Get lucrative contract, fail, get paid anyway

The public health care system in Iraq was a mess before the U.S. invasion in 2003, as years of conflict and sanctions took their toll. When the Bush administration committed to rebuilding that system, it was undoubtedly a good decision.

If only the administration were capable of succeeding.

A reconstruction contract for the building of 142 primary health centers across Iraq is running out of money, after two years and roughly $200 million, with no more than 20 clinics now expected to be completed, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers says.

The contract, awarded to U.S. construction giant Parsons Inc. in the flush, early days of reconstruction in Iraq, was expected to lay the foundation of a modern health care system for the country, putting quality medical care within reach of all Iraqis.

Parsons, according to the Corps, will walk away from more than 120 clinics that on average are two-thirds finished. Auditors say the project serves as a warning for other U.S. reconstruction efforts due to be completed this year.

Naeema al-Gasseer, the World Health Organization’s representative for Iraq, said the 86% failure rate is “shocking,” and added, “We’re not sending the right message here. That’s affecting people’s expectations and people’s trust, I must say.”

It’s not just medical clinics. As the WaPo noted, reconstruction efforts in Iraq will also finish “only 300 of 425 promised electricity projects and 49 of 136 water and sanitation projects.”

Of course, the company that won the lucrative contract will still get paid based on its agreements with the government, despite the failures. Raise your hand if you’re surprised.

This is like sending American private contractor drivers to Iraq and paying them four times what we pay American soldiers to do exactly the SAME JOB. (Doesn’t help the soldiers morale to see it, either.)

Or paying Haliberton to feed our troops when we have mess facilities as part of the Army.

During the Napoleonic wars, even the British finally militarized the contractor transport services they had been using up til then. The rest of Europe got it done decades before. Now we are going backward, and contracting out services that had been part of the military. Sergeant’s time and other military activities may reduce the productivity of servicemen, but they are a lot less expensive then Haliberton.

But I suppose that the Army Corps of Engineers had been a Congressional playground and contracting agency for too long to really step up and get a job done in Iraq on time and on budget.

  • Hey, you commie liberal pinkos, why are you against helping U.S. companies and the U.S. economy?? Bush is putting our money where it can do the most good for America! And without wasting our resources on actually building anything!! You damn terrorist sympathizers!!!

    Just by talking about this issue you are providing aid to our enemies!!

    (Please Note: This is a belated April Fools. Any resemblance to an actual troll is purely coincidental. )

  • The Bush Administration has been flat-out wrong about every single thing in Iraq, haven’t they? And they led their contactor buddies to believe it was going to be a cakewalk as well:

    “Security degenerated from the beginning. The expectations on the part of Parsons and the U.S. government was we would have a very benign construction environment, like building a clinic in Falls Church,” said Earnest Robbins, senior vice president for the international division of Parsons in Fairfax, Va. Difficulty choosing sites for the clinics also delayed work, Robbins said.

    Who in their right mind believes any war zone is going to be similar to a Washington D.C. suburb? Oh, right … an administration full of people who have never served in the military or shirked their commitments.

  • It’s odd how Parson’s completion rate is oh-so-close to Cheney’s approval rating…isn’t it? I wonder if that’s just a coincidence. While we’re on the subject, I think it might be a good idea to start calling members of Congress and asking why in blaze’s name we’re paying for criminally-incomplete work. If a construction contractor pulled this stunt in Tehran…or Havana…or Caracas…they’d find themselves behind bars right quick.

    And Washington calls those regimes “out of touch with the values of Democracy….”

  • If all of these projects had been completed and had helped the Iraqi citizenry, President George W. Bush could have withdrawn all of our troops by the end of his second term. But, when Bush said that “future presidents” would determine the role of our presence in Iraqi, he was admitting the U.S. failures in rebuilding Iraq.

  • Ahh, the success of Rumsfeld’s corporate military.

    Carry out orders to torture Iraqis, get court-martialed, followed by imprisonment (unless you’re a private contractor, then you get a pass)

    Waste taxpayer money on projects that do more harm than good, get even MORE money from the Pentagon.

    God, that man is a fucking genius!

  • I just think it is more spin. They can say that there are only 140,000 troops in Iraq and they don’t have to talk about the other 150,000 “civilian contractors.” who are stationed there. (I’m just guessing the number because they aren’t really talking about that.) The lies and half truths are just sickening. Too bad if the work is substandard and expensive, it is off budget, just like this war. Let the poor Democrat in 2009 figure out how to pay for this boondogle.

  • (Raising my hand…) Permission to leave the room in order to throw up?

    I’ll bet those 14 US military bases and the largest US embassy in the world are still on schedule. What else matters?

  • Well, what do you expect when our nation is being run by The Keystone Cops? Send in Beetle Baily. He’ll get the job done quicker and better!

  • Comments are closed.