Getting a better sense of those ‘hospitality suites’

Way back in December, the San Diego Union-Tribune, as part of its reporting on [tag]Duke Cunningham[/tag]’s bribery scandal and his relationship with Defense contractor lobbyist [tag]Brent Wilkes[/tag], noted that the lobbyist “ran a [tag]hospitality suite[/tag], with several bedrooms, in Washington.”

Now, one does not necessarily need a dirty mind to wonder why, exactly, Wilkes needed, and presumably used, a “hospitality suite.” As Josh Marshall noted at the time, “After all, what possible need could congressmen and senators and their staffers have for access to private hotel suites near the Capitol registered in someone else’s name?”

Today, the Wall Street Journal helped shed some additional light on the subject.

Federal prosecutors are investigating whether two contractors implicated in the bribery of former Rep. Randall “Duke” Cunningham supplied him with [tag]prostitutes[/tag] and free use of a limousine and hotel suites, pursuing evidence that could broaden their long-running inquiry.

Besides scrutinizing the prostitution scheme for evidence that might implicate contractor Brent Wilkes, investigators are focusing on whether any other members of Congress, or their staffs, may also have used the same free services, though it isn’t clear whether investigators have turned up anything to implicate others. (emphasis added)

In fact, the WSJ noted that the FBI has been “interviewing women from escort services” who may have been involved in the arrangement.

Wilkes’ lawyer has denied his client was involved in procuring prostitutes, but Mitchell Wade, the former head of MZM and Wilkes’ “co-conspirator” who struck a deal with prosecutors, tells a different story.

Mr. Wade in February pleaded guilty to giving bribes of more than $1 million to Mr. Cunningham, including cash, antiques and payment for yachts. Mr. Wade, who hasn’t been sentenced yet, is cooperating with prosecutors. According to people with knowledge of the investigation, Mr. Wade told investigators that Mr. Cunningham periodically phoned him to request a prostitute, and that Mr. Wade then helped to arrange for one. A limousine driver then picked up the prostitute as well as Mr. Cunningham, and drove them to one of the hotel suites, originally at the Watergate Hotel, and subsequently at the Westin Grand.

Mr. Wade told investigators that all the arrangements for these services had been made by Mr. Wilkes and two employees of Mr. Wilkes’s company, according to people with knowledge of his debriefing. He said Mr. Wilkes had rented the hotel suites and found the limousine driver, who had “relationships” with several escort services. Mr. Wade told prosecutors that sometimes Mr. Cunningham would contact him to request these services, and he would pass on the request to Mr. Wilkes or his employees, who then made the actual arrangement. Mr. Wade said that other times Mr. Cunningham called Mr. Wilkes directly to make the requests.

Cunningham, of course, is already going to jail, though the sex angle adds a new wrinkle to his scandal. But of particular interest now, federal investigators are trying to determine whether other members of Congress or their staffs “received services at so-called hospitality suites,” which would further shed light on Wilkes’ alleged corruption. Wade said “he doesn’t know whether Mr. Wilkes may have provided prostitutes or other free entertainment to anyone besides Mr. Cunningham.”

Stay tuned.

Republicanites are the most amazing people.

They buddy up with Theocratic Reactionaries to get elected, then accept the services of prostitutes as bribes.

Togethery they manage to have both sick relationships with sex, they denounce it and they demean it. Jimmy Swaggert managed to do both in one person.

A sad commentary on America that we just accept this hypocrisy.

  • “Hospitality hostess ” takes on a new meaning for the Dukester.

    I pray that Cunningham hath found it in his heart to share this wonderous bounty with his congressional brothers, and that the Duke’s generosity can come to light just before the elections. Amen

  • I always knew that Congressmen prostituted themselves for corporations. I guess it adds a certain sort of balance to have it confirmed that they reciprocate in some way.

  • If this scandal goes beyond Cunningham, it will enter the zeitgeist Lewinsky-style through late-night comedians, morning DJs, joke emails– even Fox will have to snark on it day-in/day-out for months. This has the potential of changing individuals votes to bring down Congressmen like little we’ve seen in our lifetime.

  • “I always knew that Congressmen prostituted themselves for corporations. I guess it adds a certain sort of balance to have it confirmed that they reciprocate in some way.” – Ed Stephan

    Actually, I think the corporations are pandering, not prostituting themselves but others for the benefit of congressmen (and congresswomen???, after all, Joann Davis of VA’s 1st was on both the same committees as Cunningham, and she is the promoter of pagan symbols).

  • Mr. Cunningham periodically phoned him to request a prostitute

    Defense of Marriage Act Votes

    House of Representatives
    Roll No. 316
    12 July 1996
    YEAS–342

    * * *
    Cunningham

    * * *

  • Well, when the wife is home, barefoot and pregnant, with all those kids you have since you’re pro life so you can’t use contraception, where else can you take your prostitute but a free hospitality suite? Jeezus! And, as Jimmy Swaggert so persuasively opined–God had already forgiven him (on a weekly basis), so why can’t we?
    Governing is hard work apparently…exhausting, yet satisfying. (and yes, all puns are intended).

  • Many years ago there was a Saturday Night Live episode where, during the monologue of the guest host (I think it was Buck Henry), they made the size of the picture larger or smaller depending on their “scientific measurement” of how interested the audience was in what he was saying. So it was normal size when he began, gradually shrank as he droned on and on, grew sharply when he said the word “sex”, then shrank again, etc. It was kind of funny.

    The metaphorical screen that shows how much attention America is paying to the Cunningham scandal just grew a whole lot bigger.

  • From all the comments, it appears that everyone assumes that the prostitutes (at least for Duke) were female. Would it really surprise anyone here if it turned out otherwise? (Not that there is anything wrong with that). We’ve seen a pattern developing with Republicanites and know that their hypocracy has no bounds.

  • “…originally at the Watergate Hotel…”

    YES!!!! Watergate is back! Damn, disco’s probably coming next…

  • …Mr. Wade told investigators that Mr. Cunningham periodically phoned him to request a prostitute…

    Really, he should just use Craig’s List like everyone else! 😛

    I’ve always had a feeling the key to cracking Washington was the sex industry.

    I wonder what those girls (or guys) have overheard during pillowtalk?

  • Hurry, call Larry Flynt! Get him to Washington with a suitcase of money, a tape recorder, a stenographer, and a notary. He’ll be having the escorts talk for his money.

  • “He’ll be having the escorts talk for his money.” – sknm

    You people need to stop picking on the girls (and boys). It’s part of their job description to be discreet, but here you want them to spill all.

    Ask the damned congressmen. They have no right to keep silent!

  • Twas always thus. Men in high places have always
    sought extra-marital sex as part of the game of
    power and money, and always will. It’s not rare,
    and it’s not partisan, and it exists in all walks of
    life, not just politics.

  • “Ask the damned congressmen. They have no right to keep silent! ”

    We can trust the prostitutes to be honest. We can’t trust the Congressmen.

  • C’mon folks, have you ever looked at a Republican politician? Buying sex is the only way they’re going to get it, outside of the once-a-yar, missionary-only, procreational-purpose-only 3 minutes they get from the family churchgoer when she “graciously submits” to hubby’s “leadership.”

  • was that a male or female prostitute? when this story broke a washington based website suggested Duke, as well as some other Repubs were doing gay sex, (Jeff Gannon involved?) in that suite. Also I don’t trust the SD UT, and figure the story was dumped in their lap, perhaps by the SD Federal attorney. The attorney claimed to be completely surprised by the events. the reason for dropping the story in the lap of a conservative newspaper? Damage Control. The story is still being headlined as a bribery case, and not a money laundering scheme to transfer taxpayer funds into Republican campaign war chests. I’ll leave it for Tarpley readers to put together the sordid pieces of the gay sex innuendos, and draw their own (tinfoil hat?) conclusions.

  • “Twas always thus. Men in high places have always
    sought extra-marital sex as part of the game of
    power and money, and always will. It’s not rare,
    and it’s not partisan, and it exists in all walks of
    life, not just politics.”

    Exactly right. I’m a college professor (we’re supposedly all liberals)–depending on the crew you hang out with, conferences can be a baccanalia with little sleep. One of my students, a stripper, even said our college’s dean frequented one of her friend’s establishments. Which is an illustration of why one doesn’t go to the local topless bars–you might meet someone you know!

    Yes, the GOP is hypocritical. I could at least be cool with the GOP on this if they weren’t such noisy hypocrites about it, because this really is something that transcends profession and party line.

  • Let’s see how the corporate media handles this sex angle.

    It will be tempting for them to use since sex sells and gets eyeballs; but, on the other hand, they have to protect their political party – the Republicans.

  • Dadgum it, if a U.S. Congressman can have free hookers, then every American of legal age should have free hookers of the gender of their choice, too. It’s the only fair thing to do.

    ‘Course, they’d all have to be screened and tested, wouldn’t want to pick up any little nasties on the way. And licenses, can’t forget licenses. Have to make sure they pay their share of taxes and all.

    Wait, isn’t that sort of like legalizing prostitution?

    Dang. Never mind.

  • Kind of reminds me of how Shrub’s brother Neil (was it Neil?) had prostitutes mysteriously show up at his door at conferences overseas….

    Has Cunningham had his Navy pension revoked? It damn well should be.

  • I personally have no issue at all with The Pukester getting a little something on the side. It’s all the hypocritical hyperventilating that gets me.

    As a great man once said about Tricky Dick Nixon: “you, sir, are more in need of a blowjob than any man alive”.

    You’d think that a little sexual liberation would take the edge off of these crazies.

    Oh wouldn’t it that Ralph Reed, Tom DeLay and Karl Rove get busted in a gay bathhouse in San Francisco…

  • Supplying Cunningham with a prostitute could have been achieved simply by giving him a mirror.

    Comment by sarabeth — 4/27/2006 @ 1:09 pm

    NOW THAT’S FUNNY!!

  • A guy who used to run the Califonia Legislature, Jesse Unruh, had a saying: “If you can’t take their money, eat their food, drink their booze, fuck their whores, and vote against them the very next morning, you don’t have what it takes to be here.”

  • This was standard procedure in the hi-tech business for years, probably still is now, I don’t know. The top-performing salesmen had intimate knowledge of every strip bar in their territory, had taken their customers to all of the best ones, and procured whores for them when some big deal or another was coming down. Happened all the time.

    I mean, your closing the deal on a $500k network installation, what’s spending $500 here and there on a first-class hooker for the “decision maker”? Especially if you can get pictures… rather useful for keeping the competition out of the account for the future too. It’s a cost of doing business, is what it is.

  • Comments are closed.