Friday’s political round-up

Today’s installment of campaign-related news items that wouldn’t generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:

* The Republican push-polling season has begun: “Here’s today’s key story out of the New Hampshire local press: The Union Leader reports that New Hampshirites have been getting push-poll calls … targeted against Mitt Romney. The calls, which among other things attack Romney’s Latter-Day Saints religion, have reportedly been traced back to Utah-based firm Western Wats, which has done push-polling in past general elections against Democrats as well as primary campaigns against Republicans. The calls do not specify which candidate is being supported by them, as is required under New Hampshire law.”

* The same tactic is being used against Romney in Iowa: “Among the questions was whether a resident knew that Romney was a Mormon, that he received military deferments when he served as a Mormon missionary in France, that his five sons did not serve in the military, that Romney’s faith did not accept blacks as bishops into the 1970s and that Mormons believe the Book of Mormon is superior to the Bible.”

* Depending on which pollster you believe, the Republican race in Iowa is either relatively competitive, or extremely competitive. The latest poll from KCCI, the Des Moines CBS affiliate, shows Romney ahead with 27%, followed by Huckabee with 18%, and Giuliani with 16%. A new Des Moines Register poll, however, shows a much closer contest: Romney 24%, Huckabee 22%, Giuliani 11%, Thompson 11%.

* As for Dems, KCCI shows a very close race, with Hillary Clinton leading Barack Obama by just two points, 27% to 25%, with John Edwards third at 21%. The new Des Moines Register poll, however, shows a slightly bigger lead for the frontrunner: Clinton 27%, Obama 21%, Edwards 20%.

* A Dec. 4 Republican debate co-sponsored by the Iowa Republican Party and Fox News was called off yesterday after Mitt Romney said he had a scheduling conflict. Rudy Giuliani had also not said whether he’d attend, presumably waiting for Romney’s decision. Without these two on the stage, organizers decided to skip the event altogether.

* Barack Obama got some good news in yesterday when the United Auto Workers Region 4, which includes 30,000 members and retirees in Iowa, announced it’s endorsement of the Illinois senator.

* John Edwards’ campaign is hitting the Clinton campaign pretty hard for the planted-question flap. Yesterday, Edwards unveiled a new website, “Plants for Hillary.” Among the highlights of the parody site is a T-shirt that reads, “Questions are hard…so plant them. Hillary 08.” Ouch.

* Journalist Sidney Blumenthal, most recently of Salon fame, announced that he’s joining Clinton’s campaign as a senior advisor.

* While Chris Dodd continues to focus his attention on Iowa, he’s apparently divesting in Nevada — he closed his Nevada headquarters yesterday.

* And it looks like Giuliani’s appeal to Iowa conservatives still isn’t going too well: “The Des Moines Register reports that Congressman Steve King (R-IA) is openly bashing the idea of the Republican Party nominating Rudy Giuliani, warning that a Rudy nomination would undermine the GOP. King was critical of Giuliani’s record on abortion, gun rights and illegal immigration, as well as his past support for gay rights. ‘All these things are essential to the Reagan coalition,’ King said, worrying that Rudy’s candidacy could give rise to a third-party spoiler candidate.”

“Without these two on the stage, organizers decided to skip the event altogether.”

Heeheeheeheeheeheeheehee!!

You think maybe if Hannity had toned down his drooling man-crush on Rudy that Mitt might have decided to show up after all? We’ll never know, but it looks pretty bad when even Republicans don’t trust Fox News to give them a fair shake at their own partisan events.

  • Remember the Eleventh Commandment, which reached its zenith during the Reagan era?

    “Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican.”

    So much for Saint Ronnie.

    I love it when slimy Republicans turn their slime against each other.

    I’m beginning to think that Huckabee might actually win the nomination. All of the others are fatally flawed. Not that Huckabee isn’t fatally flawed as well.

  • The anti-Romney stuff has all the markings of a Ghouliani assault. First, we already know that he doesn’t give a rat’s rumproast about state laws; he’s the ultimate Unitary Executive, didn’t you know?

    Second, he—and his flying monkey band—have made far too much about “not needing those primaries” to win the nomination. It reeks to high heaven of a smokescreen—denying the act prior to actually committing the act, thereby technically “not lying” about the act.

  • Regarding the push-polling in New Hampshire, where the hell is NH’s Attorney General, Kelly A. Ayotte? Is Western Wat’s involvement a “smoking gun” or what?

  • Blumenthal’s a smart guy and a good writer, but I have about the same opinion of his political ethics as I do of most Republican operatives. Thus, it’s not at all surprising that he’s returned to his former masters.

  • John Edwards’ campaign is hitting the Clinton campaign pretty hard for the planted-question flap. Yesterday, Edwards unveiled a new website, “Plants for Hillary.” Among the highlights of the parody site is a T-shirt that reads, “Questions are hard…so plant them. Hillary 08.” Ouch.

    Wow, that could be a Republican t-shirt. John is being tantamount to a proxy Republican with this stuff. Time to think through the suggestions from your enthusiastic staff a little bit more before approving them, John, and time to get off this anti-Hillary thing, big-time.

  • CB: That DM Register poll linked above appears to be the one from early October.

    I got all excited too, because DM Register/Seltzer poll is really the only poll of the Iowa caucuses I truly trust. I thought it was a little too soon though. They normally do theirs months apart and so I wasn’t expecting another one from them until maybe the week before the caucuses, it that. (Damn.)

  • Time to think through the suggestions from your enthusiastic staff a little bit more before approving them, John, and time to get off this anti-Hillary thing, big-time. -Swan

    Maybe while Edwards is considering staff changes at your request, Clinton can consider my request to stop planting questions.

    Sounds like you condone her behavior and have more of a problem with Edwards criticizing her decidedly undemocratic bullshit.

  • Ok, the Edwards site “plantsforhillary.com” isn’t working for some reason, but the CNN website confirms the shirts were available for purchase.

    If these shirts don’t say “Edwards ’08” right across the top in big print, Edwards should seriously get rid of them, because they’re going to fire up the Republican base- he’s going to be putting shirts that look like Republican shirts on Democrats, and thereby make Republicans who see them think there are a lot of people out there raring to beat Hillary, which could cause a bandwaggonning effect (to get Republican volunteers involved in this presidential race). John should wise up, because this is the biggest idiot, asshole thing he’s done.

    By the way, doubtful, can you please quit your retart fist-swinging? Can you please fuck off and leave me alone? I keep writing obviously helpful stuff here, trying to help us out, and you keep trying to get me to shut up. Can you please learn some manners and fuck off?

  • Doubtful, here’s a tip: don’t have kids, because your genetic contribution would be a net-minus contribution to the human race.

  • Doubtful, here’s a tip: don’t have kids, because your genetic contribution would be a net-minus contribution to the human race. — Swan, @12

    Some Ugly Ducklings remain just that, Andersen’s story of miraculous transformation notwithstanding…

  • Comments are closed.