After Sen. George Allen’s (R-Va.) “macaca” controversy, and the photo of him with leaders of the Council of Conservative Citizens, and his suspect history involving nooses and the confederate flag, the senator from Virginia started to get something of a reputation. After last night’s debate with his Democratic rival, Jim Webb, it’s possible the reputation may be slightly worse.
It started with a question from WUSA-TV’s Peggy Fox who asked if Allen’s Tunisian-born mother has Jewish blood.
“It has been reported,” Fox said, that “your grandfather Felix, whom you were given your middle name for, was Jewish. Could you please tell us whether your forebears include Jews and, if so, at which point Jewish identity might have ended?”
By my standards, it was an inappropriate question and Allen, at least at first, was right to dismiss it.
Allen recoiled as if he had been struck. His supporters in the audience booed and hissed. “To be getting into what religion my mother is, I don’t think is relevant,” Allen said, furiously. “Why is that relevant — my religion, Jim’s religion or the religious beliefs of anyone out there?”
Quite right. It’s not relevant at all. One could maybe make the argument that Allen has raised his family’s background in the campaign — he’s mentioned a few times that his grandfather was in a Nazi concentration camp — but even that’s a stretch. Webb hasn’t brought the issue up at all, and there’s little to no public interest. It’s a rare public debate with a limited schedule, and Fox was wrong to ask.
Unfortunately for Allen, his good answer took a bit of a detour.
Allen challenged Fox to explain why she asked the question in the first place. “Honesty, that’s all,” she said, slightly taken aback.
“Oh, that’s just all? That’s just all,” the senator mocked, pressing his attack. He directed Fox to “ask questions about issues that really matter to people here in Virginia” and refrain from “making aspersions.”
Now, in context (Wonkette has a clip of the entire exchange), it’s possible Allen meant that perhaps it’s best to avoid all personal questions and stick exclusively to “the issues.” But it also sounds a bit as if Allen was suggesting that being confronted with Jewish ancestry is an “aspersion.” And if so, that’s a problem.
The comment seems to have sparked considerable discussion around the ‘sphere. The Plank suggested that Allen seems to have had “a visceral revulsion to being associated with Judaism.” Kos has three separate items on the flap today, concluding, “The issue isn’t whether Allen has Jewish blood or not. It’s the fact that Allen seems to have a problem with it.” Podhoretz thought it was “weird” that Allen “acted as though the question were absolutely beyond the bounds of all rational discourse.”
What do you think? Given his past, Allen hasn’t exactly earned the benefit of the doubt, but was his reaction really a sign of anti-Semitism?