George W. Bush’s forgotten victim

Guest Post by Morbo

Like Godzilla rampaging through downtown Tokyo, [tag]President[/tag] [tag]George W. Bush[/tag] continues to destroy all in his political wake.

In another post today, I discuss how Bush’s unpopularity has spilled over on to his brother, Jeb, the governor of Florida. But there’s another politician Bush has helped ruin, one who, unlike Jeb, started out half decent but was quickly dragged down into the morass of the [tag]Iraq[/tag] [tag]War[/tag]: [tag]Tony Blair[/tag].

Blair’s [tag]approval[/tag] ratings in [tag]Great Britain[/tag] are now about as low as Bush’s. Brits are feeling Blair fatigue, and even members of his own Labour Party are starting to criticize him. The only question that remains is when Blair will leave. As Newsweek recently reported:

In a series of interviews this week, one of the British prime minister’s most loyal political allies, the former Home Minister Charles Clarke, offered a dire assessment of Blair’s premiership. Clarke said Blair’s government has lost leadership, authority and direction, and he expressed reservations about Blair’s ability to recover them.

To be sure, some of Blair’s wounds are self-inflicted. Newsweek noted that Labour has been hit hard by scandals dealing with “secret campaign loans to Blair’s Labour Party in alleged exchange for seats in the House of Lords, and damning stories about the release of foreign criminals from British prisons.”

But looming over it all is the shadow of the Iraq War.

The British have always been divided over the war, and lately opposition is increasing. A poll taken in April found 57 percent of Britons saying military action against Iraq was a mistake. Support for the war there dropped nearly 20 points in less than a year.

Unlike the compliant U.S. media, some elements of the more freewheeling British press have not hesitated to attack the war, and many BBC reports have been critical as well. (Like many Americans, I took to reading the BBC online after the invasion to get something more than rah-rah boosterism and lies. It was one of the few news outlets that, for example, reported on the deaths of Iraqi civilians during the initial bombing.)

Brits are not fond of Bush. Two-thirds say they disapprove of him. The sight of their prime minister constantly hobnobbing with Bush has probably not done much for Blair’s approval rating. As a result, Labour is looking to dump him and regroup with a new leader. The question is, is it too late? The [tag]Conservative Party[/tag], once down in the polls to sub-basement levels, is looking a little better to people again.

I remember when Blair took office after so many years of Thatcherism and “Thatcher lite” (John Major). I felt a real sense of hope and solidarity with the Brits. The U.S., after all, had been cursed with eight years of Reagan and “Reagan lite” (Bush I) and finally turned the corner. I’m no expert on British politics, but for a time it really looked as if [tag]Labour[/tag], led by a young and dynamic leader, was poised to enter a new era of dominance.

Leave it to [tag]Bush[/tag] to screw even that up.

i was with you until the last line. the only person to blame for blair’s problems is blair. if a follower is dumb enough to follow, why blame the leader for it?

  • Hey Morbo. The ark-eologists are at it again:

    Archaeologists Say They May Have Found Noah’s Ark…

    ABC News  |   June 30, 2006 at 08:25 PM

    Texas archaeologists believe they may have located the remains of Noah’s Ark in Iran’s Elburz mountain range.

    “I can’t imagine what it could be if it is not the Ark,” said Arch Bonnema of the Bible Archaeology Search and Exploration (B.A.S.E) Institute, a Christian archeology organization dedicated to looking for biblical artifacts.

    The term “Texas archaeologists” is funny to me somehow.

  • >Hey Morbo. The ark-eologists are at it again:

    >Archaeologists Say They May Have Found Noah’s Ark…

    I was just looking at an old book last night, from the 1970s, called “Noah’s Ark Nonsense.” It makes the same kind of claims. They’ve been finding that ark for 40 years now, if not longer.

    Here’s what I want to know: When they finally find it, will bigfoot be living there?

    Morbo

  • Blair isn’t a victim, he’s a participant–he was there in the planning stages to paint a war plane in UN colors, hoping to bait Saddam into shooting it down, thus creating a pretext for invasion. Blair is also deeply religious (though I have my doubts about Bush religiosity) and sees this as his mission from god too. The war is in the hands of a couple of purported mystics on a mission from god. And it really looks like it.

  • Definitely Blair destroyed himself by allying with Bush on Iraq. And he’s taking a bouyant, successful Labour administration down with him. The amount of disgust and dismay in the UK is palpable.

    It is the curse of evangelical Christianity that causes otherwise decent, dynamic and intelligent people to go right off the rails. It’s a hell-hole these two have created that will take lifetimes to expunge. I pity them.

    On the other hand, one has to admit that fanatical Muslims are not cherry blossom in spring either.

  • “On the other hand, one has to admit that fanatical Muslims are not cherry blossom in spring either.”
    Comment by Goldilocks

    Fanatical *anyone* is no fun; don’t forget the communist fanatics.

    As for Bliar… He earned the new spelling of his name, in spades. And it wasn’t just the issue of taking UK to war, either.

  • Jeb Bush was never “half decent” … he was a disaster from the start. Just ask any feminist/progressive in Florida. Jeb has always been bad on reproductive rights, affirmative action, labor, school vouchers, LGBT rights, and the list goes on. The frightening thing about Jeb is that he seems much smarter than his older brother, but even more mean spirited.

    BAC

  • Being smarter than W is a hop skip and jump whereas being more mean spirited than him is a pole vault.

  • Comments are closed.