have been under assault…

  • geee, libra, where did you copy and paste that from – I can tell by your posts “downstairs” that you had to have some help. Did someone show you these wonderful places on the map? Perhaps you have a kitty that does your commenting for you?

    Such a mature person and always so right – surely you must have help from some higher life form.

  • geee, libra, where did you copy and paste that from — Winnie, @ 27

    Wouldn’t you like to know… 🙂

  • “unfortunately we dont have any soldiers available for such a humanitarian mission. they’re all busy policing a civil war that we started.”

    yeah, i thought of that myself after i posted. kind of puts us in a bind doesn’t it?

    “Words fail.”

    belligerent academic: in my humble opinion, once the convention is over and we’re into the campaign, these people you are quoting will actually realize what an ass mclame is, and will end up voting for obama in the general. right now they’re just trying to help shillary the only way they know.

  • #29 no – wouldn’t really, its a fairly stoooooooopid analysis, but it does show your level of thought processing.

  • I’m jealous libra – you appear to have your own personal troll!
    (who continually proves my point that you agreed with above.)

  • And despite Davis’s protest of election night coverage, he’s actually appearing tonight on “Larry King Live.” Davis said that King is always fair, and he will never stop going on his show….
    …“Fox, no matter how much you might criticize an ideological bent, in this campaign, they have been religiously middle-of-the-road, point-counterpoint,” Davis said.

    Tell me again why I should vote for this guy’s candidate if she strongarms the convention into anointing her Empress?

    As for Larry King, by “fair” he means “easy”. That show has seen more softballs thrown than a high school girl’s bullpen.

  • Comments are closed.